Top

Crypto Winter Halves Korean Bank Fee Profits

Markets·April 19, 2023, 3:42 AM

Last year, Korean banks collected only half the amount in fees from crypto exchanges compared to the previous year, according to Korean news agency News1.

frozen ball on snow
©Pexels/Pixabay

 

Declining bank fee profits

Files submitted by the Korean Financial Services Commission to Yun Chang-hyun, a member of the ruling People Power Party, revealed that the five major Korean crypto exchanges paid 20.4 billion KRW (~$15.6 million) in fees to banks last year, which is a 49.4% decrease from the previous year’s 40.3 billion KRW (~$30.7 million). These exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax) have established agreements with banks to hold real-name bank accounts, which is a legal requirement for exchanges that wish to conduct trades in Korean won.

Banks that have provided real-name accounts to crypto exchanges saw an increase in fee profits from 2019 to 2021. However, due to a decline in market sentiment last year, trade volume decreased, resulting in a reduction of bank fees. Last year’s crypto winter is attributable to various factors, including uncertainties in the global economy and collapses of crypto enterprises such as Terraform Labs and FTX.

 

Fees by exchanges

In terms of fees paid to banks by exchanges last year, the largest exchange, Upbit, paid 13.9 billion KRW (~$10.6 million) in fees to Kbank, a mobile banking service provider. Bithumb and Coinone paid 4.9 billion KRW (~$3.7 million) and 989 million KRW (~$750,000) in fees to NH Bank, respectively. It is worth noting that Coinone switched its bank from NH Bank to Kakao Bank last November, paying 72 million KRW (~$55,000) to Kakao Bank in the fourth quarter. Korbit paid 486 million KRW (~$370,000) and 19 million KRW (~$14,500) to Shinhan Bank and Jeonbuk Bank, respectively. Gopax partnered with Jeonbuk Bank to obtain its real-name accounts in April last year.

Lawmaker Yun said it was apparent that partnerships were being forged between only a handful of banks and crypto enterprises. Current regulations have to be reviewed to encourage more banks to participate in various blockchain businesses, he added.

More to Read
View All
Web3 & Enterprise·

May 10, 2023

OmniBOLT to Support BRC-20 Tokens on Lightning

OmniBOLT to Support BRC-20 Tokens on LightningSingapore’s OmniBOLT, a project that’s developing technological solutions within bitcoin’s layer two network environment, has outlined that it will support BRC-20 tokens on Lightning Network.Before we consider precisely what OnmiBOLT's decision to support BRC-20 tokens means, let’s cover the backstory.Photo by Sander Weeteling on UnsplashBRC-20BRC-20 is an experimental token standard which was created by an anonymous developer with the handle “Domo”, and username ‘@domodata’ on Twitter. A token standard governs how and where a cryptocurrency can be used. The approach has been pioneered by developers on the Ethereum blockchain who created the ERC-20 standard a number of years ago, relative to the Ethereum network.A bitcoin evolutionIn this instance, BRC-20 is a fungible token standard designed for the bitcoin blockchain. Bitcoin development is very slow and conservative, and deliberately so, in an effort to put network security first. However, it has had two major upgrades over the course of the last few years, namely SegWit and Taproot.Many in crypto have been critical of the bitcoin project on the basis of it being a pet rock that lacked features and the flexibility to use it in other ways aside from as a store of value or means of exchange. However, those protocol upgrades have led to further development that is expanding bitcoin’s use case and versatility.SegWit and Taproot enabled the development of Bitcoin Ordinals in January 2023. Ordinals provide a means to create Bitcoin non-fungible tokens (NFTs), by attaching data to individual satoshis, the smallest denomination of Bitcoin. NFTs created this way are immutable as they’re not created on side chains but on the bitcoin blockchain itself.In a fast moving scenario, the development of Ordinals led two months later to the emergence of the BRC-20 standard. BRC-20 tokens can be stored on the bitcoin base-chain, built with the assistance of Ordinals. BRC-20 is an exciting development as it stands to enable smart contract capabilities relative to bitcoin.Solving the bitcoin fee issueMany see this development as a solution for the longer term fees issue that the bitcoin blockchain will have to overcome. Bitcoin miners are compensated in mining rewards but the level of rewards is being cut in half every four years. The concern is that in the longer term, there may not be enough revenue for miners to continue to secure the network effectively.With the development of Bitcoin Ordinals, more fees are generated, and so this is seen as a means through which the network can sustain itself over the longer term.Mempool backlogSo what’s not to like? The issue that has arisen over the past few days is that bitcoin transaction fees have hit a two year high. Over the past few days, there have been in excess of 400,000 unconfirmed bitcoin network transactions sitting in the mempool. The mempool is a mechanism within the bitcoin protocol that stores the data relative to a queue of transactions that are waiting to be confirmed.Relieving pressure on bitcoinThat brings us back to the significance of the Singaporean team of developers at OmniBOLT deciding to support BRC-20 tokens on the lightning network. That move can relieve the pressure on the bitcoin mainnet. The project is being backed by Waterdrip Capital, Danhua Capital, Redline DAO and others.Bitcoin has been a boring protocol and many have celebrated that fact as a feature and benefit for a network that serves a couple of vitally important use cases exceptionally well. However, development never stops and it’s fascinating to see another side to the protocol unfold, and all the while, it’s not entirely clear where it will end.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Jan 12, 2024

