HeyBit to Cease Virtual Asset Deposit Services in October

OKX NFT Marketplace hits the front on trading volumeIn the non-fungible token (NFT) space, OKX’s NFT marketplace has emerged as the leader in daily trading volume, surpassing long-standing frontrunners such as OpenSea, Blur and Magic Eden.According to data from decentralized applications (DApp) tracker DappRadar, on Dec. 18, the OKX NFT Marketplace had recorded a 24-hour trading volume of $50 million. In more recent trading, that has reduced to around $35 million. Nevertheless, it maintains its lead over its main competitors, whose combined 24-hour trading volume stands at approximately $24 million.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashOrdinals driving volume uptickThe surge in trading volume can be attributed to OKX’s support for Bitcoin Ordinals NFTs and BRC-20 tokens. Notably, the NFT transaction volume on Bitcoin experienced a substantial increase, reaching $121.8 million between Dec. 10 and Dec. 17.Unlike traditional NFTs, Ordinals do not rely on smart contracts pointing to a digital asset. Described as digital artifacts by developer Casey Rodarmor, they lack smart contract features, making their trading reliant on decentralized exchanges and wallets.The Ordinals protocol has been made possible by the Bitcoin Taproot upgrade, which was implemented in November 2021. The upgrade allows digital files to be inscribed on satoshis, the smallest monetary denomination on the Bitcoin network, each with a unique number or ordinal.Strategic focus on BRC-20The OKX NFT Marketplace’s strategic focus on the BRC-20 token standard has also played a role in its success. Collaborating with UniSat, a developer of Ordinals wallets, OKX created an indexing mechanism for BRC-20 transactions built on ordinal inscriptions, further solidifying its position in the market.The Ordinals protocol has not been without controversy, with some, including Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream, criticizing it as a misuse of Bitcoin transaction blockspace. Despite the controversy, Ordinals have gained momentum, contributing to $367 million in sales volume on the Bitcoin network, surpassing Ethereum and Solana.Ordinals and the BRC-20 standard have generally been a boon for Bitcoin miners, boosting their revenues through increased fees. This incentivizes miners to secure the network. Over 49 million transactions have resulted in over 2,250 BTC in transaction fees. Around 6 p.m. UTC on Monday, bitcoin fees are averaging out at $38.43 per transaction.Beyond Bitcoin Ordinals, the broader NFT space has seen a resurgence, with the collective volume nearing $1 billion in November. During that month, the average value of NFT transactions experienced a notable 114% increase, rising from $126 to $270. This suggests a willingness among users to engage in higher-value trades compared to previous months.Speaking with The Block, Nick Ruck, COO of ContentFi Labs, a community-owned Web3 tool suite, had this to say on the development:“OKX has become the number one NFT marketplace after enabling trading of BTC Ordinals NFTs. Blur and OpenSea have not yet allowed trading of these Bitcoin-based NFTs, so they’ve started to fall behind in terms of volume due to the huge demand of Ordinals.”

