Zodia Custody Expands to Hong Kong to Meet Asian Institutional Demand

Disagreement has emerged within the Bitcoin blockchain community, revolving around the BRC-20 token standard. Domo, the pseudonymous developer behind the creation of the token standard, has publicly expressed his opposition to an upcoming upgrade proposed by the Hong Kong headquartered project, UniSat Wallet.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashDue diligence concernsOn Tuesday Domo took to the X social media platform (previously Twitter) to articulate his concerns. He voiced apprehensions about hastily implementing updates in BRC-20, asserting that such a rush could potentially harm the broader BRC-20 user community. Domo's resistance is rooted in his belief that UniSat Wallet's proposed updates lack due diligence and are being introduced precipitously without considering potential repercussions. He wrote:”Recognizing the serious implications and valuations involved, I believe rushing these updates in BRC20 is reckless, disregards their peer indexers, and could potentially harm the broader community of BRC20 users.” ‘Split’ rather than ‘fork’Conversely, UniSat Wallet has declared its intention to “follow the Ordinals Jubilee upgrade, to confirm that BRC-20 is still on Ordinals without splitting into an isolated protocol." Described as a "split" rather than a "fork," UniSat Wallet's approach adapts to the Ordinals Jubilee upgrade, a transformative change in how the Bitcoin blockchain manages tokenized assets. In mapping the way forward its proposing to take, UniSat outlined that it would publish a whitepaper on Jan. 31, describing it as “the most significant present we are able to deliver” for BRC-20, Ordinals and Bitcoin. The crux of the matter lies in the method and pace of implementing these changes. Domo's concerns reflect a broader sentiment within the crypto community, where the rapid pace of advancements often collides with the need for stability and thorough vetting. UniSat Wallet's proposed changes, though innovative, may be viewed as potentially destabilizing by certain community members, especially those deeply entrenched in the current BRC-20 standard. Striking a balanceThis development is pivotal, highlighting the dynamic and occasionally contentious nature of blockchain technology and cryptocurrency standards. Web3 project incubator and investor TrustlessLabs summed up the matter in a social media post on Wednesday, drawing the following conclusions:”This situation encapsulates a critical challenge in blockchain protocol development: finding the right balance between preserving stability and embracing technological advancements.” As technology evolves, divergent opinions on the trajectory of these advancements are inevitable. The ongoing debate between Domo and UniSat Wallet serves as a microcosm of the larger conversations transpiring in the crypto space about how to strike the right balance between progress and stability. The BRC-20 token standard, an experimental fungible token standard on Bitcoin, draws inspiration from Ethereum's ERC-20 standard. It allows the creation of fungible tokens using Bitcoin’s Ordinals protocol, constituting a significant breakthrough in cryptocurrency by enabling novel forms of tokenization on the Bitcoin blockchain. This disagreement not only spotlights a critical debate in the crypto realm but also emphasizes the delicate equilibrium between innovation and stability.  

