Rotonda revamps Burrito Wallet with cross-chain swapping, added mainnet and more

Hong Kong Urged to Issue HKD StablecoinA new policy proposal is urging the Hong Kong government to take a bold step by issuing its own stablecoin, HKDG, pegged to the Hong Kong dollar. The aim is to compete with established stablecoins like USDT and USDC, according to a paper co-authored by notable experts in the field.The proposal, co-authored by Wang Yang, Vice Chancellor of the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and Chief Scientific Advisor of the Hong Kong Web3 Association, angel investor Cai Wensheng, BlockCity founder Lei Zhibin, and Ph.D. student Wen Yizhou, stresses the significance of stablecoins as a link between traditional finance and the digital economy.Photo by Chapman Chow on UnsplashHKD stablecoin benefitsThe authors believe that a Hong Kong Dollar-pegged stablecoin can enhance financial inclusiveness, improve transaction efficiency, reduce costs, strengthen payment systems, and boost Hong Kong’s fintech capabilities.The experts argue that the current plan of allowing private institutions to issue stablecoins is not ambitious enough and may result in limited market share. They draw a comparison with Singapore’s XSGD stablecoin, issued by Xfers, which only has a market cap of $65 million, compared to the combined market capitalization of over $110 billion for USDT and USDC. With Hong Kong’s foreign exchange reserves surpassing $430 billion as of March, an HKDG stablecoin backed by the government would offer higher credibility and lower risk.Private vs. public issuanceWhile the proposal acknowledges potential risks, such as legal and regulatory challenges, technical risks, and short-term exchange rate fluctuations, it argues that government-issued HKDG would bear lower risks compared to stablecoins issued by private institutions. The authors assert that HKDG would benefit from government regulation and the transparency provided by blockchain technology.Furthermore, the paper suggests that HKDG could aid in Hong Kong’s de-dollarization efforts and challenge the dominance of the US Dollar in the crypto ecosystem. It is believed that HKDG could provide additional liquidity for government investment projects, facilitate the digitization of traditional assets, foster financial innovation and competitiveness, and increase transparency.Recent months have seen Hong Kong demonstrate its intention to establish itself as a global hub for the crypto industry. To support this, a Web3 task force has been set up to cultivate a thriving ecosystem in the region.There has been plenty of activity of late relative to stablecoin development in Asia. At the end of May, Hong Kong-based qualified custodian and trust company First Digital Trust, announced plans to introduce a US dollar stablecoin, issued and regulated in Hong Kong. Last month it emerged that Japan’s largest bank, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG), is in discussions regarding the issuance of stablecoins on its blockchain network.Competing internationallyIssuing a government-backed stablecoin could be a transformative move for Hong Kong’s fintech landscape. By leveraging its substantial foreign exchange reserves and embracing blockchain technology, Hong Kong could create a stablecoin that not only competes with established players but also promotes financial inclusiveness and strengthens its position as a fintech leader.With the potential benefits appearing to outweigh the identified risks, it still remains to be seen whether the Hong Kong government will adopt this proposal and pave the way for an HKDG stablecoin in the near future.

