Top

Calls for Regulation of Crypto Investment Management Firms Amidst Growing Concerns

Policy & Regulation·August 25, 2023, 5:58 AM

There have been recent calls in South Korea for crypto investment management companies to be subject to the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act amidst concerns about potential regulatory blind spots negatively impacting crypto investors.

Photo by Conny Schneider on Unsplash

 

Pushing for regulatory oversight

Kang Seong-hoo, chairman of the Korea Digital Asset Business Association (KDA) went into detail regarding the issue during a forum held by the association on Thursday to discuss the efficient use of technology and safety management in the era of the digital economy.

He emphasized that dealings related to virtual asset management such as deposits, lending, and staking must be regulated by authorities under the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act. This is due to the fact that crypto investment management companies are not within the purview of the Act On Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information or the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, the latter of which is set to take effect next year.

The Act On Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information defines financial companies as those that provide services for selling, buying, exchanging, transferring, keeping, or managing virtual assets; or act as a broker, intermediary, or agent for these services. However, there is no mention of crypto management companies.

 

Echoes of past crypto platform controversies

These concerns are driven by the looming possibility of another debacle like the class-action lawsuits against crypto platforms like Haru Invest or Delio arising again as a result of regulatory gray areas. Two months ago, investors had filed a legal complaint after the two lenders unexpectedly suspended customer deposits and withdrawals, claiming that they suffered around KRW 50 billion (approximately $39 million at the time of the incident) in damages as a result.

Furthermore, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), a division under the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC), recently stated in a report that virtual asset deposits, lending, and DeFi services do not fall under the obligations of the Act On Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information.

“Given the context of the ongoing crypto winter since last year, the business model of virtual asset management companies, which is heavily reliant on arbitrage between exchanges, poses a high risk of incidents similar to the Haru Invest and Delio cases,” said Chairman Kang.

“In order to ensure virtual asset user protection and market safety, authorities should promptly explore regulatory measures under the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act for virtual asset management such as deposits, lending, staking, and the like.”

More to Read
View All
Markets·

Apr 19, 2023

Crypto Winter Halves Korean Bank Fee Profits

Crypto Winter Halves Korean Bank Fee ProfitsLast year, Korean banks collected only half the amount in fees from crypto exchanges compared to the previous year, according to Korean news agency News1.©Pexels/PixabayDeclining bank fee profitsFiles submitted by the Korean Financial Services Commission to Yun Chang-hyun, a member of the ruling People Power Party, revealed that the five major Korean crypto exchanges paid 20.4 billion KRW (~$15.6 million) in fees to banks last year, which is a 49.4% decrease from the previous year’s 40.3 billion KRW (~$30.7 million). These exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax) have established agreements with banks to hold real-name bank accounts, which is a legal requirement for exchanges that wish to conduct trades in Korean won.Banks that have provided real-name accounts to crypto exchanges saw an increase in fee profits from 2019 to 2021. However, due to a decline in market sentiment last year, trade volume decreased, resulting in a reduction of bank fees. Last year’s crypto winter is attributable to various factors, including uncertainties in the global economy and collapses of crypto enterprises such as Terraform Labs and FTX.Fees by exchangesIn terms of fees paid to banks by exchanges last year, the largest exchange, Upbit, paid 13.9 billion KRW (~$10.6 million) in fees to Kbank, a mobile banking service provider. Bithumb and Coinone paid 4.9 billion KRW (~$3.7 million) and 989 million KRW (~$750,000) in fees to NH Bank, respectively. It is worth noting that Coinone switched its bank from NH Bank to Kakao Bank last November, paying 72 million KRW (~$55,000) to Kakao Bank in the fourth quarter. Korbit paid 486 million KRW (~$370,000) and 19 million KRW (~$14,500) to Shinhan Bank and Jeonbuk Bank, respectively. Gopax partnered with Jeonbuk Bank to obtain its real-name accounts in April last year.Lawmaker Yun said it was apparent that partnerships were being forged between only a handful of banks and crypto enterprises. Current regulations have to be reviewed to encourage more banks to participate in various blockchain businesses, he added.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Mar 26, 2025

