Gulf Binance Secures Thai Digital Asset License

Coins.ph Suffers 12M XRP ExploitCoins.ph, a leading cryptocurrency exchange in the Philippines, is grappling with the alleged loss of over 12 million XRP tokens, valued at $6 million, in a purported exploit.That’s according to various reports that have been emerging from the Philippines in recent days. The incident not only spotlights serious questions about the security protocols and regulatory oversight of crypto exchanges in the Philippines but it also sparked fears of an impact on market sentiment relative to the XRP unit price.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashHacker used various platformsThe reports revealed that an exploit targeted Coins.ph, resulting in the unauthorized transfer and exchange of 12 million XRP tokens in a mere 30 minutes. The hacker behind this incident managed to navigate through various platforms, including OKX, WhiteBIT, OrbitBridge, SimpleSwap, ChangeNOW, and Fixed Float, leaving users and investors alarmed.Coins.ph’s wallet, the focal point of the exploit, has a connection to BitGo, a California-based crypto custody firm, which initiated its activation back in 2018. At present, neither Coins.ph nor BitGo has issued any official statements regarding this reported breach.The alleged exploit brings to the forefront once again, the importance of robust security protocols and regulatory oversight within the cryptocurrency industry in the Philippines and elsewhere. Coins.ph is a major player in the crypto sector in the Southeast Asian country, having more than 10 million users.The hacker responsible for the exploit attempted to execute several transactions, trading nearly 13 million XRP tokens, with one transaction seemingly failing to go through. Following the successful acquisition of approximately 12.2 million XRP tokens, the hacker swiftly moved these assets to different exchanges.Responding to the incident, some platforms promptly blocked or marked the stolen XRP tokens and sought assistance from blockchain analysis firms such as Cristal and Chainalysis. This exploit is being deemed as one of the most substantial thefts of XRP tokens in recent history.It’s understood that WhiteBIT blocked the movement of some of the XRP that has been implicated in the hack. WhiteBIT told The Block: “WhiteBIT, as soon as received a request from the Philippines-based exchange Coins, promptly reacted and blocked 445,000 Ripple.”XRP impactXRP, the native cryptocurrency of the Ripple network, which primarily focuses on facilitating cross-border payments, has been grappling with its price stability in recent times. This has been largely due to the ongoing legal disputes between Ripple and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over allegations of conducting unregistered securities offerings.While it had been speculated initially that the hack would have impacted the XRP unit price, XRP seems to have held up well. At the time of writing, it was trading at $0.526. There has been an overall uplift in the crypto market as a whole over the course of the past 24 hours which may be a contributing factor, with digital asset market cap being up 2.7%.As the crypto community waits for official responses from Coins.ph and BitGo, the incident serves as a stark reminder of the importance of safeguarding digital assets and enhancing regulatory oversight in an industry that continues to evolve and expand.

US Sanctions Chinese for Enabling Crypto Money LaunderingIn a press release published earlier this week, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) within the Department of the Treasury in the United States, stated that it had sanctioned two Chinese nationals and a Hong Kong British national for allegedly having aided the North Korean government in crypto money laundering activities.©Pexels/RODNAE ProductionsThe Americans claim that the funds are the proceeds of cyber crime with the laundered money in turn being used to support the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) regime, including its ballistic missile and weapons programs.Illicit OTC crypto tradesThe three OFAC-sanctioned individuals are Wu Huihui (Wu), Cheng Hung Man (Cheng) and Sim Hyon Sop (Sim). Wu is an over the counter (OTC) cryptocurrency trader based within China. OFAC claims that he has facilitated the conversion of millions of dollars worth of stolen digital assets into fiat currency at the behest of a North Korean cyber-crime syndicate.In 2009 OFAC sanctioned a small North Korean bank, Korea Kwangson Banking Corp. (KKBC). At the time, the agency claimed that KKBC had extended financial services to previously designated North Korean banks including Tanchon Commercial Bank and Korea Hyoksin Trading Corporation. Fourteen years on, OFAC has now identified Sim as a facilitator of KKBC money laundering schemes. OFAC claims that Sim represented the sanctioned bank, and in the process, he was the recipient of millions of dollars worth of cryptocurrency.Overseas earningsThe agency claims that the source of this money was the earnings of North Korean IT workers who had worked overseas, including within the United States. The North Korean regime has pursued a strategy of sending workers into employment overseas in an effort to raise capital in harder currency.Like Wu, Cheng was also identified as an OTC cryptocurrency trader. It’s understood that Cheng collaborated with Wu, and employed a series of shell companies in order to convert cryptocurrency into fiat money.Blockchain data analysis firm Chainalysis has researched the topic based upon the OFAC and Department of Justice data and information. That analysis has revealed that the North Korean hackers and cyber-crime facilitators make use of cryptocurrency mixers such as Tornado Cash and Sinbad. While other illicit entities utilize these crypto mixers which attempt to obfuscate the origin of digital assets, Chainalysis’ research suggests that the North Korea-affiliated actors use mixers to a far greater extent than others.Reward offeredIt’s understood that the US authorities indicted a fourth person who remains unknown beyond his/her online moniker, “live:jammychen0150.” Properties in the United States connected with the three known individuals have been frozen. The State Department has also outlined its willingness to provide a reward of up to $5 million for any information that leads to the arrest or conviction of Sim. Furthermore, rewards of $500,000 each are being offered relative to the apprehension of two of Sim’s associates, Han Linlin and Qin Gouming.In a statement, Department of Justice Criminal Division Assistant Attorney General Kenneth Polite Jr. said that “the North Korean operatives have innovated their approach to evading sanctions by exploiting the technological features of virtual assets to facilitate payments and profits, and targeting virtual currency companies for theft.”

Civic Group Files Embezzlement Complaint Against Former Kakao Chairman Over KLAY TokensA South Korean civic group, known as Economic Democracy 21, filed on Wednesday a prosecution complaint against Kim Beom-soo, the former chairman of the internet giant Kakao, and several executives from Kakao’s affiliated companies. The allegations at hand pertain to embezzlement, specifically revolving around the virtual asset known as KLAY.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashKlaytn’s native tokenKLAY represents the native token of the Klaytn blockchain, which was developed by GroundX, a blockchain subsidiary of Kakao.Legal breach claimsThe complaint, formally submitted to the joint crypto-crime investigation division of the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office, asserts that Kakao executives have breached the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Specific Economic Crimes and the Capital Markets Act.Clandestine pre-salesWithin the detailed complaint, Economic Democracy 21 alleges that following the issuance of KLAY, Kakao’s executives conducted private pre-sales of KLAY tokens before their official listing. These pre-sales activities reportedly raised between KRW 150 billion and 300 billion ($113 million and $226 million). The accusation is that these funds were not channeled into business endeavors, but rather diverted for personal use.The complaint also contends that Kim and other executives withdrew KLAY tokens from the company under the guise of investments, compensation, and service fees related to “overseas investment business” since 2022. The civic group further asserted that these corporate leaders employed a program to manipulate transaction records, presumably with the intent of preventing third parties from discovering the nature of these transactions.