Dunamu Helps Adolescents Tell the Difference between Blockchain and Bitcoin

Blockchain-based digital payment network enterprise Ripple has announced that it has acquired in-principle approval of a financial services license from the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). In a press release published on the firm’s website on Oct. 1, Ripple claimed that the approval “unlocks Ripple’s end-to-end payment services in the UAE, boosting Middle East operations.” The in-principle approval is a first step on the company’s path towards full approval. That eventuality will enable Ripple to offer cross-border payment services relative to fiat and digital assets, within the Dubai International Financial Center (DIFC) special economic zone.Photo by Moose Photos on PexelsExpanding Middle Eastern presenceThe company claims that pursuing the license is part of a broader strategy to expand its Middle Eastern presence. It follows on from the firm’s move in 2020 to establish its Middle Eastern headquarters in Dubai. Ripple claims that the licensing “significantly strengthens Ripple’s global footprint as a regulated entity and enables the introduction of seamless cross-border payment services, including Ripple Payments Direct (RPD), in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).” In moving from in-principle approval to full approval, Ripple will have further obligations to accomplish, such as securing office space within the DIFC special economic zone. The company had previously indicated its intention of establishing an office within the DIFC. Back in August, it emerged that Ripple had partnered with the DIFC Innovation Hub with a view towards promoting blockchain and digital asset innovation within the UAE. Regulatory clarity in the UAERipple is striving to become the first blockchain-enabled payment services provider licensed by the DFSA. Once licensed, the company plans to roll out its enterprise-grade digital asset infrastructure. Ripple’s XRP has been one of five digital assets approved by the DFSA such that investment funds are allowed to invest in it, although the regulator did indicate in June that it is moving towards expanding the list of recognized tokens. Mired in legal difficulties with local regulator the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in its home market of the United States in recent years, the company signaled a change of strategy in 2023, indicating its interest in focusing more on international expansion. While speaking at an event in Dubai at the time, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said that Ripple was expanding in Dubai. Taking to X in relation to this latest milestone, Garlinghouse wrote that “regulatory clarity is what businesses want, and what consumers need,” adding that “the UAE understands that.” In the company’s press release, Garlinghouse referred to the “forward-thinking regulatory approach” being pursued in the UAE, which he believes is positioning the country “as a global leader in this new era of financial technology.” The UAE isn’t the only focus for the company’s international expansion. Ripple has established an office in Singapore which handles over 50% of the firm’s payment flows. On Oct. 1, U.S. investment bank Houlihan Lokey published a report in which it highlighted Ripple as an emerging competitor to the SWIFT cross-border payments system.  Although the company has had some success in navigating its way through litigation with the SEC in the U.S., it’s thought that the dispute may be prolonged further as some commentators have suggested that the SEC plans to appeal a recent court decision. 

