Top

Beosin Report: Crypto Rug Pulls Surpass DeFi Exploits in May

Markets·June 03, 2023, 6:32 AM

According to a recent report by blockchain security firm Beosin, losses from “rug pulls” or “exit scams” in the cryptocurrency space exceeded the amount stolen from decentralized finance (DeFi) projects during the month of May.

The report, published on June 1 by Beosin Blockchain Security, revealed that rug pulls and scams resulted in losses of over $45 million across six incidents during the month. Beosin is headquartered in Chengdu, in China’s Sichuan province. The firm uses formal verification methods to secure smart contracts.

In general there were 22 security incidents in the digital assets space over the course of the month. That overall figure accounts for losses totaling $20 million, and represents a vast improvement on the previous month.

Three of the incidents were accounted for by security issues related to hardware wallets such as the Trezor and imKey wallets. Six were rug pulls/crypto scams, two were crypto crime incidents while another implicated a critical vulnerability relative to zero-knowledge proof technology.

Photo by Tara Winstead on Pexels

 

DeFi protocol attacks

In contrast, there were 10 attacks on DeFi protocols, amounting to $19.7 million in stolen funds. This figure represents a significant decrease of nearly 80% compared to April, and the losses from these types of exploits had been declining for two consecutive months, as per Beosin’s findings.

The largest rug pull incident in May involved the alleged disappearance of $32 million associated with the crypto project Fintoch on May 24. Meanwhile, the largest attack on a DeFi platform was a $7.5 million breach targeting Jimbos protocol, according to Beosin’s report.

 

Shifting hacker strategy

Beosin noted a shift in the targeting strategy of hackers and scammers, who are now increasingly focusing their attacks on ordinary users rather than various project parties. To mitigate risks, the report recommended that crypto users enhance their anti-fraud awareness, conduct thorough due diligence before investing in projects, and learn how to improve the security of their digital assets.

The report also issued a warning against using shared or public charging devices for mobile phones. Beosin highlighted the potential risks associated with these devices, as they could be manipulated to inject malicious programs that compromise private keys. This caution aligns with a similar advisory issued by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in April.

The FBI’s Denver office cautioned against using public USB ports, including those found at airports, due to the potential introduction of malware and monitoring software onto devices. Instead, they suggested carrying a personal charger and USB cord for use with electrical outlets.

As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, it is crucial for users to remain vigilant and proactive in safeguarding their investments. With the rise of rug pulls and the ongoing threats in the DeFi space, staying informed, exercising caution, and adopting robust security measures are essential for protecting one’s digital assets in this rapidly changing industry.

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Oct 26, 2023

The Legal Future of South Korea’s Crypto Industry: Necessary Legislation and Systems

The Legal Future of South Korea’s Crypto Industry: Necessary Legislation and SystemsA recent National Assembly symposium organized by South Korea’s Digital Asset Policy Forum brought experts together to discuss the challenges and prospects of the implementation of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act at the National Assembly Members’ Office Building in Seoul on Tuesday.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashInternational modelsReferences were made to global examples, such as the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) — the world’s first standalone virtual asset legislation enacted in the EU — which ensures transparency, disclosure, authorization, and supervision of crypto-asset transactions. However, unlike the capital market, MiCA does not impose regular disclosure reporting requirements or corrections on them. Firms in Japan, on the other hand, are asked to provide disclosure under autonomous regulation through the Japan Virtual and Crypto Assets Exchange Association (JVCEA).Notably, in its recent Policy Recommendations for Crypto and Digital Asset Markets Consultation Report, the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) states that it is “seeking to encourage optimal consistency in the way crypto-asset markets and securities markets are regulated within individual IOSCO jurisdictions, in accordance with the principle of ‘same activities, same risks, same regulatory outcomes’.” This principle refers to the concept that any crypto-asset activity that has a similar function and poses similar risks to those in the traditional financial system — such as operating a trading platform or providing custody services — is subject to regulation that ensures equivalent outcomes, as defined by the UK Parliament.The IOSCO report also suggests that crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) should disclose information regarding ownership and control of crypto-assets, issuer and business-related information, issuer management teams, transaction history and operational description of crypto-assets, token ownership concentration, transfer protocols, and a given CASP’s treatment of the client crypto-assets and their respective rights and entitlements during events like hard forks and airdrops.Hurdles to overcomeExperts at the forum reflected these considerations in their sentiments. Han Suh-hee, a lawyer at Barun Law Firm, emphasized that it is important to determine what kind of information should be disclosed. She argued that it is necessary to discuss to what extent information about virtual asset issuers should be disclosed and whether mandating firms to disclose their financial and business conditions is efficient.In particular, Han underlined the need to consider the differences between virtual assets and stocks when establishing a framework for the disclosure of virtual assets holdings. Unlike stocks, virtual assets possess distinctive characteristics like their borderless and decentralized nature, unclear issuer backgrounds, and the ability to conduct peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions.Lee Han-jin, a lawyer at Kim & Chang Law Firm, added that the enactment of Korea’s Virtual Asset User Protection Act was aimed at establishing a system directly targeted at regulating virtual assets and virtual asset service operators (VASPs) — a significant development from the Financial Transaction Reporting Act, which had until now been the only legal framework responsible for regulating VASPs along with other entities like casino business operators. Virtual assets are now subject to a more systematized regulatory approach.However, he said that the Virtual Asset User Protection Act still has its setbacks because it is undergoing a two-stage legislative process. Lee criticized the fact that the same definition of VASPs outlined in the Financial Transaction Reporting Act had been brought over, which limits their identity to transaction intermediaries, wallet operators, and custodians while overlooking their other roles like crypto management, crypto deposits, and crypto collective investments.Lee also pointed out another weakness: the scope of prohibition on using undisclosed information and market manipulation is broader in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act than in the Capital Markets Act. He argued that enforcement decrees should stipulate the definition of insiders and exceptional cases when deliberating on the prohibition of insider virtual asset trading.Lee thus emphasized the need for a clear definition of virtual assets in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, as it is yet unclear whether they are objects or assets. All things considered, he believes there must be a law that can encompass blockchain-based decentralization, outline the similarities and differences between digital assets and financial products, and accommodate new services that utilize smart contracts.“We are in the process of creating a regulatory system similar to those being adopted in other countries based on their respective markets,” said Lee Seok-ran, head of the Financial Innovation Bureau at the Financial Services Commission (FSC). “Unlike the stock market, which is equipped with regulations to prevent fraudulent transactions and misconduct, virtual assets are traded on multiple exchanges, so we are considering how to interpret unfair trading activities and conduct market surveillance.”She explained that the commission is prioritizing user protection measures and subordinate regulations. “I believe we will be able to create a system for subordinate regulations on disclosure once an overall global trajectory is established. But before that happens, we are working on guidelines for defining unfair trading activities with regulators and the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA).” Unfair trading activities associated with virtual assets include not only those conducted on exchanges but also under other circumstances.The FSC officer said that the financial authority is set to establish legal criteria to distinguish cases such as false statements in white papers of crypto projects. She added that enforcement decrees will define both the conditions for restricting deposits and withdrawals on crypto exchanges and the corresponding limits.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Jul 21, 2023

