Flybit Achieves Top Score in FIU’s Anti-Money Laundering Assessment

Korea requires lawmakers and senior officials to declare crypto holdingsSouth Korea’s Ministry of Government Legislation announced on Thursday (local time) that 84 new legislative statutes are set to be implemented in December. Among these statutes, an amendment to the Public Service Ethics Act stands out, which will require lawmakers and senior government officials to report their virtual asset holdings.Photo by Huy Phan on UnsplashStarting Dec 14The Public Service Ethics Act requires public officials in political service, government officials of rank four or higher and executives of public service-related organizations to declare their own wealth as well as that of their spouses and lineal relatives. In Korea, public servants are ranked from one to nine, with one being the highest and nine being the lowest. As it stands, disclosing cryptocurrency holdings isn’t mandated, but this will change from Dec. 14 due to recent amendments. Records of cryptocurrency transactions will also be subject to disclosure.Possible restrictions on departments or employeesFurthermore, the leader of a national or local government organization has the authority to enforce restrictions on the acquisition of virtual assets for specific departments or employees under their jurisdiction. This action is applicable if their roles are associated with accessing cryptocurrency information or having an impact on the crypto market. In such scenarios, the chief officer is obligated to report their methods of imposing these restrictions to the pertinent government ethics committee. The committee then holds the right to recommend adjustments to these strategies.

Roger Ver sues Matrixport over frozen crypto fundsRoger Ver, often referred to as “Bitcoin Jesus,” finds himself embroiled in a legal dispute with Jihan Wu, the co-founder and chairman of Matrixport, a Singapore-based digital assets financial services platform.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on Unsplash$8 million disputeThe crux of the matter is a contentious $8 million that Ver claims Wu withheld from him in connection with the fallout of the unrelated failure of the CoinFLEX crypto platform. This conflict has led to a lawsuit filed by Ver’s counsel in the Seychelles.The legal complaint, which originated last year, revolves around bit.com, a crypto exchange owned by Matrixport, refusing to allow Ver to withdraw his $8 million. Wu, a creditor of CoinFLEX, contends that he incurred financial losses due to the exchange’s restructuring.However, Ver asserts that the insolvency of CoinFLEX, an unrelated entity, should not be tied to the funds owed to him by Matrixport. Off the back of that assertion, Ver confirmed to The Block that in August 2022, he sued Smart Vega Holding Limited, a Seychelles-incorporated subsidiary company of Matrixport, for $8 million.Ver asserts CoinFLEX collapse innocenceRoger Ver maintains that he is not to blame for CoinFLEX’s collapse. He states that the narrative emerged due to breaches of confidentiality regarding the arbitration between CoinFLEX and himself. It emerged last month that creditors of CoinFLEX had taken legal action against its CEO, Mark Lamb, as well as Ver. It’s understood that Ver had benefited from a settlement negotiated with Lamb. Creditors are seeking to recover any benefit realized by Ver as a consequence of this settlement.Ver told Coindesk in an email that he initiated arbitration proceedings against CoinFLEX in June 2022, seeking $200 million in damages. He maintains he was the plaintiff in this case, not CoinFLEX, which later filed a counterclaim for $84 million.Confidentiality is a key aspect of arbitration proceedings, especially in Hong Kong where the arbitration took place. Despite this, it is alleged that Lamb broke this confidentiality, which led to the misrepresentation that CoinFLEX was the plaintiff in the case. Ver firmly believes that CoinFLEX’s insolvency was primarily due to market turmoil in May 2022 and poor risk management on the part of its co-founders.Matrixport standing firmWhile Matrixport does not deny withholding the cryptocurrency from Ver, it argues that Ver should repay his debt to CoinFLEX, which is a creditor of Ver. Once this is done, CoinFLEX will release monies owed to Wu.The dispute also touches on the terms of service. Matrixport maintains that it has the right to withhold funds for penalties related to defaulted margin calls and legal fees and it is committing significant legal resources to defend its position. Ver’s attorney counters this argument, stating that Matrixport’s terms of service do not permit such penalties and that there is no legal justification for withholding the funds.Matrixport claims that the funds are being held because of an investigation into Ver’s “margin trading irregularities.” The company’s Head of Public Relations and Brand, Ross Gan, said that Ver “continues to make unreasonable demands.” Gan added:“We will respect the legal process and the ultimate Court ruling on this case and reserve all our rights to take further legal action in this ongoing dispute with Mr. Ver.”

