Singapore Gets with Banks to Provide Guidance on Crypto Businesses

The Need for Crypto Regulation Improvements in South KoreaAlthough the cryptocurrency market entered a bearish phase last year, there are prospects for growth as regulatory inclusion and market transparency begin to improve. However, the domestic market is currently hindered by deepening monopolies and inadequate support policies, limiting the development of the industry, said Kim Jin-won, Executive Director of Korean crypto exchange COREDAX, during a conference last Friday in Seoul.The conference, hosted by the Federation of Korean Industries, invited experts to discuss the oncoming era of convergence and the current status and challenges of virtual asset legislation in South Korea, as well as the necessary steps for improving regulations on virtual assets.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashGlobal decentralization trendsOverseas, various decentralized projects, such as the integration of blockchain technology into traditional financial markets, have led to the growth of related markets such as Bitcoin futures, decentralized finance (DeFi), over-the-counter (OTC) trading, custodial services, the metaverse, and Web3. However, in Korea, the lack of clear guidance or policy management for crypto businesses and services prevents the market from thriving.Countries like the US and Japan as well as the European Union (EU) are overhauling regulations in order to dominate the global industry and market through blockchain technology and virtual assets. Kim emphasized that Korea also needs to incorporate such flexible regulatory improvements considering the likely possibility that various industries are going to thrive on crypto-related businesses.Challenging existing regulations and calls for clarityHe started off by stating that the implicit regulation known as the “One Exchange, One Bank” principle was created for administrative convenience and is acting as a barrier to entry into the crypto industry. He argued that it is a discriminatory regulation, especially considering the fact that securities firms choose to operate stock trading accounts through multiple banks.Regarding the standards for issuing bank accounts under real names, which will be determined by the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), he argued that they are difficult to comply with, even for banks that already have contracts with crypto exchanges. He called for the FIU to express a clear stance on the retroactive application of these standards to avoid potential consequences such as barriers to market entry for late-movers.“The crypto market — including DeFi, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), artificial intelligence (AI), the metaverse, and Web3 — is growing at an annual average rate of 12.8%, and is expected to reach a scale of $4.9 billion by 2030,” he said. “When combined with Web3 innovation, the metaverse will evolve into a 3D platform business that incorporates the use of payment methods, NFTs, and virtual assets.”Promoting innovation in the crypto industryTo foster such industry growth, it is necessary to actively explore new types of services as well as potential challenges. Innovative financial services should also be designated or promoted through regulatory sandboxes. The regulatory sandbox is a system run by the Korean government that exempts or suspends existing regulations for a designated amount of time for companies releasing new products and services and regulates them post-mortem if there is a problem.Kim went on to propose specific measures such as negative regulations — regulations that outline what is prohibited by law while allowing everything else — to promote new industries. He also suggested that banks should be allowed to engage in custodial services for virtual assets.Furthermore, he highlighted the need for cooperation between payment companies and crypto firms. “Payment service providers like Visa and Mastercard are already collaborating with global crypto exchanges to incorporate virtual assets into their businesses,” he said. “With companies like Tesla, eBay, and more adopting or considering adopting cryptocurrency as a payment method, we must consider allowing collaborations between domestic credit card companies, payment gateway companies, and crypto firms.”He also urged for the early approval of initial exchange offerings (IEOs) to stimulate the crypto market and advocated for support policies for virtual asset service providers (VASPs). He cited examples such as brokering transactions for security tokens, allowing OTC trading, requesting security token issuance assessments through system integration with account management agencies, and permitting outsourcing for issuance operations.

