Laos to Prioritize Blockchain for Digital Transformation

Conflict Identified as Crypto.com Trading on its Own PlatformTrading practices at Crypto.com, the Singapore-based cryptocurrency exchange, have raised questions about potential conflicts of interest within the digital assets industry.Citing a number of unnamed sources, the Financial Times (FT) made the claim in a report published on Monday.Photo by Pixabay on PexelsConflict of interestIn traditional financial markets, exchanges typically match buyers with sellers at competitive transparent prices, while market making and proprietary trading are conducted by separate private companies. However, US regulators have recently cracked down on similar activities at digital asset exchanges. Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, faced 13 charges from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including allegations of manipulative trading to inflate trading volume.The presence of internal traders at Crypto.com has not been widely known since the company’s launch in 2016. The FT’s sources claim that Crypto.com executives provided sworn statements to external trading houses denying the company’s involvement in trading activities.Employees were allegedly instructed to deny the existence of an internal market-making operation. In response to inquiries, Crypto.com denied that employees were asked to lie, stating that their internal market maker functioned similarly to third-party market makers, ensuring tight spreads and efficient markets on their platform.The majority of Crypto.com’s revenue reportedly comes from its app for retail traders, where the company acts as the counterparty for transactions and operates as a broker model. The company’s trading team hedges these positions on various venues, including their own exchange, to maintain risk neutrality. Crypto.com emphasized that their exchange provides a level playing field for institutional traders.According to insiders, Crypto.com’s proprietary trading desk engages in trading activities on the company’s exchange and other platforms, solely focused on generating profits rather than facilitating an exchange. The market making desk, on the other hand, aims to enhance liquidity on the platform.Not a revenue sourceCrypto.com defended its practices by stating that comparing trading volumes to competitors is common in the industry. It said that the company’s priority is to continuously improve order book liquidity and reduce spreads, benefiting all participants. The firm told Decrypt that trading is not a source of revenue: “While we do have some market making activity, for example, we have internal market makers for our CFTC-regulated product Up/Downs in the United States.”As a private company, Crypto.com publishes accounts in different countries, but revenue breakdown by business line is not disclosed.Closure of institutional tradingFollowing the SEC’s enforcement actions, earlier this month Crypto.com announced the closure of its exchange for institutional US traders due to limited demand in the current market landscape, effective from June 21.In any marketplace transparency and fairness are crucial. It’s fair to say that there has been some level of sharp practice among some actors in the marketplace while regulators have been lacking in getting up to speed with the emergent sector, and moving to protect consumers. With the major crypto platform failures of 2022 has come renewed interest in resolving these issues. That may make for some short-term difficulty, but in the longer term, it should mean greater protections for market participants so long as a common sense approach is pursued.

