Scroll’s zkEVM Launches on Ethereum Mainnet

OSL Parent Company Denies Sale PlansBC Technology Group, a Hong Kong-based investment holding company, has firmly denied recent reports suggesting it is exploring the sale of its licensed digital asset business, OSL, for up to HK$1 billion (US$137.3 million).Photo by Nextvoyage on PexelsCompany stock plummetsThis comes in response to a report that emerged via Bloomberg on Monday. The news of the possible sale had a significant impact on the company’s stock, which plummeted by over 22% to HK$3.35 the following day.BC Technology Group, which has been listed on the Hong Kong stock exchange since 2012, is the parent company of OSL. The reports hinted at the possibility of selling off parts of the business, citing undisclosed sources.In response to these rumors, BC Technology Group issued a formal statement to clarify the situation, deeming the article “factually inaccurate and highly misleading.” It vehemently refuted any intention to sell OSL, a key player in the cryptocurrency exchange sector.First licensed exchangeOSL was the first cryptocurrency exchange to be licensed by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) in Hong Kong in 2020, initially operated under a voluntary scheme and was limited to serving professional investors. However, the recent licensing requirement broadened its scope, allowing it to cater to retail investors as well, including popular cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum.Both OSL and HashKey had their licenses upgraded this year, enabling them to serve retail investors as per the new policy. However, the reception to this new regulatory framework has been somewhat lukewarm, with only five local exchanges applying for the new virtual asset trading platform (VATP) license. The SFC had to publish a list of applicants following a financial scandal involving the JPEX crypto exchange, which led to over 2,500 complaints and losses totaling approximately HK$1.5 billion.The backdrop of this unfolding situation is Hong Kong’s efforts to establish itself as a significant virtual asset hub. The city announced its ambition to transform into a hub for digital assets a year ago, drawing considerable attention from cryptocurrency exchanges. These efforts included implementing new regulations in June that mandated licensing for cryptocurrency exchanges.Several companies with connections to Hong Kong and mainland China have expressed their intent to obtain a license, potentially taking advantage of Hong Kong’s favorable stance toward virtual assets when compared to mainland China’s strict regulations.High compliance costsNonetheless, high compliance costs in Hong Kong continue to pose a barrier, potentially preventing the city from becoming the primary base of operations for crypto businesses. Industry insiders estimate that the cost of compliance from start to finish can be as high as HK$60 million for a company. Firms have reported that obtaining a trading license in Hong Kong can involve an outlay of between HK$20 million and HK$200 million.As per BC Technology Group’s mid-year report, the company reported a net loss of HK$94.7 million in the first half of 2023. This marked a notable improvement compared to the HK$312.1 million in losses during the same period the previous year. OSL remains a significant source of income for the company.

