Taiko Labs Raises Funding to Build Ethereum-Equivalent zkEVM

In a recent blog post, Christopher Hui, Hong Kong's Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB), announced a stringent deadline for unlicensed virtual asset service providers (VASPs) to submit licensing applications, as well as outlining the intention to develop a regulatory framework for over-the-counter (OTC) venues.Photo by Manson Yim on UnsplashUnlicensed VASP deadlineThe Hong Kong government's financial services department has set Feb. 29 as the cutoff date for applications from VASPs that are currently unregistered and unregulated. Those not approved must cease operations by May 31. The move comes as the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) established a licensing system for VASPs, acknowledging a transitional period for those operating before its implementation. Midway through last year, the SFC issued a stern warning to unlicensed crypto trading platforms engaging in what it termed as “improper practices.” Hui emphasized that VASPs wishing to continue operations in Hong Kong must submit their license applications by the end of this month. Failure to meet the relevant requirements outlined by the SFC could result in the issuance of a "no-deeming notice" for existing service providers. This notice mandates that they must halt operations either by May 31 or three months after receiving the notice. Service providers failing to submit their applications by the February deadline are also expected to cease operations by the end of May. As the deadline approaches, Hui highlighted that the SFC is actively preparing for enforcement work, including issuing notices to disapproved service providers and intensifying publicity efforts. Proposed regulatory framework for OTCsHighlighting the specific role OTC venues played in some fraud cases involving unlicensed VASPs in 2023, Hui announced that the SFC plans to launch a consultation on a proposed regulatory framework for OTC crypto venues. The consultation will encompass virtual-asset outlets, including shops and online platforms. Hui emphasized the necessity of regulating OTC venues to prevent investor deception and protect against fraudulent activities. This move aligns with Hong Kong's ongoing efforts to create a vibrant sector and ecosystem for virtual assets. The city implemented a licensing regime for crypto companies in June of the previous year, with companies requiring approval before June of the current year to continue operations. Cautioning investorsHui also took the opportunity to caution investors about the volatility and value of virtual assets. He stressed that many digital assets lack intrinsic value and exhibit price volatility, urging investors to thoroughly understand details and assess associated risks before engaging in related investments. Furthermore, Hui emphasized that only platforms officially licensed by the SFC should be used for virtual asset transactions. Additionally, Hong Kong is exploring a regulatory regime for stablecoin issuers, proposing that fiat-backed stablecoin issuers obtain a license from the Hong Kong Monetary Authority. As Hong Kong strengthens its regulatory framework, it aims to create a secure and compliant environment for the evolving landscape of virtual assets.  

Representatives from various judicial authorities in China, including the country’s Supreme People’s Court, held a seminar recently to discuss crypto-related legal issues. Speculation on easing of crypto regulationsThat event has sparked a wave of speculation within the crypto sector about a potential softening of the official stance in China relative to crypto. The Chinese government banned crypto trading and mining in 2021. However, beyond these speculative takes, no verifiable information has arisen following the seminar to indicate that the Chinese authorities are pivoting and looking to overturn the current bans on crypto trading and crypto mining. A report emerged on Feb. 25 on Chinese social media platform WeChat that the seminar was held on Feb. 23. Among the attendees was the Dean of the Law School of the Renmin University of China, the Dean of the Law and Fintech Institute (China University of Political Science and Law) and officials from the Supreme People’s Court. Photo by Mikhail Pavstyuk on Unsplash‘Virtual currency disposal issues’The research topic, “virtual currency disposal issues,” included consideration not just of the disposal path of virtual currency but also how to establish and improve digital currency supervision going forward. Participants scrutinized both criminal and civil cases that had involved digital assets, with a focus on possible future enforcement strategies. Some attendees highlighted financial security concerns at a national level relative to digital assets, proposing a strengthening of Chinese regulations in order to minimize that risk. One official from Beijing’s Third Intermediate People’s Court outlined past rulings within the Chinese judicial system in crypto-related cases, while suggesting that there was a need for further research to be carried out in order to further refine the approach taken by the courts. Some proposed a need for further research that takes into consideration legal theory together with real-world application relative to the treatment of virtual assets. This view received the backing of Zhai Chao, vice president of the Supreme People’s Court, the highest court within the People’s Republic of China.Establishing legal precedentOver the last few years, Chinese courts have had the opportunity to establish several precedents relative to digital assets. In 2023 the People’s Courts recognized the legal status of cryptocurrency, classifying it as property. Around the same timeframe, the Shanghai Second Intermediate People’s Court published a report which recognized the unique attributes of Bitcoin, with the report also considering the legal treatment of cryptocurrencies. In September of last year, the People’s Court Daily, a state-run media outlet, published an article calling for standardization in terms of the legal treatment of virtual currencies within the court system. Last August a court in the Chinese province of Hubei ruled that investors must bear their own losses from virtual asset investments where such losses were caused by the closure of a crypto exchange. November 2024 saw further crypto-related court precedent in China, with the Shanghai High Court recognizing virtual currency as property, while a court in Shenzhen ruled that an employment contract that included payment of wages using stablecoin was invalid.

