NFT Game Slime World’s Creator Join Forces with Blockchain Investor Assemblock

According to a report published on March 31 by Nikkei, a Tokyo-based financial news outlet, the Japanese authorities are gearing up to categorize digital assets as financial products, while in the process broadening the scope of insider trading restrictions. While the publication didn’t cite a particular source, it reported that the Japanese Financial Services Agency (FSA) is expected to file a draft amendment related to the existing Financial Instruments and Exchange Act in 2026.Photo by M.S. Meeuwesen on UnsplashFrom payment to investment productCurrently, Japan’s Payment Services Act categorizes crypto assets as a means of settlement. That categorization looks at these assets from the perspective of a payment tool rather than considering them as investment products. The move is understood to be part of a broader effort to copper-fasten crypto sector oversight. Earlier this month, the Japanese cabinet approved a proposal that seeks to amend the Payment Services Act.  At the time, it had been suggested that the amendment would look to exclude crypto assets from being classified as securities, while also bringing about a reduction in the capital gains tax rate as it is applied to digital assets. It’s likely that crypto assets will find themselves in a distinct category, apart from securities like stocks and bonds. Crypto adoptionActivity related to crypto assets has been growing in Japan. 7.34 million active accounts were found to be responsible for crypto transactions in Japan in January. That amounts to a tripling in such crypto transaction activity over the course of five years. Japan enjoyed greater adoption at a very early stage in the global development of crypto. However, following the Mt. Gox crypto exchange collapse in 2014, which at the time accounted for the loss of 7% of Bitcoin’s supply, regulators responded by clamping down on the sector.  That situation led to greater investor protection for Japanese investors but it presented as a difficulty for Japan-based exchanges to compete globally with other exchange businesses overseas. A conservative stance taken by the FSA has also held back crypto exchange-traded fund (ETF) approval and adoption. Bitcoin ETFs were approved in the United States over a year ago. Earlier this month, Astar Network founder Sota Watanabe outlined that the current ruling party in Japan plans to remove crypto assets from a securities classification, alongside other changes which could potentially lead to the approval of crypto ETFs. The Liberal Democratic Party has also put forward crypto tax reforms that, if implemented, would see a 20% tax rate brought into effect where capital gains on digital assets are concerned.The finer detail with regard to the nature of insider trading restrictions as they will be applied to crypto assets has yet to be revealed. Nikkei speculated that such restrictions would likely be similar to those applied to conventional financial products. Last week, the Asia Web3 Alliance Japan, a crypto advocacy group, put forward a proposal to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that, if implemented, would see collaboration between the U.S. regulator and Japan’s FSA, its central bank and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. The objective of the proposal is to bring about cross-border regulatory clarity related to the further development of the Web3 ecosystem in both Japan and the U.S.

Amid the heightened excitement about the potential incorporation of virtual assets into the traditional financial system, the Korea Exchange (KRX), the country’s only securities exchange operator, plans to run a pilot test on central bank digital currency (CBDC) transactions using distributed ledger technology (DLT). The pilot test is scheduled in the second half of this year, as part of KRX’s effort to respond to rapidly evolving financial technologies, Yonhap Infomax reported.  The KRX is targeting the carbon trading market for this pilot test, aiming to develop a DLT-driven carbon trading system. The objective of this initiative is to check the feasibility of applying the Delivery versus Payment (DVP) to carbon credit trading facilitated by dedicated tokens. The project will be undertaken in cooperation with the Bank of Korea (BOK), with whom the KRX signed a memorandum of understanding last year to forge digital financial infrastructure. Additionally, the exchange is planning to create a cloud-based settlement and payment system for brokerage and non-brokerage firms.Photo by Marcin Jozwiak on UnsplashLG CNS, an integrated security system provider, and Koscom, a financial IT company, will supervise the CBDC pilot program. They are tasked with conducting a comprehensive assessment of the entire process, from developing the decentralized ledger payment system to assuring its quality.  Broad application of DLTA DLT system records all transactions on a peer-to-peer network and verifies them through every participant. This eliminates the need for a central authority, thereby increasing its reliability and transparency. Currently, the DLT is of particular interest to many financial institutions worldwide, including the SIX Swiss Exchange. These financial institutions are actively experimenting with CBDC to improve the security and efficiency of their DVP settlements.  In particular, the carbon credit market is experiencing a significant integration with the DLT. A KRX official said that the exchange plans to test the maturity of DLT systems and the interoperability between the BOK’s network and those of other organizations. This will evaluate DLT’s effectiveness within the carbon credit market. The person added that this pilot test aims to establish technological standards regarding the CBDC payment and blockchain network registration, which will provide a critical reference for future technical experiments in the industry. 

Recent developments in the cryptocurrency market reveal that mainland Chinese citizens will face restrictions in purchasing Bitcoin and Ether exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in Hong Kong. This restriction stems from China's ban on crypto transactions, which has been in effect for several years. Bloomberg data analyst Jack Wang highlighted this issue, indicating that the upcoming launch of spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs in Hong Kong will not facilitate market access for investors in mainland China.Photo by Traxer on UnsplashSpot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs approved in Hong KongDespite Hong Kong's approval of spot BTC and ETH ETFs, major Chinese asset managers such as China Asset Management, Harvest Global Investments, and Bosera have established these products through their Hong Kong subsidiaries. However, despite their close ties with mainland China, these ETF issuers are unable to offer Bitcoin or Ether exposure to investors within the jurisdiction due to regulatory constraints. Exclusion of mainland Chinese investorsWang emphasized during a Bloomberg webinar that mainland Chinese citizens will not be able to participate in these ETFs, citing a statement from the Chinese State Council issued in September 2021. This statement prohibits financial institutions from engaging in crypto-related transactions, including account creation, fund transfers, and clearing services. As a result, Chinese investors are unlikely to engage with these products in the short term. Impact on regulatory environment and market accessWang expressed skepticism about the potential impact of spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs in Hong Kong on the regulatory environment in mainland China. He stated that the launch of these ETFs is unlikely to open the crypto market to Chinese investors in the foreseeable future. Thomas Zhu, head of digital assets at China Asset Management, noted that the eligibility of mainland Chinese investors to acquire crypto ETFs in Hong Kong depends on forthcoming regulatory modifications. He highlighted the Mainland-Hong Kong Stock Connect, which allows mainland investors to trade eligible Hong Kong stocks and ETFs since 2014. Comparison with U.S. Bitcoin ETF marketDespite optimism surrounding the launch of spot crypto ETFs in Hong Kong, Bloomberg analyst James Seyffart drew attention to the significant difference in market size between the U.S. and Hong Kong ETF markets. Seyffart pointed out that Bitcoin ETFs in the United States have more assets than all ETFs in Hong Kong combined, emphasizing the vast disparity in market scale and impact. As the launch date for spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs in Hong Kong approaches, stakeholders continue to monitor regulatory developments and market dynamics closely.