Top

Dubai Regulator Hits OPNX With $2.7M Penalty

Policy & Regulation·August 17, 2023, 1:04 AM

Crypto bankruptcy claims trading platform OPNX and its founders have been hit with a hefty fine, imposed by Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA). The penalty, amounting to AED 10 million ($2.7 million), was levied on the newly established exchange in accordance with a notice published by the regulator on Wednesday.

Photo by Agnieszka Stankiewicz on Unsplash

 

Payment outstanding

VARA’s recent announcement highlighted that the fine had been imposed in May and remains outstanding. The regulatory body disclosed that individual fines of AED 200,000 ($54,451) each were imposed on Su Zhu and Kyle Davies, the controversial founders of failed Singapore-based crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC). Additionally, fines were also imposed on two other co-founders of OPNX. The penalties were attributed to failures in adhering to regulations governing marketing, advertising, and promotions.

OPNX, established earlier this year by Su Zhu and Kyle Davies in collaboration with Mark Lamb and Sudhu Arumugam, positioned itself as a trading platform for crypto claims following the collapse of their Three Arrows Capital (3AC) fund last summer. The duo has since made Dubai their primary operational base.

 

Further action

“In light of the company’s unpaid fine, VARA shall determine consequential actions warranted against OPNX, which may include further fines, penalties, and/or taking any actions necessary to recover payment and definitively remedy the behavior,” stated VARA in an official statement.

Dubai is making a concerted effort to nurture the development of crypto-related business, implementing various initiatives in order to bring that about. However, as part of that strategy, Dubai’s regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies has taken a more stringent turn this year, with the introduction of a new regulatory framework mandating that companies catering to retail investors must secure full licensing from VARA.

Concerns arose in February when regulatory authorities discovered that OPNX was actively seeking customers for its platform and collecting personal data without proper authorization.

 

Formal reprimands

In April VARA issued an investor alert, outlining that OPNX was not a regulated entity although it was operating from Dubai. Shortly afterwards, formal reprimands followed for the two 3AC founders, alongside Mark Lamb, Sudhu Arumugam, and OPNX’s CEO Leslie Lamb.

Leslie Lamb, in a previous interview with Bloomberg, emphasized that OPNX had not actively marketed itself toward Dubai or the broader UAE market. She stressed the company’s full cooperation with VARA’s ongoing investigation, asserting that no regulatory guidelines had been breached.

“While Kyle and I contributed the initial ideas for OPNX, Leslie is very much the CEO, and we aren’t involved in day-to-day operations,” stated Su Zhu, clarifying their roles.

Despite the regulatory setback, both Su Zhu and Kyle Davies continued to promote OPNX on the X platform (formerly known as Twitter).

It emerged recently that the claims trading platform has been eyeing the acquisition of failed crypto lender Hodlnaut, which is currently undergoing court-supervised restructuring in Singapore. Zhu and Davies have come in for a lot of criticism within the crypto sector, having left a long list of unpaid creditors as a consequence of the failure of 3AC. The duo recently suggested that they would contribute profits from OPNX to 3AC creditors despite the fact that they have been uncooperative with the 3AC bankruptcy process.

