Bithumb to Launch Entrepreneurship Support Program

Temasek Cuts Pay Following FTX AutopsySingaporean state-owned investment firm, Temasek Holdings, has announced a reduction in compensation for executives responsible for the company’s investment in the now-defunct cryptocurrency exchange FTX. Temasek, once the second-largest outside investor in FTX, faced scrutiny after the collapse of the exchange.Photo by Emilio Takas on UnsplashNo misconduct findingOn May 29, Temasek released a statement confirming the completion of its internal review of the $275 million investment loss incurred from FTX. The review determined that there was “no misconduct” within the company. However, both the investment team and senior management took “collective accountability” and experienced a reduction in their compensation.While acknowledging the inherent risks associated with any investment, Temasek emphasized the importance of continuing to invest in new sectors and emerging technologies to understand their potential impact on the business and financial models of existing portfolios. They recognized the need to adapt to an ever-changing world and explore avenues that could drive future value.It’s worth noting that the $275 million loss from the FTX investment constituted only 0.09% of Temasek’s portfolio value, which stood at over $293 billion at the time of the collapse.Temasek maintained that it conducted extensive due diligence before investing in FTX, emphasizing its commitment to a thorough review process. Chairman Lim Boon Heng stated in a May 29 interview with Bloomberg that there was fraudulent conduct intentionally hidden from investors, including Temasek. The negative outcome of the investment has been disappointing for the company and has had a significant impact on its reputation.Reputational damageSingapore Deputy Prime Minister Lawrence Wong echoed similar sentiments, highlighting the financial loss and reputational damage caused by the FTX collapse during a parliamentary meeting in November 2022.During the due diligence process, Temasek reviewed FTX’s financial statements, assessed regulatory risks related to financial service providers in the cryptocurrency market, and sought legal advice. The company also engaged with individuals who had firsthand knowledge of FTX, including employees, investors, and industry participants.In recent news, Temasek addressed and dismissed rumors about a $10 million investment in Array, a developer of algorithmic currency systems based on smart contracts and artificial intelligence. The company clarified that such reports were incorrect, refuting the circulating news articles and tweets.Temasek’s internal review process is certainly a move towards transparency and accountability. It indicates a willingness towards addressing the matter. That said, there are FTX creditor groups who fervently disagree with Temasek’s analysis.Class action lawsuitEarlier this year a number of FTX creditors filed a class action lawsuit against a number of venture capital (VC) firms, including Temasek. The FTX customers maintain that Temasek and others played a role in a conspiracy to defraud them. Venture capital firms have countered with the view that they themselves were victims as a consequence of the FTX collapse, suffering multi-million dollar losses.The fact remains that VCs get much further involved than merely handing over a check. They get involved with marketing, operations, and many other facets of the businesses of their portfolio companies. Meanwhile, other creditors suggest that Temasek has a responsibility to do right by the 1.4 million FTX creditors (a disproportionate number of them being Singapore-based) and to invest in a restructured FTX business, an option that represents the best opportunity for FTX customers to recover their funds.Temasek may have reached certain conclusions by way of their internal report on the matter but this is not likely to be the final analysis relative to its involvement in the fall of FTX.