CoinGecko security breach latest threat within crypto space

The crypto space continues to suffer a disproportionate share of hacks and scams that were further exacerbated on Wednesday, with Malaysian crypto data aggregator the latest to succumb to a security breach. Serving as yet another stark reminder of the persistent threats plaguing the sector, a phishing scam targeted CoinGecko's X account, leading to a brief compromise that raised concerns about the safety of user information.Photo by GuerrillaBuzz on UnsplashPhishing scamDuring this incident, hackers posted a phishing link on CoinGecko's X account, falsely advertising a token airdrop for a cryptocurrency named GCKO. The deceptive post claimed that GCKO could be used for API services, including the cryptocurrency ANKR. Swift action by CoinGecko involved the removal of the fraudulent post and a public warning urging users to avoid interacting with any suspicious links or content. In an X post, CoinGecko wrote:”Our Twitter accounts @CoinGecko and @GeckoTerminal have been compromised. We're taking immediate steps to investigate the situation and secure our accounts. Please DO NOT click on any links or engage with suspicious content. Your security is our top priority.” Employee errorThe firm followed up with an update on Thursday, attributing the breach to a team member inadvertently clicking on a fraudulent Calendly link, granting unauthorized access to the hacker. Despite having two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled and employing robust security measures, CoinGecko emphasized that the inadvertent click allowed unauthorized access. The compromised accounts were then exploited to disseminate misleading information and potentially engage in malicious activities. CoinGecko expressed sincere apologies for any confusion or inconvenience caused by the incident. The company reiterated its commitment to platform security and continuous improvement of internal controls, assuring users that corrective measures were promptly implemented. SEC incompetenceCoinGecko's security incident occurred within 24 hours of a similar occurrence involving the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC's X account was compromised, with scammers posting a false message from Chair Gary Gensler about the approval of spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs). While CoinGecko identified a vulnerability in its security regimen, the SEC later confirmed that the breach in its case was far more basic. It was not due to infrastructure attacks but rather the lack of 2-factor authentication (2FA) tied to the SEC's account, the most basic form of operations security. Gensler and the SEC have come in for major criticism from the crypto community in the U.S. due to a policy of regulation by enforcement that has been pursued. With that, the Commission came in for swift and harsh criticism in the immediate aftermath of its X account hack. Many pointed out the irony of Gensler advising consumers to secure their accounts back in October when the SEC itself had failed to do so. Others queried who would be responsible for what some interpreted as an episode of market manipulation, something that the SEC has perennially associated the crypto markets with. During the time that the account was compromised, millions of dollars of value were liquidated in short and long trading positions. CoinGecko's quick response serves as a valuable lesson in the importance of vigilance and proactive security measures amid the growing threats facing the cryptocurrency community.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Dec 23, 2023

3AC liquidators estimate 46% recovery while BVI court freezes $1B

3AC liquidators estimate 46% recovery while BVI court freezes $1BThe joint liquidators of the now-defunct Singaporean crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) have provided creditors with an estimated 45.74% recovery rate for their claims in the bankrupt estate. Meanwhile, in parallel proceedings in the British Virgin Islands (BVI), a court has frozen $1 billion of founders’ assets.According to The Block, the details were disclosed in a December report to creditors by joint liquidators Russell Crumpler and Christopher Farmer of Teneo, the firm appointed to oversee the liquidation of the failed business.$1.16B in assetsAs of Dec. 18, the estimated value of 3AC’s assets was reported to be $1.16 billion, while claims totaling $2.7 billion are expected to be recognized for distribution. The liquidators highlighted that settlements in litigation against various parties, including DCG, Genesis and BlockFi, increased reported assets by an estimated $292 million. It’s important to note that the BlockFi settlement is still pending approval.A total of 154 claims, valued at $3.4 billion, were filed against the 3AC estate. The report indicates that $200 million of claims were not admitted for distribution, and $322 million in claims have either been rejected or are expected to be rejected. Additionally, $76 million in claims are currently under dispute. The report reveals that initial distributions to creditors are being planned for the first quarter of the upcoming year.Illiquid tokensThe breakdown of assets reveals that a large majority are illiquid tokens, subject to vesting periods, comprising 82% of the total. Only 6% of the portfolio is liquid, while equity and investments account for 6.9% and 4.8% is in cash. These illiquid tokens, totaling $563 million at current prices, consist of 13 different tokens with vesting schedules unlocking assets over the next three years, reaching $200 million by the end of 2024.To date, the liquidators have staked some of these tokens, resulting in $5.4 million in staking rewards. Liquidation efforts, including the sale of $34.5 million worth of liquid tokens and $15 million in NFTs, along with other asset sales, have generated a total of $66 million.Photo by Kemp Fuller on UnsplashFrozen assetsIn a related development, Bloomberg reported on Thursday that a British Virgin Islands court has frozen assets totaling $1.1 billion belonging to 3AC co-founders Su Zhu and Kyle Davies, along with Davies’ wife Kelly Chen. The liquidators filed a claim for insolvent trading against the founders for $1.078 billion, with additional claims against Davies for $66 million and Chen for $4.6 million.Teneo outlined the rationale behind the move in the following statement it made to Decrypt:“The worldwide freezing order has been sought in connection with claims that are being pursued by the liquidators that allege, amongst other things, that the Founders should be held responsible for causing 3AC’s position to deteriorate by an amount that is equivalent to the value of the freezing orders sought.”Su Zhu, who was under house arrest for the last few weeks, became free on Dec. 20. Zhu had been arrested in Singapore on Sept. 29 and sentenced to four months imprisonment, serving two-thirds of his sentence under house arrest.Throughout the bankruptcy proceedings, legal fees have accumulated to $49.7 million while the report suggests ongoing efforts to maximize creditor recovery.

news
Loading