Ret Games Teams Up with Binance to Support Blockchain Acceleration Program

South Korea Reveals Guidelines for Public Officials’ Virtual Asset DisclosureSouth Korea’s high-ranking government officials will soon be obliged to divulge specific information regarding their virtual asset holdings, including types and quantities, as part of their wealth declaration process. The Ministry of Personnel Management (MPM) issued a press release yesterday, announcing revisions to the Enforcement Decree of the Public Service Ethics Act. These amendments are slated to come into effect on December 14.Photo by Chris Boland on UnsplashIn addition, officials holding positions of rank one or higher will be required to disclose the methods through which they acquired their virtual assets. They must also furnish documentation of transaction records for a period of one year.These amendments to the decree come in the wake of the revised Public Service Ethics Act, which was passed in May. The primary aim of this act is to make it obligatory for government employees to declare their virtual asset holdings. The changes to the decree can be summarized into five main points.Types and amountsFirst, officials obligated to disclose their wealth must report the types and amounts of virtual assets. The prices of virtual assets traded on Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, and Korbit — all virtual asset service providers (VASPs) designated by the Commissioner of the National Tax Service — are required to be reported using the average daily price observed on the reporting day. As for other assets, their values should align with their most recent market prices. In cases where determining these prices is not feasible, they should be reported at reasonable values that reflect transaction prices.Acquisition methodsSecond, high-level public officials must explain how they acquired virtual assets. Under the existing regulation, officials are obligated to reveal both the date and method of acquisition, along with the source of funds. However, following the adoption of the updated decree, they will also be required to provide analogous information for virtual assets.Year-long transaction historyThird, comprehensive guidelines will be established to outline the process of reporting virtual asset transaction history records. Officials subject to the disclosure requirement must divulge all virtual asset transactions conducted within the past year, even if they do not possess such assets on the day of reporting. They are obligated to furnish documentation prepared by VASPs.Officials and their family membersFourth, officials are required to permit VASPs and other relevant institutions to provide the Government Ethics Committee with information on virtual asset holdings owned by both themselves and their family members. This will be facilitated through the inclusion of virtual assets in the existing information provision agreement, similar to the approach applied to other types of assets such as real estate.Addressing conflict of interestLastly, the revised decree could potentially impose restrictions on certain public officials with regard to possessing virtual assets, especially when their responsibilities encompass tasks like formulating relevant policies, granting approval for virtual assets, and overseeing taxation matters related to them. The outcomes of these restrictions will be reported on an annual basis to the Government Ethics Committee.In a briefing regarding this development, MPM Vice Minister Lee In-ho underscored the significance of the amended decree as the regulatory framework for enforcing the requirement of public officials to declare their virtual assets. He highlighted the Korean government’s commitment to ensuring that public servants adhere to accurate reporting practices concerning virtual assets, thereby preventing unlawful accumulation of wealth.

