South Korean FSC updates definition of virtual assets and VASP regulations for Virtual Asset User…

South Korea is set to allow initial coin offerings (ICOs) next year, easing a ban on crypto fundraising that has been in place since 2017. A draft of the Digital Asset Basic Act, prepared by the Financial Services Commission, would allow domestic sales of digital assets if issuers meet disclosure requirements, the Maeil Business Newspaper reported. The measure is intended to address concerns about tokens that are initially listed on overseas exchanges before becoming available to South Korean investors. The legislation outlines tougher accountability standards for crypto issuers. Projects that provide false information or fail to disclose material details in their whitepapers ahead of an ICO could be held liable for investor losses. Liability would also extend to other parties substantially involved in an offering, including outsourced operators and market makers.Photo by Y K on UnsplashStablecoin issuers need Korean presenceSeparate provisions set out rules for stablecoins, barring tokens issued by entities without a physical presence in South Korea from domestic trading, a restriction that would apply to widely used stablecoins such as USDT and USDC. Issuers would be required to fully back stablecoins with reserves such as cash or government bonds held at banks or financial institutions and would be prohibited from paying interest to users. The proposal reflected the FSC’s position on the second phase of digital asset legislation focused on stablecoin issuers. The issue remains subject to inter-institutional debate, with the Bank of Korea pressing for a bank-led consortium model for stablecoin issuance. The ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) is expected to review a consolidated bill combining proposals from the government and the National Assembly next month, with plans to advance the legislation during the regular parliamentary session in the first quarter of 2026. The FSC’s focus on consumer protection is also reflected in its plans to introduce a Digital Finance Security Act, detailed in a recent report to the presidential office. According to Digital Asset, the proposed legislation would establish rules for traditional financial institutions as well as electronic financial businesses and virtual asset service providers. The move came after a 44.5 billion won ($30 million) hacking incident last month at Upbit, the country’s largest crypto exchange. Existing regulations under the Virtual Asset User Protection Act do not contain provisions specifically covering such cases. Separately, the FSC is working to strengthen its response to emerging forms of financial crime, including transnational offenses and crypto-enabled money laundering. It said measures under consideration included adding state-level criminal organizations to the list of entities barred from financial transactions, improving anti-money-laundering (AML) rules to better align with international standards, and expanding the scope of the travel rule. On the supervisory side, the commission intends to make the Virtual Asset Division a permanent unit after initially establishing it as a temporary body, News1 reported. The Virtual Asset Inspection Division within the Financial Intelligence Unit is also set to become a standing unit. Price declines weigh on exchangesThe stepped-up regulatory focus has coincided with a broader downturn in the crypto market. Bitcoin is trading below $89,000, about 30% below its all-time high of $126,000 set earlier in October. CoinGecko data cited by IT Chosun showed average daily trading volume across South Korean exchanges falling to $2.95 billion in November from $4.41 billion in August, with trading fees accounting for about 98% of exchange revenue. The broader market weakness has also been accompanied by declines in altcoins. South Korean crypto investors attributed the recent drop in altcoin prices to capital flowing into major cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. A weekly survey conducted by CoinNess and Cratos showed that 41.7% of the 2,000 respondents cited capital concentration in leading tokens as the primary factor, followed by the growing number of altcoins at 31.6%, their limited practical value at 14.7%, and technical factors such as chart patterns at 12.1%. 

