Rotonda revamps Burrito Wallet with cross-chain swapping, added mainnet and more

Hong Kong's debut of Bitcoin and Ether exchange-traded funds (ETFs) faced a tough start on their first day of trading, with volumes falling far below the record-breaking figures seen in the United States earlier in January 2024. Tough act to followThe launch of six spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs, managed by prominent firms including China Asset Management, Harvest Global, Bosera and HashKey, marked a significant milestone for Hong Kong's cryptocurrency market. However, initial trading volumes indicated a notable contrast with the groundbreaking volumes witnessed during the debut of spot Bitcoin ETFs in the United States. On their inaugural day, the total trading volume of the six new crypto ETFs in Hong Kong amounted to 87.58 million Hong Kong dollars ($12 million). This figure, while significant, paled in comparison to the $4.6 billion trading volume recorded for U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs on their first day, making the U.S. investment funds a tough act to follow. Despite the disparity, industry experts like Justin d'Anethan, head of APAC business development at crypto market maker Keyrock, viewed the Hong Kong ETFs' performance positively within the local market context.Photo by Simon Zhu on UnsplashAbsence of stakingD'Anethan told The Block that while the trading volume in Hong Kong didn't match the U.S. debut, it reflected a noteworthy level of investor interest, particularly considering the market dynamics in Hong Kong, which lacks access to mainland China investors. Bloomberg ETF Analyst Eric Balchunas suggested on X that people expected too much and that in reality, it was a good first day’s trading. In an interview with Bloomberg, China Asset Management CEO Yimei Li stated that the products open the door “for a lot of RMB holders.” They didn’t show up on day one as d’Anethan pointed out, and he further noted that the absence of staking rewards for Hong Kong's spot Ether ETFs was a notable factor affecting investor decisions. Data from the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX) cited by Cointelegraph illustrated the relatively subdued performance of the newly launched ETFs. Among them, the Bosera HashKey Bitcoin ETF and Ether ETF recorded modest trading volumes, while the China Asset Management (CAM) Bitcoin ETF demonstrated stronger traction, attracting significant trading volume by the closing bell. Prior to trading, CAM's subscription size for its spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs drew substantial interest, totaling $140 million during the initial offering period. This heightened anticipation was further fueled by the success of HKEX's cryptocurrency futures ETFs, which garnered $529 million in net inflows in the first quarter of 2024. Fee exemptionsIn an effort to stimulate investor participation, local fund managers and brokerages in Hong Kong offered fee exemptions for the new crypto ETFs. Harvest waived its management fee for six months, while Bosera extended a fee waiver period of four months. Despite the optimism surrounding the launch, potential access to the ETFs by mainland Chinese investors remains uncertain, subject to Know Your Customer (KYC) policies. Meanwhile, the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) stance on Ether ETFs in the U.S. complicates the prospects of listing such products in the near future. While Hong Kong's debut of Bitcoin and Ether ETFs faced challenges in matching the fervor witnessed in the U.S., it nevertheless represents a significant step forward for the region's cryptocurrency market, signaling growing interest and participation in digital asset investments.