Chainlink partners with Abu Dhabi’s ADGM on tokenization framework development

Chainlink, a prominent decentralized oracle network, has partnered with the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM), a free zone and international financial center located on Al Maryah Island in Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), with a view towards further developing tokenization frameworks.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashCompliant tokenization frameworksAccording to an announcement on the ADGM website, the international financial center signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Chainlink. It claimed that the collaboration marks “a major step in advancing compliant tokenisation frameworks.” Chainlink provides a suite of services. Central to that is the delivery of real-world data feeds into blockchain networks. ADGM believes that through the partnership, projects located within the free zone will be able to access this technology, while the ADGM’s Registration Authority will ensure regulatory compliance. The CEO of the ADGM Registration Authority, Hamad Sayah Al Mazrouei, said that the strategic alliance is a significant step towards ADGM leadership in blockchain innovation. He added: “By collaborating with Chainlink, we are aiming to set a global benchmark that spearheads transparency, security, and trust across the blockchain space.” The collaboration includes plans to host events and workshops aimed at educating the blockchain sector within the UAE. The two parties also aspire to the initiative, sparking greater dialogue on regulatory matters relative to blockchain, artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies. Global collaborationsThis is the latest in a long list of collaborations that Chainlink has entered into, relative to asset tokenization. In October, it partnered with Singapore’s DigiFT, an exchange dedicated to tokenized real-world assets (RWAs). The following month, it completed a pilot program alongside financial messaging service SWIFT and UBS Asset Management under the umbrella of the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s (MAS) Project Guardian. The project concerned itself with the settlement of tokenized funds. Earlier in 2024, Chainlink partnered with U.S. financial market infrastructure firm DTCC on the Smart NAV pilot project. The initiative centered on the creation and issuance of tokenized funds, counting JPMorgan, State Street, BNY Mellon, Invesco and Franklin Templeton among its participants. In the UAE, Chainlink has been added as a member of the Digital Asset Lab of one of the country’s largest banking groups, Emirates NBD. For its part, the ADGM has also been on the front foot with regard to tokenization initiatives. Its Regulatory Authority has established a regulatory framework with regard to asset tokenization, with an emphasis on investor protection. In October of last year, RWA tokenization platform Realize launched the financial center’s first tokenized U.S. treasury bill fund. At the time, the ADGM said that the development highlighted an objective for the region in becoming the global market leader where RWA tokenization is concerned. The ADGM began operations in 2015 with its own legal system. As of the end of 2024, the financial center hosted 134 fund and asset managers. Market maker and Web3 investment firm DWF Labs moved its headquarters from Singapore to Abu Dhabi’s ADGM at the end of last year, citing the goal of wanting to expand tokenized RWA-based projects as one of the reasons for the move.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Feb 28, 2025

First stablecoins gain DFSA approval in Dubai

The Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), the financial regulatory agency of the Dubai International Financial Center (DIFC), a special economic zone, has approved two stablecoins under its crypto regulatory framework. The two stablecoins, USD Coin (USDC) and EURC, are both issued by blockchain-focused financial services firm Circle. While USDC is a U.S. dollar-backed stablecoin, EURC is a euro-backed stablecoin. In a press release published on the Circle website on Feb. 24, the company announced details regarding the approval. The stablecoins are the first to be recognized and approved by the DFSA.Photo by Christoph Schulz on UnsplashStablecoin integrationThe development means that firms based in the DIFC are now free to integrate either stablecoin into digital asset applications and products focused on areas such as payments and treasury management. A number of Circle executives took to social media to comment on the development. Circle Co-founder and CEO Jeremy Allaire outlined on X that the approval means that financial institutions in Dubai “are now able to transact in markets with USDC and EURC.” In legally recognizing the two stablecoins, Allaire pointed out that the DFSA had joined regulators in the European Union (EU) and Canada.  Last Summer, Allaire announced that Circle’s stablecoins complied with the EU’s Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) regulation. In December, Circle became the first stablecoin issuer to meet Canadian listing regulations. Dante Disparte, Circle’s chief strategy officer and head of global policy, pointed out that a trend is emerging requiring the pre-clearing of stablecoins prior to them entering into circulation or gaining regulatory approval. “In always-on finance, reciprocity is key,” he added.  Meanwhile, the firm’s EU Strategy & Policy Director, Patrick Hansen, underscored the significance of the approval. Hansen pointed to the fact that the DIFC is home to 6,000 registered entities, including 800 authorized financial firms. An ‘edge’ over TetherEugene Cheung, Chief Institutional Business Officer at Hong Kong-based digital asset platform OSL, said that the approval was “massive for institutional adoption,” while giving Circle an “edge” over Tether within the $157 billion stablecoin market. While Circle has always taken a regulatory-compliant approach, competitor Tether has struggled with compliance. In Europe, 10 companies have been approved to issue stablecoins under MiCA regulations, but Tether is not among them. This has led to a number of exchanges delisting Tether’s USDT in Europe. The DIFC was first established in 2004. The economic free-zone caters to firms operating within the Middle East, South Asian and African regions. The number of businesses registered within the free zone has increased by 25% since 2023. In November 2022, the DIFC recognized Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH) and Litecoin (LTC). The following year, it added Toncoin (TON) and Ripple’s XRP, together with ZETA, the native token of the ZetaChain network. In 2024, the DFSA amended its crypto regulations to allow foreign funds to invest in recognized crypto tokens, while enabling domestic qualified investor funds to invest in unrecognized tokens.Although the regulatory approach taken by the authorities in Dubai accommodates stablecoins, algorithmic stablecoins are prohibited.

news
Loading