One Store’s App Market to Support Polygon-Based dApps

Zodia Custody and Blockdaemon Partner on Institutional StakingLondon-based cryptocurrency storage provider Zodia Custody, a portfolio company of Japan’s SBI Holdings, has entered into a partnership with blockchain infrastructure provider Blockdaemon relative to crypto staking.Photo by Traxer on UnsplashInstitutional interestBlockdaemon announced the crypto staking collaboration, tailored to institutional clients, on Twitter on Tuesday. This move comes as institutional interest in staking, the process of contributing digital assets to support blockchain networks and earning rewards, continues to surge.Following the Ethereum network’s Shapella upgrade on April 12, the amount of ether (ETH) staked increased by an impressive 4.4 million, reaching a total of 22.58 million ETH (equivalent to $42 billion) as of May 23. This remarkable growth in staked assets reflects the growing confidence in the Ethereum network and the potential for substantial returns.First bank-owned custodianZodia Custody is a subsidiary of the well-known multinational bank Standard Chartered and backed by prominent institutions such as Northern Trust alongside SBI Holdings. It claims the title of being the first bank-owned custodian to provide staking services exclusively to institutional clients. This collaboration enables Zodia Custody to leverage Blockdaemon’s infrastructure to deliver secure and efficient staking solutions, catering to the specific needs of institutional investors.Blockdaemon has been at the forefront of facilitating seamless integration between traditional financial institutions and the emerging crypto industry. Earlier this year, the company introduced a wallet service targeted at the institutions and crypto custodians. The wallet assists clients in managing their assets securely, eliminating the need for third-party storage solutions. By partnering with Zodia Custody, Blockdaemon expands its portfolio of services, capitalizing on the rising demand for staking among institutional investors.The firm’s CEO and Founder, Konstantin Richter, stated that the partnership with Zodia “allows stronger security, automation and simplification of the process to participate in staking, truly accelerating Web3 innovation.”LMAX collaborationEarlier this month Zodia partnered with digital asset trade execution specialist LMAX Digital to provide a combination of institutional-grade trading infrastructure and custody services to crypto asset manager, Coinshares.Institutional investors, traditionally cautious about entering the crypto ecosystem, are now becoming more proactive in engaging with digital assets. Staking, with its potential for consistent and predictable returns, has emerged as an appealing opportunity. By participating in staking, institutions not only contribute to the efficient functioning of blockchain networks but also enjoy the rewards associated with validating transactions and securing the network.The partnership between Zodia Custody and Blockdaemon exemplifies the industry’s efforts to bridge the gap between traditional finance and the rapidly evolving world of cryptocurrencies. As more institutional clients seek exposure to digital assets, it becomes essential to provide them with secure and reliable solutions tailored to their specific requirements.With demand for staking services continuing to rise, institutional players are recognizing the value of taking a more active part in the crypto ecosystem. With Zodia Custody and Blockdaemon leading the way, the opportunities for institutional clients to engage in staking and reap the rewards are set to expand, further fueling the growth of the entire crypto industry.

