GameFi-Oriented MARBLEX Decides to Burn 670M MBX Tokens

Chinese authorities are gearing up for a significant amendment to the country's anti-money laundering (AML) regulations, with a specific emphasis on cryptocurrency-related transactions. Growing concerns about cryptoThe move, reported by Chinese business and financial news media outlet Jiemian on Wednesday, comes in response to growing concerns among policymakers in China about the need for heightened scrutiny within the burgeoning crypto industry. This marks the first substantial update to China's AML rules since their introduction in 2007. In 2021, China took a decisive step by imposing a comprehensive ban on cryptocurrency use, which included prohibiting offshore exchanges from offering services and putting a stop to all forms of mining. However, despite these restrictions, mainland users have managed to find avenues to access the crypto market. The upcoming amendment to AML regulations aims to introduce more stringent guidelines to address and mitigate these activities effectively. Prime Minister Li Qiang chaired an executive meeting of the State Council on Jan. 22 to deliberate on the revised AML law. The initial draft of the AML regulations was proposed in 2021. The revised version is set to become law by 2025 after being included in the legislative agenda of the State Council for 2023.Photo by Max van den Oetelaar on UnsplashDigital assets not clearly definedUrgency was stressed in addressing cryptocurrency money laundering at the legal level, as the current laws lack a clear definition of digital assets. Although the revised draft includes measures to prevent digital asset money laundering, concerns were raised about the absence of operational guidance on subsequent actions such as asset seizure, freezing, deduction and confiscation in money laundering cases involving digital assets. Experts noted that there is room for improvement in combating digital asset-related money laundering. China's existing AML law is designed not only to deter money laundering but also to protect fiscal order and combat related crimes. As a country with a deep understanding of money laundering and terrorist financing risks, China is not included in the Financial Action Task Force's (FATF) list of AML-deficient countries. However, a 2019 FATF report suggested that China should focus more on addressing the laundering of crime proceeds and expand its resources for national risk assessment. Circumventing the banDespite the formal ban on cryptocurrency circulation and mining by Chinese authorities, there are still avenues for Chinese nationals to access the digital asset ecosystem. BitMEX founder Arthur Hayes recently indicated that wealthy Chinese individuals have access to banking in Hong Kong, serving as the gateway for mainland China to global capital markets, including the cryptocurrency markets. While many crypto miners left the jurisdiction following the ban in 2021, Chinese companies account for a significant proportion of mining equipment manufacturing. Major exchanges like Binance and OKX have Chinese roots, underscoring the nation's influence in the global crypto landscape. Before the cryptocurrency trading ban in China, trading volumes on yuan-denominated crypto exchanges surpassed those of dollar pairs. As China prepares to fortify its AML regulations, the crypto industry awaits further clarity on how these changes will shape the landscape and influence the conduct of cryptocurrency-related activities within the country.  

Dunamu Loses Lawsuit Seeking $19M in Corporate Tax Refunds After Venture Status RemovalDunamu, the operator of South Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchange Upbit, lost a 24.8-billion-won (approximately $18.7 million) corporate tax lawsuit, according to local news outlet The Korea Economic Daily. This legal action emerged after Dunamu was removed from the list of registered venture firms in December 2018. The Seoul Administrative Court ruled that since Dunamu was no longer a venture, it was not eligible for the associated tax benefits.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashLosing venture statusIn September 2017, Dunamu obtained certification as a venture company from the Ministry of SMEs and Startups. However, this certification was revoked in December of the following year. This revocation was due to an amendment to the Enforcement Decree of the Venture Businesses Act in October 2018, which resulted in the exclusion of “blockchain-based crypto asset trading and brokerage” from the venture business classification. Consequently, the withdrawal of this certification rendered the company ineligible for government tax incentives.Tax refund request deniedIn August 2020, Dunamu took action by formally requesting a refund of KRW 24.8 billion in taxes previously paid to the tax office. The foundation of its claim rested on its entitlement to venture company tax benefits up until the corporate tax period of 2018. However, its request was turned down, leading Dunamu to escalate the matter by initiating an administrative case against the tax authorities, following an unfavorable decision by the Korean Tax Tribunal.Meanwhile, an amended version of the Act on Special Cases Concerning Taxation Restrictions, which excluded cryptocurrency-related industries from benefiting from tax reductions, went into effect in January 2019. Pointing to the effective date of this act, Dunamu argued that the company should be entitled to benefits applicable up until the corporate tax cycle of 2018. Furthermore, Dunamu highlighted its legal action, which had led the administrative court to suspend the effects of the venture company certification revocation from December 31, 2018, to January 18, 2019.Court’s stanceDespite these arguments, the court rejected Dunamu’s argument and upheld that tax relief could not be granted for the tax year encompassing the date of the removal of its venture status. Additionally, the court affirmed that the tax authorities’ decision was valid since the venture status had been revoked in 2018, regardless of the amended Taxation Act’s implementation.In disagreement with the court’s ruling, Dunamu has filed an appeal against the decision.