Over Half of Leading Korean Conglomerates Are Venturing Into Web3 and BlockchainMore than half of South Korea’s conglomerates are ushering in the emerging era of Web3 in an attempt to seize new business opportunities presented by a decentralized internet that permits open access and sharing of resources as well as ownership of personal data.Photo by Abbe Sublett on UnsplashSurging interest among Korea’s biggest enterprisesAccording to a survey conducted by local news outlet E Today, 46 of Korea’s top 82 corporations as designated by the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) are pursuing ventures in Web3 and blockchain this year, including those related to non-fungible tokens (NFTs), security tokens, and logistics chains. The survey examined whether the corporations had issued coins, tokens, or NFTs; whether they had corporate divisions or subsidiaries dedicated to blockchain-related projects; and whether they had made investments in blockchain or digital asset-related companies as well as coin and token issuance projects. It was conducted remotely using publicly disclosed information and press releases.Of the 82 total companies, 48 are under the mutual investment restriction system, which prohibits independent corporations from investing their capital in the form of an exchange. Commercial law prohibits mutual stock holdings between parent companies and their subsidiaries in order to prevent a processive increase in company assets through mutual investments. Of those 48, the survey revealed that 32 are engaged in blockchain and Web3-related projects.Nearly 60.42% of the mutual investment restriction group and 48.78% of the total survey group were found to have become involved in the field by signing business deals with blockchain and digital asset-related companies or utilizing blockchain technology themselves.On the other hand, only seven corporations, or 8.54%, had directly issued digital assets or invested in related companies. On the other hand, 26 firms, or 31.71%, invested in NFT-related businesses.Navigating the path to Web3 adoptionHowever, although Web3 is gaining traction as the next generation of future innovation, it has not yet become the dominant trend as Web3 platforms have yet to attract a significant user base. This hindrance can be attributed to the ongoing crypto winter and strict financial regulations.Woo Jong-soo, Director of the Pohang University of Science and Technology’s (POSTECH) Blockchain Research Center and a professor at POSTECH’s Graduate School of Information and Communication, also pointed out that in order for blockchain to exert its influence as an innovative technology, it should be open to the public like Bitcoin. There will be limitations in implementing centralized private blockchains into corporate businesses, he said.But despite these challenges, major leading companies are still pushing their own Web3 and blockchain projects. “The current situation is not an ideal time for diving into Web3 and blockchain businesses, but everyone is quietly preparing while waiting for regulatory uncertainties to be resolved,” said an anonymous developer working at a major corporation.Notably, Park Hye-jin, a professor at the Seoul School of Integrated Sciences and Technologies, revealed that she had received separate Web3 business consultation requests from several teams under the same division of a particular corporation and that these teams were essentially unaware of each others’ ventures into the field. The corporation, which ostensibly announced that it had closed its business, also continues to request consultations, she claimed, highlighting the corporate world’s acknowledgment of Web3’s potential.“Individuals can now monetize and have control over their data, which big tech companies like Facebook and Instagram used to own,” Park explained. “The essence of Web3 is that it is ushering in an era where users have the ability to take initiative.”

Bitcoin is facing growing uncertainty as it trades near $90,000, down nearly 30% from its October peak of $126,000. While the cryptocurrency remains under pressure, investors are increasingly focused on Tokyo, where a potential change in monetary policy could tighten global liquidity. According to CoinDesk, which cited a report from Nikkei, the Bank of Japan (BOJ) is expected to raise its policy rate by 25 basis points to 0.75%, a move that would push borrowing costs to their highest level in nearly three decades. Historically, a stronger yen has often been associated with weaker Bitcoin performance amid tighter global liquidity.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashYen carry trade in focusThe report suggested that higher rates could unwind the yen carry trade, a strategy in which investors borrow cheap yen to fund positions in higher-yielding assets such as stocks and U.S. Treasuries. A similar dynamic played out following the Japanese central bank’s July hike, which precipitated a market-wide selloff that dragged Bitcoin from roughly $65,000 down to $50,000. However, CoinDesk noted that a recurrence of such volatility cannot be assumed. It added that speculative positioning is already skewed toward yen strength, while steadily rising Japanese bond yields suggest monetary policy is adjusting to prevailing market realities. Institutional skepticism toward BitcoinBeyond the macroeconomic landscape, fundamental skepticism remains entrenched among traditional finance heavyweights. John Ameriks, Vanguard’s global head of quantitative equity, said at Bloomberg’s ETFs in Depth conference that the asset behaves more like a speculative digital collectible, comparable to a Labubu toy, than a conventional investment, citing its lack of income generation, compounding, and cash-flow characteristics. Ameriks’ comments follow Vanguard’s move earlier this month to permit trading of select third-party crypto ETFs. He said the decision was based in part on the funds’ ability to establish a track record since their January 2024 launch. While acknowledging that Bitcoin could theoretically offer value during periods of high inflation or political instability, he maintained that its history remains too short to draw conclusions. Bullish case for BitcoinA contrasting view was offered by Katherine Dowling, president of the Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company. Speaking with DL News, Dowling projected that Bitcoin would surge to $150,000 by the end of 2026. She pinned this bullish outlook on favorable U.S. regulatory shifts, increased liquidity from Federal Reserve rate cuts, and sustained institutional adoption via ETFs.The perceived influence of institutional flows was also underscored by a recent weekly survey of 2,000 South Korean investors conducted by CoinNess and Cratos. The data showed that 42.3% of respondents view flows into and out of spot Bitcoin ETFs as the primary price driver. Monetary policies in major economies like the U.S. and Japan ranked second at 26.7%, while 16.3% pointed to shifts in equity markets. Another 11.5% attributed price action to the halving cycle, and 3.4% said they could identify no specific catalyst.