Japanese firms expand Bitcoin holdings amid growing institutional interest

The recent 19b-4 approval of spot Ethereum exchange-traded funds (ETFs) by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is putting pressure on South Korean financial regulators to revisit their policies on digital assets. The SEC's decision to allow ETFs for Ethereum, the world's second-largest cryptocurrency, on May 24, 2024, follows its earlier endorsement of Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024. This move is seen as a significant step in merging traditional finance with the digital asset sector.Photo by DrawKit Illustrations on UnsplashKorean regulatory cautionIn contrast to the progressive stance in the U.S., the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) and the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) have maintained a cautious approach regarding the integration of crypto assets into traditional securities markets. According to current regulations under the Capital Markets Act, ETFs in Korea are limited to traditional underlying assets such as financial instruments, securities, international currencies and commodities. These foundations are crucial for the creation of financial derivatives, leaving little room for digital assets under current laws. Calls for regulatory reforms and market implicationsThe decision by the SEC is expected to influence the Korean regulators to update their views on digital assets, according to local media and industry experts. Jung Eui-jung, the head of the Korean Stockholders’ Alliance, has advocated for Korea to emulate the U.S. by approving Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs. He expressed concerns that continued regulatory hesitance could lead to investor funds migrating to more progressive markets like the U.S., potentially positioning the U.S. to broaden its crypto market further. Xangle, a digital currency data provider in Seoul, has also criticized the current regulations as outdated, emphasizing the need for revisions to accommodate the increasing relevance of digital assets in global finance. 

As the 2024 F1 season gears up for its launch on March 2, leading NFT marketplace and crypto exchange OKX is set to take center stage by showcasing its logo on McLaren F1 cars.Photo by Jesper Giortz-Behrens on UnsplashThe move, outlined in a recent press release, will see the OKX brand on the side of McLaren’s cars in 20 high profile races. Going beyond a mere branding endeavor, the sponsorship initiative has been put together in an effort to energize the blockchain-centric world of F1, enhancing track-side aesthetics and elevating the visibility of the Web3 company. ‘Stealth Mode’The collaboration will see OKX's branding appear on various elements of McLaren cars, from side pods and rear wings to mirrors, drivers' helmets and team apparel. OKX's logo will be prominently featured during 20 out of the 24 races in the upcoming F1 season. The primary 2024 livery of the vehicle draws inspiration from the OKX-McLaren "Stealth Mode" design showcased during the Singapore and Japan Grand Prix races in 2023. According to Haider Rafique, the Chief Marketing Officer at OKX, the decision to expand the sponsorship deal with McLaren aligns with the increased brand awareness achieved through their partnership. Building upon existing sponsorship dealThe collaboration between McLaren and OKX isn't new. OKX's initial partnership with McLaren commenced in May 2022 as a primary partner to its F1 team and laid the foundation for this continued collaboration. The crypto platform’s livery featured on McLaren MCL60 F1 cars at the Singapore and Japan Grand Prix races in 2023.  Surveys conducted post-event revealed that 80% of attendees expressed interest in learning more about the exchange, indicating a curiosity within McLaren's fan base about Web3 and digital finance. This resonance with the audience aligns with OKX's mission to make the crypto economy accessible to everyone and educate the public about the benefits and opportunities within this space. Looking ahead, Rafique expresses OKX's intent to pursue a long-term partnership with McLaren, emphasizing the value derived from longevity and growth over time. He envisions the McLaren-OKX partnership as potentially spanning decades, fostering generational associations akin to his own fondness for Ayrton Senna and McLaren from his youth. Broader crypto sector marketingThe broader trend of the cryptocurrency sector's increased involvement in F1 is evident, with partnerships like Crypto.com creating NFTs for every lap and Kraken's marketing collaboration with the Williams Formula One racing team. Earlier this month, crypto gambling platform Stake signed a sponsorship deal with the Sauber F1 team. Crypto.com has been a prominent sponsor of Formula 1 since 2021, showcasing its logo at Grand Prix circuits globally and sponsoring the Aston Martin Aramco Cognizant F1 team. The other high profile sports sponsorship forum for crypto businesses appears to be the English Premier League (EPL). In this arena too, OKX has been active, having an ongoing deal in place with Manchester City which it strengthened last year. Singapore-based crypto trading platform BingX recently followed suit, securing a sponsorship deal with Chelsea Football Club.  

DeFiance Capital Secures Interim Victory in Dispute With 3ACSingapore’s DeFiance Capital, a Web3 and crypto investment firm, has notched up a small triumph in its ongoing $140 million legal clash with failed Singaporean crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC).Photo by Sasun Bughdaryan on UnsplashFavorable rulingAccording to a statement provided via a Medium blog post by DeFiance Capital Founder and CEO Arthur Cheong on Tuesday, the High Court of Singapore has delivered a favorable ruling for the firm, endorsing its preference for jurisdiction in Singapore, rather than the British Virgin Islands, which had been advocated by 3AC.The tussle between 3AC and DeFiance Capital centers around the ownership of certain assets. The liquidators appointed by the British Virgin Islands Court, from Teneo, assert that these assets essentially belong to 3AC’s creditors. However, DeFiance Capital argues vehemently that these assets must be partitioned and returned to its stakeholders.Struggle over assets and jurisdictionAt the heart of the matter are assets totaling $115 million, encompassing digital currencies and non-fungible tokens (NFTs), which currently remain under the control of DeFiance Capital. Additionally, there are 69 SAFE (simple agreement for future equity)/SAFT (simple agreement for future tokens) agreements linked to 3AC. Although Teneo places the collective worth of these assets at roughly $141 million, DeFiance Capital’s estimation is more conservative, pegging it at around $120 million.Beyond asset ownership, jurisdiction has become a pivotal point of contention in the legal discourse. DeFiance Capital has steadfastly advocated for legal proceedings to take place in Singapore, where it operates, as opposed to the British Virgin Islands. The recent ruling from the High Court of Singapore lends support to this stance, challenging Teneo’s argument.DeFiance articulated its position, asserting: “Our position was that all the important witnesses and documents are in Singapore and the dispute ought to be heard by the Singapore Courts to ensure all relevant evidence would be available.”With the court’s decision aligning with DeFiance’s jurisdictional preference, the firm hopes that this development will pave the way for more substantive engagement between the parties, rather than being embroiled in procedural wrangling. The firm believes that this will allow the focus to shift towards addressing the core issues at hand.Business riftThe genesis of this legal saga dates back to 2020 when DeFiance was established as part of the 3AC group, operating autonomously under the stewardship of its founder, Arthur Cheong. The rift escalated in February 2022, when Cheong declined 3AC’s proposal to relocate to Dubai, eventually leading to the formation of two Singapore-based firms in May of that year.Furthermore, in the same month, DeFiance extended a loan of $35 million worth of USDC to 3AC, effectively becoming a creditor. Complications arose when 3AC’s founders transferred legal rights related to DeFiance Capital, a transaction that remained incomplete as 3AC filed for bankruptcy.In light of the ongoing dispute, 3AC asserted that DeFiance’s assets should be harnessed to settle its debts. However, DeFiance firmly stood its ground, upholding its ownership claims over the assets.With liquidators advocating for resolution in the British Virgin Islands — a move that DeFiance rejected due to its Singaporean management ties with 3AC — the stage was set for the legal clash that has now taken a notable turn with this recent court ruling.