OKX expands McLaren F1 sponsorship deal

As is the case in the rest of the world, South Korea is also experiencing a bullish cryptocurrency market these days. However, local blockchain companies that started their business between 2017 and 2018 – those considered the first-generation blockchain firms – are trying to distance themselves from the label “blockchain,” removing words such as “block,” “chain” or “coin” from their names to rebrand themselves.  This is largely due to local regulations that stifle blockchain businesses and widespread negative perspectives towards the crypto industry among the public, the local media outlet News1 reported. Photo by Robert Stump on UnsplashMediBloc rebrands itself to WeavrCare: The two-track strategy Among the first-generation blockchain firms that changed its name is MediBloc. Founded in April 2017 as a blockchain-based digital health company, MediBloc rebranded its Korean branch last month to WeavrCare, combining the words "weave" and "care" to highlight its commitment to connecting patients and hospitals onchain.  WeavrCare offers a blockchain healthcare data platform named Panacea, where patients can directly manage their own medical data. It also provides a blockchain-based medical data and insurance claim platform Medipass. MediBloc's native token MED is currently listed on prominent local crypto exchanges such as Upbit and Bithumb.  The company is known to have well weathered the crypto winter between 2022 and 2023 by pitching a cloud electronic medical record (EMR) solution, Dr. Palette, which enables medical staff to easily check medical charts and manage patients' data.  Following its rebranding, WeavrCare has demonstrated its intention to pursue a two-track strategy, with the company’s Gibraltar branch focusing on blockchain business under the original corporate name MediBloc. In contrast, WeavrCare in Korea will focus on expanding new businesses including Dr. Palette.  Meanwhile, WeavrCare has reportedly embarked on investor relations (IR) activities to secure a Series B investment.  Chain Partners rebrands itself to AI3: Merging Web3 with AIChain Partners, a blockchain firm focused on crypto exchanges and the over-the-counter (OTC) markets, has also recently rebranded itself to AI3, a new name that the company expects will illustrate its aim of focusing more on AI businesses. The name reflects the company's dedication to exploring both Web3 and generative AI technology.  Following its rebranding, AI3 has embarked on developing an AI service equipped with a prompt response system. AI3 had already launched a personal AI assistant dubbed Wrks last year, which aims to improve workflows. A company official said AI3 is currently preparing for IR to qualify for a Series A investment.  CPLABS and Parameta: Earlier pioneers of blockchain Meanwhile, other blockchain firms that launched their businesses earlier than the above two companies have already completed their rebranding last year. CoinPlug changed its name to CPLABS, and Iconloop to Parameta.  

BitMEX CEO Calls for an End to Internal Market MakersIn a recent interview, Stephan Lutz, the acting CEO and group CFO of 100x Group, the parent company of Seychelles-headquartered global crypto exchange BitMEX, expressed his belief that crypto exchanges should phase out their internal market-making teams.Photo by Joe Roberts on UnsplashProp trading desks unnecessarySpeaking with The Block, Lutz argued that with the growth of institutional liquidity providers and high-frequency traders (HFTs) in the market, proprietary trading desks are becoming unnecessary.Lutz stated: “You have enough HFTs out there and prop shops that can perform that function.” He was referring to the role of liquidity providers in filling gaps in the market. He made these comments in response to the emergence of information earlier this week that raised questions about internal trading practices at Crypto.com, a Singapore-based exchange.BitMEX, once the world’s largest crypto derivatives exchange, also used to employ internal traders who acted as market makers. However, Lutz explained that BitMEX’s internal trading team, named Arrakis Capital, now functions primarily as a “treasury desk.” He sees this transition as a natural evolution for crypto exchanges in a market that has matured and attracted more institutional liquidity providers.Arrakis Capital currently performs limited functions, including converting commission fees earned in Bitcoin into fiat currency for operational purposes, hedging BitMEX’s exposure to tokens held as inventory, and making markets for BitMEX’s token $BMEX. Lutz clarified that Arrakis’s market-making activities are limited because external market makers find the token’s liquidity insufficient.Regarding profitability, Lutz stated that Arrakis earns “very minor returns” of up to $100,000 per month from holding T-Bills, but it incurred losses last year. He noted that Arrakis used to play a more significant market-making role when BitMEX dominated the crypto futures market. However, he assured that the trading desk was always segregated, despite accusations in the past.Fee structuresLutz acknowledged that exchanges with internal trading teams have faced increased scrutiny since the controversies surrounding Alameda Research and FTX. To differentiate between benign internal trading teams and hedge fund-like operations, Lutz highlighted several factors, including the separation of client funds and house funds, access to sensitive data, and the ability to move markets on their own exchange. Fee structures also play a role, with low or no transaction fees potentially signaling a market-making motive rather than serving as a counterparty.Lutz’s perspective suggests that crypto exchanges should rely on external liquidity providers and HFTs rather than maintaining internal market-making teams. He argues that the market has evolved. At this point he feels that these teams are no longer necessary, due to the presence of established players within the digital assets space.As regulatory scrutiny grows, ensuring transparency and avoiding conflicts of interest become crucial for maintaining trust within the crypto exchange ecosystem. The digital assets industry is far from arriving at a mature stage in its development. While many in the industry have found the stance taken by regulators to be unhelpful, the industry itself must also demonstrate its ability to iteratively move towards best practice, without that being a knee-jerk response to regulatory enforcement.

