Vietnam legalizes crypto assets

Cross Trading of LUNA Tokens Uncovered on Three Korean Crypto ExchangesAccording to a report by the Maeil Business Newspaper on Wednesday, it was discovered that cross trading of LUNA tokens took place on three South Korean cryptocurrency exchanges: Bithumb, Coinone, and GoPax.Three crypto exchangesAn indictment by the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office against Terraform Labs co-founders Do Kwon and Daniel Shin, along with interviews conducted within the cryptocurrency industry, revealed that Bithumb, Coinone, and GoPax were involved in cross trading LUNA tokens with a combined value of $598 million. Specifically, Bithumb accounted for $224 million, Coinone for $299 billion, and GoPax for $74 billion.The prosecution has confirmed that cross trading continued until the end of February 2022, a period marked by significant demands for virtual asset legislation from both the market and academia. Despite widespread calls for regulations to curb unfair trading practices, these instances of cross trading went undetected.Classification of LUNAMoreover, it is reported that legal punishment for the $598 million worth of cross trading is challenging unless LUNA tokens are officially recognized as securities by the court. Under the Korean Capital Markets Act, only cross trading involving tokens identified as securities can be subject to penalties as a form of market manipulation.During a plenary session of the National Assembly’s Legislation and Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, Justice Minister Han Dong-hoon made a statement suggesting that LUNA tokens could be considered securities due to their backing by real-world assets. However, he said that this distinction might not apply to other tokens.On April 25, the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office indicted Shin and others as accomplices to Kwon, assuming that LUNA tokens were indeed securities. This case now revolves around whether the prosecution can successfully establish the classification of LUNA tokens as securities during the trial, making it the central issue in the case.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashCrypto investor protection legislationLast Thursday, the National Assembly’s National Policy Committee approved a bill known as the “Virtual Assets User Protection Act,” signaling an accelerated legislative process. However, there are arguments suggesting that the definition of cross trading should be further clarified in either the legislation or enforcement decree.A representative of a law firm specializing in virtual assets stated that the implementation of the User Protection Act would take another year even after its promulgation, making it challenging to retrospectively penalize cross trading practices that had already occurred.

HTX and Heco Chain exploited with $115 million lossSeychelles-incorporated cryptocurrency exchange HTX, linked to digital-asset entrepreneur Justin Sun, has fallen victim to a significant hack, only a few months after having suffered another hack in September.Photo by Markus Spiske on UnsplashSecond HTX hack in recent monthsThe last hack, involving a loss of digital assets to the value of $8 million, was resolved when the hacker agreed to return funds in October in return for a goodwill payment of around $400,000.This latest unfortunate incident follows another hack on Poloniex, also associated with Sun, just weeks ago. Sun acknowledged the HTX hack in a tweet, announcing the temporary suspension of deposits and withdrawals without specifying the exact amount pilfered.Separate Heco Chain hackIt is understood that approximately $30 million worth of cryptocurrencies was siphoned from the exchange wallet. The platform is actively investigating the breach, aiming to uncover the specifics surrounding the attack. Simultaneously, the HECO Bridge, which was established by HTX for cost-effective fund transfers across different blockchains, experienced a separate hack.This breach resulted in losses exceeding $85 million, including ETH, US dollar stablecoin Tether (USDT) and various other tokens. Although initially launched by HTX, HECO operates independently from the HTX exchange.Crypto community concernThese security breaches cast a shadow over Sun’s crypto ventures, especially considering the recent hack on Poloniex, which saw losses surpassing $100 million in various cryptocurrencies. A spokesperson for crypto security firm Hacken told Cointelegraph that these hacks could be the work of an insider.“We can see that all these attacks have the same target: Justin Sun’s projects,” the spokesperson stated. These related incidents are the cause of significant speculation within the crypto space, with some concern expressed about the financial health of HTX, given that the firm is currently offering unsustainable interest rates of up to 100% APY on a selection of digital assets.In response to the HTX hack, Justin Sun assured the community in a post on X (formerly Twitter) that HTX would fully compensate for the losses incurred in its hot wallet. The exchange has temporarily halted deposits and withdrawals as the investigation unfolds. Sun emphasized the commitment to resume services once the investigation concludes and the cause of the breach is identified.These incidents raise questions about the security infrastructure of platforms associated with Justin Sun. The crypto community awaits further details on the investigation’s outcomes and preventive measures that will be implemented to fortify these exchanges against future attacks.Such recent security breaches have not just affected Justin Sun-related enterprises. Earlier this month, decentralized exchange (DEX) KyberSwap was exploited to the tune of $46.5 million. Earlier this week, Kronos Research — a Taipei-based crypto trading, market making and venture capital platform — experienced a $25.6 million loss. The past twenty days have seen five major hacks resulting in an aggregate loss of a staggering $290 million.As the crypto industry grapples with increasing security challenges, the importance of robust protective measures cannot be overstated. These developments underscore the need for a cautious and diligent approach in safeguarding digital assets within the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency landscape.

