OKX Strengthens Partnership with Manchester City Football Club

Cryptocurrency exchange Bybit has reinstated access to its mobile app for users in India via Apple’s App Store and Google Play, saying website access has been restored following regulatory steps taken earlier this year. The company said it registered with the Financial Intelligence Unit–India (FIU-IND) in January 2025 and re-enabled trading functions for eligible users on Feb. 25, with full app access announced on Sept. 8.Photo by appshunter.io on UnsplashPenalty and registration paved way for Bybit’s comebackThe return follows an enforcement action at the start of the year. On Jan. 31, FIU-IND imposed a penalty of 92.7 million Indian rupees (approximately $1.05 million) on Bybit for violations under India’s anti-money laundering law and said its website had been blocked under the Information Technology Act until compliance was achieved. The following month Bybit announced it had paid the penalty and completed its FIU registration. Bybit’s latest announcement comes against the backdrop of India’s cautious approach to sector-wide rules. A government document reviewed by Reuters indicates New Delhi is distancing itself from a comprehensive cryptocurrency law, citing the Reserve Bank of India’s view that regulation could confer “legitimacy” and elevate systemic risks, while an outright ban would not stop peer-to-peer or decentralized exchange activity. India does not have a comprehensive crypto law but applies a flat 30% tax on income from transfers of virtual digital assets (VDAs) and a 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) on consideration paid for VDA transfers under section 194S of the Income-tax Act. Platforms bet on India despite tighter oversightIt's worth noting that authorities had moved to bring offshore platforms within local oversight. FIU-IND issued show-cause notices to nine foreign exchanges (Bitfinex, Bittrex, Binance, Bitstamp, Gate.io, Huobi, Kraken, KuCoin and MEXC Global) in December 2023 and sought to block access to non-compliant services. App store removals of several offshore exchange apps occurred in January 2024 following the notices. Binance later registered with FIU-IND as a reporting entity after paying a fine of 188.2 million Indian rupees (about $2.14 million) for earlier violations, imposed in June 2024. KuCoin also registered, with a smaller penalty of $41,000. In March 2025, Coinbase joined the list by gaining clearance from the Indian financial regulator, announcing plans to launch offerings for retail customers in the country later this year, with other products to follow. Their rush to establish a foothold makes sense, as India topped the Chainalysis Global Crypto Adoption Index, underscoring the country’s widespread embrace of digital assets. Bybit’s re-entry follows a major security incident unrelated to India’s rules. In February, the exchange reported a theft of roughly $1.5 billion in Ethereum (ETH), which the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation later attributed to North Korean actors known as “TraderTraitor.” Shortly after the incident, Bybit CEO Ben Zhou said the exchange had replenished the gap in the ETH reserves. 

Korea’s DAXA Prohibits Relisting of Delisted Cryptos for a YearThe Digital Asset Exchange Alliance (DAXA) in Korea will prohibit the relisting of cryptocurrencies delisted from its member exchanges for a year, according to Korean media outlet Edaily.©Pexels/Jan van der WolfDAXA’s arbitrary regulationSome criticize this regulation, arbitrarily created by DAXA, which consists of five major Korean cryptocurrency exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax), as this rule poses a significant impact on crypto issuers and investors.In fact, a blockchain industry insider said that when cryptos are designated by DAXA as a risky asset, their operators receive a notification from the group that relisting is possible after a year once delisted. So far, assets that have been delisted or designated as such are WEMIX, PCI, BASIC, SRM, and OMG.Coinone’s relisting of WEMIXDAXA added this stipulation, as it faced criticism for the absence of relisting regulations in its guidelines when Coinone, one of its members, exclusively relisted the WEMIX token. This raised doubts about the self-regulation of the industry because DAXA had decided the delisting of WEMIX on the grounds that the information on its circulation supply was unreliable.Crypto enterprises are complaining about DAXA’s devising of strict penalties when delisting processes are not transparent. DAXA has stated that a consensus has been reached for the first draft and it will be continuously revised.Stronger DAXA presenceThe Korean crypto industry forecasts that this regulation will empower DAXA’s presence in the crypto scene, considering that its members are responsible for 98% of the domestic trading volume.Experts note that DAXA needs to establish fairness and transparency in order for it to gain trust as a self-regulatory body. Park Yong-beom, Chairman of the Korea Society of Blockchain, said rules on listing and delisting have to be fair and transparent, and if market participants find them unconvincing, it would undermine the credibility and authority of the self-regulatory body.In an interview with Economic Review, Former KB Kookmin Bank CEO Lee Kun-ho suggested that DAXA should prioritize market vitalization and ecosystem strengthening. He believes that instead of focusing on market management and supervision, DAXA should concentrate on enhancing investor protection.

Philippine Police Warns of Play-To-Earn DangersThe play-to-earn gaming trend has not only captured the enthusiasm of gamers but has also raised concerns among authorities, prompting a closer examination of the risks inherent in cryptocurrency gaming schemes. The Philippine National Police Anti-Cybercrime Group (PNP ACG) has issued a warning about the potential dangers associated with these enticing gaming models, shedding light on some of the hidden complexities and vulnerabilities within this developing ecosystem.Play-to-earn gaming takes on added significance in the Philippines as it was in the southeast Asian country that the first breakthrough play-to-earn game, Axie Infinity, took hold during the pandemic. Axie Infinity is a metaverse game crafted on the Ethereum blockchain, inspired by the world of Pokemon. Under its play-to-earn model, players are required to acquire a minimum of three Axie characters to embark on their gaming journey.Photo by iSawRed on UnsplashHighlighting game costsHowever, the PNP ACG has raised a red flag concerning the financial commitment demanded from players, with an upfront investment potentially reaching $300. This stands in stark contrast to the traditional gaming industry, where user expenditures tend to average around $100.The PNP ACG’s warning echoes the ethos of cautious investment practices in the crypto sphere. While the security of the underlying blockchain technology may be robust, the operational components of the gaming engines and marketplaces require careful scrutiny. By implication, just as investors are advised to thoroughly research ecosystems and founders before engaging in cryptocurrency investments, gamers must exercise the same due diligence before diving into play-to-earn platforms.BCP partnershipAs part of a broader movement towards fostering the adoption of Web3 technologies in the Philippines, the Department of Information and Communications Technology (DICT) has partnered with the Blockchain Council of the Philippines (BCP). This alliance aims to harness the potential of blockchain startups to serve the public good, reflecting a commitment to sustainable growth and innovation within the sector.It is essential to emphasize that the focus on Axie Infinity doesn’t go so far as to label it a scam. Rather, it spotlights the larger concerns surrounding market volatility and accessibility barriers encountered within certain play-to-earn crypto games. The history of Axie Infinity itself underscores the vulnerabilities faced by such platforms, as exemplified by a significant hack that led to the loss of $622 million in user funds.Iterative improvementAs the gaming and crypto industries continue to intertwine, the path ahead involves careful navigation and a shared responsibility among gamers, developers, and authorities to ensure a secure and enriching experience for all stakeholders. In the overall scheme of things, the advent of Axie Infinity, and the play-to-earn model more broadly, has been a positive development when viewed as an iterative step towards the use of blockchain in gaming.Many in the blockchain gaming space have since expressed the view that the play-to-earn model can be improved upon for the benefit of gamers and developers alike. Blockchain-based gaming developers are now concentrating on engaging gameplay rather than trying to lead primarily with an emphasis on earning through playing.