The Need to Distinguish Between Security and Non-Security Virtual AssetsWith the recent enactment of the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill in South Korea, there is a need to lay out criteria for determining whether virtual assets qualify as securities, says Kim Ja-bong, a senior research fellow at the Korea Institute of Finance, in his report titled “The Implications of Determining Which Virtual Assets Constitute Securities and Investor Protection” released on Saturday.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashThe implications of the Virtual Asset User Protection ActThe Virtual Asset User Protection Act — which will take effect in July of next year — aims to protect customer assets, establish regulations against unfair trading practices, and enforce penalties. Notably, it will target virtual assets that are not securities, deeming it necessary for regulators to determine if virtual assets qualify as securities or not in order to enforce the bill. Assets with characteristics of securities will fall under the jurisdiction of the Capital Markets Act.Therefore, if the Virtual Asset User Protection Act does not provide sufficient investor protection, issuers may be incentivized to issue non-security assets rather than security assets to avoid the regulations of the Capital Markets Act. This further necessitates the act of distinguishing between virtual assets that are securities versus those that are not.Determining if a virtual asset is a security or notThere are two approaches to do this, according to Kim: the passive approach, which avoids considering a virtual asset as a security whenever possible, and the active approach, which treats a virtual asset as a security whenever applicable.He argues that it is better to focus on whether an investment contract qualifies as a security if it is considered an investment contract, rather than simply selecting a specific approach.Furthermore, the nature of virtual assets renders them unbound by national borders, so it is necessary to establish assessment criteria that correspond with international standards, such as those used in the US and Europe.This is especially important because if the criteria differ from international standards, there is a risk of domestic investors suffering damages due to an issuer’s pursuit of regulatory arbitrage between countries.Equitable recognition and potential for security tokensAccording to Kim, the importance of determining whether virtual assets are securities lies in ensuring that security tokens receive the same recognition and trading treatment as traditional securities such as stocks. With such a measure, security token offerings can serve as an efficient and reliable method for raising funds. Although there may be concerns that such a regulation may hinder the development of virtual assets, it may well be an opportunity for security tokens to be qualified and trusted as high-quality financial instruments just like existing securities, Kim claims.Even for virtual assets that are not considered securities, there are many types of assets that are financial in nature, such as e-money tokens — therefore, it is necessary to actively protect investors in non-security virtual assets through financial regulations such as reinforcing disclosure obligations, which is being done in the EU through the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).Empowering regulators for enhanced investor protection and market integrityKim underscored that investor protection and healthy growth of the virtual asset market are made possible mainly through expanding regulators’ authority to protect economic interests and prevent damages. The author also suggested institutional reforms that grant regulators substantial authority, which would enhance their ability to protect investors effectively and provide compensation for damages.He added that regulators should also have the authority to enforce liability for damages or impose civil penalties for unfair trading practices conducted using classified information.

Binance announced on its blog on Sept 9 that its Indonesian subsidiary company, Tokocrypto, had secured a Physical Crypto Asset Trader (PFAK) license from the Southeast Asian country’s regulator, Bappebti. Compliant global growthThe company put itself forward as a candidate for licensing in 2019, and with the licensing award, it became the third crypto entity to be licensed. In its post on Binance Square, Binance claimed that the “PFAK license strengthens Tokocrypto’s position as a regulated and trusted platform in Indonesia's Web3 ecosystem.”  It called the five-year process “rigorous,” indicating that the license acquisition was critical not just for Tokocrypto but also relative to the overall development on Indonesia’s crypto and Web3 industry. The licensing now enables the company to trade as a fully authorized physical crypto asset trader in Indonesia. The licensing award comes just days after it was reported that Binance is inching ever closer to obtaining a full trading license in Kazakhstan, indicating that the company is expanding its global presence in a compliant manner. This development is likely to be significant for Binance and its subsidiary in terms of global growth efforts, given that a 2023 Chainalysis report found that ranked in terms of the pace of crypto adoption, Indonesia was placed seventh, making it an important market for the company.Photo by Fahrul Razi on UnsplashBinance CEO Richard Teng commented on the development, stating:“Binance is committed to fully supporting Tokocrypto in its mission to drive the growth of the Web3 ecosystem in the region.” Tokocrypto CEO Yadhono Rawis classed the company becoming “the third exchange to receive [a] PFAK license in Indonesia” as an important achievement in a “market which has 35 prospective crypto exchanges registered with Bappebti.”  Growing user-baseIn its Binance Square post, Binance also highlighted that Tokocrypto’s user base has now grown to 4.5 million users. Additionally, Tokocrypto is responsible for 43% of crypto trading within the Indonesian market in 2023, according to CoinGecko data. It’s understood that Binance has held a majority stake in Tokocrypto since a very early stage in the firm’s development.  Crypto tax revenue surgeRecently published data revealed that tax revenue generated through Indonesia’s crypto sector has surged. It appears that tax revenues have increased despite calls for the authorities to implement crypto tax policy reform. Earlier this year CoinDesk Indonesia speculated that high crypto taxation rates were responsible for a slump in crypto-related tax revenues. In March reports emerged that crypto transactions had increased by over 200%, with Tokocrypto’s Rawis attributing the uptick to a recovery in the Bitcoin unit price across all markets. In early 2025, it’s expected that crypto industry oversight will be transferred from Bappebti to the Financial Services Authority (OJK). With that, it’s thought that some changes may be made to how crypto-related taxes are applied.