A Korean Lawmaker’s Crypto Holdings Worth $4.5M Spark Controversy

Hong Kong Pressing Banks to Facilitate Crypto ClientsHong Kong’s banking regulator is urging banks, including HSBC and Standard Chartered, to onboard crypto exchanges as clients, despite increasing regulatory scrutiny of the industry in the United States.That’s according to a report published by the Financial Times (FT) on Wednesday. The FT cited three people who it claims are familiar with the matter, together with a letter seen by the publication as the basis for the assertion.Photo by Ansel Lee on PexelsChallenging crypto banking reticenceAt a recent meeting, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) questioned these UK-based lenders, together with the Bank of China, about their reluctance to accept crypto exchanges as customers, according to sources familiar with the matter. The HKMA emphasized that due diligence on potential clients should not create unnecessary burdens, particularly for those seeking opportunities in Hong Kong. While banks do not have a ban on crypto clients, concerns over potential money laundering and illegal activities have made them cautious.The pressure faced by banks highlights the challenges Hong Kong is facing in establishing itself as a global hub for the crypto industry, especially in light of previous high-profile collapses, such as the implosion of FTX. However, the HKMA is encouraging banks to overcome their reservations, as the regulator believes there is resistance from senior executives who adhere to traditional banking mindsets.The enthusiasm of some Hong Kong officials for the sector is evident as pro-Beijing lawmaker Johnny Ng invited Coinbase and other crypto exchanges to set up operations in the city following the recent SEC lawsuit against Binance and Coinbase.Caught between opposing forcesBanks in Hong Kong find themselves walking a fine line between supporting the crypto industry as encouraged by the government and being cautious due to the US regulatory environment. They want to ensure the industry’s development aligns with government policies, but they are also concerned about potential anti-money laundering and know-your-customer issues.The HKMA and the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) have been vocal about their expectations, setting them apart from regulators in other jurisdictions that may be more skeptical of cryptocurrencies. Last month it emerged that crypto startups are having difficulties in establishing banking facilities in the autonomous Chinese territory. At the time, the HKMA did convene a meeting to bring parties together in order to forge a path forward.While Hong Kong has a history as a crypto center, its position weakened after Beijing’s crackdown on the industry in 2017. However, the Hong Kong government aims to reestablish the city as a hub for digital assets, having expressed its desire to provide a supportive environment for crypto-related businesses. The introduction of a new licensing regime for crypto platforms in Hong Kong is part of the government’s efforts to attract more crypto groups to the city.HSBC, Standard Chartered, and the Bank of China hold influential positions in Hong Kong as issuers of the city’s currency and have key roles in the Hong Kong Association of Banks lobby group. Standard Chartered claims that it maintains regular dialogue with regulators on various subjects, while HSBC has claimed that it is actively engaging in policies and developments within the nascent industry.

Korean Financial Regulator Reveals Crypto Accounting Guidelines to Prevent Inflated Company ValuationsThe Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) has announced new regulations to address accounting uncertainties in the blockchain industry, according to local news outlet KBS News. The rapid growth of the industry and the increasing impact of cryptocurrency transactions on corporate accounting have resulted in confusion due to the lack of clear guidelines.Last month, the National Assembly’s plenary session passed the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill, emphasizing the need for improved regulation. In line with this development, the FSC has introduced practical guidelines and measures to resolve accounting uncertainties.The FSC has introduced two measures to achieve this goal: virtual asset accounting guidelines and mandatory disclosure of virtual assets in annotations within financial statements.Photo by Beatriz Pérez Moya on UnsplashAccounting guidelinesThe virtual asset accounting guidelines state that when an issuer sells virtual assets to a customer, they must fulfill all obligations, such as the sales process, in order to recognize it as revenue. Any costs incurred during the issuance of a virtual asset and the creation of its platform should be recognized as expenses, unless there is clear evidence that these activities specifically contribute to the development of the virtual asset. Additionally, any reserved virtual assets after issuance cannot be treated as assets on the company’s balance sheet. These guidelines aim to prevent companies from artificially inflating the value of their companies using virtual assets.When recognizing virtual assets as assets or liabilities, virtual asset service providers (VASPs) must consider the concept of economic control. Economic control refers to the entity’s authority to dispose of a virtual asset without needing customer authorization.Virtual assets in annotationsFurthermore, companies are obligated to disclose their virtual asset transactions and holdings in annotations to the financial statement. This requirement ensures that users of corporate accounting information have sufficient details. Public companies holding virtual assets for investment purposes must state the basis for classifying the assets as assets or liabilities. They must also provide the book and market values of their virtual assets in their financial statements.Companies that have created or issued virtual assets are required to provide comprehensive information about the quantity and characteristics of these assets. They must also explain their revenue recognition methodology in the event of asset sales. Companies must provide disclosure regarding the historical utilization of cryptocurrencies that have been issued but remain unsold. This disclosure includes various factors such as portfolios and volumes.VASPs must disclose the volume and market value of virtual assets entrusted to them by customers for each asset, regardless of whether these assets are recognized as assets or liabilities. VASPs also have to provide information about the level of protection measures they have implemented to mitigate risks such as hacking.The FSC expects that these measures will enable readers of financial statements to make meaningful comparisons between VASPs while ensuring the provision of reliable information.The accounting guidelines, after incorporating industry feedback, are expected to undergo deliberations and resolutions by both the accounting standards review committee and the Korean Securities and Futures Commission, as per local news outlet Kyunghyang Shinmun. Once the guidelines receive final approval, they will be promulgated and implemented immediately. This process is anticipated to take place between October and November.Meanwhile, the inclusion of virtual asset disclosures in the annotations of financial statements will be enforced next January.

Gyeonggi-do Province Mandates Senior Officials to Report Crypto HoldingsSouth Korea’s most populated province which encircles Seoul has taken a proactive step towards regulating virtual assets by notifying the legislation of an amendment to the code of conduct for public officials. As reported by local news outlet Yonhap News Agency, the Gyeonggi-do province will gather public comments on the amendment until July 25.Photo by Ryoo Geon Uk on UnsplashProvincial levelUnder the revised code of conduct, Gyeonggi-do officials will be prohibited from engaging in property transactions or investments related to virtual assets, using any virtual asset information acquired during the course of their duties. Provincial officials are also forbidden from providing virtual asset information to others to aid their property transactions or investments.Implementation next monthThe amendment compels public officials whose duties involve crypto-related projects, as well as high-ranking officials with an obligation to report their wealth, to declare their virtual assets. Once reviewed by the Ordinance and Rules Review Committee early next month, the amendment will be implemented immediately.National levelA Gyeonggi-do official explained that the decision to preemptively amend the code of conduct regarding virtual assets was made in anticipation of the implementation of the revised Public Service Ethics Act. This act, passed during the National Assembly’s plenary session in May, mandates high-level government officials to report their virtual assets and is set to become effective on December 14.Gyeonggi-do’s crypto surveyGyeonggi-do has been active in taking measures related to crypto assets. In a recent announcement, the province revealed its plan to conduct a survey among residents, aimed at hearing their experiences with unfair virtual asset trading practices. The survey is scheduled to run from August to November and was prompted by a growing number of residents suffering unfair losses from crypto investments amidst an economic slowdown.