Fake Security Tokens Linked to HD Hyundai Oilbank in Circulation

The Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), the financial regulatory agency of the Dubai International Financial Center (DIFC), a special economic zone, has approved two stablecoins under its crypto regulatory framework. The two stablecoins, USD Coin (USDC) and EURC, are both issued by blockchain-focused financial services firm Circle. While USDC is a U.S. dollar-backed stablecoin, EURC is a euro-backed stablecoin. In a press release published on the Circle website on Feb. 24, the company announced details regarding the approval. The stablecoins are the first to be recognized and approved by the DFSA.Photo by Christoph Schulz on UnsplashStablecoin integrationThe development means that firms based in the DIFC are now free to integrate either stablecoin into digital asset applications and products focused on areas such as payments and treasury management. A number of Circle executives took to social media to comment on the development. Circle Co-founder and CEO Jeremy Allaire outlined on X that the approval means that financial institutions in Dubai “are now able to transact in markets with USDC and EURC.” In legally recognizing the two stablecoins, Allaire pointed out that the DFSA had joined regulators in the European Union (EU) and Canada.  Last Summer, Allaire announced that Circle’s stablecoins complied with the EU’s Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) regulation. In December, Circle became the first stablecoin issuer to meet Canadian listing regulations. Dante Disparte, Circle’s chief strategy officer and head of global policy, pointed out that a trend is emerging requiring the pre-clearing of stablecoins prior to them entering into circulation or gaining regulatory approval. “In always-on finance, reciprocity is key,” he added.  Meanwhile, the firm’s EU Strategy & Policy Director, Patrick Hansen, underscored the significance of the approval. Hansen pointed to the fact that the DIFC is home to 6,000 registered entities, including 800 authorized financial firms. An ‘edge’ over TetherEugene Cheung, Chief Institutional Business Officer at Hong Kong-based digital asset platform OSL, said that the approval was “massive for institutional adoption,” while giving Circle an “edge” over Tether within the $157 billion stablecoin market. While Circle has always taken a regulatory-compliant approach, competitor Tether has struggled with compliance. In Europe, 10 companies have been approved to issue stablecoins under MiCA regulations, but Tether is not among them. This has led to a number of exchanges delisting Tether’s USDT in Europe. The DIFC was first established in 2004. The economic free-zone caters to firms operating within the Middle East, South Asian and African regions. The number of businesses registered within the free zone has increased by 25% since 2023. In November 2022, the DIFC recognized Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH) and Litecoin (LTC). The following year, it added Toncoin (TON) and Ripple’s XRP, together with ZETA, the native token of the ZetaChain network. In 2024, the DFSA amended its crypto regulations to allow foreign funds to invest in recognized crypto tokens, while enabling domestic qualified investor funds to invest in unrecognized tokens.Although the regulatory approach taken by the authorities in Dubai accommodates stablecoins, algorithmic stablecoins are prohibited.

