Netmarble F&C prepares to lay off employees of Metaverse World subsidiary

Yes24 Teams Up with KPC to Establish Digital Content Distribution EcosystemSouth Korean culture and arts content platform Yes24 announced on Thursday that it has signed a business agreement with digital content aggregator Korea Publishing Contents (KPC) to build a digital content distribution ecosystem based on blockchain technology to protect the rights of copyright holders and users alike.Photo by Hal Gatewood on UnsplashYes24 CEO Choi Sera and KPC CEO Lee Joong-ho attended the signing ceremony for the agreement last Tuesday.Collaboration on multiple frontsUnder the new partnership, both parties plan to explore various business models and collaborate on marketing efforts to establish and operate the digital content ecosystem. They also intend to cooperate by leveraging their human resources, technological capabilities, and market networks.“We will do our best to create a secure and fair digital content distribution environment that both protects and grants more rights to copyright holders and users,” Yes24 said in a statement, adding that it would also strive to contribute to the acceleration of the digital content market.Fueling creativity and content consumptionAs a major online book retailer, Yes24 provides a range of services, which include selling books as well as tickets for various concerts and events. KPC is a joint venture established by 65 Korean publishers with the collective aim of discovering sustainable growth drivers for the publishing industry. Currently, the company distributes over 1,000 e-books and audiobooks from various publishers to local and international e-book stores and libraries.

The Chinese autonomous territory of Hong Kong is moving closer towards the issuance of stablecoin licenses, while 30 kilometers away on the Chinese mainland, the authorities in Shenzhen are warning against stablecoin investment scams. Hong Kong has set Aug. 1 as the effective date for its incoming Stablecoin Ordinance. Firms such as JD.com and Ant Group, an affiliate company of Alibaba Group, are understood to be interested in seeking licensing. Photo by ダモ リ on UnsplashSingle-digit license issuanceIn a recent interview with Chinese language newspaper Ming Pao, Christopher Hui, Hong Kong’s Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, outlined that stablecoin licenses are likely to be issued in 2025 following the passing of the Aug. 1 effective date, although he indicated that the number of licenses issued will remain in single digits. Hui hopes that stablecoins can address some of “the difficulties and pain points in the real economy,” like cross-border payments involving volatile local currencies. The official said that stablecoins can reduce transaction costs and facilitate cross-border transactions when based on fiat currencies and serving as effective payment tools. Yuan-based stablecoinsHui stated that the issuance of a stablecoin in Hong Kong which is based on the sovereign currency of another jurisdiction would only be permitted following “discussions with the relevant authorities."  It’s understood that the aforementioned Chinese e-commerce firms have been lobbying government for the approval of offshore yuan-based stablecoins. Last month, the Governor of the People’s Bank of China, Pan Gongsheng, acknowledged that stablecoins are disrupting global payments infrastructure. However, mainland China still has a mining and trading ban in place in relation to crypto, despite previous speculation that the country would open up to crypto. Hui expressed the view that where a stablecoin implicates another sovereign currency, there are additional risk factors that would have to be taken into account. Exploiting uninformed view of stablecoinsMeanwhile, 30 kilometers from Hong Kong, the authorities in Shenzhen have issued a warning to members of the public highlighting that scammers are exploiting the public’s uninformed view of stablecoins as a guise through which to lure victims into investment scams. They asserted that scammers are using new concepts, in this case stablecoins, for hype in an effort to peddle illegal fundraising, gambling, fraud and money laundering schemes.The Shenzhen Municipal Task Force Office for Preventing and Combating Illegal Financial Activities asked the public to report such schemes “engaged in illegal fundraising in the name of investing in stablecoins,” in order to enable the authorities to crack down on the illicit activity. The authorities added: "We urge the general public to remain rational in their investment decisions, avoid blindly trusting extravagant promises, develop a correct understanding of money and investment, stay alert to financial risks and avoid falling victim to scams." Last month, JD.com took to Weibo to warn the public that fraudulent JD stablecoins were being offered by scammers at a time when the company has yet to issue a stablecoin.

The Asia Web3 Alliance Japan, an agency that regards itself as a bridge between the Web3 ecosystem in Asia and Japan’s broader business sector, has reached out to the Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States with a view towards establishing a strategic collaboration.Photo by Clement Souchet on UnsplashFocus on Web3 regulatory innovation & tokenizationThe President of the organization, Hinza Asif, wrote to SEC Crypto Task Force Chairperson and SEC Commissioner, Hester Peirce, on the subject, on March 25. The letter, subsequently published by the SEC, sets out a proposal that centers on a strategic U.S.-Japan partnership relative to Web3 regulatory innovation and tokenization. The Japanese agency, which has set out cross-border synergy as one of its objectives, calls for collaboration between Japan’s Financial Services Agency, the Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and the Bank of Japan with the U.S. regulator. The Alliance proposes that the goal of that partnership would be the establishment of regulatory clarity in respect of the Web3 sector, together with the fostering of interoperability between a developing Web3 ecosystem in the U.S. and the one that’s developing in Japan. Token classification frameworkDelving deeper into proposal specifics, Asif sets out the formation of a harmonized token classification framework as a key objective. The proposal suggests that a distinction needs to be made between tokenized securities, utility tokens and non-security digital assets.  The alliance believes that right now, token classification is unclear, with projects struggling to understand what category their token falls within from a regulatory perspective. There’s a lack of token offering frameworks. While it sees that further work is required, the Asia Web3 Alliance Japan is encouraged by progress made by the SEC’s Crypto Task Force in identifying security categories. With this cross-border collaboration, the Japanese crypto advocacy group believes that there is an opportunity to achieve regulatory interoperability on an international basis. That would facilitate compliant cross-border token issuance. On that basis, the alliance suggests that standards be developed such that regulatory consistency is achieved internationally when it comes to items such as digital asset trading, custody and token issuance. The proposal sets out a need for reciprocal disclosure requirements between the two jurisdictions where cross-border token issuance is concerned. It advocates for mutual recognition of what it terms “compliant tokenized offerings.” Bringing safe harbor to JapanAnother focus area contained within the proposal is the suggestion of a need to implement a safe harbor approach in Japan for early-stage token projects in line with what has been put forward in the U.S. Peirce first put forward a token safe harbor proposal in the U.S. in 2020. It sets out to provide exemptions over a defined initial period for certain token issuances. The idea behind it is to enable these early-stage projects to innovate and mature without getting bogged down in a regulatory quagmire. The establishment of a U.S.-Japan Web3 regulatory roundtable is another strand contained within the proposal. This would provide a mechanism for ongoing dialogue between stakeholders such as regulators, industry leaders and legal experts.