Laser Digital Expands Global Presence with New Tokyo Office

With the general election just over a month away, South Korea’s ruling People Power Party (PPP) has retracted its campaign pledges to allow trading of spot bitcoin ETFs, local media outlet Chosun Biz reported. The PPP has previously drawn substantial attention from the crypto industry, as the party showed its intention to ease a range of crypto regulations in hopes of gaining more votes in the general election.  A political insider familiar with the issue said yesterday that the PPP has recently removed crypto-related agendas from its priority list. The crypto pledges, initially planned to be announced last week, have been permanently suspended, the person said. “The leaders of the PPP are currently focusing on nomination for local constituencies and its satellite People’s Future Party, rather than coming up with additional crypto agendas. As the PPP appears to be embarking on the election campaign starting in March, the likelihood of the ruling party releasing crypto pledges is very slim,” another political circle insider mentioned.Photo by Traxer on UnsplashTalks between PPP and FSC go in vainThe PPP’s decision to retract crypto-related pledges comes after its attempt to approve the introduction and trading of spot bitcoin ETFs met with opposition from the Financial Services Commission (FSC).  Unlike the PPP or its opposition Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) that scrambled to ease crypto regulations ahead of the general election, the FSC’s stance on viewing crypto assets as risky hasn’t changed much. Despite last month’s approval of spot bitcoin ETFs by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the FSC continues to ban the issuance of crypto-based financial products or investments in them, stating that crypto assets are not defined as underlying assets under the current Capital Markets Act. This has gotten in the way of the PPP’s plan to delay taxation on crypto gains for as long as two years and allow institutional investments in virtual assets.  The PPP also had to verify all the party members to see if any of them had a record of wrongdoings related to crypto transactions, which further delayed the pledges. This shows politicians’ heightened awareness of crypto-related issues. Last year, the DPK lawmaker Kim Nam-guk made headlines for a scandal, as he was accused of failing to report a considerable amount of crypto assets transactions to the financial authority. PPP lags a step behind its opposition DPKThe DPK has also strived to come up with crypto pledges alongside the PPP. The crypto-related pledges released by the DPK so far largely overlap with those of the PPP, meaning there’s no particular merit to the PPP’s campaign vows leading up to the general election. Many see this as another reason for the PPP’s decision to withdraw crypto pledges. The DPK unveiled its plan on Feb. 21 to legalize spot bitcoin ETFs, and pledged to deduct taxes on crypto gains worth less than KRW 50 million ($37,400). Under the current law, only crypto gains that are worth less than KRW 2.5 million qualify for the tax deduction. Most of these pledges largely align with those of the PPP.  With the PPP’s withdrawal of its plan to ease crypto regulations, the excitement among crypto industry insiders for the upcoming general election appears to have subsided. “Despite the DPK’s promise to allow spot bitcoin ETFs, it is unlikely that we’ll see crypto assets being incorporated into the conventional financial system without the ruling party’s approval, let alone fostering the blockchain industry,” said one crypto insider. 

Thailand's government has recently secured approval for a $14 billion digital handout program as part of its economic recovery strategy. The program hasn’t come about without considerable debate and a backdrop of concerns expressed about the Southeast Asian nation's sluggish economic growth. According to Reuters, the decision was confirmed by Deputy Finance Minister Julapun Amornvivat, who stated that the Office of the Council of State, an advisory panel, found no legal obstacles to utilizing state budget funds for the initiative.Photo by Oleksandr P on PexelsDigital handout programThe digital handout program, a key policy of the ruling Pheu Thai party, involves distributing 10,000 baht (approximately $300) to digital wallets set up for each of the 50 million Thai citizens. This financial injection aims to stimulate spending within local communities, providing a much-needed boost to the economy. While the program has faced concerns about potential inflation risks due to Thailand's slow economic growth, the government has argued that it will ultimately benefit the economy. Julapun emphasized that the government plans to proceed with the scheme in May, funded through borrowing. Council of State and opposition party concernsEarlier reports had indicated that the Council of State had initially advised against the government's plan to enact a loan bill for the digital wallet scheme. Concerns were raised about potential violations of constitutional articles, including Article 140, which requires the government to offset any loans outside the budget bill in the next fiscal budget. In addition to inflation worries, the opposition expressed concerns about a potential breach of Article 53 of the 2018 State Fiscal and Financial Discipline Act, which permits off-budget borrowing only in urgent situations. Despite these concerns, the Office of the Council of State ultimately found no reason to prohibit the cabinet from borrowing to fund the program. Thailand's move towards a $14.3 billion cash handout program, termed the "digital wallet" program, is expected to commence by May. Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin affirmed this timeline after the Council of State's approval. The program, allowing Thais to receive funds via a mobile app, aims to spur consumption and overall economic growth. Election campaign giveawayThe idea of the digital asset giveaway was first floated by the Pheu Thai Party (PTP) in April of last year as part of its election manifesto. Subsequently, the party won the election in August, with Srettha being installed as Prime Minister. That appointment was interpreted as being a positive one by crypto advocates, given that Srettha had worked with crypto and blockchain-related technologies in his previous business dealings. Critics, including some economists and former central bank governors, argue that the handout plan could be fiscally irresponsible and fuel inflation. Prime Minister Srettha, who is also the finance minister, plans to discuss the stimulus plan and related matters with the central bank governor. The Thai Chamber of Commerce anticipates a 3% year-on-year growth in the first quarter of 2024, with an annual growth rate of 3.2%, driven by tourism and exports. The digital wallet scheme, if implemented as planned, could potentially add 1.0-1.5 percentage points to this year's growth, according to the chamber. 

