Token pre-sale for Web3 mental health dApp sells out in nine hours

Web3 Offers Potential for Japan to Rediscover its MojoEveryone recognizes that Japan has been at the forefront of innovation and the development of technology in the past but can it rediscover that cutting edge through Web3 and blockchain? In a recent interview with Forkast News, Yudai Suzuki, Co-Founder of a Tokyo-based Web3 incubator, suggested that it has that potential.©Pexels/邱 韬Re-establishing a competitive edgeSuzuki, who heads up Fracton Ventures, believes that such a pivot is possible for Japan in making Web3 the means through which it can rediscover the innovative edge it has been lacking in more recent years.Despite an historical strength and depth in technology and innovation, Japan has struggled when it comes to adopting and implementing new technology on a global scale more recently.Legacy techEarlier this year, it emerged that leading Japanese technology companies were collaborating with a view to creating a new open metaverse infrastructure called “Ryugukoku.” That project implicates the creation of a Japan Metaverse Economic Zone. Suzuki cites this project as demonstrative of a key issue relative to the overall development of Web3 in Japan.The project involves Japan’s legacy tech companies such as Fujitsu and Mitsubishi. He goes on to clarify that the majority of Web3 projects in Japan are being led by the existing technology behemoths despite the fact that Japan is seeing the emergence of a Web3-native generation.Suzuki identifies that one of the fundamental aspects of Web3 is that every decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) that’s created is immediately global in nature. Allied with that, most of that 18–25 year old Web3 native generation in Japan want to break through language barriers and communicate on a global basis.That outward looking characteristic is positive but it’s not how venture investment has traditionally worked in Japan. He explains that the conventional approach to investing in start-ups in Japan has been to first look to dominate the Japanese market before going global. The Fracton Ventures founder believes that this is a flawed approach in today’s world and that by the time they’ve gotten to number one in Japan, it’s already too late in trying to achieve that on a global basis.Government responsibilitySuzuki places much of the responsibility in affecting a more appropriate approach on the Japanese Government. “If they focus only on these huge Japanese companies, they will not succeed,” he says. He is also critical of the regulatory approach. Suzuki believes that “the government wants to change the laws and set new regulations at an early date,” and with that, such over-regulation has resulted in crypto entrepreneurs leaving the field. Regulation needs to be set on a more flexible basis so that it can be easily updated and upgraded as the technology develops.Global MindsetHe highlights the importance of having a global mindset and being open to different ideas and perspectives in order to succeed in the Web3 space. The entrepreneur points to that Web3-native demographic in Japan, explaining that their mindset has changed to a more global one as a consequence of dabbling in Web3. The same he believes is necessary on the part of the government if Japan is to become a leader in the tech industry once again.

Cross Trading of LUNA Tokens Uncovered on Three Korean Crypto ExchangesAccording to a report by the Maeil Business Newspaper on Wednesday, it was discovered that cross trading of LUNA tokens took place on three South Korean cryptocurrency exchanges: Bithumb, Coinone, and GoPax.Three crypto exchangesAn indictment by the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office against Terraform Labs co-founders Do Kwon and Daniel Shin, along with interviews conducted within the cryptocurrency industry, revealed that Bithumb, Coinone, and GoPax were involved in cross trading LUNA tokens with a combined value of $598 million. Specifically, Bithumb accounted for $224 million, Coinone for $299 billion, and GoPax for $74 billion.The prosecution has confirmed that cross trading continued until the end of February 2022, a period marked by significant demands for virtual asset legislation from both the market and academia. Despite widespread calls for regulations to curb unfair trading practices, these instances of cross trading went undetected.Classification of LUNAMoreover, it is reported that legal punishment for the $598 million worth of cross trading is challenging unless LUNA tokens are officially recognized as securities by the court. Under the Korean Capital Markets Act, only cross trading involving tokens identified as securities can be subject to penalties as a form of market manipulation.During a plenary session of the National Assembly’s Legislation and Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, Justice Minister Han Dong-hoon made a statement suggesting that LUNA tokens could be considered securities due to their backing by real-world assets. However, he said that this distinction might not apply to other tokens.On April 25, the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office indicted Shin and others as accomplices to Kwon, assuming that LUNA tokens were indeed securities. This case now revolves around whether the prosecution can successfully establish the classification of LUNA tokens as securities during the trial, making it the central issue in the case.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashCrypto investor protection legislationLast Thursday, the National Assembly’s National Policy Committee approved a bill known as the “Virtual Assets User Protection Act,” signaling an accelerated legislative process. However, there are arguments suggesting that the definition of cross trading should be further clarified in either the legislation or enforcement decree.A representative of a law firm specializing in virtual assets stated that the implementation of the User Protection Act would take another year even after its promulgation, making it challenging to retrospectively penalize cross trading practices that had already occurred.

