MARBLEX Announces Game Tokenomics Revamp and New Game Title

A legislator in the Philippines has put forward a bill that, if passed and enacted, would see the Southeast Asian country establish a Bitcoin reserve consisting of 10,000 BTC. The proposed bill was filed with the House of Representatives as House Bill 421. Its proposer is Congressman Miguel Luis Villafuerte, a representative of Camarines Sur’s 5th district since 2022. Villafuerte also served as governor of the same province on two occasions, gaining recognition for becoming the youngest individual to assume the governorship in the Philippines.Photo by Michael Förtsch on UnsplashDrawing on developments overseasPrefacing the bill with an explanatory note, Villafuerte draws on developments related to Bitcoin in the United States. He drew attention to U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell having referred to Bitcoin as “digital gold,” while pointing to a bill in the U.S. proposed by Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis to create a strategic Bitcoin reserve in the U.S., with the support of U.S. President Donald Trump. The bill itself, if passed and enacted, would provide a mandate to Banko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), the country’s central bank, to acquire 2,000 BTC on an annual basis over a period of five years. According to Villafuerte’s proposal, that would result in the Philippines amassing a reserve of 10,000 BTC. 20-year minimum holding periodFollowing the achievement of this accumulation, the bill sets out that the leading digital asset would be locked in trust for a period of 20 years for the benefit of the country. A provision is included to establish a procedure that would enable the purchase schedule to be adjusted if a need arose to do so due to prevailing market conditions. Upon completion of the 20-year holding period, the proposed legislation calls on the central bank to present a report to Congress with recommendations as to whether Bitcoin should continue to be held or if some of the holdings should be sold off on a gradual basis. Following the expiration of that initial 20-year period, the governor of the central bank cannot recommend the selloff of more than 10% of the holding over any two-year period. Proof of reservesIn terms of sovereign nations, an early mover with regard to Bitcoin has been El Salvador. It became the first nation to establish Bitcoin as legal tender, while also establishing a Bitcoin reserve. However, the Central American nation has been criticized with regard to a lack of transparency surrounding that reserve. In the case of Villafuerte’s bill, the proposed legislation includes a requirement for the central bank governor to establish a system of quarterly proof of reserve attestations. It calls for attestations to be performed by an independent third-party auditor with expertise in auditing digital assets.The proposal comes as a number of nations are understood to be exploring the establishment of a strategic Bitcoin reserve. In April, a parliamentarian in Sweden proposed adding Bitcoin to the Nordic nation’s foreign exchange reserves. The Swedish parliament is set to debate the notion of a Bitcoin reserve next month. Meanwhile, Switzerland’s central bank has reportedly gained exposure to Bitcoin through a $253 million shareholding in Bitcoin treasury firm Strategy.

Cryptocurrency exchanges operating in the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC), a financial hub in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), entered a new compliance environment on Jan. 12 as updated Crypto Token rules issued by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) came into force. The revised framework bars exchanges from offering certain digital assets.Photo by Christoph Schulz on UnsplashPrivacy tokens restricted to private walletsThe affected assets are privacy tokens like Zcash (ZEC) and Monero (XMR), although the restriction does not prevent Dubai residents from holding those coins in private wallets. The move is aimed at addressing anti-money laundering (AML) and sanctions compliance risks. The exclusion of privacy tokens reflects alignment with global compliance standards, according to Elisabeth Wallace, Associate Director of Policy & Legal at the DFSA. She told CoinDesk that bans of this kind are effectively inevitable if crypto businesses want to align with standards set by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), given that privacy tokens are designed to obscure transaction histories and the identities of holders. The revised rules extend beyond token classifications, preventing regulated firms from deploying or providing tools designed to mask blockchain activity. These include mixers, tumblers, and other technologies that obscure transaction information. At the same time, the DFSA refined its classification of what it terms “Fiat Crypto Tokens,” limiting the category to tokens pegged to fiat currencies and backed by high-quality, liquid assets capable of meeting redemption requests under market stress. Under this definition, algorithmic stablecoins such as Ethena (ENA) would not qualify as stablecoins, though they would still be treated as cryptocurrencies. The update also alters how token eligibility is determined. Rather than maintaining a centralized list of approved assets, the DFSA now requires licensed firms to carry out their own assessments of the crypto assets they offer, document those judgments, and keep them under ongoing review. Thailand enforces crypto travel ruleComparable regulatory tightening is unfolding elsewhere in Asia. In Thailand, during a high-level meeting on Jan. 9, Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul said the Securities and Exchange Commission had been instructed to strictly enforce the travel rule, according to The Nation Thailand. The international standard requires crypto service providers to verify both senders and recipients in wallet-to-wallet transfers. The directive forms part of a broader government initiative to establish a national data bureau, envisioned as a centralized platform for real-time monitoring of suspicious transactions and the development of detailed financial risk profiles. In South Korea, enforcement actions have similarly intensified. According to Dailian, Korbit, the country’s fourth-largest crypto exchange, paid a 2.73 billion won ($1.9 million) fine imposed by the Financial Information Unit (FIU) under the Financial Services Commission (FSC) for violations of anti-money laundering (AML) rules. The payment followed a board decision and was made within a reduced-penalty period, allowing Korbit to receive a 20% discount. Crypto firms comprise 77% of Korean finesA broader review of penalties issued by the FIU since the disclosure of its sanctions guidelines shows that 77% of total fines were levied against virtual asset service providers (VASPs). While an analysis by Digital Asset found that only four of 95 fine cases issued since August 2023 involved VASPs, those cases accounted for a disproportionately large total of 41.8 billion won ($28.4 million). Exchanges fined to date include Delio, Hanbitco Korea, Dunamu—the operator of Upbit—and Korbit, with Dunamu receiving the largest penalty imposed by the FIU to date. The sanctions were linked to alleged know-your-customer (KYC) failures, unreported transactions involving individuals subject to warrants, and shortcomings in systems designed to detect suspicious activity. Separately, the FIU had issued disciplinary measures against Dunamu, including a warning to its chief executive and a three-month partial suspension of operations, which the company is contesting in court. The next hearing is scheduled for February. In overall fine totals, casinos ranked behind crypto firms, underscoring how enforcement against crypto intermediaries has been particularly robust, as oversight patterns continue to evolve. 