Cryptocurrency exchanges operating in the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC), a financial hub in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), entered a new compliance environment on Jan. 12 as updated Crypto Token rules issued by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) came into force. The revised framework bars exchanges from offering certain digital assets.Photo by Christoph Schulz on UnsplashPrivacy tokens restricted to private walletsThe affected assets are privacy tokens like Zcash (ZEC) and Monero (XMR), although the restriction does not prevent Dubai residents from holding those coins in private wallets. The move is aimed at addressing anti-money laundering (AML) and sanctions compliance risks. The exclusion of privacy tokens reflects alignment with global compliance standards, according to Elisabeth Wallace, Associate Director of Policy & Legal at the DFSA. She told CoinDesk that bans of this kind are effectively inevitable if crypto businesses want to align with standards set by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), given that privacy tokens are designed to obscure transaction histories and the identities of holders. The revised rules extend beyond token classifications, preventing regulated firms from deploying or providing tools designed to mask blockchain activity. These include mixers, tumblers, and other technologies that obscure transaction information. At the same time, the DFSA refined its classification of what it terms “Fiat Crypto Tokens,” limiting the category to tokens pegged to fiat currencies and backed by high-quality, liquid assets capable of meeting redemption requests under market stress. Under this definition, algorithmic stablecoins such as Ethena (ENA) would not qualify as stablecoins, though they would still be treated as cryptocurrencies. The update also alters how token eligibility is determined. Rather than maintaining a centralized list of approved assets, the DFSA now requires licensed firms to carry out their own assessments of the crypto assets they offer, document those judgments, and keep them under ongoing review. Thailand enforces crypto travel ruleComparable regulatory tightening is unfolding elsewhere in Asia. In Thailand, during a high-level meeting on Jan. 9, Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul said the Securities and Exchange Commission had been instructed to strictly enforce the travel rule, according to The Nation Thailand. The international standard requires crypto service providers to verify both senders and recipients in wallet-to-wallet transfers. The directive forms part of a broader government initiative to establish a national data bureau, envisioned as a centralized platform for real-time monitoring of suspicious transactions and the development of detailed financial risk profiles. In South Korea, enforcement actions have similarly intensified. According to Dailian, Korbit, the country’s fourth-largest crypto exchange, paid a 2.73 billion won ($1.9 million) fine imposed by the Financial Information Unit (FIU) under the Financial Services Commission (FSC) for violations of anti-money laundering (AML) rules. The payment followed a board decision and was made within a reduced-penalty period, allowing Korbit to receive a 20% discount. Crypto firms comprise 77% of Korean finesA broader review of penalties issued by the FIU since the disclosure of its sanctions guidelines shows that 77% of total fines were levied against virtual asset service providers (VASPs). While an analysis by Digital Asset found that only four of 95 fine cases issued since August 2023 involved VASPs, those cases accounted for a disproportionately large total of 41.8 billion won ($28.4 million). Exchanges fined to date include Delio, Hanbitco Korea, Dunamu—the operator of Upbit—and Korbit, with Dunamu receiving the largest penalty imposed by the FIU to date. The sanctions were linked to alleged know-your-customer (KYC) failures, unreported transactions involving individuals subject to warrants, and shortcomings in systems designed to detect suspicious activity. Separately, the FIU had issued disciplinary measures against Dunamu, including a warning to its chief executive and a three-month partial suspension of operations, which the company is contesting in court. The next hearing is scheduled for February. In overall fine totals, casinos ranked behind crypto firms, underscoring how enforcement against crypto intermediaries has been particularly robust, as oversight patterns continue to evolve.