Market speculates on Qatari investment driving bitcoin price surge

KuCoin Dismisses Notion of a Layoff PlanAmidst recent rumors of significant layoffs at Seychelles-based cryptocurrency exchange KuCoin, the company’s CEO has come forward to deny any such plans.While not refuting the possibility of staff reductions, KuCoin’s CEO, Johnny Lyu, took issue with the term “layoffs,” asserting that it was a reevaluation of the organization’s structure rather than job terminations. The speculations about staff cuts were first reported by Colin Wu of Wu Blockchain on Twitter.Photo by Joao Viegas on UnsplashAlleged 30% workforce reductionAccording to his sources, KuCoin was planning to layoff around 30% of its workforce, attributing the alleged measure to a strict know-your-customer (KYC) policy that had impacted the firm’s profits.The KYC policy in question was introduced after KuCoin faced legal action from the United States. In March, the New York Attorney General accused the exchange of violating securities and commodities laws, leading to the implementation of the more stringent KYC measures.Routine bi-annual appraisalsInstead, Lyu has clarified that any adjustments to the company’s headcount were a result of routine bi-annual appraisals aimed at maintaining competitiveness in the market.Taking to Twitter on Tuesday, Lyu referred to the layoff reports as “rumors.” He emphasized that the company regularly evaluates its organizational structure based on employee performance and overall company development to ensure dynamism and competitiveness.The Kucoin CEO pointed to a recent report issued by the company as evidence of the exchange’s ongoing growth. The report revealed that the firm had added 300 new employees in the first half of the year. It also mentioned that KuCoin was in the process of upgrading its KYC authentication systems to enhance user asset security, comply with global compliance requirements, and create a safer trading environment.Despite the speculation and policy changes, KuCoin ranks 11th in terms of “trust score” among other exchanges, according to CoinGecko. Over the past day, the exchange notched up an impressive $327 million in trading volume.KYC policy changeRecently, KuCoin updated its KYC policy, requiring newly registered users to complete the KYC process to access the exchange’s products and services. Existing registered users who had not completed KYC by the deadline faced restrictions on their accounts, limiting certain activities but allowing fund withdrawals.The update to the KYC policy had a notable impact on KuCoin’s trading volume. A day after the announcement, trading volume skyrocketed to $6.8 billion from the previous day’s $500 million, according to CoinGecko data.Lyu has pledged to continue investing in the company’s core businesses while providing users with the exceptional trading experience they’ve been promised.KuCoin may have dispelled rumors of widespread layoffs and clarified that any staff adjustments were part of routine organizational development. However, there’s no doubt that the crypto exchange business is going through a difficult period.Most exchanges have suffered due to regulatory pushback, particularly those that have focused their activities in the United States. Earlier this month, global exchange Binance cut 1,000 jobs with plans to make further cuts in the future.

South Korean brokerage firms are expanding into the security token offering (STO) space, a sector gaining attention ahead of the upcoming presidential election in June. Photo by Raymond Yeung on UnsplashDedicated STO divisionsAccording to local outlet Kukinews, major players like Mirae Asset Securities, Hana Securities and Shinhan Securities are either establishing dedicated STO divisions or partnering with tokenization platforms to stay ahead of the curve. Some are also exploring fractional investment opportunities tied to real-world assets (RWAs) such as real estate, art and music copyrights. Security tokens are blockchain-based digital assets that represent rights to real-world assets (RWAs) and, as the name suggests, are classified as securities. The financial industry is increasingly interested in this technology for its potential to accelerate digital transformation. However, trading such tokens requires a comprehensive legal framework—something that is currently lacking in Korea. Election renews STO interestSTOs have resurfaced as a key topic, with presidential candidates from both the left and right likely to include them in their campaign agendas. The renewed interest follows the ousting of President Yoon Suk-yeol earlier this month, after the Constitutional Court upheld his impeachment by the National Assembly over his declaration of martial law. Before the presidential election became imminent, legislative discussions around STOs had stalled in the National Assembly and received little attention. Among the standout moves made by presidential hopefuls, Lee Jae-myung, a primary candidate from the Democratic Party of Korea (DPK), recently added Kim Yong-jin, an STO expert and professor at Sogang University, to his policy advisory group. Meanwhile, lawmakers across party lines have introduced amendments to the Electronic Securities Act and the Capital Markets Act, aiming to establish a regulatory framework for STOs, according to the National Assembly’s National Policy Committee. This regulatory shift in political circles favoring STOs has been anticipated by the financial industry. An unnamed official from a brokerage firm predicted that presidential candidates will propose measures such as legalizing security tokens, advancing a regulatory framework for virtual asset service providers (VASPs), promoting investment in crypto-related businesses and permitting the use of stablecoins. Some observers even expect these bills to receive final approval within the year. Brokerage meets blockchainKorean securities firms' push into the STO space is further highlighted by a recent partnership between Shinhan Securities and the Solana Foundation.According to Yonhap, the two parties signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to collaborate on expanding the digital asset ecosystem. Their cooperation will focus on STOs, RWAs, crypto custody infrastructure, stablecoin payments for both online and offline use and responses to global policies and regulations.