Cake Group co-founder files application to wind up company in SingaporeChua U-Zyn, the co-founder and Chief Technology Officer of crypto firm Cake Group, has officially applied to the Singapore High Court to initiate the winding-up process for the company.A winding-up notice appeared in Singapore’s The Straits Times on Thursday. U-Zyn is being represented by law firm Rajah & Tann on the matter. The court will now decide whether to grant this application, which was filed on Dec. 1.Photo by Kelvin Zyteng on UnsplashFinancial strugglesCake Group is the parent company of the crypto platform Bake, which made headlines last month for announcing significant staff reductions affecting 30% of its workforce. Bake is an automated market maker (AMM) and decentralized exchange (DEX) that revolves around Binance’s BNB Smart Chain (BSC).In existence for some five years, the platform claims to have over 1 million users worldwide, retaining over $1 billion in customer assets and having achieved reward payouts to date of $411 million.Cake Group’s financial struggles have been evident, with its revenue plummeting by over half to $266 million in 2022, while profits experienced a fivefold decrease to $23.5 million during the same period. The company generates income through transaction fees.A hearing for creditors or opposing parties is scheduled for Dec. 22, providing an opportunity for stakeholders to voice concerns or contest the winding-up process.Internal disputeWhile the specifics behind U-Zyn’s winding-up application remain unclear, the decline in financial performance and the recent layoffs are undoubtedly contributing factors.It’s understood that CEO Julian Hosp learned about the filing on Dec. 6 and has since emphasized that the company is actively working with legal counsel to challenge the application. Hosp will challenge this request in court, asserting that the company’s finances are strong and unrelated to the dispute.Taking to the X social media platform on Thursday, Hosp wrote:”Disappointed to see U-Zyn filing a request on December 1st” . . . “For me, it’s selfish that he’s prioritizing his own interests over those of our customers, employees, and partners, instead of resolving it internally.”Hosp added that U-Zyn’s application is unrelated to the company’s finances and that the firm is financially solvent.Former employees, speaking anonymously to Tech in Asia, expressed surprise at the escalating situation, describing the co-founders as emotionally charged and seemingly unable to safeguard their investment.U-Zyn opposed to layoffsThe court filing under Section 125(1)(i) of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act of 2018 adds an element of uncertainty. Unlike other sections that typically specify reasons for winding up, this particular section allows for liquidation if “the Court is of the opinion that it is just and equitable that the company be wound up.”Hosp clarified that the application is not based on Cake Group’s inability to pay its debts, emphasizing that day-to-day operations continue at full capacity.It’s understood that the ongoing dispute between U-Zyn and Hosp stems from internal disagreements, particularly related to cuts within the company’s engineering division. Chua claimed Hosp excluded him from decisions, especially concerning the recent layoffs.Despite the internal discord, Hosp stressed the company’s commitment to resolving the dispute swiftly and maintaining its operational capabilities. Undeterred by his fellow co-founder’s actions, he published a blog post on Thursday, outlining his vision for the Cake Group moving forward.

Nano Labs, a Web3-focused semiconductor design company listed on the Nasdaq (NA) and headquartered in Hangzhou, China, has arranged $500 million in financing to fund a BNB treasury. In a press release published on the company’s behalf by GlobeNewswire on June 24, Nano Labs outlined that it has entered into a convertible notes purchase agreement with a number of investors. Convertible promissory notes to the value of $500 million will be issued. Holders of the notes, which mature in 360 days, have the option to convert them to Class A ordinary shares at an initial conversion price of $20 per share. Unconverted notes will not accrue interest, but will be repaid in line with the initial principal amount at maturity. 5%-10% of BNB’s total supplyNano Labs asserted that the agreement “marks an important step in the company’s strategic growth.” It stated that as part of the initiative it plans to conduct an in-depth assessment of the BNB token, the native token of the BNB Chain ecosystem. The token enables transactions on the BNB Chain and access to various services and decentralized applications (DApps) that run on the blockchain network. In the initial phase of the initiative, Nano Labs plans to acquire $1 billion worth of BNB through convertible notes and private placements. In the long term, the firm plans to build up a holding equal to 5% to 10% of BNB’s total circulating supply. On X, @Whdysseus, the pseudonymous founder of Asian Web3 and crypto financial media project BroadChain Finance, commented on Nano Labs' BNB reserve initiative, considering it to be a BNB version of the Bitcoin treasury strategy pioneered by American firm Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy).Photo by Vadim Artyukhin on UnsplashShare price surgeChangpeng Zhao (CZ), the co-founder and former CEO of Binance, who has been heavily involved in the development and overall vision of BNB Chain, outlined on X that Nano Labs’ share price “went through the roof” following the announcement. He added that none of his affiliated entities participated in the funding that Nano Labs has put in place. At the time of writing, Nano Labs stock (NA) was trading at $14.85, up 36.36% over the course of 24 hours. Nano Labs isn’t the only corporate entity to declare an interest in holding BNB. According to a report published by Bloomberg on June 23, former executives at Coral Capital, a Japanese venture capital firm, are understood to be in the process of raising $100 million through a newly formed entity called Build & Build Corporation, in order to launch a crypto treasury that will invest in BNB. In another positive development, on-chain analytics firm Nansen highlighted last month that the BNB Chain had seen active addresses double to two million.  Earlier in May, Geoff Kendrick, head of digital asset research at Standard Chartered, outlined in a research report that the BNB token could reach a unit price of $2,775 by 2028. Kendrick maintained that the deflationary nature of the token, together with its ties to the Binance exchange platform, are factors that support its long-term value.