KICA partners with PiLab and CODE for Web3 authentication services

Zettai Pte Ltd., the Singapore-based holding company that controls Indian crypto exchange WazirX through its subsidiary Zanmai India, has filed an application for a moratorium with the Singaporean High Court, under section 64 of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018. Six months requestedIn the filing (HC/OA 861/2024), the company has pleaded with the court to be granted a six-month moratorium, which would give the firm the space and time needed to restructure its liabilities. The company laid out details of its moratorium application in a blog post published to its website on August 28. The firm outlined that a moratorium represents “ the most efficient way to address users’ cryptocurrency balances on the Platform and facilitate recovery for users.” An automatic moratorium of 30 days has effectively been granted as a consequence of the application itself, and it is up to the court if it approves the six-month moratorium that is being sought. A date for the hearing of that matter has yet to be scheduled.Photo by Palu Malerba on Pexels$234 million hack falloutWazirX has been dealing with the fallout from a $234 million hack which occurred in July. One key entity that is owed funds is Indian crypto app CoinSwitch. In an effort to get its funds back, the company has sued WazirX. Taking to the X social media platform, CoinSwitch outlined why it felt the need to take legal action. It stated: "From the day of the incident, we have tried to be in constant touch with the WazirX team, seeking recovery of the funds that are stuck on their exchange. However, our efforts have not come to fruition." In a follow-up tweet, CoinSwitch assured its own users that its exposure to WazirX has no impact on user balances. The company has WazirX exposure that amounts to 2% of its overall user funds. That exposure is reduced further if WazirX’ claim that only ERC-20 tokens were affected is taken on board, accounting for 1% of CoinSwitch user deposits. White KnightWazirX co-founder Nischal Shetty spoke to the notion of a “white knight” in an affidavit submitted under the Zettai name to support the application. He outlined that WazirX is in talks with 11 crypto exchanges and has signed three non-disclosure agreements (NDAs). The company has also received offers for financing and for partnering with Zettai, the WazirX parent company. WazirX has outlined that it has set aside $12 million in digital assets to cover legal and associated costs that the company anticipates incurring as part of its restructuring efforts. Matters are further compounded by the fact that a cloud hangs over the ownership of the company. Shetty has claimed that he is no longer an owner of the exchange. In 2022, he wrote that Binance had acquired WazirX. Around the same time frame, Binance’s Changpeng Zhao (CZ) outlined that Binance didn’t control WazirX systems.  India’s economic intelligence agency, the Enforcement Directorate, has claimed in the past that Shetty has gone out of his way to obscure the ownership structure by way of a complex chain of companies in Singapore.

Japan is preparing to shift oversight of crypto assets from its payments rulebook to its main securities law, a move that would treat digital tokens more squarely as investment products rather than payment tools, according to a new report from the country’s financial regulator. In a working-group paper on crypto asset regulation released Dec. 10, the Financial Services Agency (FSA) said it plans to bring “crypto assets” under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA) instead of the Payment Services Act (PSA), as reported by local outlet CoinPost. The agency framed the change as an effort to strengthen investor protection as more households buy digital assets for investment purposes.Photo by Alessio Ferretti on UnsplashCrypto distinct from traditional securitiesThe regulatory perimeter itself would not expand. The FSA intends to keep using the PSA’s existing definition of “crypto assets,” while leaving non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and stablecoins outside the scope of the new framework. Under FIEA, crypto assets would be carved out as a distinct class separate from traditional securities, reflecting the fact that they generally do not confer legal claims such as dividends or interest payments. That distinction is already shaping how firms attempt to expand the economic utility of crypto assets. The move toward a clearer rulebook also arrives as market participants look for ways to construct return-generating mechanisms for assets that do not produce steady income on their own. Hong Kong–based Animoca Brands has partnered with Solv Protocol to provide Japanese institutions access to a Bitcoin-backed wrapper, according to Cointelegraph. The product is structured to generate returns in the 4% to 12% range for large holders, effectively layering yield on top of a token that otherwise provides no ongoing income. Rising retail demandThe regulator's report also details how deeply crypto has penetrated Japan’s retail market. As of October 2025, accounts at domestically registered crypto-asset exchanges had climbed past 13 million, with user deposits topping 5 trillion yen (about $32 billion). Roughly 70% of account holders fell into annual income brackets below 7 million yen (around $45,000), and more than 80% of individual accounts held less than 100,000 yen (about $640). The FSA said 86.6% of trading was driven by expectations of long-term price gains, indicating that most users view crypto primarily as an investment vehicle rather than a means of payment. Against that backdrop, the working group concluded that FIEA is a better fit than the PSA, which is geared toward payment services and anti-money-laundering (AML) controls. Shifting to the securities law would give regulators clearer authority to impose disclosure standards, govern conduct in the market, and levy penalties for unfair trading practices, the report said. The proposed framework would place heavier disclosure obligations on token issuances and initial exchange offerings (IEOs). Issuers or the listing exchanges would be required to provide key information to investors, and, in cases where an issuer does not have audited financial statements, offerings would be subject to investment limits. Crypto exchanges would face stronger due diligence requirements, tighter cybersecurity expectations, and broader insider-trading restrictions. Those rules would not only apply to employees at trading platforms but also to issuers and other insiders around listing events. Rules split for CEXs and DEXsCentralized exchanges (CEXs) would be supervised largely in line with securities firms. That would include requirements to maintain reserves or insurance to protect customer assets and expanded oversight of wallet-service providers connected to those platforms. Decentralized exchanges (DEXs), which have no central operator, would not be brought under the same regime. Instead, the FSA is proposing lighter, perimeter-based rules focused on disclosures by wallet providers and interface operators, coupled with efforts to warn users about the specific risks of trading on DEXs.  Industry participants, meanwhile, have raised concerns that licensed exchanges may face higher compliance costs in the near term as they adapt to the new regime.  Moving forward, the FSA is expected to refine the framework with an eye toward submitting a bill to the ordinary Diet session in the new year. 

