Korean Firms Join Forces to Expand the Security Token Market

Russians will continue to have access to crypto markets despite the application of sanctions, according to a senior Russian official. Impossible to completely block marketThat’s the view of Anton Gorelkin, the deputy head of the State Duma committee on information policy. In a report published by Russian state-owned news agency TASS on March 6, Gorelkin is quoted as stating: "It should be recognized that it is impossible to completely block this market for Russia." Gorelkin added that crypto remains one of the mechanisms through which international sanctions being applied to Russia can be circumvented. Russian firms have increasingly been using Bitcoin and crypto in international trade to circumvent sanctions. The Russian official’s comments come as Russian crypto exchange Garantex has been forced to suspend its services. Last month, the Council of the European Union (EU) had added the exchange to its latest Russian sanctions package. This was part of the EU’s sixteenth sanctions package against Russia since the conflict in Ukraine began. It’s the first time that a crypto exchange has been included within any such sanctions. The EU did so on the assertion that Garantex is “closely associated with EU-sanctioned Russian banks.” Photo by Michael Parulava on UnsplashTether ‘enters war’ against Russian crypto marketThe crypto exchange took the decision to suspend its services following an action taken by leading stablecoin issuer, Tether. Taking to Telegram, the exchange stated: “We have bad news, Tether has entered the war against the Russian crypto market and blocked our wallets worth more than 2.5 billion rubles [$27 million].” The exchange took the opportunity to warn its users that “all USDT in Russian wallets is currently under threat.” Garantex added that it has been the first to be hit with such a measure, but that it won’t be the last. The firm said that it “will fight, and [it] will not give up.”  Tether has been under the spotlight of regulators and governments globally in recent years. In response, it appears to have incorporated the freezing of funds subject to sanctions more recently, with closer cooperation with law enforcement and government agencies. Last year, the company outlined that it planned to freeze funds held in addresses related to countries or companies subject to sanctions. Last September, Tether claimed to have played a role in an operation carried out by the Dutch authorities and U.S. Secret Service that led to the takedown of two crypto exchanges, Cryptex and PM2BTC, who were alleged to have been involved in money laundering. Garantex had already been subject to U.S. sanctions since April 2022. At the time, the U.S. authorities described the exchange as a "ransomware-enabling virtual currency exchange." The firm was originally established in Estonia in 2019. Commenting on the development, Gorelkin stated:  "To the investors who underestimated this risk, my condolences."  He also asserted that the latest round of sanctions will not be the last in attempts to apply pressure on Russian cryptocurrency firms and crypto sector infrastructure within Russia. While he believes that crypto remains a tool to get around sanctions, he stated that “USDT can be safely deleted from this list.”

As cryptocurrencies increasingly position themselves as a recognized asset class and potential hedge against fiat inflation, illicit activity tied to digital tokens is becoming more visible. A recent high-profile case in the UK has brought this issue into sharp focus, centering on a fraud scheme originating in China. According to BBC News, the case involves Qian Zhimin, a woman who raised funds from more than 100,000 investors in China by claiming to operate a crypto mining company that also develops health products. Instead, she laundered the proceeds and fled the country. On Nov. 11, Qian was sentenced to 11 years and eight months in prison by a UK court.Photo by Vasilis Chatzopoulos on Unsplash$6B fraud and lavish lifestyle​Qian entered Britain on a forged passport in September 2017 and proceeded to live an extravagant lifestyle, renting a mansion in Hampstead for over £17,000 ($22,700) per month. She was arrested in northern England in April 2024, and it was found that she held roughly 61,000 Bitcoin, valued at roughly £5 billion ($6.6 billion), having converted portions of her holdings to cover her substantial living expenses. ​The sheer scale of her wealth was revealed after police searched her rented residence, discovering the Bitcoin reserves on hard drives and laptops. It marks the largest crypto seizure ever recorded in the UK. During the raid, officers also found four other individuals at the property illegally employed to handle household tasks such as shopping, cleaning, and security. ​Since Qian’s arrival in the UK, the value of her Bitcoin holdings has appreciated more than 20-fold. With the fraudster now sentenced, victims are seeing a glimmer of hope for restitution. A civil case scheduled for early next year will determine the fate of the seized assets. However, while many defrauded Chinese investors are reportedly preparing to file claims, establishing a clear paper trail may prove difficult. Many victims routed funds through local intermediaries rather than transferring them directly to Qian’s firm. ​U.S. Bitcoin forfeiture and Beijing’s allegationsWhile the UK courts grapple with the aftermath of Qian’s fraud, a separate crypto controversy is brewing between the U.S. and China, highlighting Beijing's continued vigilance over the sector despite its 2021 ban on trading and mining. According to Cointelegraph, the state-supported National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center (CVERC) has alleged that American authorities are connected to the disappearance of roughly 127,000 Bitcoin, valued at around $14.5 billion, from the LuBian mining pool. ​These allegations surfaced after the U.S. filed a civil forfeiture claim in October against Chen Zhi, the Cambodia-based founder of the Prince Group, who is believed to have owned the assets prior to the breach. At the time of the filing, the U.S. Treasury Department noted that the funds were already under its control. ​CVERC contends that Washington hasn't explained how it accessed the assets. Citing data from analytics firm Arkham, the Chinese agency suggested the funds had been under U.S. control for over a year. They argued that the prolonged inactivity of the Bitcoin before the formal seizure is inconsistent with the typical behavior of hackers seeking quick profit, implying state-level involvement. Economic chess between Washington and BeijingThis matter of Bitcoin control adds a new layer of complexity to U.S.–China relations, even as a trade truce between the two countries took effect on Nov. 10. In a report by CNBC, Washington cut tariffs on China’s fentanyl-linked imports to 10% and extended a reciprocal rate reduction under that agreement. In exchange, Beijing is said to have eased certain restrictions on rare earth exports. Analysts at Morgan Stanley suggest that China is maintaining its export-control regime, implemented in April, to retain strategic leverage. They caution that recurring negotiations and strategic divergence will remain defining features of the evolving bilateral relationship. 

