GRVT Debuts zkSync’s Inaugural ‘Hyperchain’

Thailand's Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has approved the leading U.S. dollar stablecoins USDT and USDC, expanding its list of approved cryptocurrencies within the Southeast Asian country.Photo by Tarun Ottur on UnsplashListing on regulated exchanges The approval was announced in a statement published on the SEC website on March 6. It means that Tether’s USDT and Circle’s USDC can now be listed on regulated exchanges in Thailand. The regulator had arrived at its decision to add the two stablecoins following a public consultation process regarding regulatory changes. Those changes were finalized last month and will now proceed to go into effect on March 16. The two stablecoins join five cryptocurrencies that had previously been approved. These include Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Ripple (XRP) and Stellar (XLM). Certain cryptocurrencies are also being used for the testing of payment settlement through the Bank of Thailand’s Programmable Payment Sandbox.   A regulatory sandbox is a controlled environment testing ground for products and services developed within the private sector. Back in June of last year, the Southeast Asian country’s central bank launched an enhanced regulatory sandbox focused on programmable payments.  USDT issuer Tether responded to the addition of its stablecoin within the approved cryptocurrency list, stating: “This approval enables USD₮ to be traded within the country, facilitating its listing on regulated exchanges and paving the way for USD₮ to be accepted for payments, which advances the region’s leadership in digital asset innovation.” Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino said that the company sees value in the Thai market and with that, it intends to continue to explore ways to broaden its service offering within Thailand. He added:  “We are committed to supporting the long-term success and adoption of stablecoins in Thailand and look forward to contributing to the growth of the country’s digital asset ecosystem by fostering a strong and sustainable stablecoin infrastructure.” Stablecoin market growth According to DeFi data aggregation platform DefiLlama, the stablecoin market now stands at $227 billion in terms of market capitalization. This represents a 68% increase by comparison with the size of the market in 2023. It indicates that stablecoin adoption is on an upward growth trajectory. Digital assets are being used in many instances to facilitate international payments and remittances, particularly in emerging markets. In Europe, American investment bank JPMorgan recently forecasted that the introduction of the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation will drive euro-pegged stablecoin growth.  Meanwhile, in the United States, S&P Global Ratings recently identified that a current lack of stablecoin regulation is acting as a barrier to broader institutional use. The company anticipates adoption growth once regulatory clarity has been achieved. Vlad Tenev, CEO of commission-free investing platform Robinhood, stated last month on Yahoo Finance’s Opening Bid podcast that stablecoin legislation will be passed in the U.S. in 2025. Tenev believes that applying a 4% interest rate to stablecoins would lead to a greater rate of adoption.

Hong Kong Legislator Courting US Crypto Exchange CoinbaseRecently, Johnny Ng, a member of the Hong Kong Legislative Council, expressed his interest in the future development of Coinbase, a major US cryptocurrency exchange, in Hong Kong. In a tweet today, Ng said that he had been in contact with Coinbase and that he would keep the public updated on further progress.Photo by Ruslan Bardash on UnsplashNg’s invitation to crypto exchangesThis tweet follows Ng’s earlier invitation to Coinbase and other global crypto trading platforms to apply for licenses in Hong Kong. His comments are in line with Hong Kong’s efforts to become a hub for cryptocurrency and blockchain-related activities. As of June 1, a new licensing regime for centralized virtual asset trading platforms (VATPs) went into effect in the Chinese special administrative region.Differing opinionsDespite the enthusiasm shown by Ng, there are differing opinions on Hong Kong’s current suitability as a crypto-friendly jurisdiction. Leo Weese, the co-founder and President of the Bitcoin Association of Hong Kong, expressed reservations in an interview with crypto media outlet CoinDesk.Weese described Hong Kong’s current setup as “highly unattractive” for crypto businesses. He cited factors such as a relatively small and untested market, limited banking partnerships, and restrictive product offerings.Despite these challenges, Weese acknowledged some potential advantages, stating that Hong Kong’s classification of tokens as non-securities allows for the trading of securities that are deemed unregistered in other jurisdictions. It is important to note, however, that Weese cautioned against assuming that moving operations to Hong Kong would protect Coinbase from US regulatory measures.Moody’s altered outlook on CoinbaseMeanwhile, Moody’s, the American credit rating agency, recently revised Coinbase’s outlook from stable to negative, citing uncertainties surrounding the impact of the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) charges on Coinbase’s operation as an unregistered securities broker.

3AC Co-Founder Disputes US Jurisdiction Citing Singaporean CitizenshipKyle Davies, the Co-Founder of the failed Singaporean crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC), has asserted that he is solely a citizen of Singapore and not of the United States.Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on PexelsEvading pursuit of damagesThe assertion may have relevance as it may mean that Davies can evade actions taken against him in a US court on the basis of a lack of jurisdiction. In a recent filing with the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), Davies presented documents demonstrating that he had renounced his US citizenship in December 2020. He emphasized that he obtained citizenship in Singapore after being issued a passport in early 2021 and that he does not subject himself to the jurisdiction of US courts.$3.5 billion owedIn June it emerged that liquidators appointed for 3AC were seeking to recover $1.3 billion from the fund’s co-founders, Davies and Su Zhu. The firm reportedly owes creditors a staggering $3.5 billion.In the midst of public criticism surrounding the events leading to 3AC’s collapse, Zhu and Davies launched a platform called Open Exchange (OPNX), allowing trading claims against bankrupt crypto firms. Despite a deficit of goodwill for the duo in the crypto sector, they have been putting all their energies into the new venture.Last month, they outlined that they would donate future earnings from OPNX to 3AC creditors. It’s difficult to reconcile that claim when with this action, Davies is trying to evade contributing to creditors via the 3AC bankruptcy process and this legal action taken by the liquidator.Renounced citizenshipAccording to court documents, Davies officially renounced his US citizenship at the US Embassy in Singapore, citing his decision to reside in the country on a long-term basis. He revealed that he got married to a Singaporean national in 2017 and subsequently gained permanent residency in Singapore. Because Singapore does not permit dual nationality, Davies chose to renounce his US citizenship to establish himself fully as a Singaporean citizen.The submission of these documents came after 3AC’s liquidators requested a subpoena to gather information on the crypto hedge fund’s collapse. Both Kyle Davies and Zhu, were subpoenaed on Twitter, as their whereabouts were unknown. However, while Zhu, being a Singaporean national, might not be subject to the subpoena while residing outside the United States, Davies’ refusal to comply with the order led to discussions about holding him in contempt of court.In response to the subpoena controversy, Davies’ legal representatives claimed that he cannot be validly served with process as a non-party in the case, as he has not been a US citizen or resident since well before the case was initiated. They stated that the court lacks personal jurisdiction over him due to his renunciation of US citizenship. Accordingly, they requested that the Service Order and Compel Order, which were based on the assumption that Davies was a US citizen, be vacated.