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Aug 17, 2023

DeFiance Capital Secures Interim Victory in Dispute With 3AC

DeFiance Capital Secures Interim Victory in Dispute With 3ACSingapore’s DeFiance Capital, a Web3 and crypto investment firm, has notched up a small triumph in its ongoing $140 million legal clash with failed Singaporean crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC).Photo by Sasun Bughdaryan on UnsplashFavorable rulingAccording to a statement provided via a Medium blog post by DeFiance Capital Founder and CEO Arthur Cheong on Tuesday, the High Court of Singapore has delivered a favorable ruling for the firm, endorsing its preference for jurisdiction in Singapore, rather than the British Virgin Islands, which had been advocated by 3AC.The tussle between 3AC and DeFiance Capital centers around the ownership of certain assets. The liquidators appointed by the British Virgin Islands Court, from Teneo, assert that these assets essentially belong to 3AC’s creditors. However, DeFiance Capital argues vehemently that these assets must be partitioned and returned to its stakeholders.Struggle over assets and jurisdictionAt the heart of the matter are assets totaling $115 million, encompassing digital currencies and non-fungible tokens (NFTs), which currently remain under the control of DeFiance Capital. Additionally, there are 69 SAFE (simple agreement for future equity)/SAFT (simple agreement for future tokens) agreements linked to 3AC. Although Teneo places the collective worth of these assets at roughly $141 million, DeFiance Capital’s estimation is more conservative, pegging it at around $120 million.Beyond asset ownership, jurisdiction has become a pivotal point of contention in the legal discourse. DeFiance Capital has steadfastly advocated for legal proceedings to take place in Singapore, where it operates, as opposed to the British Virgin Islands. The recent ruling from the High Court of Singapore lends support to this stance, challenging Teneo’s argument.DeFiance articulated its position, asserting: “Our position was that all the important witnesses and documents are in Singapore and the dispute ought to be heard by the Singapore Courts to ensure all relevant evidence would be available.”With the court’s decision aligning with DeFiance’s jurisdictional preference, the firm hopes that this development will pave the way for more substantive engagement between the parties, rather than being embroiled in procedural wrangling. The firm believes that this will allow the focus to shift towards addressing the core issues at hand.Business riftThe genesis of this legal saga dates back to 2020 when DeFiance was established as part of the 3AC group, operating autonomously under the stewardship of its founder, Arthur Cheong. The rift escalated in February 2022, when Cheong declined 3AC’s proposal to relocate to Dubai, eventually leading to the formation of two Singapore-based firms in May of that year.Furthermore, in the same month, DeFiance extended a loan of $35 million worth of USDC to 3AC, effectively becoming a creditor. Complications arose when 3AC’s founders transferred legal rights related to DeFiance Capital, a transaction that remained incomplete as 3AC filed for bankruptcy.In light of the ongoing dispute, 3AC asserted that DeFiance’s assets should be harnessed to settle its debts. However, DeFiance firmly stood its ground, upholding its ownership claims over the assets.With liquidators advocating for resolution in the British Virgin Islands — a move that DeFiance rejected due to its Singaporean management ties with 3AC — the stage was set for the legal clash that has now taken a notable turn with this recent court ruling.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Jun 10, 2025

Metaplanet raises funds to fulfill 2027 Bitcoin goal

Japanese Bitcoin treasury company Metaplanet, whose shares are listed on the Tokyo stock exchange (3350/TYO), has taken an important step towards its goal of holding 210,000 BTC by 2027. ‘Asia’s largest-ever equity raise’The firm’s CEO, Simon Gerovich, took to the X social media platform on June 6 to outline details of what he termed “Asia’s largest-ever equity raise.” Gerovich stated that Metaplanet had raised 770.9 billion yen ($5.4 billion) by means of moving strike warrants, implicating 555 million shares. Moving strike warrants are a type of equity warrant through which the strike price changes over time. Photo by Cullen Cedric on UnsplashGerovich claimed that the warrants were issued at a premium to the market due to Metaplanet’s “high volatility and deep liquidity.” The Metaplanet CEO stated that the firm is targeting 100,000 BTC by the end of 2026 and 210,000 by the end of 2027. On June 2, the firm announced that it had acquired its latest tranche of Bitcoin, adding another 1,088 BTC to its corporate treasury. The company paid an average Bitcoin unit price of 15,519,019 yen ($107,000). Metaplanet has adopted the treasury playbook first pioneered by Michael Saylor’s Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy), acquiring the leading crypto asset through a combination of equity issuance, debt financing and opportunistic buying.  Russell Okung, a former professional American football player and well-known Bitcoin proponent, took to X on June 6 to highlight that Saylor “lit the match” through Strategy in the United States.  Okung stated: “Metaplanet just launched the rocket in Asia. When capital moves, narratives follow.”He added that “Metaplanet didn’t just buy Bitcoin. They’re directing global attention toward Japan.” Both Metaplanet and Strategy have appealed to investors who are otherwise not in a position to gain exposure to Bitcoin directly, either as a result of regulatory issues or concerns with regard to the custody of the digital asset.  Corporate treasuries adopting BitcoinIn addition to these companies who have led first with a Bitcoin treasury as their primary attraction, other corporates have added Bitcoin to their corporate treasuries while maintaining their focus on other business activities.  Announcements have come thick and fast over the course of recent weeks, particularly in the Asian region.  A number of Nasdaq-listed companies, including Hong Kong-based Reitar Holdings, Indonesian fintech firm DigiAsia, Malaysia-based Treasure Global and South Korea-based K Wave Media, have all announced the addition of Bitcoin to their corporate treasuries.  Metaplanet’s new funding round will put it on track to achieve the goal of obtaining 210,000 BTC by 2027, equating to approximately 1% of the entire Bitcoin supply. The Japanese firm’s shares have risen in price by over 275% since the beginning of this year. According to BitcoinTreasuries.net, Strategy remains the largest corporate treasury holder of Bitcoin with 582,000 BTC. It’s followed by MARA Holdings, Twenty One, Riot Platforms, Galaxy Digital Holdings and CleanSpark. Tesla, Hut 8 Mining Corp and Coinbase Global also feature prior to Metaplanet which comes in tenth place.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Mar 15, 2024

