Fingerlabs launches Web3 solution to help partners build membership NFTs

In an effort to fortify the cryptocurrency market and safeguard investors' funds, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has introduced a minimum insurance requirement of 50% for licensed cryptocurrency exchanges handling customers' assets.Photo by Simon Zhu on UnsplashGuarding against insolvency riskThe move came to light through a statement published recently by OSL, one of Hong Kong’s licensed virtual asset trading platforms. It’s aimed at enhancing security measures, protecting users from potential security breaches or insolvency. As part of that disclosure, OSL announced a two-year partnership with Canopius, an underwriter syndicate associated with Lloyd's of London. Under this collaboration, OSL will provide insurance coverage for an impressive 95% of its users' assets, surpassing the mandated 50%. OSL emphasized its commitment to safeguarding regulated assets under custody, irrespective of the regulatory guidelines permitting virtual asset service providers (VASPs) to reduce insurance coverage to 50%. Response to recent failuresThis decision is grounded in the acknowledgment of the volatile market conditions and the series of cryptocurrency firm collapses witnessed in recent years. 2022 saw a number of high-profile crypto platform collapses, such as the demise of FTX. HashKey Exchange, another licensed crypto exchange in Hong Kong, has also proactively secured its users' assets by entering into a crypto insurance agreement with Hong Kong headquartered fintech firm OneDegree back in September. The insurer entered the digital assets space last July, expanding into the Middle East last month. OneDegree’s arrangement with HashKey offers coverage ranging from $50 million to $400 million, extending beyond standard security breaches and insolvency to include server downtime, data back-up and load management incidents, ensuring comprehensive protection. Broader regulatory effortsThe minimum insurance requirement is part of the SFC's larger strategy to regulate the cryptocurrency industry in Hong Kong. While the Chinese autonomous territory enabled cryptocurrency trading for retail investors in August, only OSL and HashKey have obtained virtual asset trading licenses. Thirteen other entities are currently in the application process, undergoing rigorous due diligence checks, including comprehensive financial audits exceeding the scope beyond proof-of-reserve systems. This insurance mandate represents a significant step toward enhancing investor confidence in the cryptocurrency market. As digital assets gain popularity, ensuring the security of customers' funds has become paramount. The SFC's proactive approach seeks to strike a balance between fostering innovation and safeguarding investors. Products are also emerging that crypto users themselves can access. UK-based CryptoShield offers insurance protection directly to users that covers potential loss of funds on crypto platforms. The cryptocurrency landscape in Hong Kong is evolving rapidly, with the SFC playing a pivotal role in shaping the regulatory environment. Regulators aim to establish a robust framework addressing potential risks and protecting market participants while embracing digital innovation. As the regulatory landscape matures, more licensed crypto exchanges in Hong Kong may be required to meet the 50% minimum insurance requirement, further strengthening security measures and making the market a safer place for investors.  

Vietnam has moved to take a positive approach to crypto assets by passing legislation to legalize them. Last week, the Southeast Asian nation’s National Assembly passed the Digital Technology Industry Law, which takes effect on Jan. 1, 2026, according to a report published in the official online newspaper of the Vietnamese government. Photo by Daniel Bernard on UnsplashCategorizing digital assetsThe law sets out two categories of digital assets, virtual assets and crypto assets. The legislation frames virtual assets as digital assets used for exchange or investments. Meanwhile, crypto assets are to be regarded as digital assets utilized to validate transactions and confirm ownership while relying on the use of encryption technology. Neither category includes securities or digital versions of fiat currencies such as central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) or other financial instruments. The legislation gives the Vietnamese government the authority to define and apply specific regulatory conditions when it comes to items such as anti-money laundering (AML) measures and the inclusion of international cybersecurity standards. It is hoped that the law will pave the way for the development of home-grown technological enterprises within Vietnam, while also promoting a nationwide digital transformation process. Regulatory clarityThe legislation is significant as it clearly sets out the legal status of digital assets in Vietnam after years of uncertainty and regulatory ambiguity. Singapore-based blockchain-focused Business Strategist, Anndy Lian, said that such legal clarity could result in Vietnam becoming a regional hub for the crypto sector.  Anh Tran, who belongs to Superteam Vietnam, a community for Solana builders in Vietnam, said that the development was huge for founders, developers and investors in the crypto space in Vietnam. He stated: “For a country who has always been at the forefront of crypto adoption, [Vietnam] is now a 'green-lighted zone' in principle, but we're still waiting at the red light for operational rules.” He refers to the fact that Vietnamese regulators still have until Jan. 1, 2026, to flesh out the details in terms of defining who can issue, trade, custody or manage crypto, and how AML, cybersecurity and taxation are handled. Vietnamese officials are likely to give strong consideration to AML measures relative to crypto given that the Southeast Asian nation has been on the grey list of the Financial Action Task Force since 2023. Countries who appear on the grey list are under considerably more scrutiny with regard to AML matters. While another community member claimed that anywhere crypto regulation has been implemented, actual usage has declined, Tran maintained that regulation is inevitable and that “crypto doesn’t need to be lawless to be free.” Last October, Vietnam set out its blockchain strategy, aspiring to the goal of achieving regional leadership in the sector by 2030. In March, the country’s Prime Minister, Pham Minh Chinh, requested that a legal framework for cryptocurrencies be established.  According to Chainalysis’ 2024 Global Crypto Adoption Index, Vietnam ranks fifth in the world.

