Top

Hong Kong’s SFC Issues Warning Against Unlicensed Crypto Platforms

Policy & Regulation·August 09, 2023, 3:50 AM

In a move to safeguard its financial ecosystem, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) issued a stern warning recently, cautioning against the activities of unlicensed cryptocurrency exchanges involved in what it termed “improper practices.”

In a statement published to its website on Monday, the regulatory authority underscored the gravity of engaging in unlicensed operations within the crypto trading sphere, categorizing such activities as a “criminal offense” under Hong Kong jurisdiction.

Photo by Chi Hung Wong on Unsplash

 

Deceptive tactics

Furthermore, the SFC exposed the deceptive tactics employed by certain unlicensed crypto trading platforms, which misleadingly assert that they have submitted license applications to the commission. The reality, however, is quite the opposite, as these platforms remain unregulated.

The warning coincides with the SFC's ongoing establishment of a novel regulatory framework for overseeing retail crypto trading. Notably, the SFC made it clear that applicants who fail to adhere to pertinent regulations might find themselves ineligible for licensing under the newly instituted regime.

This initiative from the SFC aligns with the broader efforts undertaken by Hong Kong authorities to instill effective oversight and regulation within the cryptocurrency market. The primary objective remains the protection of investors’ interests and the preservation of the integrity of the overall financial system.

 

Platforms must demonstrate ability to comply

The SFC emphasized, “VATPs (Virtual Asset Trading Platforms) which consider themselves eligible for deeming under the transitional arrangements are reminded that the SFC may decide that deeming is inapplicable if it does not see a reasonable prospect for the VATPs to successfully show that they are capable of complying with the applicable legal and regulatory requirements.”

This development follows closely on the heels of Hong Kong’s recent announcement outlining plans to grant licensed cryptocurrency platforms the permission to cater to retail investors within the new regulatory framework.

These comprehensive guidelines encompass critical facets such as cybersecurity protocols, asset custody safety standards, and the segregation of client assets. This regulatory evolution commenced on June 1, synchronizing with the launch of the novel licensing regime for virtual asset platforms.

Drawing attention to the growing influence of the sector, it’s worth noting that in April, cryptocurrency exchange OKX registered an astonishing surge of over 10,000 new user sign-ups within a mere month of launching its operations in Hong Kong.

 

Web3 implementation

In a recent tweet, Chris Lee, former CEO of both the Huobi and OKX crypto exchanges, said that “if Hong Kong wants to implement Web3 well, it still needs to complete the basic requirements, such as Web3 foundation laws and bills.” Lee added that “Hong Kong’s competitors will always be itself, not New York or Singapore.”

The Hong Kong SFC’s warning to unlicensed crypto platforms is another step in creating the right foundation for Web3 in the city. It underscores the concerted effort to maintain a regulated and secure environment for cryptocurrency transactions within the Chinese autonomous territory.

As the regulatory landscape continues to evolve, industry participants are gradually being compelled to adhere to the stipulated legal and compliance requirements in an effort to foster a robust crypto ecosystem.

More to Read
View All
Web3 & Enterprise·

Aug 08, 2023

Concerns Hanging Over Huobi Result in Significant Net Outflow

Concerns Hanging Over Huobi Result in Significant Net OutflowAmidst rumors swirling around its executives’ involvement in a Chinese investigation, Seychelles-headquartered cryptocurrency exchange Huobi has observed net outflows exceeding $73.3 million in the past week.Photo by Shubham Dhage on Unsplash$73 million net outflowAccording to data sourced from blockchain analytics firm Nansen, Huobi reported an outflow of tokens worth $505.9 million over the previous week, with an inflow of $432.5 million. This resulted in a net outflow of approximately $73.3 million.Notably, this net outflow seems to be gaining momentum, as the exchange witnessed an outflow of $32.9 million on Monday alone, based on Nansen data. Additionally, Huobi’s stablecoin balances experienced a significant 33% contraction, dwindling to $99.47 million within the seven-day span, as per the data.Unverified reportsHowever, the outflow of funds coincided with unverified reports. Techub News, a Hong Kong-based crypto media outlet, cited insider sources to suggest that at least three high-ranking Huobi executives had been apprehended by Chinese authorities for investigation. Huobi originated in China with Chinese founders, albeit it has based itself in Seychelles ever since the Chinese crackdown on crypto trading emerged.Huobi’s Head of Social Media, Jiayin Xie, acknowledged the rumors and likened the situation to being “invited to tea,” a colloquial Chinese expression for being summoned by authorities for questioning. Despite this, Xie expressed concern over the baseless nature of the allegations, suggesting that the path to restoration might be challenging yet necessary for the exchange’s resurgence.Justin Sun, an advisor to Huobi, responded cryptically by tweeting the number “4,” a term commonly used in the crypto community to counter FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt). He also retweeted Xie’s post, standing in defiance of the rumor.Alongside this specific difficulty, Huobi continues to grapple with financial challenges. Sun revealed that the exchange hadn’t posted a profit from last year’s third quarter to this year’s second quarter. Despite this, Sun remains optimistic, projecting a potential break-even in the present quarter and a return to profitability in the upcoming quarter.Crypto platform uncertaintyThe aftermath of widespread crypto platform failures in 2022 has resulted in both regulatory pushback and concern among the crypto community relative to the well-being of the platforms that remain standing. Both Huobi and Binance are front and center of this speculation and concern. The issue is that without independently verified audits carried out by reputable auditors, market participants simply have no way of telling if these platforms are solvent.Travis Kling, the Chief Investment Officer at Ikagai Asset Management didn’t mince his words in taking Houbi to task via Twitter: “You are clowns and criminals, and there’s a billion dollar hole in your balance sheet that customers will have to eat.” Kling has been equally scathing in his criticism of Binance and its founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ). Ikagai took a significant hit in the FTX collapse, and in its wake, Kling promised to speak out more and be more critical regarding emerging issues within the sector.As the net outflows coincide with reports of executive custody, the situation surrounding Huobi remains fluid. The exchange’s journey through these challenges will no doubt be closely monitored by the crypto community.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Jun 22, 2023