Shinhan Bank and SCB TechX Succeed in Stablecoin Remittance Pilot

Shinhan Bank and SCB TechX Succeed in Stablecoin Remittance PilotSouth Korean banking institution Shinhan Bank, Thai Siam Commercial Bank’s tech arm SCB TechX, and a Taiwanese financial institution recently announced the successful completion of a proof-of-concept (PoC) pilot of stablecoin remittances. The PoC was built on the hashgraph consensus-based public ledger, Hedera. Hashgraph consensus is a technology that provides an alternative to the more commonly used blockchain consensus mechanisms.Photo by Lea L on UnsplashThree currenciesThe pilot test was conducted to assess the feasibility and functionality of a system involving real-time settlement and real-time foreign exchange (FX) rate integration. The test was successful in implementing these capabilities for three currencies: the Thai Baht (THB), the New Taiwan dollar (NTD), and the South Korean won (KRW). Since the PoC is compatible with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), EVM-based stablecoins should be able to join the PoC framework without significant modifications.More efficient and affordableIn November 2021, Shinhan Bank developed this PoC on the Hedera network in collaboration with an international bank outside Korea, employing stablecoins for cross-border remittances. The success of the subsequent pilot test this year represents a major achievement in the pursuit of more efficient and affordable cross-border payments, especially given that the financial industry has been increasingly recognizing the transformative possibilities of blockchain and distributed ledger technology.These banks expect that this stablecoin solution will allow individuals and organizations to conduct transactions in locally denominated stablecoins, benefiting from remarkably low fees.Kim Byung-hee, Chief of the Blockchain Division at Shinhan Bank, said, “The successful completion of this second PoC marks an important step forward in our efforts to make cross-border payments faster, cheaper, and more accessible to people around the world.”SCB TechX’s CEO Trirat Suwanprateeb echoed this sentiment, stating that this endeavor can help “increase financial inclusion and improve access to financial services for individuals and businesses in underserved communities.”

news
Policy & Regulation·

May 16, 2024

China busts underground bank conducting illegal currency exchanges via crypto

China's authorities have dismantled an underground bank that illicitly utilized cryptocurrency for currency exchange operations between the Chinese yuan and the South Korean won, involving approximately 2.14 billion yuan ($295.8 million). China has a history of imposing strict capital control policies, prompting some individuals and entities to resort to cryptocurrency as a means of bypassing these regulations. According to a report published by local police in Northeast China’s Jilin province, six suspects were apprehended for their alleged involvement in facilitating the illegal operations spanning China and South Korea.Photo by Hyory Liu on UnsplashExploiting cryptocurrency featuresThe suspects purportedly took advantage of cryptocurrency features like transaction anonymity and decentralization to execute foreign currency exchange activities unlawfully. Investigations revealed that the criminal group utilized domestic accounts for fund receipt and transfer, alongside over-the-counter cryptocurrency transactions. Supporting illicit transactionsThe arrested individuals allegedly aided various entities, including South Korean purchasing agents, cross-border e-commerce platforms and import-export trade firms, in circumventing currency exchange regulations between the Chinese yuan and the South Korean won. 

news
Loading