Renault Korea Establishes Metaverse Space for Car Enthusiasts

Terraform Money Trail Leads to Swiss BankAuthorities in both South Korea and the United States continue to advance their investigations into Terraform Labs, the Singapore-based company behind collapsed algorithmic stablecoin Terra USD (TUSD) and its South Korean CEO, Do Kwon, with the latest developments involving transfers made to a Swiss bank.©Pexels/Robert StokoeFollowing the moneyIn a lawsuit filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the United States in February, the Commission claimed that Do Kwon and his company Terraform Labs transferred 10,000 Bitcoin to a Swiss bank. It now appears that the bank in question is digital asset banking specialist, Sygnum Bank.It’s understood that Do Kwon converted a large proportion of that Bitcoin into cash. According to Finbold, the Financial Securities Crime Joint Investigation Division at the Seoul Southern District Prosecutor’s Office has disclosed that it is following the digital asset trail to Switzerland in an effort to secure associated funds.LFG fundsThe funds are believed to have belonged to the LUNA Foundation Guard (LFG), an entity that was established with the objective of building reserves and safeguarding the USD peg of the Terra USD algorithmic stablecoin during volatile market conditions.Roughly 130 billion won, or $100 million, is being pursued, between digital assets and cash held within various Sygnum accounts. South Korean authorities had previously indicated that they were investigating transfers made by Do Kwon to a prominent Korean law firm. Earlier this week, they charged ten individuals connected to Terraform Labs with various offenses.During the press conference in which those charges were brought, the Seoul Southern District Prosecutor’s Office stated:”We have also confirmed that $100 million has been used in several places, not left in the Sygnum account as it is, and some transfers have been made to the Kim & Chang law firm account (at the attorney’s expense) and the remaining amount is about billions of won.”International complexityThis recent phase in the investigation is revealing the international nature of the case and the complexity that brings with it. Authorities in the United States and South Korea have submitted requests to have certain Sygnum Bank accounts frozen. Do Kwon and Terraform Labs are trying through the courts to have the SECs involvement dismissed on the basis that Terraform was a Singaporean company and Do Kwon a South Korean national, and on that basis they claim that the SEC lacks jurisdiction.Sygnum, being a Swiss entity will have to abide by what Swiss authorities instruct it to do relative to the Terraform-related funds held in accounts with the bank. Sygnum told Finbold that it couldn’t comment on whether it had received requests to freeze assets.The bank stated: “We can communicate that after the collapse of Terra in May 2022, on the basis of an official court order, Sygnum transferred more than 70% of the Bitcoin-sale FIAT proceeds into the escrow account of an international and to other reputable law firms.” It added that no Swiss or foreign authority has accused Sygnum of any wrongdoing.

Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA) is proposing new legislation in an effort to prevent the assets of Japanese investors held on crypto exchanges from being transferred overseas. According to local news outlet Jiji Press, the Japanese regulator recently put forward the idea of drafting such a bill. It’s thought that the move suggests that the Japanese regulators have learned from the collapses of cryptocurrency exchanges Mt. Gox and FTX. Photo by Jaison Lin on UnsplashLearning from past failuresWhile Japan already had a higher standard of regulation in place prior to the FTX collapse, likely as a consequence of the authorities having experienced the downfall of Mt. Gox in February 2014, there is still room for improvement.  While funds had been ring-fenced for FTX Japan users, those who accessed services advertised in Japan through the FTX app were deemed to have been accessing a service which fell under an international jurisdiction, denying them the same protections otherwise offered to FTX Japan platform users as a consequence of the regulations that had been put in place. Incorporating a holding orderJapanese media outlet Nikkei described this latest move by the Japanese FSA as follows: “The Financial Services Agency is moving towards creating a new ‘holding order’ in the Payment Services Act, which regulates cryptocurrency exchanges, that will order them not to take domestic assets entrusted to them by customers overseas.” Consequently, the regulator is looking to add this as the latest proposed amendment to the Payment Services Act. Back in September it emerged that amendments to that existing legislation were being looked at with a view towards making it easier for businesses to incorporate digital assets into their service offerings. The regulator has also been mulling over the reclassification of crypto as a financial instrument by amending the Payment Services Act accordingly. Additionally, a more generous tax policy is being proposed. Currently, the Japanese authorities impose a tax rate of up to 55% on cryptocurrency-related revenues. Corporate holders of digital assets have to apply a 30% tax rate, irrespective of income or profits. With that, a 20% tax rate is being considered. The matter became a political issue prior to the East Asian nation’s recent elections, with the leader of the Democratic Party for the People (DPP) backing the application of a 20% crypto tax rate. The application of a holding order has applied previously to companies that have been registered under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. This proposed amendment would see it applied to virtual asset trading platforms as part of the Payment Services Act. Guarding against bankruptcy lossesIf applied, the amendment would prevent loss of Japanese investor funds in circumstances where a crypto exchange platform goes into bankruptcy. Legal precedent set in the FTX bankruptcy in the United States means that if a user’s funds go into a non-individually segregated hot wallet belonging to an exchange, any property rights, even if explicitly outlined in the terms of service, are lost.  A company can make a case to go into bankruptcy in any international jurisdiction, which means that this precedent has potential implications for all market participants. The proposed amendment from the Japanese FSA would serve to protect investors from such an eventuality.

