Korea considers legal recognition of virtual assets as trust assets for investor protection

Crypto Winter Halves Korean Bank Fee ProfitsLast year, Korean banks collected only half the amount in fees from crypto exchanges compared to the previous year, according to Korean news agency News1.©Pexels/PixabayDeclining bank fee profitsFiles submitted by the Korean Financial Services Commission to Yun Chang-hyun, a member of the ruling People Power Party, revealed that the five major Korean crypto exchanges paid 20.4 billion KRW (~$15.6 million) in fees to banks last year, which is a 49.4% decrease from the previous year’s 40.3 billion KRW (~$30.7 million). These exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax) have established agreements with banks to hold real-name bank accounts, which is a legal requirement for exchanges that wish to conduct trades in Korean won.Banks that have provided real-name accounts to crypto exchanges saw an increase in fee profits from 2019 to 2021. However, due to a decline in market sentiment last year, trade volume decreased, resulting in a reduction of bank fees. Last year’s crypto winter is attributable to various factors, including uncertainties in the global economy and collapses of crypto enterprises such as Terraform Labs and FTX.Fees by exchangesIn terms of fees paid to banks by exchanges last year, the largest exchange, Upbit, paid 13.9 billion KRW (~$10.6 million) in fees to Kbank, a mobile banking service provider. Bithumb and Coinone paid 4.9 billion KRW (~$3.7 million) and 989 million KRW (~$750,000) in fees to NH Bank, respectively. It is worth noting that Coinone switched its bank from NH Bank to Kakao Bank last November, paying 72 million KRW (~$55,000) to Kakao Bank in the fourth quarter. Korbit paid 486 million KRW (~$370,000) and 19 million KRW (~$14,500) to Shinhan Bank and Jeonbuk Bank, respectively. Gopax partnered with Jeonbuk Bank to obtain its real-name accounts in April last year.Lawmaker Yun said it was apparent that partnerships were being forged between only a handful of banks and crypto enterprises. Current regulations have to be reviewed to encourage more banks to participate in various blockchain businesses, he added.

FactBlock, a Seoul-based Web3 ecosystem builder and consulting firm, has become the newest member of the WEMIX3.0 blockchain’s 40 WONDERS, or Node Council Partners (NCP), according to an official announcement on Friday (KST). Photo by Growtika on UnsplashShaping the WEMIX3.0 ecosystemThe 40 WONDERS make up a governance council that represents the interests of the WEMIX community by participating in on-chain voting processes for improving or changing WEMIX3.0’s protocol. They are also responsible for validating transactions and operating nodes on the mainnet to boost and maintain its integrity and security. In particular, each member gets to choose their own WONDER number – FactBlock has joined as WONDER 13, shortly after blockchain security audit firm Verichains joined as WONDER 12. FactBlock was able to join by tapping into its resources from secured investments and committing to expanding the ever-growing WEMIX ecosystem and promoting community activity. FactBlock’s industry-oriented missionThe firm is dedicated to ameliorating information asymmetry within the Web3 industry, serving as a gateway for overseas blockchain projects looking to enter the South Korean market and local firms preparing to go international. The firm’s upcoming projects for this year include the launch of Fablo, an educational platform for collective blockchain learning centered around community engagement.  FactBlock has also hosted Korea Blockchain Week (KBW), the largest blockchain conference in the country and in Asia, since 2018. Last year’s event was held at the Shilla Hotel in Seoul in September, hosting a number of industry experts who discussed trends and outlooks for the Web3 industry.

Cebu Meeting of FSB Highlights Crypto RisksThe Regional Consultative Group for Asia of the Financial Stability Board (FSB) has highlighted the risks implicated by crypto assets in a series of meetings held on Thursday and Friday in Cebu, the Philippines.The FSB is an international body with a mandate to monitor the global financial system, as well as make recommendations in respect of that system. The agency was established by the G20 group of countries in April 2009, replacing its forerunner, the Financial Stability Forum.Photo by John Alvin Merin on UnsplashA regulatory framework for cryptoThe two-day event focused on non-bank financial intermediation (NBFI) in Asia and the development of an effective global regulatory framework for crypto-assets. It discussed recent developments in financial markets, together with their regional impact.In opening remarks, Philippine Central Bank Governor, Felipe Medalla, stated: “Crypto, the biggest issue there is, whether we like it or not is quite a lot, especially younger people who are actually gambling. They have huge losses, our view right now. Well, you’re there, it’s your problem and the regulation becomes strict the moment crypto meets banking.”International participants highlighted the need for the development of an effective global regulatory framework for crypto-assets. Particular concern exists with regard to the potential for systemic risk in relation to crypto and a potential overflow into the traditional financial system.Earlier this year, the FSB proposed a complete regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, with the report having been originally submitted in October of last year. Among its key components is the imposition of tighter controls. It proposed the guiding principle of “same activity, same risk, same regulation” for crypto assets, mirroring the approach taken for traditional financial assets.Global approach to taming cryptoThis approach has proven to be problematic for people working within the digital assets space. Many of the core facets of cryptocurrencies are entirely different to anything we see in traditional finance. Trying to frame crypto within an existing approach and standard has been perceived by many to be akin to trying to fit a square peg in a round hole.It’s not the FSB's role or place to affect policy directly. That responsibility lies with policymakers and regulators in each individual country. However, the organization is seeking to influence those individuals and entities in the hope that they will employ its suggested regulatory framework.Klaas Knot, Chair of the FSB and President of the Dutch Central Bank, provided this view on crypto: “We will come up with a global regulatory framework. It also only makes sense to regulate this from a global perspective. Because, nowadays you can take a server and put it anywhere in the world and start issuing these digital assets.”From Knot’s take, it’s clear that governments and central bankers are cottoning on to the fact that individual nation-state regulation is futile to an extent where decentralized innovations like cryptocurrency are concerned. Others such as European Central Bank (ECB) President Christine Lagarde and Mark Branson, President of German financial markets regulator BaFin, similarly have called for a globally enforced regulatory approach over the course of the past year.Ongoing struggleWhile regulation can be helpful, particularly when it comes to the points at which crypto meets the traditional system, there’s no doubt that this emerging innovation will disrupt the conventional system to some degree or other. That may place an incentive before central bankers and governments to try and stymie the further development of digital assets.While a truly global approach to regulating digital assets could retard development of the sector, there is rarely total consensus among world governments on a single issue. Therefore, by its very nature, crypto, and the digital assets sector will likely continue to develop regardless. It’s more a question of how long that process takes.