Cake Group co-founder files application to wind up company in SingaporeChua U-Zyn, the co-founder and Chief Technology Officer of crypto firm Cake Group, has officially applied to the Singapore High Court to initiate the winding-up process for the company.A winding-up notice appeared in Singapore’s The Straits Times on Thursday. U-Zyn is being represented by law firm Rajah & Tann on the matter. The court will now decide whether to grant this application, which was filed on Dec. 1.Photo by Kelvin Zyteng on UnsplashFinancial strugglesCake Group is the parent company of the crypto platform Bake, which made headlines last month for announcing significant staff reductions affecting 30% of its workforce. Bake is an automated market maker (AMM) and decentralized exchange (DEX) that revolves around Binance’s BNB Smart Chain (BSC).In existence for some five years, the platform claims to have over 1 million users worldwide, retaining over $1 billion in customer assets and having achieved reward payouts to date of $411 million.Cake Group’s financial struggles have been evident, with its revenue plummeting by over half to $266 million in 2022, while profits experienced a fivefold decrease to $23.5 million during the same period. The company generates income through transaction fees.A hearing for creditors or opposing parties is scheduled for Dec. 22, providing an opportunity for stakeholders to voice concerns or contest the winding-up process.Internal disputeWhile the specifics behind U-Zyn’s winding-up application remain unclear, the decline in financial performance and the recent layoffs are undoubtedly contributing factors.It’s understood that CEO Julian Hosp learned about the filing on Dec. 6 and has since emphasized that the company is actively working with legal counsel to challenge the application. Hosp will challenge this request in court, asserting that the company’s finances are strong and unrelated to the dispute.Taking to the X social media platform on Thursday, Hosp wrote:”Disappointed to see U-Zyn filing a request on December 1st” . . . “For me, it’s selfish that he’s prioritizing his own interests over those of our customers, employees, and partners, instead of resolving it internally.”Hosp added that U-Zyn’s application is unrelated to the company’s finances and that the firm is financially solvent.Former employees, speaking anonymously to Tech in Asia, expressed surprise at the escalating situation, describing the co-founders as emotionally charged and seemingly unable to safeguard their investment.U-Zyn opposed to layoffsThe court filing under Section 125(1)(i) of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act of 2018 adds an element of uncertainty. Unlike other sections that typically specify reasons for winding up, this particular section allows for liquidation if “the Court is of the opinion that it is just and equitable that the company be wound up.”Hosp clarified that the application is not based on Cake Group’s inability to pay its debts, emphasizing that day-to-day operations continue at full capacity.It’s understood that the ongoing dispute between U-Zyn and Hosp stems from internal disagreements, particularly related to cuts within the company’s engineering division. Chua claimed Hosp excluded him from decisions, especially concerning the recent layoffs.Despite the internal discord, Hosp stressed the company’s commitment to resolving the dispute swiftly and maintaining its operational capabilities. Undeterred by his fellow co-founder’s actions, he published a blog post on Thursday, outlining his vision for the Cake Group moving forward.