In less than a year since Hong Kong regulators gave the green light to crypto exchanges, there's been a noticeable surge of interest among traditional financial institutions and brokerages eager to secure their digital asset licenses for trading.Photo by Florian Wehde on UnsplashTiger BrokersTiger Brokers, a Beijing-headquartered one-stop trading brokerage with nine million international customers, offers one such example. The firm upgraded its Type 1 Hong Kong Securities & Futures Commission (SFC) license in January to include crypto trading for professional investors and financial institutions based in Hong Kong. The move followed an uptick in interest from mainland China-based firms in Q4, 2023.In a recent interview with Cointelegraph, John Fei Zeng, the CFO and director of Tiger Brokers, revealed that the firm currently boasts 865,500 funded accounts in Hong Kong, managing $18.9 billion in assets. Zeng stated: "Residents of Hong Kong will be able to trade virtual assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum alongside stocks, options, futures, funds, and ETFs [Through Tiger Trade]." He explained that as part of the firm's expansion plans, additional digital assets will be evaluated. HKMA guidance on crypto custodyAs a testament to the regulatory clarity that has attracted firms like Tiger Brokers, on Tuesday Hong Kong's central bank issued guidance for authorized institutions interested in offering custody services for digital assets. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) outlined comprehensive risk assessment procedures and emphasized the importance of robust policies, oversight, and resource allocation to manage custodial activities effectively. Notably, the HKMA's guidance seeks to address concerns stemming from recent industry mishaps, including the collapse of FTX, Terra and Three Arrows Capital (3AC), by mandating stringent safeguards to protect clients' digital assets from theft, fraud or misappropriation. Key requirements include independent systems audits, secure storage practices and transparent record-keeping, underscoring the regulator's commitment to fostering trust and stability in the digital asset ecosystem. Victory SecuritiesIn a similar move to that of Tiger Brokers, Victory Securities, another Hong Kong brokerage, secured a license from the SFC last November to offer crypto trading services for retail investors. The company reported a significant surge in virtual asset transactions and new customer acquisitions, prompting plans to introduce trading discounts to incentivize compliant and safe virtual asset trading services. Moreover, OSL, a licensed Hong Kong crypto exchange, joined forces with Interactive Brokers in November 2023, enabling the latter to offer bitcoin and ether trading to retail investors through its platform. Further underscoring the evolving regulatory landscape, crypto exchange Bybit submitted a retail trading license application in Hong Kong, indicative of the sector's continued growth and maturity. Nevertheless, navigating the regulatory framework isn't without its challenges. Web3 firms eyeing Hong Kong may need to invest up to $25 million in corporate infrastructure and compliance to secure licensing approval, reflecting the stringent requirements imposed by regulators. As Hong Kong continues to refine its regulatory framework and enhance investor protections, the stage is set for further collaboration between traditional financial institutions and emerging crypto players within the Chinese autonomous territory.