OKX expands McLaren F1 sponsorship deal

Taiwan Proposes New Crypto Business CategoryWith regulation having trailed the crypto innovation, more recently it seems like every day brings further developments, with the latest installment seeing Taiwan take a significant step forward. Officials in Taipei are proposing the classification of crypto regulations within their own novel business category.Photo by Jack Brind on UnsplashFostering self-regulationThe move aims to potentially allow cryptocurrency-related companies to establish industry associations, ultimately fostering the creation of self-regulatory guidelines. The Ministry of Economic Affairs, in a recent announcement, unveiled its draft amendment to the Standards of Classification of Commercial Group regulations. This proposed amendment centers on the inclusion of a distinct category for digital asset services.An official from the economic ministry informed The Block that the freshly introduced business category outlines the scope of operations within the cryptocurrency sector. This encompasses various activities, such as cryptocurrency to fiat or digital token exchanges, facilitating cryptocurrency transfers, offering services for crypto storage and management, and providing assistance related to cryptocurrency issuance or sales.The official further elaborated that cryptocurrency firms will be permitted to form industry associations once the proposed business category is successfully incorporated into the relevant regulations. Seeking public input, the ministry anticipates finalizing the amendment in collaboration with the Ministry of the Interior in either mid- or late-October.Encouraging trade associationsBy allowing the establishment of industry associations, cryptocurrency companies can proactively devise self-supervisory rules that address industry-specific challenges and concerns. This move is anticipated to bolster transparency, security, and responsible conduct within the cryptocurrency ecosystem.Taiwan’s approach to virtual asset services providers (VASPs) has mandated compliance with anti-money laundering laws since the implementation of anti-money laundering regulations by the Financial Supervisory Commission in July 2021. However, the overall industry remains relatively unregulated within the country.Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, has recently embarked on the process of obtaining registration for anti-money laundering compliance under the FSC.Regulatory guidelines being draftedAs the regulatory landscape evolves, Taiwan’s FSC, which assumed its role as the principal regulator overseeing the crypto industry in March, is actively formulating comprehensive guidelines. These guidelines will cover trading and payment aspects associated with cryptocurrencies for VASPs.An FSC official revealed that the agency plans to unveil the VASP guidelines by the end of September. It’s understood that the guidelines will comprise thirteen regulatory principles. It’s believed that the issuance of crypto assets will be permitted but that stablecoin issuance will be prohibited. One prerequisite for the issuance of digital assets will be a requirement to accompany that issuance with a comprehensive whitepaper, detailing fundamental and necessary information that investors can review, relative to the token offering.Taiwan’s proposition of a novel business category signifies a pivotal move towards enhanced self-regulation and industry cohesion within the cryptocurrency sector. As the regulatory framework takes shape, the introduction of self-regulatory guidelines is poised to contribute to the responsible growth of the cryptocurrency industry in Taiwan.

