Wemade Expands Blockchain Game Platform with Lithuanian and Japanese Developers

HeyBit to Cease Virtual Asset Deposit Services in OctoberSouth Korean centralized finance (CeFi) company HeyBit announced on Monday that it will terminate its virtual asset deposit service, Harvest, on October 2 in line with regulatory guidelines.Photo by Andre Taissin on UnsplashRegulatory limitations“Although we have made efforts to pay promised returns and provide stable digital asset investment products, we have ultimately decided to terminate the Harvest service in accordance with the policy guidelines of regulatory authorities,” the company said in a statement.It further emphasized that the service termination is solely due to regulatory restrictions, rather than questions of financial integrity or credit issues, while also citing its judgment call that running a deposit business is practically impossible at the moment.“Although some customers of other businesses have faced damages due to operational issues, the results of our due diligence report for the second quarter of 2023 were consistent with that of our last four reports, stating that the value of the assets we own exceeds that of deposited assets,” HeyBit said, seemingly referring to the recent class-action lawsuits against the Korean crypto platforms Haru Invest and Delio, who had unexpectedly suspended customer deposits and withdrawals, inciting KRW 50 billion (approximately $39 million at the time of the incident) in damages in the process. The company stressed that it was unrelated to this debacle and was securely storing all customer assets, alleviating potential investor concerns.The company has thus been able to properly handle management operations involving promised returns, additional deposits, and withdrawals for Harvest users up until now.However, it has decided to comply with the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, which is set to take effect next year in Korea. Article 7, Paragraph 2 of this act outlines that virtual asset companies must keep their own virtual assets and customers’ virtual assets separate, and they must own the same quantity and type of virtual assets — including deposited assets — as those that have been entrusted by customers.“We are thus unable to use the assets entrusted to us by our customers as a source of return,” HeyBit said.Planned reboundDespite this setback, the company promised to resume services based on regulatory and policy changes in the future, including revamping virtual asset deposit services.

Fobl Partners with KDAC to Store Part of Customers’ Assets in CustodyKorean non-fiat cryptocurrency trading platform Fobl announced on Tuesday that it has teamed up with Korea Digital Asset Custody (KDAC) to provide enhanced customer protection.©Pexels/Savvas StavrinosKDAC, backed by Shinhan Bank, has been providing virtual asset custody services to businesses seeking safe asset management.Collaboration plans between Fobl and KDACWith the partnership, the two sides will store a portion of Fobl customers’ assets in custody, build a systematic process for custody of projects’ virtual assets and their pre-disclosures, and seek out new business opportunities in the Korean security token market.Fobl’s potential transformation to fiat exchangePreviously, it was reported that Fobl is set to face a comprehensive inspection next week from the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) under the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC).This move from the FIU suggests that Fobl may soon become a fiat crypto exchange in the near future, as the financial regulator has announced that it will first inspect non-fiat exchanges that are preparing to allow fiat trading.

Regulatory crackdown as Hong Kong authorities act against crypto entitiesIn a recent move, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong has issued a public warning against suspected virtual asset-related frauds involving HongKongDAO and BitCuped, marking a significant crackdown on deceptive practices in the crypto space.The action taken by the SFC in conjunction with the Hong Kong Police Force was outlined in a notice published on Wednesday. The notice stated:“The SFC suspects HongKongDAO may be disseminating false and misleading information about itself and its business through online channels.”In relation to BitCuped, it stated: “The SFC notes that BitCuped claims on its website that ‘Laura Cha’ and ‘Nicolas Aguzin’ serve as its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer respectively, when in fact none of them has any affiliations with BitCuped.”Photo by Teodor Kuduschiev on UnsplashHongKongDAO’s alleged misinformationOperating under the name “Hong Kong Digital Research Institute,” HongKongDAO has faced accusations of disseminating false and misleading information. The SFC expressed concerns about the claims made by HongKongDAO, including assertions of licensing by the SFC, engagement in regulated activities since July 2020, and bids for a “Hong Kong Digital Currency Exchange Licence” related to the government’s stablecoins framework.The SFC contends that these claims are unfounded and could potentially mislead the public into believing that HongKongDAO’s services are officially sanctioned and legitimate.HongKongDAO seems to manage at least two Telegram groups, one in Chinese with over 10,000 members and the other in English with over 1,700 members. Within these groups, there appears to be a promotion of the purported “market” price and future market value of the HKD token, enticing investors to make purchases.Allegations of BitCuped false affiliationsSimultaneously, BitCuped has been accused of making fraudulent claims to enhance the credibility of its operations. The company falsely asserted affiliations with prominent figures Laura Cha and Nicolas Aguzin, claiming them as its chairman and CEO, respectively. However, the SFC has refuted these affiliations. Laura Cha is the Chairman of Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX), while Nicolas Aguzin is the Executive Director and CEO of HKEX.Taking proactive measures, the SFC has requested the Hong Kong Police Force to block access to the websites of both HongKongDAO and BitCuped. Cease and desist letters have also been issued to the operators of these websites, demanding the cessation of the sale of HKD Tokens offered by HongKongDAO.Series of crypto scamsFollowing the JPEX fraud allegations in September, Hong Kong faced another cryptocurrency exchange scandal involving Hounax in November. With at least 145 police reports filed and a sum of over HK$148 million ($19 million) involved, affected investors expressed frustration at what they deemed a slow response from regulatory bodies.These incidents have reignited discussions about the need for more robust cryptocurrency regulations in Hong Kong. The city’s aspiration to become a global hub for crypto innovation and adoption faces challenges due to a lack of clear and consistent regulation, leaving investors vulnerable to fraud and manipulation.In light of these developments, the SFC emphasized the importance of public caution regarding investment opportunities that seem too good to be true. The regulator urged vigilance against social media and instant messaging platforms where individuals, not investment professionals, might lure unsuspecting investors.