Korea Securities Depository Spotlights the Significance of a Security Token Platform

CMB International Securities, the brokerage and investment banking arm of China Merchants Bank (CMB), has acquired a virtual asset trading license and rolled out related trading services in Hong Kong.Photo by Traxer on UnsplashFirst Chinese bank-affiliated brokerage to add crypto servicesThe development is significant as it marks the entry of the first brokerage firm directly affiliated with a Chinese bank into the digital assets arena. It takes on further significance due to the importance of its parent company within financial services in Asia.Recent reports suggest that China Merchants Bank has assets under management (AUM) of RMB 15 trillion, equating to around $2.1 trillion. Headquartered in Shenzhen, the bank is China’s seventh largest in terms of AUM. Compared globally, an S&P Global Market Intelligence report published in 2024 positioned the bank in 25th place by measure of AUM. CMB International Securities disclosed that it started offering such services on Aug. 18 via a post on the Chinese social media platform WeChat. It explained that the launch followed the company’s acquisition of an upgrade to its existing trading license from Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) on July 11, authorizing the brokerage to offer virtual asset trading. 24/7 digital asset tradingThe company outlined that it has added virtual asset trading via its mobile application, offering qualified investors 24/7 digital asset trading. Following the launch, eligible investors can now trade Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH) and the USDT stablecoin. These professional or eligible investors must open a CMB International Securities cash account before they can commence trading digital assets on the CMB platform. Given the ongoing ban on crypto trading activity within mainland China, CMB International has to ensure that its product offering doesn’t reach mainland residents. At the time of the company being awarded its virtual assets trading license last month, Hong Kong Web3 Association Co-Chair Joshua Chu spoke to that requirement. He stated:“By securing this licence, CMBI gains regulated access to Hong Kong’s dynamic crypto market, yet it must operate within strict boundaries that prevent direct mainland participation, reflecting the delicate balance of innovation and legal constraint.” ‘One country, two systems’“One country, two systems” is a constitutional principle of the People’s Republic of China that enabled the reunification of Hong Kong with China back in 1997. Many believe that while Beijing continues to impose a ban on crypto and hasn’t been vocal in its support of Hong Kong’s embrace of the crypto sector, there is an implied support nonetheless of Hong Kong’s development as a crypto hub.Hong Kong’s separate system allows China to let it develop as a proving ground for virtual assets. That tacit support has encouraged companies like Beijing-headquartered Tiger Brokers to pursue virtual asset trading licensing within the Chinese autonomous territory. Similarly, Victory Securities, a Hong Kong firm with a significant presence within the mainland Chinese market, has also pursued digital asset-related licensing in Hong Kong. This isn’t CMB International’s only crypto-related venture. Earlier this month, the company partnered with Singaporean digital asset exchange DigiFT in launching the Hong Kong-Singapore Mutual Recognition Fund. The development marked the first money market fund to be hosted on the Solana blockchain. 

Financial regulators in Hong Kong are moving towards the presentation of stablecoin legislation following the completion of a consultation process. In February of this year, that consultation process, which received 108 submissions from professional bodies and industry stakeholders, was completed. It was run jointly by The Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB) and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), culminating in the publication of the results of the process.Photo by Pat Whelen on UnsplashLegislative proposal publishedOff the back of that prior body of work, the regulators have now published a legislative proposal, incorporating responses to issues that were brought to light via the consultation process. The regulators concluded that going forward, stablecoin regulation should be considered primarily in terms of those stablecoin assets which operate on a ledger which runs on a decentralized basis. Additionally, no individual or unilateral entity should have the ability to tamper with or control those assets or the network upon which they exist. On this basis, the regulators intend to submit a bill relative to fiat-referenced stablecoins for consideration to the Legislative Council at a later stage in 2024. Before submitting any legislative proposal, the regulators plan to once again consult with stakeholders prior to finalizing any such proposal. As part of what they have set out thus far, regulators are looking to include a requirement for any stablecoin issuer to obtain a license in Hong Kong.  Reserve asset requirementsThey remain open to the idea that reserve assets backing an issued stablecoin could be held in an overseas jurisdiction. However, if the issuer is an overseas entity, it will be required to establish a local corporate entity in Hong Kong, with relevant management personal based within the Chinese autonomous territory. In light of feedback received during the consultation process, the regulator is looking at reducing the attestation frequency that each stablecoin issuer will be required to provide via an independent auditor in order to verify that the stablecoins issued are backed by the requisite amount of liquid assets.  Such reserve assets must be segregated from the working capital of the stablecoin issuer’s business, with the HKMA expressing a preference for a trust-like structure following input via the consultation process. Furthermore, reserve assets must be deemed to be both high quality and highly liquid, which would include cash, bank deposits and government issued securities where counterparty risk is minimized. On the basis that the Hong Kong dollar is pegged to the U.S. dollar, the regulator is content to allow issuers to use USD-denominated reserve assets if they prefer to do so. The legislative proposal also stipulates the need for issuers to have a minimum share capital of HK$25 million or 1% of the value of stablecoin in circulation.  The HKMA foresees crypto exchanges, securities firms and regulated banks having the ability to offer stablecoins to customers, so such offerings won’t be confined to dedicated stablecoin issuers.Back in March the HKMA introduced a stablecoin sandbox with a view towards learning what works best from a regulatory standpoint. It’s understood that a list of participants will be announced in the near future. Participating entities will be able to issue stablecoins in Hong Kong within that controlled sandbox environment, prior to full scale implementation once stablecoin regulation has been fully legislated for.