Dispute Embroils Bitget in Legal Battle With Crypto InfluencerBitget, the crypto exchange registered in Seychelles, finds itself entangled in a legal dispute with prominent crypto influencer Evan Luthra.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashAccount freezing allegationsThe conflict stems from Luthra’s allegations of account freezing and loss of funds after a token listing incident in March. Luthra has filed a lawsuit against Bitget, accusing the exchange of withholding $200,000 in Tether (USDT) without adequate explanation, while also freezing his account.The legal drama follows Luthra’s involvement with the Reel Star project, where he served as an advisor for the platform which is aimed at creators. As compensation for his collaboration with the project, Luthra received Reel Token (REELT), the project’s utility token.Bitget alleged market manipulationUpon the listing of REELT tokens, Luthra reportedly sold 1.3 million tokens on Bitget. In response, Bitget claims it faced a manipulative attack orchestrated by a group of traders attempting to profit from market manipulation immediately after the token’s listing. This allegedly caused a significant drop in the token’s price, prompting Bitget’s decision to freeze Luthra’s account.Bitget states that it contacted Luthra seeking an explanation for the suspicious trading behavior. Luthra acknowledged the token sale but failed to provide satisfactory reasons for his actions, according to Bitget’s version of events. The exchange maintains that user protection is its foremost priority and that it takes swift action against illegal or fraudulent behaviors.$16 million damages claimLuthra refutes the allegations, asserting his innocence and citing alleged approval from Reel Star’s Co-Founder Navdeep Sharma for his token sale plans. He seeks a substantial $16 million in damages, in addition to the frozen funds. Luthra claims that Bitget unjustly deprived him of his tokens, asserting his status as a fully KYCed user entitled to access his holdings.In the aftermath of the incident, Bitget conducted an investigation and offered a compensation plan for affected clients. Gracy Chen, Bitget’s Managing Director, emphasized the exchange’s commitment to user protection and its actions against illicit activities on its platform. Addressing the matter on Twitter, Chen didn’t hold back in her commentary on Luthra, stating that he “has a history of fraudulent activities,” which she says were exposed by crypto journalist CoffeeZilla.The legal dispute has ignited debates within the crypto community. Supporters of Luthra contend that his case underscores broader issues faced by users of centralized exchanges, shedding light on the need for improved user rights and protection. On the other hand, some argue that Bitget acted appropriately to safeguard its users and the market integrity.CZ brought into the disputeThe legal battle has attracted attention from influential figures in the crypto industry. Against a backdrop of a very public airing of the dispute on Twitter, in a recent tweet Luthra invited Changpeng Zhao (CZ), the CEO of Binance, to respond to Luthra’s claim that Bitget spreads rumors about other exchanges. CZ was having none of it, writing: “You should talk to them, right? We are not a regulator for other exchanges.”The case highlights the intricate challenges surrounding market manipulation and token listings within the crypto space. As it unfolds, the outcome could potentially set a precedent for similar situations involving token listings, market manipulation, and user protection.

Web3 Offers Potential for Japan to Rediscover its MojoEveryone recognizes that Japan has been at the forefront of innovation and the development of technology in the past but can it rediscover that cutting edge through Web3 and blockchain? In a recent interview with Forkast News, Yudai Suzuki, Co-Founder of a Tokyo-based Web3 incubator, suggested that it has that potential.©Pexels/邱 韬Re-establishing a competitive edgeSuzuki, who heads up Fracton Ventures, believes that such a pivot is possible for Japan in making Web3 the means through which it can rediscover the innovative edge it has been lacking in more recent years.Despite an historical strength and depth in technology and innovation, Japan has struggled when it comes to adopting and implementing new technology on a global scale more recently.Legacy techEarlier this year, it emerged that leading Japanese technology companies were collaborating with a view to creating a new open metaverse infrastructure called “Ryugukoku.” That project implicates the creation of a Japan Metaverse Economic Zone. Suzuki cites this project as demonstrative of a key issue relative to the overall development of Web3 in Japan.The project involves Japan’s legacy tech companies such as Fujitsu and Mitsubishi. He goes on to clarify that the majority of Web3 projects in Japan are being led by the existing technology behemoths despite the fact that Japan is seeing the emergence of a Web3-native generation.Suzuki identifies that one of the fundamental aspects of Web3 is that every decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) that’s created is immediately global in nature. Allied with that, most of that 18–25 year old Web3 native generation in Japan want to break through language barriers and communicate on a global basis.That outward looking characteristic is positive but it’s not how venture investment has traditionally worked in Japan. He explains that the conventional approach to investing in start-ups in Japan has been to first look to dominate the Japanese market before going global. The Fracton Ventures founder believes that this is a flawed approach in today’s world and that by the time they’ve gotten to number one in Japan, it’s already too late in trying to achieve that on a global basis.Government responsibilitySuzuki places much of the responsibility in affecting a more appropriate approach on the Japanese Government. “If they focus only on these huge Japanese companies, they will not succeed,” he says. He is also critical of the regulatory approach. Suzuki believes that “the government wants to change the laws and set new regulations at an early date,” and with that, such over-regulation has resulted in crypto entrepreneurs leaving the field. Regulation needs to be set on a more flexible basis so that it can be easily updated and upgraded as the technology develops.Global MindsetHe highlights the importance of having a global mindset and being open to different ideas and perspectives in order to succeed in the Web3 space. The entrepreneur points to that Web3-native demographic in Japan, explaining that their mindset has changed to a more global one as a consequence of dabbling in Web3. The same he believes is necessary on the part of the government if Japan is to become a leader in the tech industry once again.