Korea Exchange to conduct CBDC pilot test in H2

The focus of Thailand’s crypto market is moving towards institutional business rather than retail. That’s the view of Nirun Fuwattananukul, CEO of Binance Thailand. Changing regulatory landscapeFuwattananukul laid out his thoughts on the matter in an opinion piece published by the Bangkok Post on Oct. 25. The Binance executive believes that the regulatory conditions are changing in the country such that institutional involvement in digital assets will become more likely. Fuwattananukul pointed to a proposal that was put forward by the Thai Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) earlier this month. The proposal, published on Oct. 9, seeks to permit mutual and private equity funds in Thailand to invest in various crypto products, including the spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that were launched in the United States earlier this year. Back in June, the Thai SEC green-lighted the launch of homegrown spot Bitcoin ETFs. In August, the regulator launched the Digital Asset Regulatory Sandbox, inviting interested parties to test crypto-related services within a controlled environment. Fuwattananukul described the SEC’s new rules opening institutional access to digital asset products as a “vital step in the maturation of Thailand’s cryptocurrency landscape.” The Binance Thailand CEO added that “by allowing more institutional funds to participate, the SEC is enabling a diverse range of investment strategies and helping digital assets gain broader acceptance in the mainstream.”Photo by Vadim Artyukhin on UnsplashPotential regional crypto hubIt’s based on this rationale that the Binance executive perceives a shift in focus within the crypto market in Thailand, with the likelihood of more money flowing into the space from institutional sources than from retail.  The entry of institutional money could lead to a “more mature ecosystem,” while further legitimizing Bitcoin and the crypto space more broadly. Extending that line of thought, Fuwattananukul suggests that this change of focus to institutional involvement could lead to positioning Thailand as a regional digital asset hub.RWA tokenizationThe Binance Thailand executive also identified the tokenization of real-world assets (RWAs) as an area that’s trending right now. He cites it as an example of the convergence of TradFi and digital assets markets. Fuwattananukul stated: “Tokenisation brings 24/7 trading, increased liquidity, and cross-border accessibility, which could reshape traditional financial markets and make investment opportunities more inclusive.” Back in January, Thailand’s SEC introduced new rules that lifted restrictions on retail investors accessing two classes of tokenized RWAs. The change affected real estate-backed tokens or tokens linked to real estate revenues. Prior to the rule change, retail investors couldn’t invest more than $8,415 in such tokenized assets. In collaboration with Gulf Innova, a subsidiary of Gulf Energy Development, Binance launched Binance Thailand as a joint venture in January. The SEC had awarded the business a trading license in 2023.

Philippines Delays Crypto Framework PublicationThe Philippines’ financial regulator has decided to postpone the release of a legal framework for the crypto industry, originally scheduled for late 2022, despite a tumultuous year.That’s according to a report published by local news outlet, Philstar Global. In the face of numerous market failures in 2022, the Philippines’ financial regulator has opted for a cautious approach and delayed the publication of a legal framework for the crypto industry, which was initially expected to be released by the end of the same year. However, work on the guidelines is still ongoing, and there is a possibility that the results could be made public in 2023.Photo by Krisia on PexelsScrutinizing crypto failuresAccording to the chairman of the Philippines Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Emilio Aquino, the regulatory authority has adjusted its previous deadlines for introducing the crypto framework in the country. The SEC had originally planned to roll out the guidelines in 2022, but they held back in order to thoroughly study the reasons behind the collapse of the FTX exchange and ensure the protection of investors.Aquino stated that there is still a chance that the framework will be issued by the end of 2023, saying, “We haven’t closed the door. We really just have to make sure people don’t get burned.”Earlier this year, the SEC joined forces with the University of the Philippines Law Center (UPLC) to collaborate on the development of guidelines for digital assets. In January 2023, the regulator introduced the Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act No. 11765 for public comment. This act, which was signed into law in 2022, however, does not explicitly mention “crypto” or “blockchain.”The crypto industry in the Philippines has been facing increasing pressure. The country’s central bank has been urging citizens to refrain from engaging in any transactions with unregistered or foreign crypto exchanges, and the SEC has echoed these recommendations.In May 2023, the SEC identified Gemini Derivatives as an unregistered security product under national law. In the investor advisory, the Commission wrote: “The public is advised not to invest or to stop investing in the investment scheme of Gemini Trust Company, LLC.”Last month the country hosted a meeting of the Regional Consultative Group for Asia of the Financial Stability Board. That meeting, held in the Philippines' oldest city, Cebu, highlighted the risks pertaining to crypto assets.Potential for positive approachNevertheless, the Philippines remains an attractive destination for crypto enthusiasts. With its rapidly growing economy, it has emerged as one of the world’s fastest-growing markets, with over 11.6 million Filipinos owning digital assets, placing it 10th worldwide in terms of crypto adoption.In an opinion piece published by Forkast News in April, Robert De Guzman, Head of Legal Compliance at Philippines-based cryptocurrency exchange Coins.ph, outlined his view that the country is forging a positive, workable framework for crypto assets. With that, it sounds like while the delay is unwelcome, the more important factor is that the South East Asian country devises a framework that is fit for purpose relative to the innovation at hand.

Japan’s Cryptoasset Group Proposes Self-Regulatory Reforms for IEO SystemThe Japan Cryptoasset Business Association (JCBA) has revealed a preliminary draft advocating for reforms in self-regulation to bolster the soundness of the initial exchange offering (IEO) system. This draft has been submitted to the Japan Virtual and Crypto Assets Exchange Association (JVCEA).IEOs serve as a mechanism enabling various enterprises to accrue funds and broaden their user base by orchestrating token sales on cryptocurrency exchanges for Web3 projects. This fundraising method holds the potential to enhance trust as crypto exchanges, supervised by the Japanese Financial Services Agency, undertake evaluations of project feasibility and maintain ongoing oversight.Photo by Takashi Miyazaki on UnsplashPositive regulatory developmentsThe ameliorating regulatory landscape is also a positive development, highlighted by this year’s tax law amendment, which grants exemptions to enterprises’ self-issued tokens from year-end corporate taxation. In Japan, four IEOs have been conducted so far, with the inaugural IEO amassing over 900 million yen (approximately $6 million). The cumulative amount from the four IEOs has surpassed 4.4 billion yen. However, given that the IEO is a relatively nascent fundraising method, improvements in token price stability and operational modalities are required to ensure that businesses and users can engage with it confidently.Enhanced user protectionAgainst this backdrop, JCBA, an organization comprised of various enterprises involving virtual assets and Web3, has been discussing the direction of the IEO system from a corporate viewpoint since May of this year. Establishing price stabilization measures and selling restrictions within the Japanese IEO system will contribute to user protection by allowing investors to manage their assets under domestic regulations. JCBA stated that users will find domestic exchanges more secure in comparison to foreign ones.As this proposal represents an initial draft, deliberated and formulated only within the JCBA, the group intends to consult and assess the feasibility of the self-regulatory rules with each pertinent organization as necessary.Four key pointsThe document submitted by JCBA to JVCEA presented four key points concerning the IEO. Pertaining to pricing, it suggested the diversification of calculation methods customized to each project and the specification of price-related disclaimers. On liquidity, it posited that liquidity objectives should be established at the time of listing, and an environment conducive to securing liquidity should be developed. JCBA also pointed out the necessity of establishing rules for price stabilization measures at the time of listing. Finally, regarding selling restrictions, it was noted that both token issuers and exchanges should adhere to a minimum three-month lock-up period for tokens.