China has provided insights into the conviction of Zhao Dong, the influential crypto over-the-counter (OTC) trader and widely known founder of the RenrenBit crypto trading desk. The ‘OTC King’Last Wednesday, China’s Supreme Procuratorate disclosed that Zhao, known as the "OTC King," was handed down a substantial prison sentence for engaging in illegal foreign exchange and crypto business operations. The case is emblematic of China's persistent efforts to clamp down on cryptocurrency trading, even when conducted through less transparent channels like OTC desks, private chat groups and stablecoins.Photo by Hanson Lu on UnsplashTracing fundsIn their comprehensive disclosure, the Chinese authorities outlined the meticulous investigation that led to Zhao Dong's conviction. The focus was on tracing fund movements across Chinese bank accounts, overseas cash pools and the circulation of Tether and Bitcoin. Investigators honed in on accounts associated with Zhao Dong and the chat groups used for trading activities. Their arsenal included detailed bank records, WeChat conversations, testimonies from Zhao's OTC agents and other documentary evidence. The report highlighted that all defendants, including Zhao Dong, confessed to the process of collecting dirhams in cash in Dubai, paying RMB to the other party's designated account, buying Tether with dirhams, and allowing the domestic gang to illegally sell it back for RMB. Seven year sentenceIn one of the alleged schemes, Zhao Dong purportedly orchestrated crypto-fiat trades between Dubai-based entities holding cash piles in United Arab Emirates (UAE) dirhams and Chinese contacts within the country. With numerous related recipients confirming that the funds Zhao received were payments from foreigners, the prosecution's case was made so much stronger. Zhao unsuccessfully argued during three public court hearings that his actions constituted digital currency transactions and not a breach of foreign exchange laws. The prosecution countered with evidence from the group's chat records, emphasizing the nature of foreign exchange in their dealings. The court ultimately rendered a verdict, sentencing Zhao Dong to seven years in prison and imposing a 2.3 million Chinese yuan ($325,000) fine. This conviction serves as a stark reminder of the stringent regulatory stance that China has adopted towards cryptocurrency trading. Zhao Dong was considered one of China's most influential OTC crypto traders. He was a Bitfinex shareholder and founder of the D Fund venture capital fund. He established RenrenBit in August 2018, incorporating the company in Singapore. The influential crypto trader is also believed to have been involved in assisting stablecoin-issuer Tether to launch its Tether Yuan product. However, once the authorities moved against him, RenrenBit was taken offline while Tether scrapped its pursuit of Tether Yuan. Despite his influence, Zhao has ultimately become a symbol of the government's commitment to curbing such crypto trading activities within mainland China. The outcome underscores the severity of China's regulatory crackdown on cryptocurrency trading and sends a strong message to other players in the crypto space within the country.