Busan Introduces Blockchain-Powered Cards for Multi-Children Families to Offer Social Benefits

Hong Kong Launches Web3 InstituteThe Institute of Web3 Hong Kong has recently been established with the aim of promoting and developing Web3 technologies, including blockchain and other decentralized technologies. That’s according to a report that was published by the Hong Kong China News Agency (HKCNA) last week.©Pexels/Zetong LiPromoting Web3 developmentThe Institute of Web3 Hong Kong aims to promote the development of Web3 technologies by providing education, research, and development support to individuals and organizations interested in these technologies. It will also serve as a platform for collaboration between different stakeholders in the Web3 ecosystem, including developers, entrepreneurs, investors, and regulators.The institute is being led by Joseph Yam, the former Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), and is expected to play a key role in the growth and development of Web3 in Hong Kong and beyond.Yam is well-known for his expertise in financial regulation and has been a strong advocate for the adoption of blockchain technology in the financial industry. In his new role as the head of the Institute of Web3 Hong Kong, he is expected to use his experience and knowledge to promote the adoption of Web3 technologies in Hong Kong and the wider Asia-Pacific region.Developing financial centerThe establishment of the Institute of Web3 Hong Kong is seen as a significant development in the growth of the Web3 ecosystem in Hong Kong. Hong Kong is already known for its strong financial industry, and the adoption of Web3 technologies could further enhance the city’s position as a leading financial hub in the region. The institute’s focus on education and research will also help to develop a skilled workforce that can support the growth of the Web3 industry in the future.The institute is expected to work closely with the Hong Kong government and other stakeholders to create a regulatory framework that supports the growth and development of Web3 technologies. This is important, as regulatory uncertainty is often cited as a barrier to the adoption of blockchain and other decentralized technologies.Precursor to investmentThe establishment of the Institute of Web3 is also expected to attract more investment in the Web3 industry in the region. The institute’s focus on education and research will help to create a favorable environment for startups and other organizations that are developing Web3-based applications.While China has not been a crypto-friendly region in recent years, there are increasing signs that Chinese officials are content to see Hong Kong develop as a hub for Web3-based technologies while keeping the sector under much stricter control within mainland China. Chen Dong, Deputy Director at the Liaison Office of the Central People’s Government in Hong Kong has publicly praised Hong Kong’s push to become a regional center for Web3 innovation. Meanwhile, Li Feng, the Chairman and CEO of China Mobile, has been installed as the non profit’s honorary chairperson.The establishment of the Institute of Web3 Hong Kong is a significant development in the growth and development of Web3 technologies in the Asia-Pacific region. The institute’s focus on education, research, and collaboration will help to promote the adoption of Web3 technologies and create new business models in various industries. With the leadership of Joseph Yam, the institute is expected to play a key role in the growth of the Web3 ecosystem in Hong Kong and beyond.

Dubai Regulator Issues Reprimand to OPNX FoundersThe Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), the regulator that concerns itself with the digital assets market in the Emirate of Dubai, has formally reprimanded the founders of digital asset exchange OPNX.Photo by Kai Pilger on UnsplashVARA issued an investor and marketplace alert on April 12 to inform investors that OPNX was not a licensed entity regulated by VARA and with that, it urged investors to be cautious. The regulator has now gone one further, this time formally writing to OPNX’s founders to reprimand them.The statement cites the following rationale for the issuance of the reprimand:”Carrying out VA (Virtual Asset) Exchange Services on an unregulated basis in and from the Emirate of Dubai; and Marketing, promoting and/or advertising OPNX services and its native token [FLEX] without the necessary permits from VARA.”Contextual backgroundThe statement goes on to provide the context for the regulator’s most recent action. VARA became aware of OPNX soliciting the public to use the exchange in February of this year. It noted that the business was actively marketing through various social media channels “without establishing warranted restrictions for residents of Dubai/UAE.” VARA went on to explain that OPNX commenced trading in April without having secured a regulatory license despite the activity warranting such a license.Cease and desistOn February 27, VARA issued OPNX with a cease and desist order, relative to the foundation of the business and the marketing and promotion of services. Thereafter, the exchange applied certain restrictions but the regulator deemed the measures to not have been applied comprehensively across all OPNX communication channels, prompting it to issue a further cease and desist order the following month.The investor and marketplace alert followed in April as OPNX proceeded to launch its exchange. The written reprimand was then issued on April 18, “to address historical and ongoing activity conducted on an unregulated basis.” The recipients included the OPNX founders, (Mark Lamb, Sudhu Arumugam, Kyle Davies and Su Zhu) and the firm’s CEO Leslie Lamb.Given what the regulator deems to have been “a continued lack of satisfactory remedial action [taken] by the responsible parties,” it is continuing to actively monitor the situation. VARA stated that it will further investigate OPNX’s activity to assess further corrective measures that may be required to protect the market.Lack of industry supportThe digital assets industry is in no way enamored with founders Davies and Zhu. Their record has been badly blemished by the unceremonious collapse of their crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital, in 2022. That failure wreaked major damage on the overarching crypto space, directly leading to the failure of other crypto businesses later that year.Prominent crypto venture capitalist Michael Arrington said of their capital raise for OPNX that it was “the saddest bulls**t I’ve heard in a long time.” It later transpired that two of the investment firms that OPNX suggested were backing the start-up refuted the claim.In response to this latest development, OPNX’s CEO Leslie Lamb told Blockworks that the business was initially launched in Hong Kong. “To confirm, we have no Dubai or UAE customers and do full KYC on all users,” she stated.