Dubai Regulator Hits OPNX With $2.7M PenaltyCrypto bankruptcy claims trading platform OPNX and its founders have been hit with a hefty fine, imposed by Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA). The penalty, amounting to AED 10 million ($2.7 million), was levied on the newly established exchange in accordance with a notice published by the regulator on Wednesday.Photo by Agnieszka Stankiewicz on UnsplashPayment outstandingVARA’s recent announcement highlighted that the fine had been imposed in May and remains outstanding. The regulatory body disclosed that individual fines of AED 200,000 ($54,451) each were imposed on Su Zhu and Kyle Davies, the controversial founders of failed Singapore-based crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC). Additionally, fines were also imposed on two other co-founders of OPNX. The penalties were attributed to failures in adhering to regulations governing marketing, advertising, and promotions.OPNX, established earlier this year by Su Zhu and Kyle Davies in collaboration with Mark Lamb and Sudhu Arumugam, positioned itself as a trading platform for crypto claims following the collapse of their Three Arrows Capital (3AC) fund last summer. The duo has since made Dubai their primary operational base.Further action“In light of the company’s unpaid fine, VARA shall determine consequential actions warranted against OPNX, which may include further fines, penalties, and/or taking any actions necessary to recover payment and definitively remedy the behavior,” stated VARA in an official statement.Dubai is making a concerted effort to nurture the development of crypto-related business, implementing various initiatives in order to bring that about. However, as part of that strategy, Dubai’s regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies has taken a more stringent turn this year, with the introduction of a new regulatory framework mandating that companies catering to retail investors must secure full licensing from VARA.Concerns arose in February when regulatory authorities discovered that OPNX was actively seeking customers for its platform and collecting personal data without proper authorization.Formal reprimandsIn April VARA issued an investor alert, outlining that OPNX was not a regulated entity although it was operating from Dubai. Shortly afterwards, formal reprimands followed for the two 3AC founders, alongside Mark Lamb, Sudhu Arumugam, and OPNX’s CEO Leslie Lamb.Leslie Lamb, in a previous interview with Bloomberg, emphasized that OPNX had not actively marketed itself toward Dubai or the broader UAE market. She stressed the company’s full cooperation with VARA’s ongoing investigation, asserting that no regulatory guidelines had been breached.“While Kyle and I contributed the initial ideas for OPNX, Leslie is very much the CEO, and we aren’t involved in day-to-day operations,” stated Su Zhu, clarifying their roles.Despite the regulatory setback, both Su Zhu and Kyle Davies continued to promote OPNX on the X platform (formerly known as Twitter).It emerged recently that the claims trading platform has been eyeing the acquisition of failed crypto lender Hodlnaut, which is currently undergoing court-supervised restructuring in Singapore. Zhu and Davies have come in for a lot of criticism within the crypto sector, having left a long list of unpaid creditors as a consequence of the failure of 3AC. The duo recently suggested that they would contribute profits from OPNX to 3AC creditors despite the fact that they have been uncooperative with the 3AC bankruptcy process.