Hana Bank Teams Up with Content Distributor Danal Ent to Establish Security Token EcosystemHana Bank and Hana Securities, affiliates of South Korea’s renowned Hana Financial Group, have recently entered into a business agreement with content distributor Danal Entertainment as reported by local news outlet Newsis. The purpose of this collaboration is to establish a security token ecosystem centered around content and explore mutually beneficial business prospects.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashIP-backed security tokensUnder this agreement, their security token ecosystem will leverage Danal Entertainment’s diverse intellectual properties (IPs) associated with music, movies, goods, and concerts. Through the tokenization of copyrights, patents, and trademarks, the collaborative group aims to introduce cutting-edge digital financial services that provide convenient and user-friendly means of purchasing and managing a wide range of tangible and intangible assets.Legislative push in parliamentTheir collaboration aligns with the ongoing efforts within the Korean financial authority and political circles to promote security token legislation. It was reported earlier that proposed amendments to the Electronic Securities Act and the Capital Markets Act, which aim to legalize security tokens, will be submitted to the National Assembly later this month.Choi Won-young, the Managing Director of the Digital Division at Hana Securities, emphasized that this partnership seeks to establish a successful security token business model within the content and entertainment sector. Furthermore, he expressed the company’s commitment to delivering innovative digital financial services that utilize content-based security tokens, thereby creating new experiences and value for customers.Lim Yoo-yup, the CEO of Danal Entertainment, highlighted their aspiration to revolutionize the Korean content industry by streamlining the process of content creation and consumption. The expectation is to introduce a new paradigm in the industry by making it easier for users to engage with content.Danal’s setback and resilienceMeanwhile, Danal Entertainment’s parent company, Danal, reported a net loss in the first quarter of this year, primarily attributed to the decline in the value of Paycoin (PCI). PCI is the native token of PayProtocol, Danal’s crypto payment platform. The loss was largely a result of PCI’s delisting from the member exchanges of the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA). DAXA consists of the nation’s five largest crypto trading platforms: Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax.Despite this setback, Paycoin (PCI) has managed to secure trading support from cryptocurrency exchanges Huobi, OKX, Bitget, and GDAC. Furthermore, Danal is taking measures to remedy the situation. They are focusing on providing major cryptocurrency payment solutions and wallet services within the Korean market, seeking listings on foreign crypto exchanges, and expanding their presence in global markets.Hana’s blockchain initiativesIn a separate development, the Hana Financial Group has recently been actively promoting businesses utilizing blockchain technology. Earlier this month, Hana Bank joined forces with Korean blockchain firm Trackchain to develop and operate a platform that facilitates art banking services based on Web3 technology. These services involve the exhibition, advertisement, and distribution of artworks.

U.S. regulator, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), has fined Seychelles-headquartered crypto prime brokerage Falcon Labs as part of an overall settlement with the company.  The CFTC had found that the company had operated as an unregistered futures commission merchant (FCM) and furthermore, that it had enabled access to digital asset exchanges without the requisite registration.Photo by Joshua Hoehne on UnsplashSettlement termsIn a press release published to its website on May 13, the CFTC set out the nature of its settlement with Falcon Labs. The parties have agreed that Falcon Labs must discontinue its activities in acting as an unregistered FCM, with particular emphasis on it having provided U.S. individuals with access to digital asset derivatives trading.  Furthermore a fine of $1,179,008 has been applied in disgorgement and in addition, Falcon will have to pay a civil monetary penalty of $589,504. These penalties have been significantly reduced by comparison with the CFTCs original ask, on the basis that Falcon Labs cooperated fully with the CFTC’s Division of Enforcement over the course of the regulator’s investigative process into the activities of the company. In its statement the regulator set out its intent relative to enforcement going forward. Ian McGinley, the CFTC’s Director of Enforcement, stated:”The CFTC is taking the fight one step further by, for the first time, charging an intermediary that inappropriately facilitated access to those exchanges. Today’s action highlights that the CFTC will not hesitate to charge any entities—exchanges or intermediaries—who are providing customers access to digital asset products and services that require registration but have failed to appropriately register.” McGinley added that “the CFTC’s enforcement program has made clear it will not tolerate digital asset exchanges that fail to register with the CFTC or comply with the agency’s rules that maintain integrity in the derivatives markets.” No admission of guiltIn responding to the CFTCs original complaint, Falcon Labs tried to up the ante in terms of compliance. It moved to improve customer identification controls. As a consequence of its market position as a trading intermediary Falcon Labs enabled customer trading on a number of digital asset exchange platforms.  That activity included facilitating U.S.-based institutional customers relative to crypto derivatives trading. It allowed its own account with various digital asset trading platforms to be used, through a system of sub-accounts, by its customers, oftentimes without adequate customer information having been sought. In reaching this settlement with the CFTC Falcon Labs has not made any admission of guilt relative to the regulator’s findings. Alongside paying the agreed upon fines, it will voluntarily agree to adhere to the implementation of improved controls and to withhold its services from user groups that are deemed to be restricted, including all U.S. nationals. Taking to the X social media platform to comment on the matter, Mike Sellig, a partner at New York-based law firm Willkie Farr & Gallagher, claimed that the settlement demonstrated that the CFTC was following in the footsteps of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), establishing “a body of widely applicable precedent.”