Top

India Offers Suggestions in the Development of G20 Crypto Guidelines

Policy & Regulation·August 02, 2023, 11:49 PM

India submitted its Presidency Note on Tuesday, contributing to the global framework for cryptocurrency regulation under the auspices of the G20, a forum comprising the world’s 20 largest economies.

The document aligns itself with the guidance provided by prominent entities including the Financial Stability Board (FSB), the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

Photo by Swapnil Deshpandey on Unsplash

 

Key Summit topic

Many months in advance of September’s G20 Summit in New Delhi, it was clear that crypto regulation would be a key subject for discussion. The FSB’s guidelines, released in July, offer a comprehensive framework for regulating various crypto assets, particularly stablecoins, based on existing standards and principles. These guidelines encompass crucial aspects such as governance, risk management, disclosure, supervision, and cross-border collaboration.

In May, the FSB’s Regional Consultative Group for Asia met in Cebu, in the Philippines. During that meeting, the FSB highlighted the risks implicated by digital assets.

Published in June, the FATF guidelines put forth a universally applicable set of rules to combat money laundering and counter the risks of terrorist financing linked to cryptocurrencies. One of the main provisions is the “travel rule,” compelling crypto service providers to share customer information when conducting fund transfers.

While the IMF guidelines are expected to be unveiled in August, they will encompass a synthesis paper that offers a comprehensive roadmap for crypto regulation. This roadmap is designed to reflect input from multiple stakeholders and jurisdictions.

 

India’s supplementary additions

Amidst endorsing these global crypto guidelines, India also proposes supplementary additions, particularly highlighting the challenges faced by developing economies in the crypto realm. The document underlines that these nations may grapple with capacity and resource constraints when implementing effective crypto regulation and supervision.

Furthermore, they might require more extensive access to reliable data regarding crypto activities and associated risks. Developing economies are also at a heightened risk of falling victim to illicit crypto use, including money laundering, tax evasion, and cyber-crime.

In light of these concerns, India advocates for the inclusion of developing economy-specific considerations in the FSB’s guidelines. The country also urges for technical assistance and capacity-building support to be extended to these nations. Additionally, it proposes a global outreach initiative to raise awareness of the risks, commencing with nations experiencing higher levels of crypto adoption.

 

Broadening the scope

Another noteworthy suggestion from India is an extension of the regulatory approach beyond the G20’s scope, encompassing the broader digital economy. While recognizing that crypto is merely one facet of the sweeping digital transformation reshaping multiple sectors, India’s document underscores the need for enhanced cooperation and coordination among various stakeholders and authorities at both national and international levels.

In this vein, India proposes that the G20 contemplate formulating a comprehensive framework for the digital economy. This framework should encompass a wide array of concerns, including data governance, digital taxation, digital identity, digital inclusion, and fostering digital innovation, according to the document.

India’s exploration of diverse aspects related to cryptocurrency — ranging from legal status to taxation implications, central bank digital currency (CBDC) potential, and innovation possibilities — further underlines its desire to see greater international cohesion in relation to the regulation of digital assets.

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Apr 10, 2023

Korean Financial Watchdog to Penalize Bankers Involved in Illegal Foreign Remittances

Korean Financial Watchdog to Penalize Bankers Involved in Illegal Foreign RemittancesThe Korean Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) recently completed an investigation into illegal foreign remittances of approximately 16 trillion KRW (~$12,137,718,400) that involved numerous bankers.©Unsplash/Paul FiedlerExploiting the kimchi premiumThe investigation, launched by the Korean financial watchdog last June, found that these lawbreakers sent funds to China, Hong Kong, and other overseas destinations through Korean crypto exchanges, trading firms, and bank branches with an aim of making money through arbitrage by taking the advantage of the kimchi premium, a term used to describe that the higher prices of crypto assets in Korean exchanges compared to their foreign counterparts.Bankers neglecting the KYC ruleSome of these bankers participated in the crime by raising the remittance cap and applying favorable exchange rates to trading companies that had no previous transaction records with banks. By law, bankers in Korea are obligated to follow the “know your customer” rule. It was found that 12 domestic banks and one futures firm were involved in this incident.The FSS has decided to impose strict penalties on these financial institutions, considering they were exploited for money laundering purposes. These entities are likely to have some of their services suspended, with the employees involved being fired.Accountability of top bankersOne key point to watch out for is whether the FSS would be able to hold executives accountable. Some say penalizing top bankers is not easy, given that it has to be proven that the employees’ criminal activities were due to a lack of executives’ internal control.The financial regulator recently announced plans to revise the law governing banks’ governance, but it is expected that such a bill would take some time to pass through the National Assembly.Through a revision of the law, the financial authority aims to hold top executives at financial institutions more responsible for serious financial accidents. It looks forward to bestowing top bankers with the obligation of comprehensive internal control management and making them accountable as an overall manager only in case of critical financial accidents. The term “top executives” in the bill will encompass not only bank presidents but also chairpersons of financial holding companies. More specific revision plans are expected to be revealed by the end of this month.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Jan 05, 2024