Singapore High Court Recognizes Cryptocurrency as Personal PropertyIn a significant ruling on July 25, Judge Philip Jeyaretnam of the High Court of Singapore declared that cryptocurrency is capable of being held in trust and should be recognized as property.The judge’s decision came in response to a case brought by Dubai-headquartered crypto exchange Bybit against its former employee, Ho Kai Xin, who was accused of transferring approximately 4.2 million Tether (USDT) from the crypto exchange to her private accounts without authorization.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashNo fundamental differenceIn his ruling, Judge Jeyaretnam emphasized that there is no fundamental difference between cryptocurrencies, fiat money, or even physical objects like shells when it comes to their status as property. He argued that as long as these objects hold value and are based on mutual faith, they can be considered property. The judge’s verdict is seen as a crucial step in establishing the legal status of digital assets within the Singaporean jurisdiction.Addressing the argument that cryptocurrencies lack physical presence and therefore cannot be considered property, Judge Jeyaretnam drew an analogy, stating: “We identify what is going on as a particular digital token, somewhat like how we give a name to a river even though the water contained within its banks is constantly changing.” By equating cryptocurrencies to named entities, the judge made it clear that physical tangibility is not a prerequisite for something to be classified as property.Cryptocurrencies have valueFurthermore, the ruling challenges the perception that cryptocurrencies have no “real” value. Judge Jeyaretnam firmly refuted this notion, highlighting that the value of any asset, whether physical or digital, is ultimately determined by collective human belief and judgment.One critical classification made by the judge is grouping cryptocurrencies under the category of “things in action” within British common law. This categorization means that cryptocurrencies are considered a form of property, over which personal rights can be claimed and enforced through legal actions, rather than requiring physical possession.The judge’s decision also referenced the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s (MAS) consultation paper, which proposes implementing segregation and custody requirements for digital payment tokens. By taking cues from the MAS’s stance on digital assets, the court emphasized the legality of holding cryptocurrencies on trust, as long as practical methods for identification and segregation are in place.Cues taken from existing lawSingapore’s legal framework for property also played a crucial role in the ruling. Judge Jeyaretnam pointed to Order 22 of Singapore’s Rules of Court 2021, which defines “movable property” to include various assets, such as cash, debts, bonds, shares, and cryptocurrency or other digital currency. This inclusion reinforces the recognition of cryptocurrencies as a valid form of property within Singaporean law.In April of this year, a Hong Kong court reached a similar conclusion, recognizing cryptocurrency as property. In the High Court of Justice in London the following month, non-fungible tokens (NFTs) were recognized as “private property.”Overall, Judge Jeyaretnam’s ruling represents a significant milestone in the legal recognition of cryptocurrencies in Singapore. By acknowledging cryptocurrencies as property, the court provides greater clarity and certainty for crypto users and investors while affirming the importance of embracing digital assets within the nation’s legal framework.

Hong Kong Adapts Crypto Regulations to Broaden Market AccessHong Kong’s financial regulator has taken a further regulatory step in its evolving stance on cryptocurrency trading, widening the scope of retail access to digital assets through intermediaries.Photo by Chapman Chow on UnsplashResponding to growing demandThe move follows a surge in interest in spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and recent investigations into the unlicensed operations of the JPEX exchange. In a circular published by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) on Friday, the regulator explained that the policy shift was prompted by changing market dynamics and growing inquiries from the industry.The new guidelines aim to extend access to a broader clientele and facilitate the direct deposit and withdrawal of virtual assets through intermediaries, all while maintaining stringent safeguards. The circular states:”The policy is updated in light of the latest market developments and enquiries from the industry seeking to further expand retail access through intermediaries and to allow investors to directly deposit and withdraw virtual assets to/from intermediaries with appropriate safeguards.”Cautionary notesDespite this welcome expansion, there are a couple of cautionary notes included within the circular. Hong Kong remains circumspect about overseas virtual asset (VA) products, deeming them “complex” and, as a result, riskier. The circular emphasizes that “VA-related products considered complex should only be offered to professional investors.” For instance, an overseas VA non-derivative ETF is likely to fall into this category.The other condition pertains to potential clients, who will be required to undergo a one-off test to assess their knowledge of investing and ensure they possess the financial wherewithal to manage the risks associated with virtual asset trading. Furthermore, intermediaries must furnish clients with comprehensive risk disclosure statements.The regulator also places an onus on the intermediary to set a limit for each retail client, to ensure that a retail client’s exposure to virtual assets is reasonable. The circular outlines that deposit and withdrawal of client funds should only happen through the use of segregated funding accounts on an SFC-licensed platform.Crypto sector aspirationsThis shift in regulation underscores Hong Kong’s ongoing aspirations to solidify its position as a hub for virtual assets. The territory embarked on a new regulatory regime in June, enabling applications for crypto trading platform licenses. By August, the first batch of licenses was granted, allowing exchanges to cater to retail customers. This marked a notable turnaround from Hong Kong’s prior 18 months of skepticism and hostility toward the cryptocurrency sector.The timing of these regulatory changes coincides with surging interest in spot Bitcoin ETFs, with JPMorgan even suggesting that approval in the US could materialize within months. This shift in regulatory perspective in Hong Kong also follows the investigation and accusations made against the JPEX exchange for conducting unlicensed operations, leading to arrests and the promise to disclose details of licensed applicants. The JPEX scandal has also dampened public confidence in crypto in Hong Kong more recently.Hong Kong is adapting its crypto regulations to be more inclusive while maintaining a cautious approach toward complex overseas virtual asset products. This regulatory shift underscores the region’s determination to foster its status as a leading hub for virtual assets, following a change of heart from its previous stance of skepticism and reluctance towards the crypto industry.