Blockchain research startup Four Pillars snags $527k investment

KICA partners with PiLab and CODE for Web3 authentication servicesThe Korea Information Certificate Authority (KICA) has signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with two new business partners — dApp provider PiLab and CODE, a Travel Rule solutions provider and joint venture co-founded by Korean cryptocurrency exchanges Bithumb, Coinone and Korbit — according to local news outlet Kyunghyang Games. The three companies’ CEOs attended the signing ceremony and vowed to establish a credible authentication system to contribute to a healthy Web3 environment.Photo by GuerrillaBuzz on UnsplashEstablishing secure and compliant solutionsThrough this collaboration, the companies plan to leverage their respective capabilities to develop and distribute Web3 authentication services that comply with virtual asset service providers’ (VASPs) Know Your Customer (KYC) verification procedures as well as international standards such as the crypto Travel Rule. “We aim to create a secure and efficient environment for both providers and users of various Web3 services in line with global regulatory trends,” explained Park Do-hyun, CEO of PiLab.Setting new standardsKim Sang-jun, CEO of the KICA, anticipates that the KICA’s expertise and capabilities in identity verification and security authentication in Web2 would help the collaboration become a new benchmark in the Web3 authentication industry. “Eventually, we will expand our services to include SoulBound tokens (SBTs), enhancing identity verification, license certification and attribute certification, solidifying our position as a leading company in the Web3 industry,” he said.Furthermore, CODE CEO Lee Sung-mi emphasized the importance of complying with international standards like the crypto Travel Rule for a healthy Web3 service environment. She also pledged to ensure that CODE would use its capabilities to establish a solid connection between VASPs and the Web3 service market.This collaboration represents a strategic move towards shaping the future landscape of Web3 authentication and security services, combining the strengths of these companies to meet the evolving needs of the industry.

Taiwan to Restrict Offshore Non-Complaint ExchangesTaiwan’s Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) has been working towards taking proactive steps to regulate the cryptocurrency industry within its borders recently. One key guiding principle it has developed is to impose strict regulation on offshore crypto exchanges operating in Taiwan.Photo by Vas on UnsplashTen guiding principlesTaiwan’s Central News Agency reported on Thursday that in an effort to ensure compliance and protect consumers, the FSC has developed ten guiding principles for virtual asset service providers (VASPs). These principles are set to be officially released by the end of this month, according to a government official.The guiding principles will encompass several important aspects of the crypto industry. They will emphasize the need for enhanced information disclosure, requiring businesses to establish clear review standards for the listing and delisting of virtual assets. Additionally, there will be a focus on ensuring the separation and proper custody of assets belonging to both companies and customers.Focusing on offshore complianceThe FSC intends to make it clear that offshore crypto exchanges must adhere to proper compliance registration if they want to conduct business onshore. The move is in line with what appears to be a commitment by the Taiwanese authorities to promote responsible and secure cryptocurrency operations.One particularly significant restriction is the prohibition of illegal solicitation of business by foreign crypto firms. The FSC is determined to enforce this rule strictly. Foreign VASPs that fail to register according to company law and declare their compliance with anti-money laundering regulations to the FSC will be barred from soliciting business in Taiwan or catering to domestic residents.It’s worth noting that Taiwan has been proactive in implementing anti-money laundering laws for VASPs since July 2021. Although this particular measure has been in place, the cryptocurrency industry in Taiwan has largely operated in a regulatory vacuum. However, recent developments suggest a shift towards greater oversight and accountability.One notable example is Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, which has initiated the process of registering for anti-money laundering compliance in Taiwan. Despite not being fully regulated in the country, Binance has established a local entity, “Binance International Limited Taiwan Branch (Seychelles),” and received government approval for company registration.Building a regulatory frameworkIn addition to these regulatory efforts, the Ministry of Economic Affairs has proposed the creation of a new business category within relevant regulations. This move aims to facilitate the formation of cryptocurrency-related industry associations, encouraging the development of self-regulatory guidelines.The forthcoming guiding principles for VASPs are expected to provide much-needed clarity and structure to the rapidly evolving world of cryptocurrencies within Taiwan’s borders.Many leading jurisdictions have been behind the curve in developing a clear, workable regulatory framework for crypto. That has led to many exchanges establishing themselves in offshore locations where light touch regulation is applied. It’s highly likely that the Taiwanese have examined the fallout from this development, best exemplified by the spectacular collapse of Bahamas-based FTX last November.

