Crypto.com Holds Twitter Giveaway for PSG Fans

OKX Follows Path Towards Dubai LicensingSeychelles-headquartered OKX, one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges, has expressed its intention to seek regulatory approval for operating in Dubai as part of its expansion strategy in the Middle East.With that objective, the company has obtained a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) preparatory license, an interim step on its path towards full licensing. That’s according to a press release published on Thursday.Tim Byun, OKX’s Global Head of Government Relations, emphasized the growing trend of regulation within the industry. In an interview with Reuters, Byun stated: “We would like to get ahead of that curve and be regulated in a sound manner.” The move comes in the wake of recent legal action taken by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the United States against Binance and Coinbase, two of the largest crypto exchanges, for alleged breaches of SEC rules.Photo by Marcus Herzberg on PexelsSwitching to DubaiByun believes that the SEC’s actions will compel more market participants to seek out innovative regulators such as Dubai’s Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority (VARA).To support its expansion plans, OKX intends to hire 30 staff members following the opening of an office last month in the Dubai World Trade Center, strategically located in the business and financial hub of the United Arab Emirates.Byun further explained that by expanding its services from Dubai to jurisdictions like Saudi Arabia or Bahrain, where no domestic regulatory framework is in place, the local populations would benefit significantly from OKX’s regulation under an international regulator.Following Bahamian regulationCurrently regulated in the Bahamas, OKX does not allow customers from the United States to utilize its platform due to regulatory concerns. Following the collapse of FTX in November of last year, the Bahamas has suffered reputationally.It’s seen as a jurisdiction with much looser regulation and as the FTX debacle demonstrated, one that proved to be totally ineffective in preventing the epic fraud that occurred in that instance.Effective regulatory frameworkIn contrast, Dubai and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in general seem to be making a much better effort towards a workable yet effective regulatory framework. Established in March 2022, VARA serves as the regulatory authority overseeing the burgeoning virtual asset sector in Dubai, excluding the Dubai International Financial Centre financial free zone. The United Arab Emirates has been actively working towards positioning itself to become a global crypto industry hub.No company has yet obtained a license for VARA’s full market product (FMP) stage, which would grant permission to serve retail clients. Byun revealed that OKX intends to apply for such a license.Byun concluded by expressing OKX’s willingness to be regulated and licensed in jurisdictions that adopt a balanced, clear, and transparent approach to the industry. The exchange is committed to operating within frameworks that prioritize investor protection and promote market integrity.