India’s SEBI head wants instant settlement to counter crypto threat

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) is set to introduce a same-day settlement cycle starting March 28, making India only the second country, following China, to adopt such a system. This move comes amidst growing competition from the cryptocurrency sector, with SEBI Chairperson Madhabi Puri Buch emphasizing the need for instant settlement and tokenization to remain competitive.Photo by Big G Media on UnsplashEvolving market dynamicsBuch has unveiled plans aimed at enhancing the efficiency of India's capital markets through faster settlement processes. During a recent press conference, she highlighted the significance of adapting to evolving market dynamics. Buch stated:“If our well-regulated market cannot compete with the crypto world and cannot say we also offer you tokenization and instantaneous settlement over the medium term, I won’t even say long term, you should expect investors to move." The SEBI chairperson articulated that we live in a time where the current generation demands instant delivery of services. It’s with that in mind Buch believes that crypto is a threat to traditional financial markets. She stated:"Everybody wants instant everything. Right? So why should anyone believe that tomorrow if an alternative is available with instant settlement tokenization and they say the regulated market doesn’t offer it, you should expect people to move.” With a focus on meeting investor expectations for instant transactions, SEBI aims to bridge the gap between traditional capital markets and the rapidly evolving crypto landscape. Faster settlement cyclesIndia has been at the forefront of adopting faster settlement cycles, having transitioned to a one-day settlement (T+1) model between 2021 and January 2023. The optional same-day settlement, scheduled to commence later this month, represents another step towards enhancing market efficiency. However, Buch cautioned that further delays in embracing instant settlement could lead to a significant portion of the market shifting towards cryptocurrencies. The move towards faster settlement has been met with enthusiasm from some market participants. Indian business news publication Mint reported the comments of Shauryam Gupta, CEO of web trading platform Rupeezy, on the subject. Gupta stated: “The shift to instantaneous settlement is a substantial milestone, streamlining operations and cutting down on risk. The potential advantages of reducing counterparty risk and boosting liquidity signal positive growth for the sector.” However, others, particularly brokers, have expressed reservations. Brokers, who hold client funds and earn interest on balances, stand to see their interest earnings decrease with shorter settlement times. Nonetheless, SEBI remains steadfast in its commitment to modernizing India's capital markets to remain globally competitive. The regulatory landscape surrounding cryptocurrencies in India has been predominantly shaped by the nation's finance ministry and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). While the RBI has been vocal in its opposition to cryptocurrencies, advocating for central bank digital currencies instead, SEBI's recent initiatives underscore its willingness to adapt to changing market dynamics. SEBI's efforts reflect a broader trend of regulatory bodies worldwide seeking to strike a balance between innovation and investor protection in an increasingly digital financial landscape. 

news
Loading