A Korean Lawmaker’s Crypto Holdings Worth $4.5M Spark ControversySouth Korean lawmaker Kim Nam-kuk, a member of the opposition party Democratic Party of Korea (DPK), has recently come under scrutiny due to his reported possession of 800,000 WEMIX tokens from January to February last year, as reported by the Maeil Business Newspaper. These tokens were worth approximately 6 billion KRW or $4.5 million at the time. While Korean lawmakers are obligated to disclose their wealth, virtual assets are an exception. The disclosure of Kim’s ownership of these tokens has ignited controversy, as it unveiled a wealth magnitude significantly greater than previously understood.Photo by Karolina Grabowska on PexelsTravel Rule regulationA central issue in the unfolding dispute is the source of Kim’s investment in the WEMIX tokens. It has been reported that he purchased a significant amount of these tokens between January and February last year and withdrew the entire sum between February and March before the crypto exchange implemented measures to comply with the Travel Rule regulation. This rule requires that financial authorities be informed of transactions over 10 million KRW ($7,500). After the crypto exchange reported the transactions to the Financial Intelligence Unit of the Financial Services Commission, the government agency requested a warrant to search Kim’s account due to the transactions’ abnormality. However, the court dismissed the request.Jeonse deposit to LG Display sharesIn response to the controversy, Kim took to a YouTube channel on Tuesday to explain his WEMIX token investments. He stated that he had retrieved 600 million KRW ($450,000) after his jeonse contract expired and used the money to purchase LG Display shares. Jeonse a housing rental system in Korea where tenants put up a lump-sum refundable deposit on a rental space for a two-year stay. Kim claims that these LG Display shares later rose in value to 985.7 million KRW ($744,000) in January 2021 and that he used this sum to purchase the tokens.Account balance and WEMIX tokensDespite his explanation, there are still questions surrounding Kim’s sudden increase in his bank account balance. His account balance reportedly increased from 100 million KRW ($76,000) at the end of 2020 to 1.12 billion KRW ($850,000) by the end of 2021, which raised suspicions. If Kim had directed all the money withdrawn from the LG Display shares to WEMIX tokens, it is unclear where the additional $774,000 in his account came from. Kim has reportedly explained to his party’s leadership that he retrieved the principal amount of his investment due to the increase in the WEMIX token price. However, this explanation has not satisfied some critics.Insufficient explanationIn an attempt to address these concerns, Kim shared part of his bank transaction records on Monday. However, this disclosure has fallen short of addressing all the questions that have been raised, such as the precise amount invested in the tokens and their purchase prices. There is still significant public scrutiny and skepticism surrounding Kim’s explanation for his crypto holdings, and it remains to be seen if further disclosures will be made.Kim apologized to the Korean public via Facebook for any disappointment caused, especially amid challenging economic conditions. However, he denied accusations of using undisclosed information or unlawfully acquiring wealth. Kim maintained that all transactions were transparently made using only his own wallets through his real-name bank accounts.Potential insider trading and conflict of interestNevertheless, the public’s acceptance of his explanation is yet to be seen, as questions about his $4.5 million virtual assets persist, particularly given his reported total wealth of around $1.1 million. There are concerns surrounding the possibility of insider trading. Furthermore, Kim’s participation in proposing a bill to defer tax implementation on digital assets has triggered suspicions of a potential conflict of interest.Call for an impartial third partyRecent updates indicate that the prosecution is considering requesting a warrant against Kim in relation to the controversy surrounding his crypto holdings. The Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission is also examining if his participation in proposing the bill constitutes a conflict of interest. It is evident that an impartial third party will need to investigate and analyze all relevant information to resolve this dispute. Until a thorough and unbiased investigation takes place, the public’s concerns and questions are likely to continue.