Singapore High Court Embraces NFTs for Financial InvestigationsA recent decision by the Singapore High Court has seen it embrace non-fungible tokens (NFTs) in financial investigations. Financial investigation firm Intelligent Sanctuary, also known as iSanctuary, has been granted permission to attach NFTs containing legal documents to cold wallets linked to a hacking incident.This innovative approach, similar to the one used in Italy and the United States to deliver court summonses recently, signals a new departure in the application of NFT technology in the legal and financial world.Photo by Choong Deng Xiang on UnsplashMoving towards tokenized legal ordersLondon-based iSanctuary set out details of the court decision in a blog post published to its website recently. A pivotal moment in this scenario was the court’s issuance of a global freezing order encapsulated within soulbound NFTs, securely linked to the specified wallets. Soulbound NFTs are special types of NFTs which are tied to a user’s account. They cannot be transferred or traded.Although these NFTs do not halt transactions, they serve as powerful deterrents, notifying counterparties and exchanges about the wallets’ dubious past involvement in a hacking event.Monitoring fund movementsFurthermore, iSanctuary has unveiled an ingenious strategy to actively monitor funds leaving these wallets through the NFTs. This innovative method ensures a permanent and unbreakable connection between the NFTs and the wallets.iSanctuary recounted on its website that it was employed by a businessperson who had lost $3 million in crypto assets and was able to track the stolen funds successfully. Their method, which combines both on-chain and off-chain evidence, was presented by an iSanctuary senior investigator to the Singapore High Court. This led to the issuance of a worldwide injunction.iSanctuary’s financial and crypto investigators identified a series of cold wallets holding the proceeds of the crime, and the court approved their use of NFTs for service delivery.Mintable collaborationiSanctuary accredited Singaporean NFT marketplace Mintable as the creator of the NFTs. As reported by local news media outlet The Straits Times last week, this case revolved around a stolen private key and the alleged involvement of Singapore-based crypto exchanges in laundering the stolen assets. The fraudsters, purportedly from Singapore, are alleged to have orchestrated this saga that spans countries from Singapore to Spain, Ireland, Britain, and other European territories.Taking to X (formerly Twitter) to comment on the saga, Mintable founder Zach Burks stated:”Happy to help clean up the crypto space and move the NFT ecosystem into a realm of utility and away from the speculation of jpegs!”In a subsequent post, Burks highlighted further NFT-related innovation when pointing to a central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilot program led by Mastercard that implicated the use of NFTs to stamp out fraud. Mintable supported that particular use of the technology within that project.iSanctuary’s founder, Jonathan Benton, emphasized the impact of the recent initiative, calling it a “game changer.” The approach enables swift action, allowing for the identification of illicit asset holders and expediting the issuance of civil or criminal orders, even red flags, within hours if necessary. It also demonstrates that NFTs can be put to good use, above and beyond speculative trading.

Crypto Exchange Loss Deters Temasek from Investing in Crypto FirmsSingapore’s state-owned investor Temasek has ruled out investing in crypto companies for now, following a $275 million loss in the bankrupt US crypto exchange FTX.Photo by Plato Terentev on PexelsRegulatory uncertainty concernsTemasek’s Chief Investment Officer Rohit Sipahimalani said in a CNBC interview on Tuesday that the regulatory uncertainty in the crypto sector made it very difficult for the fund to make another investment in an exchange.“There’s a lot of regulatory uncertainty in this environment. And I do think that it will be very difficult for us to make another investment and exchange in the middle of all this regulatory uncertainty,” Sipahimalani said.He added that Temasek was not interested in investing in cryptocurrencies, but rather in exchanges that could generate fee-based revenue without taking balance sheet or trading risks. In May, it was reported that Temasek had invested in algorithmic currency system, Array. However, the global investment company was quick to deny those reports.“We’ve never been looking to invest in cryptocurrencies. Even the investment in FTX, we’ll be talking about investing in an exchange, which allowed us to get fee-based revenue without thinking [of] balance sheet risk or any trading risks,” he said. However, he said that Temasek would not be comfortable investing in exchanges given the way things are right now, and that it would depend on the right regulatory framework and investment opportunity.“If you have the right regulatory framework, and we are comfortable with it, and you have the right investment opportunity, there’s no reason for us to not to look at it,” he said. Temasek’s FTX investment was part of its early-stage investment strategy, where it invests in new disruptive technologies and tries to find the next winners, Sipahimalani said.But the strategy backfired when FTX filed for bankruptcy in November, with more than 1.4 million creditors and billions of dollars in liabilities, according to bankruptcy filings.Reputational damageTemasek wrote down its $275 million investment in FTX to zero soon after the collapse of the exchange. However, the bigger concern for the company is the posting of its worst returns since 2016 amid macroeconomic and geopolitical challenges. In the financial year ending in March 2023, the investing behemoth posted a $7.3 billion loss.The FTX loss sparked criticism from Singapore’s Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Lawrence Wong, who called it “disappointing” and damaging for Singapore’s reputation. And that is the greater issue for Temasek relative to FTX.The amount of that particular loss is not that significant, given the size of the company and the scale of losses incurred elsewhere. The issue has been the reputational damage that the company has experienced as a direct consequence. Temasek maintains that it carried out competent due diligence, as have all of the venture capital investors who have all had their FTX investments wiped out.Further details on that due diligence are likely to emerge as Temasek, alongside many other leading investors in FTX, is being sued by creditors on the basis that they gave credence to what transpired to be a fraud. Temasek announced in May that it would cut the salaries of the staff responsible for the FTX investment, after conducting an internal review of the deal.