Public Confidence in Crypto Wanes in Hong Kong Amid JPEX ScandalThe development of cryptocurrency in Hong Kong has been dented in terms of public sentiment following the JPEX cryptocurrency exchange scandal, according to a recent survey conducted by the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology’s (HKUST) business school.Photo by Alex Plesovskich on UnsplashA two-phase survey methodologyThe survey, the preliminary results of which were disclosed by the business school on Tuesday, aimed to gauge how public attitudes toward virtual assets had been affected by the JPEX scandal, which rocked the crypto community within the Chinese autonomous territory.While the survey is set to conclude on October 20, the preliminary findings have already revealed a noteworthy shift in public perception. Notably, 41% of respondents expressed a preference not to hold virtual assets, marking a 12-percentage-point increase from the earlier study conducted in May.Moreover, only 20% of respondents indicated a desire to hold virtual assets in the future, reflecting a five-percentage-point decrease compared to the previous survey. These findings suggest a growing skepticism among Hong Kong’s populace regarding the cryptocurrency industry.Post-JPEX public sentimentThe initial survey involved 5,700 participants aged 18 and above and was conducted between April 24 and May 23. Phase two of the survey commenced on September 28, approximately 11 days after the allegations against JPEX came to light. The results were compared to a similar survey conducted between April and May to assess the evolving sentiment. Between September 28 and October 5, phase two of the survey had compiled responses from 2,200 individuals.HKUST acknowledged that the second survey occurred in the “aftermath of an alleged financial fraud” involving a cryptocurrency platform but refrained from directly naming JPEX in the report.Professor Allen Huang, Associate Dean of HKUST’s business school, attributed the shift in sentiment to the recent financial scandal, which thrust the cryptocurrency industry into the spotlight. This heightened attention has led to a “more conservative investment appetite” among the public. He emphasized the need for greater educational initiatives to enhance public awareness and understanding of the risks and potential of this emerging field.HKUST’s business school stated that the survey’s primary objective was to assess the attitudes and viewpoints of Hong Kong’s residents regarding virtual asset investments, considering their experiences, intentions, and the regulatory safeguards in place.JPEX falloutThe JPEX scandal, which allegedly involved a $166 million fraud scheme, unfolded over several months before Hong Kong authorities publicly announced their investigation into the exchange. It forced local regulators to reassess the soundness of crypto trading-related regulatory measures applied within the Chinese autonomous territory.That reassessment led to regulators concluding that efforts needed to be intensified to combat unregulated platforms operating within Hong Kong. In response to the JPEX saga, the Hong Kong Police Force and the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) established a cryptocurrency-focused working group earlier this month to combat illicit activities on cryptocurrency exchanges.The evolving sentiment in Hong Kong reflects the broader challenges and concerns surrounding the cryptocurrency industry. As regulatory scrutiny increases and major incidents like the JPEX scandal come to light, it’s clear that fostering public trust and understanding is a pressing priority for crypto businesses and the broader crypto community.