The Need to Distinguish Between Security and Non-Security Virtual AssetsWith the recent enactment of the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill in South Korea, there is a need to lay out criteria for determining whether virtual assets qualify as securities, says Kim Ja-bong, a senior research fellow at the Korea Institute of Finance, in his report titled “The Implications of Determining Which Virtual Assets Constitute Securities and Investor Protection” released on Saturday.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashThe implications of the Virtual Asset User Protection ActThe Virtual Asset User Protection Act — which will take effect in July of next year — aims to protect customer assets, establish regulations against unfair trading practices, and enforce penalties. Notably, it will target virtual assets that are not securities, deeming it necessary for regulators to determine if virtual assets qualify as securities or not in order to enforce the bill. Assets with characteristics of securities will fall under the jurisdiction of the Capital Markets Act.Therefore, if the Virtual Asset User Protection Act does not provide sufficient investor protection, issuers may be incentivized to issue non-security assets rather than security assets to avoid the regulations of the Capital Markets Act. This further necessitates the act of distinguishing between virtual assets that are securities versus those that are not.Determining if a virtual asset is a security or notThere are two approaches to do this, according to Kim: the passive approach, which avoids considering a virtual asset as a security whenever possible, and the active approach, which treats a virtual asset as a security whenever applicable.He argues that it is better to focus on whether an investment contract qualifies as a security if it is considered an investment contract, rather than simply selecting a specific approach.Furthermore, the nature of virtual assets renders them unbound by national borders, so it is necessary to establish assessment criteria that correspond with international standards, such as those used in the US and Europe.This is especially important because if the criteria differ from international standards, there is a risk of domestic investors suffering damages due to an issuer’s pursuit of regulatory arbitrage between countries.Equitable recognition and potential for security tokensAccording to Kim, the importance of determining whether virtual assets are securities lies in ensuring that security tokens receive the same recognition and trading treatment as traditional securities such as stocks. With such a measure, security token offerings can serve as an efficient and reliable method for raising funds. Although there may be concerns that such a regulation may hinder the development of virtual assets, it may well be an opportunity for security tokens to be qualified and trusted as high-quality financial instruments just like existing securities, Kim claims.Even for virtual assets that are not considered securities, there are many types of assets that are financial in nature, such as e-money tokens — therefore, it is necessary to actively protect investors in non-security virtual assets through financial regulations such as reinforcing disclosure obligations, which is being done in the EU through the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).Empowering regulators for enhanced investor protection and market integrityKim underscored that investor protection and healthy growth of the virtual asset market are made possible mainly through expanding regulators’ authority to protect economic interests and prevent damages. The author also suggested institutional reforms that grant regulators substantial authority, which would enhance their ability to protect investors effectively and provide compensation for damages.He added that regulators should also have the authority to enforce liability for damages or impose civil penalties for unfair trading practices conducted using classified information.

OKX Wallet to Support BRC-20 Tokens and Bitcoin OrdinalsIn a press release published on Tuesday, Seychelles-based cryptocurrency spot and derivatives exchange OKX announced that it is in the process of enabling an Ordinals marketplace on the OKX Wallet, which will enable customers to mint and trade BRC-20 tokens.Photo by Karolina Grabowska on PexelsRising BRC-20 market capThe move will also enable users to inscribe non-fungible token (NFT)-based digital content on the Bitcoin blockchain by way of ordinal inscriptions. The market capitalization of BRC-20 tokens has been rising exponentially over the course of the past few weeks despite only being in existence since March.BRC-20 is an experimental token standard which was created by an anonymous developer with the handle “Domo” and username ‘@domodata’ on Twitter. A token standard governs how and where a cryptocurrency can be used. The approach has been pioneered by developers on the Ethereum blockchain who created the ERC-20 standard a number of years ago, relative to the Ethereum network.OKX has clearly identified a rising trend and wants to be an early adopter in benefiting from it. In their short existence, BRC-20 tokens have mainly implicated meme tokens but as more experimentation follows, use cases that rely on the token standard are likely to expand.Binance has signaled a similar intent, having stated last week that before the month is out, Bitcoin Ordinals will be added to its NFT marketplace. Ordinals preceded the development of the BRC-20 standard by a couple of months, with over five million of the inscriptions having been generated since they emerged. It’s believed that the minting of those Ordinals has generated fees to the value of around 1,000 BTC (or $27 million as per the BTC/USD price at the time of publication).Growing painsWhile the emergence of the BRC-20 standard and Bitcoin Ordinals brings quite a lot of excitement to a bitcoin blockchain that many found to be boring and lacking diversity in terms of potential use cases, it’s not been without its problems. On the one hand, these tokens and inscriptions make use of unused block space on the network.They also offer a solution to the longer term issue of a reduction in fees. The bitcoin blockchain in-built subsidy to miners is halved every four years, meaning that there will be a need for fees to sustain the incentive to miners to continue to secure the network.The downside to these recent developments is that the new tokens are going beyond using up unused block space. Instead, they’ve been responsible for driving Bitcoin transaction fees up to uncomfortable levels over the course of the past two weeks. It’s still early days in terms of this development, so there is every hope that developers can find solutions to the issue.Last week, Singapore-based project OmniBOLT announced that it will support BRC-20 tokens on Lightning Network. Taking some of this activity away from the bitcoin mainnet will serve to dampen excessive transaction costs and transaction delays due to an excessively long queue of transactions within the bitcoin mempool.The recent transaction cost difficulty relative to Bitcoin has prompted Binance to respond by stating its intention to add support for Lightning Network transactions in the not too distant future. OKX already supports Lightning transactions but not from within its wallet. As part of this announcement, the company stated that Lightning support will be coming to its wallet in the near future.