Dispute Embroils Bitget in Legal Battle With Crypto InfluencerBitget, the crypto exchange registered in Seychelles, finds itself entangled in a legal dispute with prominent crypto influencer Evan Luthra.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashAccount freezing allegationsThe conflict stems from Luthra’s allegations of account freezing and loss of funds after a token listing incident in March. Luthra has filed a lawsuit against Bitget, accusing the exchange of withholding $200,000 in Tether (USDT) without adequate explanation, while also freezing his account.The legal drama follows Luthra’s involvement with the Reel Star project, where he served as an advisor for the platform which is aimed at creators. As compensation for his collaboration with the project, Luthra received Reel Token (REELT), the project’s utility token.Bitget alleged market manipulationUpon the listing of REELT tokens, Luthra reportedly sold 1.3 million tokens on Bitget. In response, Bitget claims it faced a manipulative attack orchestrated by a group of traders attempting to profit from market manipulation immediately after the token’s listing. This allegedly caused a significant drop in the token’s price, prompting Bitget’s decision to freeze Luthra’s account.Bitget states that it contacted Luthra seeking an explanation for the suspicious trading behavior. Luthra acknowledged the token sale but failed to provide satisfactory reasons for his actions, according to Bitget’s version of events. The exchange maintains that user protection is its foremost priority and that it takes swift action against illegal or fraudulent behaviors.$16 million damages claimLuthra refutes the allegations, asserting his innocence and citing alleged approval from Reel Star’s Co-Founder Navdeep Sharma for his token sale plans. He seeks a substantial $16 million in damages, in addition to the frozen funds. Luthra claims that Bitget unjustly deprived him of his tokens, asserting his status as a fully KYCed user entitled to access his holdings.In the aftermath of the incident, Bitget conducted an investigation and offered a compensation plan for affected clients. Gracy Chen, Bitget’s Managing Director, emphasized the exchange’s commitment to user protection and its actions against illicit activities on its platform. Addressing the matter on Twitter, Chen didn’t hold back in her commentary on Luthra, stating that he “has a history of fraudulent activities,” which she says were exposed by crypto journalist CoffeeZilla.The legal dispute has ignited debates within the crypto community. Supporters of Luthra contend that his case underscores broader issues faced by users of centralized exchanges, shedding light on the need for improved user rights and protection. On the other hand, some argue that Bitget acted appropriately to safeguard its users and the market integrity.CZ brought into the disputeThe legal battle has attracted attention from influential figures in the crypto industry. Against a backdrop of a very public airing of the dispute on Twitter, in a recent tweet Luthra invited Changpeng Zhao (CZ), the CEO of Binance, to respond to Luthra’s claim that Bitget spreads rumors about other exchanges. CZ was having none of it, writing: “You should talk to them, right? We are not a regulator for other exchanges.”The case highlights the intricate challenges surrounding market manipulation and token listings within the crypto space. As it unfolds, the outcome could potentially set a precedent for similar situations involving token listings, market manipulation, and user protection.