Korean Police Establishes Task Force to Tackle Virtual Asset-Related Crimes

Hashed Emergent to Host India Blockchain Week 2023 in DecemberHashed Emergent, a subsidiary of South Korean blockchain venture capital Hashed, will host India Blockchain Week (IBW) 2023 at the Sheraton Grand Hotel in Bangalore, India, from December 4 to 10.Hashed Emergent is a venture capital firm specializing in investments in early-stage companies bridging the gap between Web2 and Web3 in India. The firm was established by Hashed, a group dedicated to propelling the global adoption of the Web3 ecosystem. Hashed Emergent seeks to tap into the potential of emerging markets.Photo by Still Pixels on PexelsIndia’s Web3 surgeIndia is exhibiting promise in the Web3 market, driven by its economy, population, and tech advancements. Since 2015, there has been an increase of about sixfold in the number of Web3 startups in the country, with the count reaching 450 as of April 2022. Among them are four unicorns, namely Polygon, FalconX, CoinSwitch, and CoinDCX. Investment in Web3 startups has also seen a rise, with the figure touching $1.3 billion between 2021 and the first quarter of 2022. Furthermore, the Indian government appears to be taking a more accommodating stance towards the Web3 industry.Hashed Emergent is organizing this event for the first time to accelerate the expansion of the Web3 ecosystem in the burgeoning Indian market. IBW2023 is an international multi-chain conference that will delve into Web3 conversations across all industries. It is designed to foster connections between blockchain enterprises in India and abroad, uniting participants from the multifaceted blockchain landscape.Echoing the prominence of notable blockchain events like Singapore’s Token2049 and Korea’s Korea Blockchain Week (KBW), IBW2023 is expected to attract blockchain enthusiasts from around the world who are eager to see firsthand the evolving potential of India’s Web3 market.Flagship IBW’23 ConferenceThe flagship event, “IBW’23 Conference,” is set for December 6 to 7 and will spotlight five pivotal themes. Discussions will delve into the latest technical advancements in the blockchain realm, the role of Web3 in emerging markets, how global regulations will shape the blockchain sector, the prospects for Web3 in India, and the opportunities and hurdles facing Web3 expansion.About 120 prominent figures from the Web3 space are set to grace the event as speakers. They include Mo Shaikh, CEO of layer 1 blockchain developer Aptos Labs; Emin Gün Sirer, CEO of Avalanche blockchain builder Ava Labs; Sebastien Borget, co-founder of metaverse platform The Sandbox; and Simon Seojoon Kim, CEO of Hashed. Furthermore, the blockchain hackathon, ETH INDIA, is poised to attract over 1,500 developers, all geared to create the decentralized future of Ethereum.Tak Lee, CEO of Hashed Emergent, highlighted that India has been gaining traction as a major player in the blockchain industry. He shared that both Hashed and Hashed Emergent have been keenly observing the potential of the Indian Web3 market since early 2020. They are dedicated to ensuring IBW2023’s success, envisioning it as the first step towards the explosive growth of the Indian Web3 ecosystem.Meanwhile, Hashed Emergent is currently managing its first fund, Hashed Emergent Fund I, which has raised $20 million to date in multiple closings. In its first year and a half, the fund has invested in 28 portfolio companies, many of which have Indian founders. Major portfolio companies include Web3 game discovery and wallet app Glip, Web3 native incubator BuidlersTribe, and African web3 startup Nestcoin.