Hong Kong Bank to Act as Settlement Bank for Crypto FirmsZA Bank, Hong Kong’s largest virtual bank, is looking to become the go-to bank for crypto startups. The online bank has been given permission to serve as the settlement bank for regulated Web3 companies in the city. This development was announced at Hong Kong’s Web3 Festival, an event supported by the local government and attended by crypto startups and institutions from across Asia.©Pexels/Frank BarningHashKey and OSL collaborationZA Bank is expected to facilitate crypto-fiat conversions with two licensed exchanges in Hong Kong, HashKey and OSL, where customers can swap crypto into fiat currencies. ZA Bank will also offer basic banking services to local Web3 startups, a category that is currently underserved by traditional financial institutions.ZA Bank is focusing on assisting local Web3 startups and small-medium enterprises (SMEs).The bank linked up to the city’s company registry data, allowing for minimal information input and cross-checking. According to Devon Sin, alternate chief executive of ZA Bank, the bank currently conducts AML scrutiny against the usual checklists to satisfy the regulatory requirements. No AML issues have emerged during the recent months of work.Competing for global crypto businessHong Kong is trying to establish itself as a crypto-friendly alternative to other hubs, such as the US and Singapore, and a sandbox for Web3 businesses from China, where crypto trading is illegal. The city is revamping its digital assets regulatory framework, with plans to legalize retail trading of major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ether. Ronald Lu, CEO of ZA Bank, said that ZA Bank’s online account opening for Web3 startups is a major step forward in integrating traditional banking services with the Web3 world.According to Lu, ZA Bank will act as a settlement bank for clients to allow withdrawals in Hong Kong, China, and US currencies after they deposit crypto tokens with exchanges. The business model is already operational through HashKey and OSL, the only two licensed crypto exchanges in Hong Kong. The bank will provide the same service for other exchanges as they become licensed.HK China’s crypto “trial run”Hong Kong is opening up to the beleaguered sector in a move that aims to revive its status as a financial center following years of COVID restrictions and political upheaval. However, access to banking has been a major hurdle for the city’s ambitions. The city’s banking and securities regulators are hosting a round-table for crypto players and bankers to share experiences and perspectives on banking services later this month.Many have speculated about a softening stance on cryptocurrency by the Chinese authorities. However, it’s more likely that they continue with strict regulation and control relative to crypto in mainland China while happy to monitor a more open approach to it within Hong Kong. Crypto analyst Myles Deutscher likens the approach to a “trial run” that is being monitored by China.Launched in March 2020, ZA Bank is one of Hong Kong’s eight licensed virtual banks and had the most net assets as of last year, despite remaining unprofitable. The virtual lender doesn’t expect it will need to boost its headcount to handle the crypto client push. Although the revenue model is still unclear, Lu said that more clients, more deposits, and more business opportunities are always great for the bank. The lender doesn’t offer services for clients from mainland China, given the restrictions in place there.

Korean Supreme Court acquits Dunamu Chairman Song Chi-hyungThe Supreme Court of South Korea, in a significant ruling on Thursday (local time), acquitted Song Chi-hyung, chairman and principal stakeholder of Dunamu, of fraud and forgery charges, according to a report by local news agency Yonhap. This ruling is particularly noteworthy because Dunamu is the operator of the nation’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, Upbit.This decision, led by Justice Oh Kyung-mi, marks the culmination of a legal battle that began with Song’s indictment in Dec. 2018, and it extends to the acquittal of the company’s Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and the head of the Data Value Team, who were jointly indicted.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashBackground of the caseSong Chi-hyung and his colleagues were alleged to have fabricated an account on Upbit between September and November 2017. They had been accused of feigning the deposit of assets valued at KRW 122.1 billion and then employing these fictitious funds to enable transactions among actual members.The prosecution also leveled fraud charges against them, claiming that the fabricated account was utilized to sell 11,550 bitcoins to 26,000 members, thereby generating KRW 149.1 billion.The Seoul Southern District Court, acting as the court of first instance, found them not guilty. The court reasoned that the evidence presented by the prosecution was insufficient to establish that the defendants actually deposited the assets in the account.Issues with the prosecution’s evidence gatheringThe Seoul High Court, serving as the appellate court, identified problems with the evidence provided by the prosecution, determining that part of it lacked credibility due to improper collection methods. Notably, the court observed that the prosecution had directed Dunamu employees to access their Amazon cloud server to download the account’s transaction history. However, since this remote server was not included in the search and seizure warrant, the court highlighted the illegitimacy of the evidence.The appellate court also pointed out another issue with the evidence: documents stored on the CFO’s USB drive. The prosecution did not follow the legitimate search process, which requires them to extract only data related to the allegations. Moreover, the prosecutors did not present a warrant when confiscating the laptop of the Data Value Team’s lead, further undermining the credibility of their evidence.The court further stated that even if the remaining evidence provided by the prosecution was considered viable, it was still insufficient to substantiate the prosecution’s accusations.The prosecution, disagreeing with the decision of the appeals court, had escalated the case to the Supreme Court. However, the highest court in the nation sided with the ruling of the appeals court, effectively upholding the decision made at the appellate level.