Taiwan has built a prototype platform that potentially could provide for a central bank digital currency (CBDC). In light of that development, there are plans afoot to hold a number of hearings and forums in 2025 relative to CBDC development. In a report cited by local news media, Taiwanese Central Bank Governor Yang Chin-long stated that the development of a CBDC is not an international competition. Yang is not motivated by a desire to be the first to launch a CBDC on the basis that such a thing doesn’t ensure a successful outcome.  At the outset, Taiwan intends to introduce a non-interest bearing CBDC although this may be revised as further development and rollout progress. The system may encompass the use of both anonymous and registered digital wallets, the report suggests.Photo by Timo Volz on UnsplashWholesale CBDCReports last year had disclosed that the retail CBDC prototype supports 20,000 transactions per second. The central bank also plans to develop a wholesale CBDC (wCBDC) proof of concept to support three sets of functionality which it plans to test via a unified ledger, developed with the assistance of Taiwan’s commercial banks.  According to feedback from the office of the Taiwanese parliament’s finance committee provided to The Block, Yang is due to present the report on the current state of progress relative to a CBDC on July 10 at the Legislative Yuan, Taiwan’s parliament. While no projected timeline has been provided for CBDC issuance, Yang emphasized that Taiwan’s CBDC project is a long-term affair. He disclosed that the Central Bank of the Republic of China (Taiwan) will take a three pronged approach to the new digital currency. In the first instance, the wCBDC will be used for for the purpose of interbank settlement relative to tokenized deposits.  In practice, this will mean that when a payee transfers a tokenized deposit to another party, the other party will receive the money instantly. However, in the background, the payee’s bank will need to transfer funds to the second party’s bank. Taiwan’s central bank also plans to trial the settlement of tokenized asset transactions. Settlement of securities in this way is seen as an opportunity to minimize risk when compared with commercially issued stablecoins. Such tests will be similar in nature to the wholesale digital ledger technology (DLT) trials carried out in recent times by the European Union (EU).  Purpose bound money trialLastly, the Republic of China plans to trial purpose bound money (PBM), a concept which covers the middle ground between programmable payments and programmable money. PBM was introduced in a whitepaper in 2023 by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). It enables the sender to specify certain conditions relative to the digital currency being sent. This may include a validity period and further specification as to how the money can be spent. This development represents the latest installment in an ongoing pipeline of announcements from various central banks with regard to CBDC project milestones. Last month, Qatar’s central bank announced the launch of the first phase of its CBDC project.

Cryptocurrency exchange Bybit has reinstated access to its mobile app for users in India via Apple’s App Store and Google Play, saying website access has been restored following regulatory steps taken earlier this year. The company said it registered with the Financial Intelligence Unit–India (FIU-IND) in January 2025 and re-enabled trading functions for eligible users on Feb. 25, with full app access announced on Sept. 8.Photo by appshunter.io on UnsplashPenalty and registration paved way for Bybit’s comebackThe return follows an enforcement action at the start of the year. On Jan. 31, FIU-IND imposed a penalty of 92.7 million Indian rupees (approximately $1.05 million) on Bybit for violations under India’s anti-money laundering law and said its website had been blocked under the Information Technology Act until compliance was achieved. The following month Bybit announced it had paid the penalty and completed its FIU registration. Bybit’s latest announcement comes against the backdrop of India’s cautious approach to sector-wide rules. A government document reviewed by Reuters indicates New Delhi is distancing itself from a comprehensive cryptocurrency law, citing the Reserve Bank of India’s view that regulation could confer “legitimacy” and elevate systemic risks, while an outright ban would not stop peer-to-peer or decentralized exchange activity. India does not have a comprehensive crypto law but applies a flat 30% tax on income from transfers of virtual digital assets (VDAs) and a 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) on consideration paid for VDA transfers under section 194S of the Income-tax Act. Platforms bet on India despite tighter oversightIt's worth noting that authorities had moved to bring offshore platforms within local oversight. FIU-IND issued show-cause notices to nine foreign exchanges (Bitfinex, Bittrex, Binance, Bitstamp, Gate.io, Huobi, Kraken, KuCoin and MEXC Global) in December 2023 and sought to block access to non-compliant services. App store removals of several offshore exchange apps occurred in January 2024 following the notices. Binance later registered with FIU-IND as a reporting entity after paying a fine of 188.2 million Indian rupees (about $2.14 million) for earlier violations, imposed in June 2024. KuCoin also registered, with a smaller penalty of $41,000. In March 2025, Coinbase joined the list by gaining clearance from the Indian financial regulator, announcing plans to launch offerings for retail customers in the country later this year, with other products to follow. Their rush to establish a foothold makes sense, as India topped the Chainalysis Global Crypto Adoption Index, underscoring the country’s widespread embrace of digital assets. Bybit’s re-entry follows a major security incident unrelated to India’s rules. In February, the exchange reported a theft of roughly $1.5 billion in Ethereum (ETH), which the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation later attributed to North Korean actors known as “TraderTraitor.” Shortly after the incident, Bybit CEO Ben Zhou said the exchange had replenished the gap in the ETH reserves.