Tether Alters ToS in Singapore Restricting USDT RedemptionTether, the issuer of the world’s largest stablecoin, USDT, has made substantial revisions to its Terms of Service (ToS), which may have a significant impact on its user base in Singapore.News of the change emerged on Monday, with Dr. Julian Hosp, CEO of Cake Group, the project team behind Singapore-based Cake DeFi, taking to social media and providing a copy of an email from Tether’s Compliance Department, confirming the change. That notification read:”Tether has changed its terms of service to, among other things, restrict its onboarding standards. Corporates controlled by; another entities, directors, shareholders residing in Singapore are no longer permitted to be Tether customers.”In his commentary, Hosp stated that he wouldn’t be in a position to confirm “if redeeming $USDT into $USD is actually possible, due to being in #Singapore.”Photo by DrawKit Illustrations on UnsplashToS Change in ContextWithin the cryptocurrency ecosystem, eyebrows have been raised regarding the timing of Tether’s ToS change, as it has coincided with a major instance of crypto-related money laundering. Conversely, some argue that the issue could be specific to Cake DeFi. The DeFi protocol had been flagged for enhanced due diligence (EDD), suggesting that the modification in Tether’s ToS might potentially be a result of a partnership issue between the two entities.Stablecoins like USDT play a pivotal role in the digital asset ecosystem, serving as a bridge between the volatile world of cryptocurrencies and the stability of traditional fiat currencies like the US dollar. Any disruption in their usage can trigger a domino effect in the crypto markets.The cryptocurrency sector is grappling with regulatory uncertainties worldwide, and Singapore is no exception. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has been actively reviewing and updating its crypto-related regulations to align with international standards and mitigate risks to financial stability.The precise motive behind Tether’s decision to restrict USDT redemption for specific customers in Singapore remains unclear. Notwithstanding that, Tether’s Chief Technology Officer (CTO) Paolo Ardoino expressed the view that the matter is being misunderstood. He tweeted:Spreading FUD”Before spreading FUD [fear, uncertainty and doubt] it would be great if you guys did take a look at webarchive… This is Jan 2022…. And if you open the link below: Last updated: May 12, 2020… Again, take a moment to search and verify information before YOLO [you only live once] posting.”Clearly Ardoino is making the point that the ToS change is consistent with existing compliance policy which has been in place since 2020. Notwithstanding that, in reviewing related records, media outlet Protos found that USDT issuance and redemption after May 2020 demonstrate that the firm continued to do business with Singapore-based entities. The publication cited UQPAY specifically, a Singapore-based payments processor. It was found to have issued USDT between May 14 and May 18 in 2020.

The trading volume of South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Bithumb exceeded that of its competitor Upbit as of 10:30 a.m. UTC on Wednesday, as reported by the local news outlet Etnews, which cited data from CoinMarketCap. This shift occurred for the first time in four years. According to CoinMarketCap, as of the specified time, Bithumb's 24-hour trading volume reached KRW 4.93 trillion (approximately $3.8 billion), surpassing Upbit, which recorded a volume of KRW 4.37 trillion. Until 2019, Bithumb was the leading exchange in Korea. However, it ceded its top position to Upbit, which gained a competitive edge through its collaboration with the internet-only bank, Kbank.Photo by Pierre Borthiry - Peiobty on UnsplashZero trading fees and new crypto listingsEarlier in the year, Bithumb initiated a strategic plan with the objective of boosting its trading volume in order to increase its market share in the domestic market to 25%. To achieve this goal, the exchange implemented several key initiatives. One of the significant steps taken was the elimination of trading fees, aimed at attracting more users and increasing transaction volumes. Additionally, Bithumb broadened its cryptocurrency offerings by listing prominent cryptocurrencies such as Tether (USDT) and WEMIX.Questioned sustainability of strategiesIn anticipation of crypto winter giving way to crypto spring, trading platforms are gearing up for more intense competition to increase their market shares. However, there are concerns about the sustainability of strategies like implementing zero trading fees. Critics argue that such policies, while they may temporarily shift market shares, are unlikely to be successful in the long term. This skepticism is largely due to the fact that cryptocurrency exchanges heavily rely on trading fees as a primary source of revenue.  An industry expert has pointed out that unless the cryptocurrency exchanges currently lagging behind develop innovative, paradigm-shifting strategies capable of significantly impacting the market landscape, there's a high likelihood that the ranking order will revert to the previously established, entrenched market order.  In fact, at the time of this publication, Upbit upended Bithumb in 24-hour trading volume, recording KRW 4.4 trillion compared to Bithumb's KRW 3.2 trillion. This data underscores Upbit's strong position in the market, illustrating its continued dominance.