Animoca Brands Secures Funding to Expand Web3 Identity Project

Beijing Municipal Government Unveils Web3 White PaperIn what is being perceived by many as a significant development, the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission, also known as the Administrative Commission of Zhongguancun Science Park, has released a white paper titled “Web3 Innovation and Development.”Photo by zhang kaiyv on PexelsThe “inevitable trend” of Web3This announcement, as reported by local news outlet, The Paper, was made during the Zhongguancun Forum. The Forum is an event focused on technological advancements and innovation. The white paper acknowledges Web3 technology as an “inevitable trend for future Internet industry development.”The objective of the Beijing Municipal Government is to establish the city as a global innovation hub for the digital economy. To support this ambition, the government plans to allocate a minimum of 100 million yuan (approximately $14 million) annually over the next two years.Enhanced policy supportThe white paper points towards Beijing’s intention to enhance policy support and accelerate technological advancements to foster the growth of the Web3 industry. This strategic move aligns with what appears to be China’s evolving stance toward the crypto industry, as the government aims to leverage the potential of emerging technologies.The timing of the white paper release coincides with the upcoming implementation of new digital asset regulations in Hong Kong. At the beginning of next month, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong will introduce new rules for the cryptocurrency sector, permitting retail investors to engage in crypto trading. This stands in stark contrast to the current regulatory environment in the United States, where authorities have been tightening their control over cryptocurrencies.Second guessing China’s approach to cryptoChina had previously banned the use of cryptocurrencies in 2021. Notwithstanding that, the release of the Web3 white paper may suggest a potential shift in the country’s approach. Notably, on May 23, China Central Television, a state-owned media outlet, aired a segment focused on cryptocurrencies, prominently featuring the Bitcoin logo and a Bitcoin ATM in Hong Kong.This coverage holds significance, but the fact that the video was quickly taken down from the broadcaster’s website casts doubt on just how far down the crypto rabbit hole China is willing to go.Changpeng Zhao (CZ), the Founder and CEO of global crypto exchange Binance, tweeted out that the timing of the publication of the paper is apt given other blockchain and crypto-related initiatives taken on by various Chinese entities. A recent study suggested that Hong Kong is emerging as a leading jurisdiction when it comes to its crypto readiness.It remains to be seen how these developments will unfold and whether Beijing’s proactive approach will pave the way for further integration of blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies in China’s digital economy.For the time being, with the release of the white paper, Beijing appears to have taken a significant step forward in shaping its future as a leading player in the global Web3 landscape. However, to what extent Beijing is ‘all in’ on crypto remains imponderable.

Bank of Japan Publishes Results of CBDC PoCThe Bank of Japan (BoJ) recently concluded the second phase of its central bank digital currency (CBDC) proof of concept (PoC) project, which began in April. The results of this phase were published on Monday, and they shed light on key aspects such as the comparison between account-based and token-based CBDCs and the management of holding limits for users with multiple accounts.Photo by Manuel Cosentino on UnsplashToken-based CBDCsThe experiments conducted by the central bank covered a wide range of topics. Among the most intriguing findings were the advantages and disadvantages of token-based CBDCs and how to effectively impose holding limits for users with multiple CBDC balances.Token-based CBDCs have garnered interest from various central banks, with some adopting the UTXO token model used by Bitcoin without the use of a distributed ledger. A UTXO or unspent transaction output, defines where a blockchain transaction starts and finishes. The Bank of Japan explored this model and analyzed its pros and cons.In the initial proof of concept, both account-based and token-based CBDCs were examined, considering scenarios where the central bank managed the ledger or shared it with intermediaries like banks. In the token-based model, fixed token denominations were used, similar to physical cash in countries like India, and a centralized ledger was employed. However, in the recent phase, the central bank utilized flexible value tokens similar to UTXO and shared ledger functions with intermediaries.The Bank of Japan favored the flexible value token model due to its ability to handle multiple requests simultaneously. However, it acknowledged that this model may require more technical resources compared to the account-based approach. Challenges may arise when implementing additional functions, such as holding limits, while maintaining optimal performance. The European Central Bank (ECB) also noted in a recent report that most payment providers are accustomed to account-based payments and would incur costs to adapt to token-based systems.Another significant aspect explored by the BoJ was how to impose holding limits when users have multiple CBDC balances through different intermediaries. The challenge lies in determining if the overall holding limit has been breached without compromising user privacy.Homomorphic encryptionOne possible solution discussed in the report is the use of homomorphic encryption, which enables computations to be performed on encrypted data without it first needing to be decrypted. That allows for the necessary checks without intermediaries accessing the specific data being checked. Although this solution may slightly increase processing time, it could introduce a higher risk of data inconsistencies.Alternatively, a simpler approach proposed by the central bank is to establish a per-account holding limit and a limit on the number of accounts a single user can hold, rather than imposing global limits. Ideally, users with multiple accounts would have a higher per-account holding limit compared to those with fewer accounts.Phase 3 underwayWith the next pilot phase already underway, the BoJ aims to test the end-to-end process flow and identify challenges related to integrating with external systems. Additionally, they are creating a CBDC Forum to gather input from the private sector, ensuring a collaborative approach to CBDC development.While investigation and research into CBDCs continues, the BoJ has said that it will make a final decision on CBDC implementation by 2026.

Fake Security Tokens Linked to HD Hyundai Oilbank in CirculationHD Hyundai Oilbank, one of South Korea’s leading refiners, said Wednesday that a counterfeit security token dubbed “HOBT” claiming affiliation to the company has been circulating online. The token is allegedly based on old stock certificates under the company’s former name, Hyundai Oil Refinery, as the underlying assets, though the company had changed its name to HD Hyundai Oilbank back in 2002. Both the token and the underlying asset are invalid and have no relation at all to HD Hyundai Oilbank, the company emphasized, so investors must exercise caution.Fraudulent promotionEntities that are giving away or selling HBOT tokens are attracting investors by promoting a one-on-one exchange of the tokens for old Hyundai Oil Refinery stock certificates. They are also promising to grant shareholder rights through blockchain technology as well as interest payments of 4% every month for a total of 24% over six months.Fraudulent activities like these have recently been on the rise following the legalization of security tokens and the formal issuance of a select few tokens.Investigative measuresThe Incheon Metropolitan Police is currently conducting an investigation into the case. Notably, the old Hyundai Oil Refinery stock certificates that the involved entities are claiming to be underlying assets have been proven to be fake in over ten court rulings. Although owners of these old stock certificates had filed lawsuits against the company related to shareholder registration renewals since the late 2000s, all of them had lost their cases.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashPast events resurfacingThis recent circulation of the forged HOBT tokens is attributed to employees of a disposal company who pocketed the invalid stock certificates and certificate papers, rather than disposing of them as they were required to do.In January 2002, HD Hyundai Oilbank had hired a company to dispose of documents — including those related to the old stock certificates — that had lost their validity during the process of attracting and increasing foreign capital.“In May of that year, we started receiving frequent inquiries about the stock certificates. We filed a legal complaint against the employees and conspirators of the disposal company for illegally distributing the certificates (including the stock certificate papers), and they were subsequently punished for theft and fraud,” the company explained.