How will Binance’s criminal case affect its presence in South Korea?Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, has reached a settlement with the U.S. government to pay a fine of more than $4.3 billion after the exchange was accused of anti-money laundering (AML) and sanctions violations. Co-founder and CEO Changpeng Zhao also pleaded guilty to violating the Bank Secrecy Act, which requires financial institutions to submit documentation to prevent them from becoming mediums for criminal funding. Binance will thus be withdrawing completely from the U.S.Photo by Vadim Artyukhin on UnsplashNews of this incident has sparked keen interest within the South Korean crypto industry regarding the impact it could have on Binance’s presence and influence in the country.Murky future for Binance as Zhao resignsBinance allegedly failed to report transactions involving criminal entities such as terrorist groups, ransomware perpetrators and money launderers without implementing a system to prevent such crimes. In particular, organizations like the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades — the armed wing of the Palestinian militant group Hamas — as well as the Palestinian Islamic Jihad and ISIS were found to have utilized Binance as a channel for their funds. Furthermore, the exchange also facilitated transactions with users in sanctioned territories such as Iran, North Korea and Syria.Zhao has subsequently decided to step down as Binance’s CEO, taking to his X (formerly Twitter) account to state that he believes it is the right move. However, he also emphasized that the U.S. government did not accuse Binance of misappropriating user assets or engaging in market manipulation.Despite this fiasco, some insights have painted Binance’s future in a positive light. JPMorgan, the largest bank in the U.S., stated that the uncertainty surrounding Binance itself would diminish. “For crypto investors, the prospect of settlement would see the elimination of a potential systemic risk emanating from a hypothetical Binance collapse,” the bank said, according to an article published by digital asset news outlet The Block.GOPAX reaffirms partnership with Binance despite concernsGOPAX, a Korean fiat-to-crypto exchange that was acquired by Binance in February, also maintained a rather unexpected positive outlook. The acquisition had been followed by a complicated string of events hindering Binance’s full-fledged expansion in Korea, including delayed approval from the country’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) to become a virtual asset service provider (VASP) and multiple leadership changes as a result.Investors in GOFi — GOPAX’s decentralized finance (DeFi) service — subsequently responded by filing a lawsuit at the end of June, claiming that financial authorities unjustly delayed the approval. They argued that, by approving the request, the FIU would enable Binance to provide the capital that GOPAX had struggled to gather to pay principal and interest payments on GOFi in the wake of last year’s FTX collapse.However, these circumstances did not sway GOPAX’s decision to work with Binance. “We learned of the news about Binance’s fine through articles from foreign media platforms,” GOPAX said. “Regardless, we are still in a business and technical partnership with the exchange.”Prospects for Binance’s landing in KoreaIn contrast to GOPAX’s seemingly positive outlook, the Korean crypto community has voiced mixed opinions about the effect of this development, especially on Binance’s successful entry into the domestic market.If GOPAX’s VASP approval had been delayed due to concerns about Binance’s suitability as its largest shareholder — incited by the legal risks it posed in the U.S. — the possibility of the approval going through may be more plausible as some of these risks have since been alleviated, said Yoon Seung-sik, an analyst at Seoul-based research firm Tiger Research.However, Jang Hye-won, an analyst at crypto data research platform Xangle, pointed out that interpretations may differ depending on the reasons behind FIU’s hesitation in approving the GOPAX acquisition. “If the concerns revolved around legal risks, then the path for Binance’s entry into Korea may seem cleared since those risks have been resolved. But if the concerns are about Binance’s capital inflow into the country, then this incident (Binance’s criminal case) will have no effect,” she explained.On the other end of the spectrum, some experts believe that this incident may have negatively affected the GOPAX acquisition. Hwang Suk-jin, a professor at Dongguk University’s Graduate School of International Affairs & Information Security and a member of the ruling People Power Party’s committee for virtual assets, stated, “Since criminal punishment for Zhao and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) lawsuit are still pending, it’s hard to conclude that legal risks have been completely resolved. Binance paying a fine for money laundering may actually reinforce the FIU’s concerns about legal risks, making the GOPAX acquisition decisively unfavorable.”These statements come after a public opinion survey conducted earlier in June by Cratos, a Korean blockchain-based polling app, revealed that a 64.6% majority of respondents favored approving the GOPAX acquisition.