Several Japanese companies, including Remixpoint and Metaplanet, have been increasing their Bitcoin (BTC) holdings, underscoring the growing institutional interest in cryptocurrencies in the region.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashRemixpoint, an energy consulting firm listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange, recently announced an additional purchase of 32.83 BTC valued at 500 million yen ($3.4 million), according to local news outlet CoinPost. This acquisition took place on May 13 at an average price of 15.23 million yen ($104,270) per BTC, bringing the company's total BTC holdings to 648.82 BTC. Remixpoint's crypto portfolio, including BTC, is now valued at 11.1 billion yen ($76 million) and also comprises Ethereum (ETH), Solana (SOL), XRP and Dogecoin (DOGE). The firm began actively accumulating BTC late last year, motivated by multiple factors, including the positive price trend following the latest Bitcoin halving event, increased market activity after the latest U.S. presidential election and the growth in institutional participation, particularly after the approval of spot crypto ETFs in the U.S. Metaplanet becomes a major BTC holderAnother notable player, Metaplanet, a publicly traded Japanese company specializing in Bitcoin investment, has positioned itself as one of the largest BTC holders globally. As of May 12, Metaplanet’s Bitcoin yield reached 170%, with total holdings of 6,796 BTC. This places it as the 11th largest Bitcoin holder worldwide and the largest in Asia, surpassing El Salvador, which currently holds 6,177 BTC, according to data from Arkham. Metaplanet's ongoing Bitcoin accumulation aligns with CEO Simon Gerovich's advocacy for Bitcoin. In a March podcast, Gerovich said he encourages his friends to allocate "100% of their net worth into Bitcoin." The company’s strategic goal is to amass 10,000 BTC by the end of 2025 and 21,000 BTC by 2026. Reinforcing its influence, Metaplanet appointed Eric Trump, the second son of pro-crypto U.S. President Donald Trump, to its newly formed Strategic Board of Advisors in January. Evolving crypto policies, including national reservesBefore Trump's second term, Gerovich expressed his expectation that other countries would follow the U.S. once it established a national Bitcoin strategic reserve—a move formalized by President Trump through an executive order in March. In a related development, Ukraine is reportedly drafting a bill to create a similar reserve in collaboration with Binance. Meanwhile, in Taiwan, lawmaker Ko Ju-Chun has been advocating for adding Bitcoin to the country's national reserves. In a similar trend, another Japanese firm, Value Creation, disclosed plans last month to acquire 100 million yen ($660,000) worth of Bitcoin, further reflecting the growing interest among Japanese companies in crypto investments. Complementing this corporate adoption trend, Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA) has been shaping its regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. The agency aims to redefine digital assets as financial products under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, a move viewed as an attempt to balance innovation with investor protection. Building on this approach, an FSA discussion paper released on April 10, which remained open for public feedback until May 10, proposed classifying crypto assets into two categories: those used for fundraising and business activities, and those that are not—such as BTC and ETH. This regulatory evolution, alongside increasing corporate investment in BTC, reflects Japan's efforts to adapt to the evolving global crypto landscape.