OKX Wallet now supports WEMIX3.0 mainnet

Seychelles-based crypto exchange OKX’s Web3 wallet service, OKX Wallet, has begun supporting Wemade’s blockchain network WEMIX3.0, according to an announcement on Friday (KST). This development will allow OKX Wallet holders to directly manage the crypto assets that they hold from the WEMIX3.0 ecosystem. Photo by GuerrillaBuzz on UnsplashSeamless access and versatile Web3 servicesOKX Wallet notably supports over 70 networks and 3,000 cryptocurrencies and provides other wide-ranging Web3 services like NFT trading, crypto swaps and a decentralized finance (DeFi) platform. In particular, it also has a hassle-free recovery process for account access that employs Multi-Party Computation (MPC) technology, effectively eliminating the need for traditional recovery methods like seed phrases.  OKX Wallet and WEMIX3.0 also vowed to work on more integrations and joint campaigns in the future to round up a larger global user base and lead the era of Web3.  A rising force in cryptoIn other news, WEMIX3.0’s governance token, WEMIX, has been making a significant impact in the crypto industry. The asset ranked ninth in CoinMarketCap’s list of largest blockchains in crypto ranked by total value locked (TVL) last month, and it possessed the largest constituent weight in terms of market capitalization in the gaming sector in the latest Crypto Sector Indices released by Sygnum, a global digital asset banking group headquartered in Switzerland and Singapore. 

news
Policy & Regulation·

Jan 19, 2024

Two Asian nations turn down spot bitcoin ETFs

In a contrasting move to the recent approval of several spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), regulators in both Singapore and Thailand have turned down permission to list spot bitcoin ETFs.Photo by Dmytro Demidko on UnsplashBitcoin not a qualified assetAccording to local news media on Wednesday, Singapore's Monetary Authority (MAS) has announced its decision not to permit the listing of spot ETFs in the country. The MAS argues that cryptocurrencies, including bitcoin, do not meet the criteria for qualified assets within the context of ETFs. This regulatory divergence means that retail investors in Singapore won't see the introduction of spot bitcoin ETFs domestically. However, they still have an avenue to trade such ETFs as they can turn to local brokerages for access to overseas markets. Despite this allowance, the MAS emphasizes the need for these retail investors to exercise caution due to the inherent high volatility and speculative nature of cryptocurrency trading. A spokesperson from the regulatory authority clarified that while collected investment schemes (CIS), falling under the Securities and Futures Act regulation, include ETFs, they do not encompass bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency. Future potentialWhile MAS may be turning down spot bitcoin ETFs at this point, there’s potential for a change of heart in the future. The FIMA Bill is currently working its way through the city-state’s legislative process. If enacted, it would give broader regulatory oversight of crypto to MAS. Lasanka Perera, CEO of Independent Reserve Singapore, recently suggested that the bill could make an ETF more likely. Thailand says noMeanwhile, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has stated that it currently does not plan to allow asset management firms to launch spot bitcoin ETFs in the country. Thai securities brokerage firms have been encouraging investors to consider investing directly in U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs. The Thai SEC clarified that while it closely monitors these developments, there is no immediate policy to allow spot bitcoin ETFs in Thailand. The regulator emphasizes that Thai investors can still engage in digital asset investments through domestic exchanges licensed by the SEC under the Digital Assets Decree. India, too, doesn’t appear to have been looking favorably on the potential for such products. The governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said last week that “the way we look at crypto remains unchanged, irrespective of who does what.” Asian optimismIn the wake of ETF approval in the U.S., many industry commentators had suggested that Asia would respond positively. Australian venture capitalist Mark Carnegie has suggested that the developing bull market would be “an Asian story.” Yat Siu, co-founder of Hong Kong’s Animoca Brands, expressed the view that U.S. ETF approval would have a substantially positive impact within the Asian region. Hong Kong appears to be the most positive in the region in its outlook with regard to embracing spot bitcoin ETFs. Immediately following approval in the U.S., a Hong Kong legislator spoke out to encourage a proactive response relative to launch of similar products within the Chinese autonomous territory. Meanwhile, recent news reports indicate that spot bitcoin ETFs experienced substantial trading volume, accumulating $10 billion just three days after their approval in the U.S. 

news
Loading