Hong Kong’s insurance regulator is drafting rules that would bring insurers’ cryptocurrency exposure under a risk-based capital framework. According to Bloomberg, the Insurance Authority of Hong Kong is preparing a risk-based capital framework that would impose a 100% risk charge on insurers’ crypto holdings. The proposal distinguishes among crypto exposures, assigning stablecoin investments risk charges based on the fiat currency backing the Hong Kong-regulated token rather than applying a uniform treatment. The regulator is also considering capital incentives to channel insurers’ investment into infrastructure projects supporting Hong Kong or mainland China, including those listed or issued within the city. The Insurance Authority said the regime is designed to bolster the industry while promoting broader economic development. A public consultation on the rules is scheduled to run from February to April, ahead of any legislative submission.Photo by Vlad Deep on UnsplashStablecoin licensing focuses on robust reservesSeparately, the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau is advancing other regulatory initiatives in the digital asset space. Secretary Christopher Hui indicated that the first batch of stablecoin licenses is expected to be issued early next year. According to the Hong Kong Economic Times, Hui noted that the government had received 36 stablecoin license applications by the end of September, following the implementation of the Stablecoins Ordinance in August. Regulators are prioritizing applicants that demonstrate strong reserve management, price stability, and robust anti–money laundering (AML) controls. Hui added that the government is currently collaborating with the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) to finalize licensing rules for virtual asset trading platforms and custodial service providers, with proposals expected to reach the Legislative Council next year. StanChart and Ant’s tokenized depositsWhile regulators refine the rulebook, the traditional banking sector is moving forward with the technology underpinning the digital pivot. Standard Chartered has collaborated with Ant International to launch a tokenized deposit solution on Whale, Ant’s blockchain-powered treasury management platform. As reported by Tech in Asia, the solution enables real-time transfers in Hong Kong dollars, offshore yuan, and U.S. dollars. This initiative falls under the umbrella of Project Ensemble, a program launched by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority in March 2024 to shape the city’s tokenization ecosystem. Market headwindsThese developments follow the crypto sector’s entry into Hong Kong’s equity market. According to Bloomberg, HashKey Holdings, a licensed exchange operator, listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on Dec. 17, raising HK$1.6 billion ($206 million). While shares initially debuted above the offer price, they had fallen approximately 15% to HK$5.69 by Dec. 22. The lackluster performance coincides with a broader pullback in the crypto market. Bitcoin is currently trading below $89,000, roughly 30% off its October peak. Institutional caution is also evident in global flows. According to CoinShares, crypto investment products recorded $952 million in net outflows for the week ending Dec. 20. Ethereum and Bitcoin products led the exit with outflows of $555 million and $460 million, respectively. Conversely, altcoins XRP and Solana bucked the trend, seeing inflows of $62.9 million and $48.5 million. James Butterfill, head of research at CoinShares, attributed the negative sentiment to delays regarding the CLARITY Act, a U.S. bill designed to clarify digital asset regulation, and continued selling by whale investors.