The Legal Future of South Korea’s Crypto Industry: Necessary Legislation and SystemsA recent National Assembly symposium organized by South Korea’s Digital Asset Policy Forum brought experts together to discuss the challenges and prospects of the implementation of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act at the National Assembly Members’ Office Building in Seoul on Tuesday.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashInternational modelsReferences were made to global examples, such as the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) — the world’s first standalone virtual asset legislation enacted in the EU — which ensures transparency, disclosure, authorization, and supervision of crypto-asset transactions. However, unlike the capital market, MiCA does not impose regular disclosure reporting requirements or corrections on them. Firms in Japan, on the other hand, are asked to provide disclosure under autonomous regulation through the Japan Virtual and Crypto Assets Exchange Association (JVCEA).Notably, in its recent Policy Recommendations for Crypto and Digital Asset Markets Consultation Report, the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) states that it is “seeking to encourage optimal consistency in the way crypto-asset markets and securities markets are regulated within individual IOSCO jurisdictions, in accordance with the principle of ‘same activities, same risks, same regulatory outcomes’.” This principle refers to the concept that any crypto-asset activity that has a similar function and poses similar risks to those in the traditional financial system — such as operating a trading platform or providing custody services — is subject to regulation that ensures equivalent outcomes, as defined by the UK Parliament.The IOSCO report also suggests that crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) should disclose information regarding ownership and control of crypto-assets, issuer and business-related information, issuer management teams, transaction history and operational description of crypto-assets, token ownership concentration, transfer protocols, and a given CASP’s treatment of the client crypto-assets and their respective rights and entitlements during events like hard forks and airdrops.Hurdles to overcomeExperts at the forum reflected these considerations in their sentiments. Han Suh-hee, a lawyer at Barun Law Firm, emphasized that it is important to determine what kind of information should be disclosed. She argued that it is necessary to discuss to what extent information about virtual asset issuers should be disclosed and whether mandating firms to disclose their financial and business conditions is efficient.In particular, Han underlined the need to consider the differences between virtual assets and stocks when establishing a framework for the disclosure of virtual assets holdings. Unlike stocks, virtual assets possess distinctive characteristics like their borderless and decentralized nature, unclear issuer backgrounds, and the ability to conduct peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions.Lee Han-jin, a lawyer at Kim & Chang Law Firm, added that the enactment of Korea’s Virtual Asset User Protection Act was aimed at establishing a system directly targeted at regulating virtual assets and virtual asset service operators (VASPs) — a significant development from the Financial Transaction Reporting Act, which had until now been the only legal framework responsible for regulating VASPs along with other entities like casino business operators. Virtual assets are now subject to a more systematized regulatory approach.However, he said that the Virtual Asset User Protection Act still has its setbacks because it is undergoing a two-stage legislative process. Lee criticized the fact that the same definition of VASPs outlined in the Financial Transaction Reporting Act had been brought over, which limits their identity to transaction intermediaries, wallet operators, and custodians while overlooking their other roles like crypto management, crypto deposits, and crypto collective investments.Lee also pointed out another weakness: the scope of prohibition on using undisclosed information and market manipulation is broader in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act than in the Capital Markets Act. He argued that enforcement decrees should stipulate the definition of insiders and exceptional cases when deliberating on the prohibition of insider virtual asset trading.Lee thus emphasized the need for a clear definition of virtual assets in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, as it is yet unclear whether they are objects or assets. All things considered, he believes there must be a law that can encompass blockchain-based decentralization, outline the similarities and differences between digital assets and financial products, and accommodate new services that utilize smart contracts.“We are in the process of creating a regulatory system similar to those being adopted in other countries based on their respective markets,” said Lee Seok-ran, head of the Financial Innovation Bureau at the Financial Services Commission (FSC). “Unlike the stock market, which is equipped with regulations to prevent fraudulent transactions and misconduct, virtual assets are traded on multiple exchanges, so we are considering how to interpret unfair trading activities and conduct market surveillance.”She explained that the commission is prioritizing user protection measures and subordinate regulations. “I believe we will be able to create a system for subordinate regulations on disclosure once an overall global trajectory is established. But before that happens, we are working on guidelines for defining unfair trading activities with regulators and the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA).” Unfair trading activities associated with virtual assets include not only those conducted on exchanges but also under other circumstances.The FSC officer said that the financial authority is set to establish legal criteria to distinguish cases such as false statements in white papers of crypto projects. She added that enforcement decrees will define both the conditions for restricting deposits and withdrawals on crypto exchanges and the corresponding limits.

The South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) announced on Dec. 26 through an official website press release that it has imposed sanctions on 15 North Korean individuals and one institution for their involvement in illegal cyber activities, including cryptocurrency theft, to fund the country's nuclear and missile programs.Photo by Micha Brändli on UnsplashAccording to the MOFA, the sanctioned individuals have been stationed overseas as part of the 313 General Bureau of the North Korean Munitions Industry Department (MID), which is already subject to UN Security Council sanctions. The bureau is allegedly responsible for deploying North Korean tech personnel abroad and using the foreign currency earned to finance the development of nuclear weapons and missiles. The sanctions, which will come into effect at 15:00 UTC on Dec. 29, will prohibit financial and foreign exchange transactions with the designated entities unless approved in advance by South Korean authorities. Violations of these sanctions may result in legal consequences under South Korean law. North Korea behind 61% of 2024’s stolen cryptoThe MOFA cited a recent report by blockchain analysis firm Chainalysis, which showed that North Korean crypto hackers took roughly $1.34 billion in 47 separate incidents in 2024. These thefts account for 61% of the year's total stolen crypto funds and 20% of all incidents. In 2023, they had stolen approximately $660.5 million over 20 incidents. It's believed these funds help finance North Korea's weapons of mass destruction programs. The ministry further stated that North Korean tech personnel are often dispatched to countries such as China, Russia and nations in Southeast Asia and Africa, where they disguise their identities and secure work from global tech companies. Some of these individuals are also suspected of engaging in information theft and cyber attacks. Emphasizing the threat these activities pose to cybersecurity and international peace, South Korea has vowed to continue its efforts to thwart North Korea's illicit cyber activities in cooperation with the international community.