A regulatory divide regarding the digital asset sector is emerging across Asia. While China is moving to strengthen its prohibition on cryptocurrency operations to ensure financial stability, Central Asian states such as Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan are increasingly formalizing frameworks to integrate and regulate the industry.Photo by Road Ahead on UnsplashChina cites renewed crypto speculationAccording to Reuters, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) has reaffirmed its prohibition on business activities involving digital assets, citing a renewed wave of speculation as a complication in managing financial risks. At a Nov. 28 meeting on crypto regulation, the central bank reiterated that commercial activity involving cryptocurrencies remains illegal. PBOC officials stated that enforcement against unlawful financial operations tied to cryptocurrencies would be intensified to safeguard economic stability. The central bank identified stablecoins as a primary concern, noting that they fail to meet customer identification standards and broader anti-money laundering (AML) requirements. Officials warned that these assets could create vulnerabilities to fraud, money laundering, and unregulated cross-border capital flows. Kazakhstan mulls $300M crypto moveIn contrast to Beijing’s elevated oversight, Kazakhstan is exploring the integration of digital assets into its financial reserves. According to BeInCrypto, National Bank Chairman Timur Suleimenov indicated on Nov. 28 that the monetary authority is considering an allocation of up to $300 million into crypto assets. However, he clarified that deploying the full amount is unlikely. Suleimenov explained that any potential investment would be drawn from the central bank’s gold and foreign-exchange reserves rather than the National Fund. He added that the National Bank of Kazakhstan intends to wait for market conditions to stabilize, citing recent volatility as a factor making the timing of such an investment uncertain. The latest development comes after Bloomberg Law reported last month that the country is preparing to launch a crypto reserve fund valued between $500 million and $1 billion as early as next year. This proposed fund is expected to target exchange-traded products and industry-related companies rather than direct crypto purchases, with capital potentially sourced from repatriated assets and mining proceeds. Simultaneously, the government is advancing physical infrastructure for the sector. In May, President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev unveiled plans for a "CryptoCity" pilot zone in the Alatau development north of Almaty. Under this government-approved sandbox program, authorities are testing blockchain-based tools for taxation, investment, and decentralized identity systems, with the aim of positioning Kazakhstan as a regional hub for innovation. Turkmenistan to launch licensing rulesFurther deepening the regional trend toward adoption, Turkmenistan has moved to establish a formal legal infrastructure for the sector.  Another Reuters report said the country recently passed legislation to legalize and regulate digital assets, which President Serdar Berdymukhamedov has signed into law. Scheduled to take effect on Jan. 1, the legislation creates a licensing regime for crypto exchanges and mining operations. A government spokesperson said the law spells out the legal and economic status of virtual assets, covering their creation, storage, circulation, and other functions, and aims to boost digitalization and draw foreign investment. Despite their differing approaches, the three countries reflect a shared recognition of digital assets’ growing relevance in global finance. China continues to view cryptocurrencies as a source of systemic risk, while Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan are testing whether regulation, licensing, and selective investment can deliver economic gains without compromising stability. Together, these diverging paths underscore a broader debate over whether engagement or exclusion offers a more resilient long-term model.