Hong Kong’s SFC appeals to digital asset investors to verify licenses

Compliance and Cooperation — A Necessary Formula for Combatting Crypto CrimesFrom common scams like voice phishing to threats of violence, the involvement of cryptocurrencies in crimes against the general public is steadily on the rise both in South Korea and abroad.Photo by Bermix Studio on UnsplashAccording to blockchain data analysis firm Chainalysis, the scale of cryptocurrency-related crimes and hacking on a global scale has decreased by 45.2% and 23.5%, respectively, compared to last year. However, financial losses resulting from smaller ransomware attacks, including phishing scams, are showing an upward trend.Authorities and industry figures alike are increasingly emphasizing the need for close cooperation to combat this growing issue, as existing regulations and legal frameworks remain insufficient to do so.Chainalysis and crypto exchange Binance co-hosted a policy summit in Seoul on Tuesday called “Securing the Future of Crypto,” where experts gathered at the Courtyard Marriott hotel to discuss compliance and cooperation between the public and private sectors in fighting crypto crimes.Challenges and complexities in crypto investigations“The Korean National Police Agency receives dozens of reports of financial losses and urgent requests for account freezes every day, with 80% of them pertaining to Binance,” said Kim Min-jae, an investigator at the National Police Agency’s International Cyber Cooperation Division.Citing a recent case of a voice phishing scam targeting a woman in her 60s, Kim said that authorities were able to proceed with the investigation within 30 minutes after receiving information from the exchange. However, addressing crimes beyond large cryptocurrency exchanges like Binance, such as those involving decentralized finance (DeFi) systems or foreign exchanges, poses a more difficult challenge due to the lack of proper measures to deal with them.Lee Soo-pyeong, a cybercrime investigator at the Korean National Police Agency’s Cyber Investigation Division, also noted that although domestic cases are relatively easier to investigate, there have been many cases — such as the appalling Nth Room case that caused an uproar throughout Korea in 2020 — that involved overseas accounts and exchanges.Steps for effective crime controlWhat measures, then, should authorities and corporations take in order to deal with such issues? Lee stressed the importance of cooperation among international judicial bodies and adherence from businesses to enhance the response to increasingly sophisticated crypto crimes.Know Your Customer (KYC) standards — the guidelines used in investment and financial services to verify customers’ identities and assess their risk and financial profiles — play an important role in this regard. However, “There are no platforms yet, including major exchanges like Binance, that provide us with personal information through KYC measures when funds are laundered,” Kim explained. He expressed hopes for a system jointly established by relevant entities, including local exchanges, that will enable swift criminal investigation.Lee also highlighted the importance of compliance from foreign companies, stating, “While it’s possible to request mutual legal assistance in criminal matters from the International Criminal Police Organization (Interpol), active cooperation from foreign companies is essential.”From an international point of view, Jarek Jakubcek, Head of Intelligence and Investigations APAC at Binance, pointed out that upholding international standards and standardized processes is important, given the fact that crypto crimes transcend borders. While some countries excel in compliance and enforcing anti-money laundering (AML) policies, others fall short, leading criminals to exploit these disparities.Recently, there have been criminals who move their funds through blockchain networks. The development of bridge technology, which facilitates cross-chain asset transfers, has led to laundering techniques becoming more and more sophisticated. However, he assured that tracing funds is still possible, although doing so has become harder than before.The amalgamation of these circumstances has thereby ushered in the era of Know Your Transaction (KYT). While exchanges have traditionally been obligated to perform Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures to prevent money laundering, they must now go beyond verifying user information and analyze customer transaction data in order to understand where money is coming from and how it flows, Jakubcek said. To achieve this, he argued, they must request information from users and work with on-chain data analysis solution companies like Chainalysis to secure real transaction data. Alec Zebrick, Manager of Investigations in the Asia-Pacific region at Chainalysis, added that leveraging on-chain data allows the verification of most transactions.In the rapidly evolving crypto landscape where crimes are still a force to deal with, experts agree that reinforcing compliance and cooperation between exchanges and authorities is imperative.