Do Kwon Out On Bail Following AppealDo Kwon, the South Korean Co-Founder of Singapore-headquartered Terraform Labs, has been granted bail in Montenegro following a court appearance last week.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashAppeal dismissalThe appeal brought by state prosecutors was dismissed by a Montenegrin court according to a statement released by the courts on Friday. The Basic Court in Podgorica confirmed that the State Prosecutor’s Office’s appeal against an earlier bail agreement was rejected, allowing Kwon and Terraform Labs’ chief financial officer Han Chang-joon to await further legal proceedings under house arrest in Montenegro.The court reinstated the original bail terms set during a hearing on May 12, requiring both individuals to pay 400,000 euros ($436,000) each to secure their release from custody. Kwon and Han are now under strict bail conditions and are not permitted to leave Han’s legal residence in Montenegro.According to the court statement: “The court appreciated the fact that they are persons who are not Montenegrin citizens, which is why it accepted their statements about the value of the property they own, which were supported by concrete evidence.”The Montenegrin court found, following the first appeal, that the original decision to permit bail was not based on a sound assessment of “concrete evidence.” That allowed prosecutors to overturn that original decision, which has itself been overturned to permit bail once again.Local police will closely monitor both individuals, and any violation of the supervision measures or departure from the residence will result in the forfeiture of the bail amount. To ensure compliance and discourage flight attempts, Kwon and Han provided personal and financial information to the local authorities, including evidence of property ownership and a sales contract for an apartment, parking space, and basement owned by Han. Kwon also submitted an invoice for a vehicle and bank account statements.Alleged fake passportsKwon and Han were arrested in Montenegro in March 2023 for allegedly using false travel documents while attempting to leave the country. Their original passports had been confiscated in South Korea in October 2022.The court acknowledged that verifying the authenticity of the Belgian passports and identity cards held by the defendants would require additional time. However, it deemed the agreed-upon bail amount sufficient to ensure their presence during legal proceedings.International interestDespite being granted bail in Montenegro, Kwon remains wanted in multiple jurisdictions. South Korean authorities seek to extradite him for investigation into the collapse of the Terra ecosystem, which caused an estimated $40 billion loss in the cryptocurrency market in June 2022. Interpol has also issued a Red Notice for Kwon in connection with the charges in South Korea, and he faces several fraud charges in the United States.The recent decision in Montenegro allows Kwon and Han temporary freedom while they await further legal proceedings. However, their legal troubles extend beyond Montenegro, with ongoing investigations and charges in South Korea and the United States casting a shadow over their future.The pair are due back to appear before a Montenegrin court once again on June 16. Prosecutors have three days in which to file another appeal of the latest bail decision.

SEC seeks summary judgment against Terraform LabsThe U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is making a strong push for a summary judgment in its ongoing legal battle against Singapore’s Terraform Labs and its co-founder Do Kwon. Such an outcome would spare the need for a protracted trial.According to a motion filed by the SEC on Thursday, the record shows that there is “no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”Photo by Caleb Fisher on UnsplashRelying on the Howey TestThe SEC’s filing underscores its central argument that Kwon and Terraform Labs were involved in the sale of securities. The document categorically states:“There is no dispute that purchasers made an investment of money, either through fiat currency or crypto assets, for each crypto asset — LUNA, wLUNA, MIR, and UST, thereby satisfying the first prong of Howey.” The Howey Test refers back to a U.S. Supreme Court case — SEC v. Howey — which took place in 1946. The case set a precedent and has subsequently become the cornerstone of determining what is or is not a security in the United States.This argument hinges on the idea that funds were pooled in a common enterprise with the expectation of profits primarily derived from the efforts of the promoters.Citing fraud as well as unregistered securitiesThe SEC’s assertion is two-fold, contending that not only did Terraform and Kwon engage in selling securities, but they also engaged in fraudulent activities and disseminated misleading information. The SEC reiterates these claims in its filing, emphasizing that the defendants committed fraud by duping investors about the stability of UST.They allegedly falsely attributed the algorithm for price stabilization while orchestrating clandestine third-party interventions. This purported deception made their claims regarding the algorithm’s effectiveness deceptive and involved the omission of crucial information. The fallout from Terra’s collapse in May of the previous year resulted in the destruction of substantial investor wealth, totaling billions of dollars.Similar defense team filingThe SEC’s move to seek summary judgment comes in the wake of a similar filing by Kwon’s defense team last Friday. Kwon is currently serving a sentence for document forgery in Montenegro, a situation stemming from his arrest at an airport with forged passports.Notably, Terraform’s co-founder, Daniel Shin, who is currently on trial in South Korea, has attributed the collapse of Terraform Labs to Kwon’s mismanagement. Shin has claimed his separation from the company and its activities occurred two years before its eventual collapse.In this legal battle that holds significant implications for the cryptocurrency and blockchain space, the SEC continues to emphasize its position, asserting that Kwon and Terraform Labs engaged in the sale of securities through deceptive means. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching consequences, setting precedents for future regulatory actions in the industry.