Japan is preparing to shift oversight of crypto assets from its payments rulebook to its main securities law, a move that would treat digital tokens more squarely as investment products rather than payment tools, according to a new report from the country’s financial regulator. In a working-group paper on crypto asset regulation released Dec. 10, the Financial Services Agency (FSA) said it plans to bring “crypto assets” under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA) instead of the Payment Services Act (PSA), as reported by local outlet CoinPost. The agency framed the change as an effort to strengthen investor protection as more households buy digital assets for investment purposes.Photo by Alessio Ferretti on UnsplashCrypto distinct from traditional securitiesThe regulatory perimeter itself would not expand. The FSA intends to keep using the PSA’s existing definition of “crypto assets,” while leaving non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and stablecoins outside the scope of the new framework. Under FIEA, crypto assets would be carved out as a distinct class separate from traditional securities, reflecting the fact that they generally do not confer legal claims such as dividends or interest payments. That distinction is already shaping how firms attempt to expand the economic utility of crypto assets. The move toward a clearer rulebook also arrives as market participants look for ways to construct return-generating mechanisms for assets that do not produce steady income on their own. Hong Kong–based Animoca Brands has partnered with Solv Protocol to provide Japanese institutions access to a Bitcoin-backed wrapper, according to Cointelegraph. The product is structured to generate returns in the 4% to 12% range for large holders, effectively layering yield on top of a token that otherwise provides no ongoing income. Rising retail demandThe regulator's report also details how deeply crypto has penetrated Japan’s retail market. As of October 2025, accounts at domestically registered crypto-asset exchanges had climbed past 13 million, with user deposits topping 5 trillion yen (about $32 billion). Roughly 70% of account holders fell into annual income brackets below 7 million yen (around $45,000), and more than 80% of individual accounts held less than 100,000 yen (about $640). The FSA said 86.6% of trading was driven by expectations of long-term price gains, indicating that most users view crypto primarily as an investment vehicle rather than a means of payment. Against that backdrop, the working group concluded that FIEA is a better fit than the PSA, which is geared toward payment services and anti-money-laundering (AML) controls. Shifting to the securities law would give regulators clearer authority to impose disclosure standards, govern conduct in the market, and levy penalties for unfair trading practices, the report said. The proposed framework would place heavier disclosure obligations on token issuances and initial exchange offerings (IEOs). Issuers or the listing exchanges would be required to provide key information to investors, and, in cases where an issuer does not have audited financial statements, offerings would be subject to investment limits. Crypto exchanges would face stronger due diligence requirements, tighter cybersecurity expectations, and broader insider-trading restrictions. Those rules would not only apply to employees at trading platforms but also to issuers and other insiders around listing events. Rules split for CEXs and DEXsCentralized exchanges (CEXs) would be supervised largely in line with securities firms. That would include requirements to maintain reserves or insurance to protect customer assets and expanded oversight of wallet-service providers connected to those platforms. Decentralized exchanges (DEXs), which have no central operator, would not be brought under the same regime. Instead, the FSA is proposing lighter, perimeter-based rules focused on disclosures by wallet providers and interface operators, coupled with efforts to warn users about the specific risks of trading on DEXs.  Industry participants, meanwhile, have raised concerns that licensed exchanges may face higher compliance costs in the near term as they adapt to the new regime.  Moving forward, the FSA is expected to refine the framework with an eye toward submitting a bill to the ordinary Diet session in the new year.