Wemade Launches NFT-Based DeFi Service to Empower Its Ecosystem

Wemade Launches NFT-Based DeFi Service to Empower Its EcosystemSouth Korean gaming company Wemade today launched NFTFi, a peer-to-peer decentralized financial service based on non-fungible tokens (NFTs), according to an official press release. The service is now accessible on Wemade’s DAO-powered blockchain NFT platform NILE, also known as NFT Is Life Evolution.Photo by Choong Deng Xiang on UnsplashBorrow and lend NFTsInitially, NFTFi will enable users to borrow and lend NFTs, with plans to introduce a swap function in the future. The service will support trading for all NFTs available on the NILE marketplace, including the NEITH NFTs unveiled in March this year.Through NFTFi, borrowers have the ability to secure WEMIX tokens or WEMIX Dollars by using NFTs as collateral. Borrowers can request loans, and lenders can review these requests and assess the conditions under which they are willing to lend their assets.The borrower who presents the most favorable borrowing terms will be selected, and the loan contract will be automatically executed. The NFTs provided as collateral will remain locked until the loan is fully repaid. In the event of failure to repay, ownership of the NFTs will be transferred to the lender.Effective asset managementNFTFi users will have the ability to evaluate the value of an NFT based on various data. Notably, NEITH NFTs offer effective asset management as their holders can claim the amount of WEMIX tokens at any time from the Covenant Date. This token eligibility feature contributes to the stability of NEITH NFTs.NILE expects that NFTFi will enhance the value of NFTs as financial assets and play a role in the sustainable growth of the WEMIX3.0 ecosystem.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Dec 13, 2023

Hong Kong court grants trademark injunction against Huobi

Hong Kong court grants trademark injunction against HuobiThe Hong Kong Special Administrative Region High Court has resolved a trademark dispute between X-Spot Global Limited and Huobi Global Limited, ruling in favor of X-Spot.Back in June, X-Spot alleged that Huobi Global infringed on its trademark rights related to the “Huobi” name. In the legal process which followed, the court sided with X-Spot, compelling Huobi Global to cease using the “Huobi” trademark or any similar name or logo in Hong Kong.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashPotential confusionThe court’s official judgment highlighted concerns about potential confusion among the public and industry professionals arising from Huobi Global’s use of the “Huobi” trademarks. It emphasized that such confusion could lead people to believe that X-Spot Global, as the registered trademark owner, is actively engaged in cryptocurrency business associated with the trademark. In response, the court dismissed Huobi Global’s plea to revoke the service order and halt negotiations, also instructing the covering of X-Spot Global’s legal expenses.Post-acquisition conflictThe background to this dispute originates in the acquisition of Huobi Global last year. It’s widely believed that TRON blockchain network founder Justin Sun purchased the exchange for $1 billion although Sun has subsequently suggested that he is just an advisor to the crypto exchange business. The acquisition was made by About Capital Management, an entity associated with the controversial crypto entrepreneur.In May of this year, Sun claimed that Wei Li, a brother of Huobi founder Leon Li, had unjustly profited from the sale of Huobi’s native HT token. The disagreement escalated and as a consequence of that conflict, it became apparent that the acquisition agreement explicitly prohibited the buyer from using the “Huobi’’ trademark.Leon Li accused the cryptocurrency exchange of violating the acquisition agreement’s rules by unauthorized use of the “Huobi” trademark. This legal battle has shed light on the strained relationship between Leon Li and Justin Sun.The court’s decision adds a layer of complexity to Huobi Global’s legal challenges, intensifying existing regulatory issues. Notably, the cryptocurrency exchange is already grappling with a recent order from Malaysian authorities to cease operations in the country due to alleged illegal activities.The ruling comes at a critical juncture for Huobi Global. In September the business rebranded to HTX, signaling aspirations for global expansion amidst a shifting legal landscape. At the time, Justin Sun provided the rationale behind the rebrand. Taking to the X social media platform, he wrote:“It’s very hard for foreigners, Westerners, to pronounce ‘Huobi’… It doesn’t make any sense to them.” Sun went on to explain that the word Huobi means fire and coin in Chinese, adding, “That’s why we rebranded as HTX for international branding.”In light of this trademark infringement injunction decision, it could equally be speculated that the company was acting in advance of an unfavorable ruling in compliance with the terms of the business acquisition agreement.In reaching a decision on the matter, Judge Mimmie Chan J noted the lack of a defense mounted by Huobi against the trademark infringement action.

news
Loading