With the general election just over a month away, South Korea’s ruling People Power Party (PPP) has retracted its campaign pledges to allow trading of spot bitcoin ETFs, local media outlet Chosun Biz reported. The PPP has previously drawn substantial attention from the crypto industry, as the party showed its intention to ease a range of crypto regulations in hopes of gaining more votes in the general election.  A political insider familiar with the issue said yesterday that the PPP has recently removed crypto-related agendas from its priority list. The crypto pledges, initially planned to be announced last week, have been permanently suspended, the person said. “The leaders of the PPP are currently focusing on nomination for local constituencies and its satellite People’s Future Party, rather than coming up with additional crypto agendas. As the PPP appears to be embarking on the election campaign starting in March, the likelihood of the ruling party releasing crypto pledges is very slim,” another political circle insider mentioned.Photo by Traxer on UnsplashTalks between PPP and FSC go in vainThe PPP’s decision to retract crypto-related pledges comes after its attempt to approve the introduction and trading of spot bitcoin ETFs met with opposition from the Financial Services Commission (FSC).  Unlike the PPP or its opposition Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) that scrambled to ease crypto regulations ahead of the general election, the FSC’s stance on viewing crypto assets as risky hasn’t changed much. Despite last month’s approval of spot bitcoin ETFs by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the FSC continues to ban the issuance of crypto-based financial products or investments in them, stating that crypto assets are not defined as underlying assets under the current Capital Markets Act. This has gotten in the way of the PPP’s plan to delay taxation on crypto gains for as long as two years and allow institutional investments in virtual assets.  The PPP also had to verify all the party members to see if any of them had a record of wrongdoings related to crypto transactions, which further delayed the pledges. This shows politicians’ heightened awareness of crypto-related issues. Last year, the DPK lawmaker Kim Nam-guk made headlines for a scandal, as he was accused of failing to report a considerable amount of crypto assets transactions to the financial authority. PPP lags a step behind its opposition DPKThe DPK has also strived to come up with crypto pledges alongside the PPP. The crypto-related pledges released by the DPK so far largely overlap with those of the PPP, meaning there’s no particular merit to the PPP’s campaign vows leading up to the general election. Many see this as another reason for the PPP’s decision to withdraw crypto pledges. The DPK unveiled its plan on Feb. 21 to legalize spot bitcoin ETFs, and pledged to deduct taxes on crypto gains worth less than KRW 50 million ($37,400). Under the current law, only crypto gains that are worth less than KRW 2.5 million qualify for the tax deduction. Most of these pledges largely align with those of the PPP.  With the PPP’s withdrawal of its plan to ease crypto regulations, the excitement among crypto industry insiders for the upcoming general election appears to have subsided. “Despite the DPK’s promise to allow spot bitcoin ETFs, it is unlikely that we’ll see crypto assets being incorporated into the conventional financial system without the ruling party’s approval, let alone fostering the blockchain industry,” said one crypto insider.