Russians will continue to have access to crypto markets despite the application of sanctions, according to a senior Russian official. Impossible to completely block marketThat’s the view of Anton Gorelkin, the deputy head of the State Duma committee on information policy. In a report published by Russian state-owned news agency TASS on March 6, Gorelkin is quoted as stating: "It should be recognized that it is impossible to completely block this market for Russia." Gorelkin added that crypto remains one of the mechanisms through which international sanctions being applied to Russia can be circumvented. Russian firms have increasingly been using Bitcoin and crypto in international trade to circumvent sanctions. The Russian official’s comments come as Russian crypto exchange Garantex has been forced to suspend its services. Last month, the Council of the European Union (EU) had added the exchange to its latest Russian sanctions package. This was part of the EU’s sixteenth sanctions package against Russia since the conflict in Ukraine began. It’s the first time that a crypto exchange has been included within any such sanctions. The EU did so on the assertion that Garantex is “closely associated with EU-sanctioned Russian banks.” Photo by Michael Parulava on UnsplashTether ‘enters war’ against Russian crypto marketThe crypto exchange took the decision to suspend its services following an action taken by leading stablecoin issuer, Tether. Taking to Telegram, the exchange stated: “We have bad news, Tether has entered the war against the Russian crypto market and blocked our wallets worth more than 2.5 billion rubles [$27 million].” The exchange took the opportunity to warn its users that “all USDT in Russian wallets is currently under threat.” Garantex added that it has been the first to be hit with such a measure, but that it won’t be the last. The firm said that it “will fight, and [it] will not give up.”  Tether has been under the spotlight of regulators and governments globally in recent years. In response, it appears to have incorporated the freezing of funds subject to sanctions more recently, with closer cooperation with law enforcement and government agencies. Last year, the company outlined that it planned to freeze funds held in addresses related to countries or companies subject to sanctions. Last September, Tether claimed to have played a role in an operation carried out by the Dutch authorities and U.S. Secret Service that led to the takedown of two crypto exchanges, Cryptex and PM2BTC, who were alleged to have been involved in money laundering. Garantex had already been subject to U.S. sanctions since April 2022. At the time, the U.S. authorities described the exchange as a "ransomware-enabling virtual currency exchange." The firm was originally established in Estonia in 2019. Commenting on the development, Gorelkin stated:  "To the investors who underestimated this risk, my condolences."  He also asserted that the latest round of sanctions will not be the last in attempts to apply pressure on Russian cryptocurrency firms and crypto sector infrastructure within Russia. While he believes that crypto remains a tool to get around sanctions, he stated that “USDT can be safely deleted from this list.”

In Malaysia local regulator the Securities Commission has ordered global crypto exchange platform Bybit to shut down its operations within Malaysia as part of enforcement actions being taken by the regulator against the company.Photo by Esmonde Yong on UnsplashOperating without registration The Securities Commission published a statement to its website late last week outlining that both Bybit and its CEO Ben Zhou had been reprimanded for carrying out digital asset trading activities in Malaysia without having completed the necessary registration. The regulator also pointed out that both Zhou and his company have been listed on its Investor Alert List since July 2021. The Securities Commission took the opportunity to remind investors that they should only deal with what it termed “Recognized Market Operators” (RMOs), a designation it applies to entities that have completed registration with the regulator. Investors who utilize unregistered platforms are not extended any form of protection under Malaysian securities law, the Securities Commission warned, adding that such platforms could put them at risk of fraud and implicate them in money laundering activity potentially. Enforcement actions Bybit has been directed by the regulator to disable its website and mobile applications that are currently targeting Malaysian investors within 14 business days from Dec. 11.  The regulator also wants the company to curb other forms of promotion aimed at Malaysian investors. With that, it has requested that the company take down its Telegram-based support channel for Malaysian customers. Advertising activity, including social media posts, must also cease in cases where such activity is aimed at Malaysian investors. The Securities Commission acknowledged that thus far, Bybit has been compliant with its latest enforcement requests. Intentions to secure licensing Bybit has responded to these developments on its Bybit Malaysia Telegram channel, stating that the company understands that these actions “may cause some inconvenience” to Malaysian customers. “Once we have secured the appropriate licenses, we look forward to reconnecting with you again in the future,” it added. The enforcement action is likely to be a setback for Bybit given that the firm appeared to be focusing on the Malaysian market of late. In June it emerged that the company was moving to relocate Chinese employees to both Malaysia and Dubai.  This is not the first occasion in which Malaysia’s Securities Commission has taken action against a crypto platform. In 2023 the commission ordered the closure of the Malaysian operations of global exchange Huobi (subsequently rebranded as HTX). The circumstances in that instance were similar in that it acted against the exchange and its CEO for operating illegally within the Malaysian market. Within the Malaysian market, only six trading platforms have been registered. These include Hata Digital, Luno, MX Global, Sinegy, Tokenize Technology and Torum International. Earlier the Securities Commission acted similarly in prohibiting Atomic Wallet from operating within Malaysia given its failure to register its digital asset exchange activities.