KuCoin CEO: Privacy Not a Key Bitcoin FeatureJohnny Lyu, the CEO of Seychelles-headquartered cryptocurrency exchange KuCoin, recently shared his perspective on the role of privacy in Bitcoin, maintaining that privacy isn’t the primary feature of the leading digital asset that many believe it to be.Photo by Karolina Grabowska on PexelsUnit of exchange is coreIn an interview with Cointelegraph earlier this week, Lyu expressed his belief that privacy is not the core feature of Bitcoin. He argued that the primary benefit of Bitcoin lies in its function as a unit of exchange, enabling users to hedge against recessions.Lyu drew a connection between the creation of Bitcoin and the 2008 financial crisis, which was triggered by the subprime mortgage crisis in the United States. According to him, these events served as the catalyst for the birth of Bitcoin. However, he made it clear that privacy is just one of the features offered by the cryptocurrency.KYC safeguarding customer fundsAddressing concerns about the increasingly stringent Know Your Customer (KYC) checks being implemented by KuCoin, Lyu emphasized the importance of these measures in safeguarding user funds. While some individuals argue that stringent KYC practices compromise privacy, the CEO believes that they enhance security. He explained that KYC procedures protect users’ assets by establishing ownership and enabling asset tracking in the event of theft.As the cryptocurrency industry continues to expand and interact with the physical world, compliance becomes crucial. Lyu expressed his belief that KYC checks are an inevitable and healthy stage in the development cycle of cryptocurrencies. Compliance measures contribute to the industry’s long-term stability and promote user confidence.New restrictionsKuCoin recently announced that starting from July 15, 2023, mandatory KYC checks will be implemented for all new users. This means that without completing the KYC process, new users will be unable to access KuCoin’s products and services. Existing users who have not undergone KYC will still be able to trade but will face restrictions on depositing new funds.Lyu acknowledged that these new KYC restrictions may impact KuCoin’s trading volumes in the short term, as some customers may choose to leave. However, the exchange remains optimistic about the long-term benefits of compliance. The CEO expressed confidence that increased compliance will attract more secure funds and users to the industry, ultimately enhancing the overall security and integrity of the ecosystem.KuCoin currently boasts 27 million users, reflecting a 35% increase compared to the previous year. Following the announcement of the KYC upgrades, the exchange experienced a notable uptick in trading volumes, with figures rising from around $540 million to over $660 million at the time of writing, according to CoinGecko data.The introduction of mandatory KYC checks is seen as a necessary step to enhance user security and protect their assets. Although short-term effects on trading volumes are anticipated, the exchange remains optimistic about the long-term benefits of compliance measures for the entire industry.

Singapore High Court Recognizes Cryptocurrency as Personal PropertyIn a significant ruling on July 25, Judge Philip Jeyaretnam of the High Court of Singapore declared that cryptocurrency is capable of being held in trust and should be recognized as property.The judge’s decision came in response to a case brought by Dubai-headquartered crypto exchange Bybit against its former employee, Ho Kai Xin, who was accused of transferring approximately 4.2 million Tether (USDT) from the crypto exchange to her private accounts without authorization.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashNo fundamental differenceIn his ruling, Judge Jeyaretnam emphasized that there is no fundamental difference between cryptocurrencies, fiat money, or even physical objects like shells when it comes to their status as property. He argued that as long as these objects hold value and are based on mutual faith, they can be considered property. The judge’s verdict is seen as a crucial step in establishing the legal status of digital assets within the Singaporean jurisdiction.Addressing the argument that cryptocurrencies lack physical presence and therefore cannot be considered property, Judge Jeyaretnam drew an analogy, stating: “We identify what is going on as a particular digital token, somewhat like how we give a name to a river even though the water contained within its banks is constantly changing.” By equating cryptocurrencies to named entities, the judge made it clear that physical tangibility is not a prerequisite for something to be classified as property.Cryptocurrencies have valueFurthermore, the ruling challenges the perception that cryptocurrencies have no “real” value. Judge Jeyaretnam firmly refuted this notion, highlighting that the value of any asset, whether physical or digital, is ultimately determined by collective human belief and judgment.One critical classification made by the judge is grouping cryptocurrencies under the category of “things in action” within British common law. This categorization means that cryptocurrencies are considered a form of property, over which personal rights can be claimed and enforced through legal actions, rather than requiring physical possession.The judge’s decision also referenced the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s (MAS) consultation paper, which proposes implementing segregation and custody requirements for digital payment tokens. By taking cues from the MAS’s stance on digital assets, the court emphasized the legality of holding cryptocurrencies on trust, as long as practical methods for identification and segregation are in place.Cues taken from existing lawSingapore’s legal framework for property also played a crucial role in the ruling. Judge Jeyaretnam pointed to Order 22 of Singapore’s Rules of Court 2021, which defines “movable property” to include various assets, such as cash, debts, bonds, shares, and cryptocurrency or other digital currency. This inclusion reinforces the recognition of cryptocurrencies as a valid form of property within Singaporean law.In April of this year, a Hong Kong court reached a similar conclusion, recognizing cryptocurrency as property. In the High Court of Justice in London the following month, non-fungible tokens (NFTs) were recognized as “private property.”Overall, Judge Jeyaretnam’s ruling represents a significant milestone in the legal recognition of cryptocurrencies in Singapore. By acknowledging cryptocurrencies as property, the court provides greater clarity and certainty for crypto users and investors while affirming the importance of embracing digital assets within the nation’s legal framework.