GDAC Joins Hands with Bitgo to Fortify Crypto Wallet SecurityCryptocurrency trading platform GDAC, which is operated by South Korean blockchain fintech company Peertec, revealed on October 19 (local time) a partnership with crypto wallet provider Bitgo. This collaboration aims to bolster the security measures for the exchange’s wallets.Bitgo, headquartered in Palo Alto, California, and backed by investment bank Goldman Sachs, is renowned for its secure wallet solutions. As a qualified custodian for digital assets across various jurisdictions such as the United States, Switzerland, and Germany, Bitgo has been serving more than 1,500 institutional clients in over 50 countries since 2013. The company also touts that it processes about 20% of all on-chain Bitcoin transactions by value.Photo by Shubham’s Web3 on UnsplashBitgo’s growing presence in KoreaBitgo’s latest partnership with GDAC isn’t its first venture in the Korean market. Just last month, the company entered into a strategic partnership with Hana Bank, one of Korea’s leading banking institutions. This collaboration aims to drive the development of security solutions, foster technical cooperation, and even explore a potential joint venture in the future.With this collaborative initiative, GDAC is now a partner of two major digital asset custodians: Bitgo and Fireblocks. Through this cooperative network, the Korean exchange seeks to take a leading role in enhancing security as a virtual asset service provider (VASP). In May, GDAC launched a mobile application where users can seamlessly enjoy all of its crypto services, including exchange, custody, and staking.Han Seung-hwan, CEO of GDAC, said that the company places the utmost priority on bolstering its security technology and ensuring the secure storage of customer assets. He added that having solidified its position as an exchange dedicated to institutional clients, GDAC will focus on delivering customer-centric, high-quality services.

Qatar Criticized for Regulatory Inaction Against Crypto CompaniesThe Qatari Central Bank (QCB) has come under fire from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) for its lack of efforts in enforcing regulations that prohibit virtual asset service providers.In a report released earlier this week, the global watchdog for money laundering and terrorist financing highlighted the need for Qatar to enhance its capabilities in effectively combating evolving forms of criminal activity, including taking action against virtual asset service providers.Photo by Akbar Nemati on PexelsContinuous improvement neededAlthough acknowledging “substantive improvements” applied to its control system, the FATF report emphasized that Qatar must further improve its understanding of more complex forms of money laundering and terrorist financing.While Qatar has shown positive progress in gathering beneficial ownership information through its unified register, which consolidates data on its citizens, the FATF report emphasized the need for stronger controls to ensure the accuracy and currency of the collected information. The report also criticized Qatar’s authorities for underutilizing their sophisticated analysis capabilities in identifying instances of money laundering.Lack of control despite VASP banDespite the Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Authority’s (QFCRA) announcement in December 2019 that virtual asset service providers (VASPs) are not allowed within or from the Qatar Financial Centre, the country’s regulatory authority has made little progress in penalizing firms that facilitate or provide crypto asset services.Interestingly, while Qatar has banned virtual asset service providers, it has expressed interest in exploring the potential use cases of a central bank digital currency (CBDC). In June 2022, it was reported that the QCB is in the early stages of developing a CBDC.Sheikh Bandar bin Mohammed bin Saoud Al Thani, the governor of Qatar’s central bank, revealed that the QCB is evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of CBDCs and determining the appropriate technology and platform.As the country explores the potential of a CBDC, it must ensure that its regulatory framework aligns with international standards and best practices. By doing so, Qatar can strike a balance between fostering innovation in the digital currency space and safeguarding its financial system from illicit activities.Global coordinationThrough the Paris-based money-laundering watchdog, and calls from the G7, the European Central Bank, and others to regulate on a global basis, the official response to controlling digital assets and VASPs is becoming more globally coordinated. Central bankers and government officials have learned that decentralized finance has the ability to be borderless.FATF has been active in getting more countries on board. Effective from Thursday, Japan now implements FATF’s “travel rule” with respect to digital assets. That action was taken following a FATF finding that Japan wasn’t following best practice relative to anti-money laundering (AML) measures. Pakistan recently banned cryptocurrencies in an effort that appears to have been motivated by wanting to stay off the FATF’s gray list of non-compliant countries.While Pakistan managed to get itself off that list, the United Arab Emirates found itself on the gray list. The UAE’s Central Bank issued guidance on AML relative to virtual asset companies, in an effort to come back into FATF compliance.It remains to be seen how Qatar will respond to the FATF’s critique and whether it will take concrete actions to address the concerns raised. The international community will be closely monitoring Qatar’s efforts to combat financial crimes in the virtual asset sector and to establish a robust regulatory framework for its future CBDC endeavors.