Hong Kong’s Development as Crypto Hub May Soften Chinese Stance on CryptoHong Kong is making waves in the crypto sector that could potentially signal a shift in China’s attitude toward digital assets. That’s a theory that has been given consideration by crypto analytics firm Chainalysis in a recently released report highlighting Hong Kong’s crypto transformation and suggesting a growing tolerance for crypto within China’s corridors of power.Photo by farfar on UnsplashOTC trade showing resilienceDespite China’s stringent regulations and the ongoing crypto market downturn, Hong Kong’s over-the-counter (OTC) crypto market has demonstrated remarkable resilience, with a transaction volume of $64 billion in the past year. While this is slightly less than China’s $86.4 billion, it’s a noteworthy achievement considering Hong Kong’s smaller population and the challenges facing the crypto industry.The close relationship between China and Hong Kong has led some industry commentators to speculate that Hong Kong’s rise as a crypto hub could indicate a shift in China’s stance on digital assets.The crypto-friendly environment in Hong Kong has not gone unnoticed. Merton Lam of Crypto HK, an OTC digital asset trading center in the city, notes that cryptocurrencies have become an integral part of investment portfolios for banks, private equity firms, and high-net-worth individuals in the region. Even Chinese state-owned businesses are launching cryptocurrency-focused investment funds.Hong Kong cornering institutional tradeWhat sets Hong Kong apart in the crypto landscape is its proficiency in large institutional crypto transactions, with 46.8% of its annual crypto trades exceeding $10 million. In contrast, retail trades under $10,000 accounted for just 4% of the city’s crypto volume, slightly below the global average of 4.7%. This institutional dominance distinguishes Hong Kong from other Asian regions.For comparison, South Korea heavily relies on retail trading on centralized exchanges, while Japan maintains a transaction breakdown that aligns closely with global trends, balancing centralized exchanges with DeFi protocols.A cautionary noteHowever, Dave Chapman of OSL Digital Securities offers a note of caution, suggesting that Hong Kong’s promotion as a crypto hub might be more exploratory, aimed at gaining a better understanding of digital assets without significantly loosening mainland policies.Despite the uncertainties, Markus Thielen, Head of Research and Strategy at Singapore’s Matrixport, believes that Hong Kong is acting as a “testing ground” for broader cryptocurrency adoption in China. The city’s unique position makes it an attractive destination for the crypto asset management industry, setting it apart from other jurisdictions that often view crypto firms as service providers rather than end-users.Hong Kong’s progress is particularly noteworthy when considering the broader context of East Asia’s crypto market. Chainalysis analysis reveals that East Asia’s share of crypto transaction value dropped from around 30% in 2019 to less than 10% by the second quarter of 2022 due to China’s crypto bans. Hong Kong’s recent surge could potentially act as a “tailwind” to reignite crypto activity in the region.The evolving relationship between the mainland and the autonomous territory of Hong Kong may hold the key to understanding the future of cryptocurrency in the region.