Dunamu Loses Lawsuit Seeking $19M in Corporate Tax Refunds After Venture Status Removal

Israel Doubles Down on Blocking Crypto Funding of HamasIn a move to disrupt the flow of funds to Hamas, Israeli authorities have ordered the closure of over 100 cryptocurrency accounts on Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange.Photo by Leonid Altman on PexelsHeightened monitoring of crypto-related financingIsraeli authorities were already monitoring crypto accounts suspected of terrorism financing before the recent attack by the Palestinian militant group Hamas. Since then, they have requested information about hundreds of accounts on Binance, suggesting that the scale of their actions has grown significantly since October 7.A statement from Israeli police last week outlined that they had frozen crypto accounts related to financing of Hamas. According to a report on Tuesday by the Financial Times (FT), the Israeli authorities have taken matters further still, having closed more than one hundred accounts on Binance.Scrutinizing 200 additional accountsSources cited by the FT as being close to the situation have revealed that these actions were initiated in response to Hamas’s assault on October 7. Authorities have also sought information on approximately 200 additional crypto accounts, with most of them being held on Binance. While Binance has acknowledged blocking a “small number” of accounts since the summer, it emphasized its adherence to internationally recognized sanctions rules and declined to provide further comment.Governments and regulators have long expressed concerns that terrorist organizations might exploit lightly regulated crypto markets for financial transactions. However, the recent attacks on Israel and the subsequent crypto-based fundraising campaigns by Hamas have made these concerns more pressing.Tom Alexandrovich, the Executive Director at the Israel National Cyber Directorate, stated that cryptocurrency has become a major tool for terror financing during these times of conflict. He noted that the amount of crypto funds involved has significantly increased since the start of the attack.Tether freezes accountsTether, the issuer of leading US dollar stablecoin USDT, announced on Monday that it had frozen 32 addresses containing more than $873,000 due to their alleged links to “terrorism and warfare” in Israel and Ukraine. The exact timing of when these accounts were blocked and the distribution of assets between Israel and Ukraine were not disclosed.Notably, US financial regulators previously alleged that money held on Binance had ties to Hamas. A lawsuit by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) in the United States in March claimed that senior Binance executives had knowledge of “Hamas transactions” in 2019. Binance has refuted these allegations and expressed its intent to contest the lawsuit.Commentators within the crypto space fear that opponents of the development of crypto, like US Senator Elizabeth Warren, will try to capitalize on this issue by using the opportunity to further draconian regulation.Over the past two years, Israeli authorities have seized millions of shekels from crypto accounts with suspected ties to Hamas and other militant groups in the Middle East. A recent analysis by Elliptic found that crypto wallets associated with various suspicious Middle East groups have interacted and relied on the same crypto exchange services to convert crypto into sovereign currencies.

Bithumb Shuts Down Crypto Research Center Amid Trading Volume SlumpBithumb, a cryptocurrency exchange based in South Korea, is shutting down its research center less than a year after its launch, according to a report by news agency Newsis. The closure is seen as a strategic move to enhance business performance in response to the recent decline in trading volume.Photo by Kelly Sikkema on UnsplashCostly research centersEstablished on June 8 last year, the Bithumb Economic Research Institute is reportedly ceasing operations tomorrow. Research centers are often perceived as costly endeavors, particularly when the company is experiencing poor financial performance. In the traditional financial sector, small and medium-sized securities firms typically prioritize restructuring their research divisions when dealing with profitability challenges.Relevance of research hubsAn official from a Korean cryptocurrency exchange told Newsis that research centers can be a financial burden during times of low trading volumes and subpar performance. Nonetheless, the official underscored the need to furnish investors with refined information through these research hubs, encouraging exchanges to cultivate an environment conducive to informed decision-making based on high-quality data.Since its inception, Bithumb’s research organization has published 55 reports aimed at forecasting cryptocurrency market trends using comprehensive macroeconomic and crypto data analysis. These reports have contributed to drawing investors to the sector.Global restructuring trendThe wave of workforce reductions in the crypto industry isn’t isolated to South Korea; it’s a global phenomenon. Chinese reporter Colin Wu, known for his crypto news platform Wu Blockchain, shared via Twitter that Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, is planning to lay off roughly 20% of its staff, totaling about 8,000 employees.In response to these concerns, Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao, also known as CZ, wrote a tweet yesterday. According to CZ, employee layoffs are a weekly occurrence within the company, based on considerations such as alignment with corporate culture. As an example, he mentioned the remote work environment and how it may not be suitable for everyone. However, CZ reassured that Binance remains engaged in hiring, with a focus on enriching its talent pool.

Korean Lawmakers Complete First Rough Draft of Virtual Asset User Protection BillKorean lawmakers have completed the first rough draft of the virtual asset user protection bill at a National Policy Committee meeting held later last month.©Pexels/Matthias ZomerAgreeing on term usage ‘virtual assets’So far, 18 bills have been proposed to regulate cryptocurrencies, and the lawmakers and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) agreed to use the term “virtual assets” to encompass similar terms such as digital assets and crypto assets.Phased enactment of billsThe bills are likely to be reviewed under the title “Virtual Asset User Protection Act.” The bipartisan group agreed to enact the bills in phases, introducing the user protection bill in the first phase and the virtual asset listing and issuance bill in the second phase.Meanwhile, there were mixed opinions on the content of the bills. In particular, there was debate over whether the bills should stipulate that the central bank digital currency (CBDC) is excluded from virtual assets, and whether the bills should include a standard for determining if a virtual asset is a security.Debate over stipulating CBDC’s statusThe stipulation of excluding CBDC from virtual assets was the most divisive topic since it would lead to defining the conditions for other assets such as non-fungible tokens. Moreover, the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information, which currently regulates virtual asset service providers (VASPs), does not contain any stipulation on CBDC. Some raised concerns that such discrepancies could later cause confusion. In the end, assembly members decided to discuss the matter again in April after consulting with the Bank of Korea and the Ministry of Government Legislation.Criteria for classifying virtual assets as securitiesRegarding whether to include criteria for classifying virtual assets as securities, the lawmakers and financial regulators took different sides.Lee Yong-woo, a member of the Democratic Party of Korea, underlined that a clear statement of the relationship between the issuer and the recipient of virtual assets in a whitepaper can determine their security status. He added that such provisions should be included in the bills.Park Min-woo, an FSC official, on the other hand, commented on a cautious note that in case virtual assets fall under the category of securities, they may not be applicable to the virtual asset act. He explained that VASPs might deal with both securities and virtual assets, and in such cases, there could be a misunderstanding that VASPs are not subject to the virtual asset act simply because they trade securities.