Strategic investment sees C1 Secondaries Fund target Animoca Brands

Busan Blockchain Special Zone Gears Up with Expert-Led Operations CommitteeGovernment officials and various executives from financial enterprises have been appointed as members of the operations committee of the Busan Blockchain Regulation Free Special Zone project, according to local news outlet Etoday on Tuesday. This project is geared towards growing the city as a blockchain hub and nurturing blockchain-related businesses in the special zone that are exempt from regulatory oversight. The operations committee will be responsible for overseeing the designated area, fostering new businesses and facilitating the development of Busan’s blockchain industry.Photo by Maicon Fonseca Zanco on PixabayDiverse lineup of expertsA total of 25 members have been appointed to the committee, including two ex-officio members — Lee Sung-kwon, Deputy Mayor of Busan for Economic Affairs, and Son Sung-eun, Policy Advisor for Financial Startups in Busan. Other members include Kim Sang-min, the leader of Busan’s initiative to establish its own digital asset exchange; Lee Keun-ju, President of the Korea Fintech Industry Association; and Jin Hyeong-gu, Vice President of KakaoPay, along with other relevant personnel and academic experts. Notably, the only representative affiliated with a cryptocurrency exchange is Seo Byung-yoon, Director of Bithumb’s Economic Research Institute.The participation of Jin Hyeong-gu, Vice President of KakaoPay, is also noteworthy given the fact that KakaoPay is under the internet juggernaut Kakao Group along with GroundX and Klaytn Foundation — two entities that served as the main driving force of blockchain projects at Kakao. However, KakaoPay clarified that its involvement in the operations committee is unrelated to any plans for blockchain and virtual asset-related businesses, instead attributing it to Jin’s experience and expertise in anti-money laundering (AML) procedures. Prior to joining KakaoPay, he had been an AML expert at prominent financial institutions like the Financial Services Commission (FSC) and Kookmin Bank.In addition, Kiwoom Securities and Hanwha Asset Management are both members of the Busan Blockchain Industry Association. Kiwoom Securities explained that it was asked to join the committee to serve as a representative of the association.Key milestones and plansThe committee’s first meeting is scheduled for Nov. 9, the first day of this year’s Blockchain Week in Busan (BWB) event, during which it will discuss matters such as the appointment of a chairman and detailed plans for setting the special zone in motion.The promotion committee of the city’s plan for a digital asset exchange, which has been active until now, is also being dissolved as the term for the members serving in the committee has ended. Subsequently, the new operations committee will become a priority.The committee’s detailed blueprint and action plan will be unveiled during BWB. Touting the theme “Target 2026 Blockchain Busan,” the event is set to host local and overseas experts in the field of blockchain and Web3 to jointly discuss the prospects and potential of Busan to become an urban blockchain hub by 2026.

Kloint and Korea University to develop on-chain data analysis solutionsKloint, a company specializing in the tracking of virtual asset transactions, revealed on Tuesday a partnership with the College of Informatics and the Center for Information System Security at Korea University. The collaboration is set to focus on the joint development of algorithms and platforms for on-chain data analysis.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashSharing insights on regulatory frameworksAs part of this initiative, Kloint and Korea University will cooperate to understand the domestic and international demand for on-chain data analysis. They will also exchange insights on the regulatory and policy frameworks that govern the technologies involved.Growing crypto-related criminal activitiesThe collaborative effort between Kloint and Korea University is set against a backdrop where, with the expansion of the cryptocurrency market, there has been a corresponding uptick in its use for criminal activities like money laundering, drug trafficking, and embezzlement.Traditional techniques used by government bodies, such as the public prosecutor’s office and financial regulators, have proven expensive and increasingly ineffective in tracking virtual assets as they struggle to keep pace with the sophisticated methods now used to circumvent detection.Kloint was co-founded last September by three blockchain technology firms: Fair Square Lab, S2W and Ozys. With a vision set on the horizon, Kloint is gearing up to supply government entities and virtual asset service providers (VASPs) with analytical platforms and reporting services. In the more immediate term, the company is focusing its efforts on developing solutions for data collection and analysis tailored to the Korean cryptocurrency market.

Conflict Identified as Crypto.com Trading on its Own PlatformTrading practices at Crypto.com, the Singapore-based cryptocurrency exchange, have raised questions about potential conflicts of interest within the digital assets industry.Citing a number of unnamed sources, the Financial Times (FT) made the claim in a report published on Monday.Photo by Pixabay on PexelsConflict of interestIn traditional financial markets, exchanges typically match buyers with sellers at competitive transparent prices, while market making and proprietary trading are conducted by separate private companies. However, US regulators have recently cracked down on similar activities at digital asset exchanges. Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, faced 13 charges from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including allegations of manipulative trading to inflate trading volume.The presence of internal traders at Crypto.com has not been widely known since the company’s launch in 2016. The FT’s sources claim that Crypto.com executives provided sworn statements to external trading houses denying the company’s involvement in trading activities.Employees were allegedly instructed to deny the existence of an internal market-making operation. In response to inquiries, Crypto.com denied that employees were asked to lie, stating that their internal market maker functioned similarly to third-party market makers, ensuring tight spreads and efficient markets on their platform.The majority of Crypto.com’s revenue reportedly comes from its app for retail traders, where the company acts as the counterparty for transactions and operates as a broker model. The company’s trading team hedges these positions on various venues, including their own exchange, to maintain risk neutrality. Crypto.com emphasized that their exchange provides a level playing field for institutional traders.According to insiders, Crypto.com’s proprietary trading desk engages in trading activities on the company’s exchange and other platforms, solely focused on generating profits rather than facilitating an exchange. The market making desk, on the other hand, aims to enhance liquidity on the platform.Not a revenue sourceCrypto.com defended its practices by stating that comparing trading volumes to competitors is common in the industry. It said that the company’s priority is to continuously improve order book liquidity and reduce spreads, benefiting all participants. The firm told Decrypt that trading is not a source of revenue: “While we do have some market making activity, for example, we have internal market makers for our CFTC-regulated product Up/Downs in the United States.”As a private company, Crypto.com publishes accounts in different countries, but revenue breakdown by business line is not disclosed.Closure of institutional tradingFollowing the SEC’s enforcement actions, earlier this month Crypto.com announced the closure of its exchange for institutional US traders due to limited demand in the current market landscape, effective from June 21.In any marketplace transparency and fairness are crucial. It’s fair to say that there has been some level of sharp practice among some actors in the marketplace while regulators have been lacking in getting up to speed with the emergent sector, and moving to protect consumers. With the major crypto platform failures of 2022 has come renewed interest in resolving these issues. That may make for some short-term difficulty, but in the longer term, it should mean greater protections for market participants so long as a common sense approach is pursued.