Hong Kong Authorities Block Access to JPEX Amid Ongoing InvestigationDubai-headquartered crypto exchange JPEX has been under intense scrutiny in Hong Kong over the course of the past week due to issues experienced by Hong Kong users in withdrawing funds from the platform. In the most recent twist to the saga, authorities in the Chinese autonomous territory have now blocked access to the JPEX website and mobile application.Photo by Tao Yuan on UnsplashCutting off service accessThe firm published a statement on Wednesday, outlining this latest sanction, while protesting that the move had been unreasonable. It appears that the authorities requested local telecommunications providers to block access to the company’s online platform.The measure follows ongoing enforcement actions initiated by local law enforcement agencies, which have led to the detention of at least 11 individuals and the seizure of assets related to the case. The scandal has also had implications for the crypto sector as a whole, as local regulators are now looking once more at regulation and determining if there’s a need to tighten regulatory measures as a consequence of JPEX’s failings in Hong Kong.VPN recommendationIn its statement, JPEX stated:“Since September 13, 2023, the SFC [Securities and Futures Commission] has suddenly made a series of accusations against our platform’s operating model and promotional methods, which we vehemently resent as they were made without investigation or review.”In response to the blocking of their platform, JPEX has encouraged users to utilize virtual private network (VPN) services to access their services. The exchange sought to reassure its user base, stating: “Here, we strongly reiterate that, even in the face of such oppression and unfair treatment, our platform will continue to operate as usual. Users can log into our mobile application or operate on our web version using VPN applications like Surfshark.”The investigation into JPEX was initiated following warnings from the SFC regarding false or misleading statements made on social media by crypto influencers and the trading platform relative to a trading license application.On Sunday, JPEX announced that it had suspended certain operations and increased withdrawal fees due to an ongoing liquidity crisis, triggering an influx of complaints from users. As of Monday night, the police had received a total of 1,641 complaints, with claims amounting to approximately HK$1.19 billion ($152 million) in assets involved, as revealed during a police briefing on Tuesday.DAO Stakeholders Dividend PlanIn response to these developments, JPEX unveiled plans for a “DAO Stakeholders Dividend Plan.” Under this initiative, JPEX users will have the opportunity to convert their assets on the platform into DAO stakeholder dividends at a 1:1 ratio.The exchange intends to distribute 49% of the DAO Stakeholder dividends, with an estimated total value of approximately 400,000,000 USDT available for subscription and conversion. Additionally, JPEX plans to offer repurchase options one year and two years after the program’s launch.New users who subscribe to the DAO stakeholder dividends will enjoy double payouts, and they will not be required to bear all the operational responsibilities of the platform. This move is seen as an attempt by JPEX to address the concerns of its user base and navigate the challenges it currently faces.The situation surrounding JPEX remains fluid, with ongoing investigations and regulatory actions continuing to unfold.