US Treasury Sanctions Gaza-Based Crypto OperatorThe Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the United States Department of the Treasury has imposed sanctions on a crypto operator allegedly linked to the Palestinian militant group Hamas.The move by OFAC comes as a result of greater scrutiny of terrorist financing following an attack by Hamas on Israel in early October, in which a number of Israelis lost their lives.Photo by Karolina Grabowska on Pexels“Buy Cash Money and Money Transfer Company”The entity targeted by these sanctions is a Gaza-based virtual currency exchange known as the “Buy Cash Money and Money Transfer Company.” It is operated by Khan Yunis, a resident of Gaza. According to the Treasury Department, both the exchange and Khan Yunis are alleged to have ties to Hamas. Ahmed M.M. Alaqad, the owner of the business, has also been named in the sanctions.The primary objective of these sanctions, as stated by the Treasury Department, is to disrupt the sources of revenue for Hamas. The attack on Israel served as a trigger for these actions. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen emphasized the determination to prevent Hamas from raising funds for further acts of terror and violence against the people of Israel.This includes imposing sanctions and cooperating with international allies and partners to identify, freeze, and seize any assets related to Hamas in their respective jurisdictions. Yellen stated:“The United States is taking swift and decisive action to target Hamas’s financiers and facilitators following its brutal and unconscionable massacre of Israeli civilians, including children.”Crypto sector riskIt’s not the first time that crypto platforms have been implicated where terrorist financing is concerned. Earlier this year it emerged that Bitfinex Turkiye, the Turkish local exchange business of global crypto platform Bitfinex, was alleged to have been used for the purposes of money laundering by Hamas. Additionally, leading crypto platform Binance has found itself facing similar allegations.In the immediate aftermath of the recent attack, Israeli authorities moved to close down accounts they claimed were linked with Hamas on crypto platforms like Binance and elsewhere. The Israelis have continued where they left off in this respect, with a report emerging earlier this week that over one hundred accounts on Binance have been ordered to be shut down, with a further two hundred accounts facing scrutiny.While crypto may not account for a sizable proportion of terrorist financing means, these events open up a point of attack for those who oppose the further roll-out of decentralized money and systems.Fighting illicit finance through sanctionsNotably, the US Treasury has been employing sanctions as a tool to cut off financial support to entities suspected of being involved in terrorism or other illicit activities. In a similar vein, earlier in October, the Treasury announced sanctions against crypto wallets associated with Chinese chemical manufacturers, concurrently with an indictment from the Department of Justice related to the production of the drug fentanyl.Earlier this year, blockchain analytics firm Elliptic indicated that most Chinese suppliers of fentanyl precursors were accepting payments for the illicit material in cryptocurrency.It’s worth mentioning that this move by OFAC not only targets Hamas but also includes other entities allegedly connected to the Buy Cash Money and Money Transfer Company, including an al-Qaeda affiliate and the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

Lack of Funds Sees Multichain Cease OperationsThe development team behind Multichain, a cross-chain protocol, has recently announced its decision to cease operations due to a lack of operational funds.This announcement follows a report by blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis, which suggested that insiders may have orchestrated a “rug pull” by withdrawing funds. The Multichain team took to Twitter on Friday to inform their community about the suspension of their business activities, citing a lack of alternative sources of information and operational funds as the primary reasons for their decision.One crucial factor contributing to the shutdown is the absence of communication with the CEO, Zhaojun, who had been missing and is now understood to be in the custody of Chinese authorities. The team explained that they had reached out to Zhaojun’s family and discovered that the police had seized his computers, phones, wallets, and mnemonic phrases.Photo by Christian Lue on UnsplashOperational controlThroughout the project’s lifespan, Zhaojun had maintained control over operational and investor funds. Consequently, the team, along with all their funds and access to servers, found themselves at Zhaojun’s mercy, as he now remains under police custody.Attempting to salvage the situation, Zhaojun’s sister initiated an asset preservation act and transferred some funds to addresses under her control. However, the team soon received news that Zhaojun’s sister, too, had been detained by the police and was now unreachable. Faced with these unfortunate circumstances, the team reluctantly announced the cessation of their operations.DeFi centralization risksThe debacle has raised concerns about the lack of decentralization demonstrated by the level of control Zhaojun had over the project. It prompted comment from Chris Blec, a DeFi Researcher & Analyst who has been highly critical of a whole host of DeFi projects on the basis that while many DeFi projects claim to be decentralized, they’re critically flawed and are centralized to a point that puts them at critical risk.Taking to Twitter, Blec stated: “Dude gets thrown in jail, admin keys to Multichain are on his computers, sister eventually uses his computer to steal money, now she’s in jail too. THIS IS WHY WE DECENTRALIZE.”The Multichain debacle traces back to May when the suspension of Multichain routes for an upgrade caused delays in fund transfers. The uncertainties surrounding the protocol prompted crypto exchange Binance to halt deposit and withdrawal support for certain Multichain bridged tokens.Adding to the platform’s woes, significant outflows from the Multichain MPC bridge platform raised concerns of an exploit. Observers analyzing the blockchain data reached a consensus on July 6 that the protocol had been hacked, as over $100 million worth of assets were withdrawn from the Fantom bridge on the Ethereum side.As Multichain now faces the unfortunate reality of halting its operations, it serves as a stark reminder of the challenges and risks inherent in the blockchain industry. The lack of operational funds, combined with the absence of communication with key figures and critical points of centralized failure have proven insurmountable for this cross-chain protocol.